A non-conducting role of the Cav1.4 Ca2+ channel drives homeostatic plasticity at the cone photoreceptor synapse

  1. J Wesley Maddox
  2. Gregory J Ordemann
  3. Juan AM de la Rosa Vázquez
  4. Angie Huang
  5. Christof Gault
  6. Serena R Wisner
  7. Kate Randall
  8. Daiki Futagi
  9. Nihal A Salem
  10. Dayne Mayfield
  11. Boris V Zemelman
  12. Steven DeVries
  13. Mrinalini Hoon
  14. Amy Lee  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas-Austin, United States
  2. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin- Madison, United States
  3. Neuroscience Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
  4. Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, United States
  5. McPherson Eye Research Institute, United States

eLife assessment

Based on analyses of retinae from genetically modified mice, and from wild-type ground squirrel and macaque, employing microscopic imaging, electrophysiology, and pharmacological manipulations, this valuable study on the role of Cav1.4 calcium channels in cone photoreceptor cells (i) shows that the expression of a Cav1.4 variant lacking calcium conductivity supports the development of cone synapses beyond what is observed in the complete absence of Cav1.4, and (ii) indicates that the cone pathway can partially operate even without calcium flux through Cav1.4 channels, thus preserving behavioral responses under bright light. The evidence for the function of Cav1.4 protein in synapse development is convincing and in agreement with a closely related earlier study by the same authors on rod photoreceptors. The mechanism of compensation of Cav1.4 loss by Cav3 remains unclear but appears to involve post-transcriptional processes. As congenital Cav1.4 dysfunction can cause stationary night blindness, this work relates to a wide range of neuroscience topics, from synapse biology to neuro-ophthalmology.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.94908.4.sa0

Abstract

In congenital stationary night blindness, type 2 (CSNB2)—a disorder involving the Cav1.4 (L-type) Ca2+ channel—visual impairment is mild considering that Cav1.4 mediates synaptic release from rod and cone photoreceptors. Here, we addressed this conundrum using a Cav1.4 knockout (KO) mouse and a knock-in (G369i KI) mouse expressing a non-conducting Cav1.4. Surprisingly, Cav3 (T-type) Ca2+ currents were detected in cones of G369i KI mice and Cav1.4 KO mice but not in cones of wild-type mouse, ground squirrels, and macaque retina. Whereas Cav1.4 KO mice are blind, G369i KI mice exhibit normal photopic (i.e. cone-mediated) visual behavior. Cone synapses, which fail to form in Cav1.4 KO mice, are present, albeit enlarged, and with some errors in postsynaptic wiring in G369i KI mice. While Cav1.4 KO mice lack evidence of cone synaptic responses, electrophysiological recordings in G369i KI mice revealed nominal transmission from cones to horizontal cells and bipolar cells. In CSNB2, we propose that Cav3 channels maintain cone synaptic output provided that the nonconducting role of Cav1.4 in cone synaptogenesis remains intact. Our findings reveal an unexpected form of homeostatic plasticity that relies on a non-canonical role of an ion channel.

Introduction

At the first synapse in the visual pathway, graded electrical signals produced in rod and cone photoreceptors gate the release of glutamate onto postsynaptic neurons. Photoreceptor synapses are specialized with a vesicle-associated ribbon organelle and postsynaptic neurites of horizontal and bipolar cells that invaginate deep within the terminal (Haverkamp et al., 2000). A variety of proteins interact with the ribbon and synaptic vesicles near release sites (i.e. active zones) (Mercer and Thoreson, 2011). The importance of these proteins for vision is illustrated by the numerous inherited retinal diseases linked to mutations in their encoding genes (Frederick and Zenisek, 2023).

One such gene is CACNA1F, which encodes the voltage-gated Ca2+ (Cav) channel expressed in retinal photoreceptors, Cav1.4 (Mansergh et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2013; Chang et al., 2006). Among the sub-family of Cav1 L-type channels, Cav1.4 exhibits unusually slow inactivation that is well-matched for supporting the tonic, Ca2+-dependent release of glutamate from photoreceptor synaptic terminals in darkness (Singh et al., 2006; Wahl-Schott et al., 2006). More than 200 mutations in CACNA1F cause vision disorders including congenital stationary night blindness type 2 (CSNB2) (Bech-Hansen et al., 1998; Strom et al., 1998). These mutations are broadly categorized as producing a gain of function or loss of function in Cav1.4 (Waldner et al., 2018). How these mutations in CACNA1F lead to the variable clinical phenotypes of CSNB2 is largely unknown. Symptoms may include strabismus, low visual acuity, and in many cases, night blindness (Boycott et al., 2000; Zeitz et al., 2015). The latter suggests a primary defect in rod pathways, which is surprising given that Cav1.4 KO mice are completely blind and lack any evidence of either rod or cone synaptic responses (Mansergh et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2013; Regus-Leidig et al., 2014). A major caveat is that rod and cone synapses do not form in Cav1.4 KO mice (Liu et al., 2013; Regus-Leidig et al., 2014; Zabouri and Haverkamp, 2013; Raven et al., 2008). Thus, Cav1.4 KO mice are not suitable for studies of how CACNA1F mutations differentially affect rod and cone pathways or for efforts to uncover how the biophysical properties of Cav1.4 shape photoreceptor synaptic release properties.

Here, we overcome this hurdle with a knock-in mouse strain (G369i KI) expressing a non-conducting mutant form of Cav1.4 (Maddox et al., 2020). We show that, although greatly impaired, cone synapses and downstream signaling through cone pathways can support photopic visual function in G369i KI mice. This novel mechanism requires the ability of the Cav1.4 protein, independent of its Ca2+ conductance, to nucleate the assembly of cone ribbon synapses and involves an aberrant Cav3 (T-type) conductance that appears when Cav1.4 Ca2+ signals are compromised.

Results

Cone pedicles and ribbons are present in G369i KI mice but not in Cav1.4 KO mice

The G369i mutation results in an insertion of a glycine residue in a transmembrane domain, which prevents Ca2+ permeation through Cav1.4 (Maddox et al., 2020). The presence of rod synapses in G369i KI mice but not Cav1.4 KO mice indicates that the Cav1.4 protein and not its Ca2+ conductance is required for rod synapse assembly (Maddox et al., 2020). To test if this is also true for cones, we performed immunofluorescence and confocal analyses using antibodies against cone arrestin (CAR) and CtBP2 to label cone terminals (i.e. pedicles) and ribbons, respectively (Figure 1). In Cav1.4 KO mouse retinas, cone pedicles were shrunken and retracted into the outer nuclear layer (ONL, Figure 1a) with little evidence of elongated ribbons (Figure 1b). In contrast, cone pedicles in G369i KI mice were normally localized in the outer plexiform layer (OPL, Figure 1a) and were populated by multiple ribbons that were associated with labeling for Cav1.4 (Figure 1b). Some abnormalities were apparent in G369i KI cone pedicles, such as extremely elongated ribbons and telodendria extending toward the inner nuclear layer (Figure 1b). These results indicate that Cav1.4 Ca2+ signals are dispensable for the integrity of ribbons and the pedicle but are necessary for their overall refinement.

Cone pedicles and the mutant Cav1.4 G369i channel are normally localized in the retina of G369i KI mice but not Cav1.4 KO mice.

Confocal images of the outer nuclear layer (ONL) and outer plexiform layer (OPL) of retina from wild-type (WT), G369i KI, and Cav1.4 KO mice that were labeled with antibodies against cone arrestin (CAR), CtBP2, and Cav1.4. (a) Inverted images of CAR labeling. Lower panels depict pedicles labeled by CAR antibodies (dotted outlines) and correspond to the boxed regions in the upper panels. Cone pedicles remain in the OPL of WT and G369i KI retina (arrows) but are misshapen and retracted into the ONL of the CaV1.4 KO retina (open arrowheads). Solid arrowheads indicate telodendria which extend only apically in the WT retina but extend basally and laterally in the G369i KI retina. (b) Deconvolved confocal images showing CaV1.4 labeling near cone ribbons in WT and G369i KI pedicles (arrows) and ribbon spheres without CaV1.4 labeling in the CaV1.4 KO pedicle (arrowheads). Rod-associated CtBP2 and Cav1.4 labeling was removed for clarity.

Cav3 channel activity is present in cones of G369i KI and Cav1.4 KO mice but not WT mice, ground squirrels, or macaque retina

A prevailing yet unsupported hypothesis regarding the relatively mild visual phenotypes in CSNB2 is that additional Cav subtypes may compensate for Cav1.4 loss-of-function in cones. If so, then Ca2+ currents (ICa) mediated by these subtypes should be evident in cones of Cav1.4 KO and G369i KI mice. To test this, we performed patch clamp recordings of cones in retinal slices of adult WT, G369i KI, and Cav1.4 KO mice under conditions designed to isolate ICa. During voltage ramps in WT cones, ICa activated around –50 mV and peaked near –20 mV, consistent with the properties of Cav1.4 (Figure 2a–d). While not observed in rods of G369i KI or Cav1.4 KO mice (Maddox et al., 2020), a small-amplitude ICa that activated around –60 mV and peaked near –35 mV was detected in cones of these mice (Figure 2a–d). To uncover this low voltage-activated ICa, we used a faster voltage ramp (0.5 mV/ms) than in the previous study of G369i KI rods (~0.15 mV/ms) Maddox et al., 2020. With this faster voltage ramp, ICa was not apparent in G369i KI rods (Figure 2—figure supplement 1). Therefore, the aberrant ICa is an adaptation to Cav1.4 loss-of-function in cones but not rods.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all
A low-voltage activated ICa is present in cones of G369i KI and CaV1.4 knockout (KO) but absent in cones of wild-type (WT) mice.

(a) Representative traces of ICa evoked by voltage ramps. (b) ICa traces from a normalized to their peak current amplitude to illustrate the hyperpolarizing shift in the I-V from cones of G369i KI and CaV1.4 KO mice. (c,d) I-V (c), and G-V (d) relationships for ICa evoked by 50 ms, +5 mV increments from a holding voltage of –90 mV. Vm, test voltage. WT, n=13; G369i KI, n=9; CaV1.4 KO, n=3. (e) Representative ICa traces and voltage protocol (bottom) for steady-state inactivation. ICa was evoked by a conditioning pre-pulse from –90 mV to various voltages for 500ms followed by a test pulse to –30 mV for 50 ms. (f), Steady-state inactivation data from cones as recorded in e. I/Imax represents the current amplitude of each –30 mV test pulse (I) normalized to current amplitude of the –30 mV test pulse preceded by a –90 mV conditioning pre-pulse (Imax) and was plotted against pre-pulse voltage. Shaded region indicates the window current for G369i KI cones. Line without symbols represents the G-V curve for G369i KI cones replotted from d. WT, n=8; G369i KI, n=8; Cav1.4 KO, n=3. In graphs c,d, and f, smooth lines represent Boltzmann fits, and symbols and bars represent mean ± SEM, respectively. (g) Representative ICa traces from WT and G369i KI cones and voltage protocol (top). ICa was evoked by a step from –100 mV to –30 mV before (P1) or after (P2) a 500ms step to –60 mV. (h,i) Graphs depicting peak amplitude of ICa during P1 and P2 steps (h) and the ratio of the amplitudes of ICa evoked by P2 and P1 pulses (P2/P1; i) from cones recorded as in g. WT, n=6; G369i KI, n=6, *p<0.05 by paired t-test.

Figure 2—source data 1

Values obtained from recordings that were used for analyses in Figure 2C, D, F, H, I .

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/94908/elife-94908-fig2-data1-v1.xlsx

We next used step depolarizations to identify the type of Cav channel underlying ICa in G369i KI and Cav1.4 KO cones. Analysis of current-voltage (I-V) and conductance-voltage (G-V) relationships revealed a significant, hyperpolarizing shift (~10 mV) in the voltage of half-maximal activation (Vh) in G369i KI cones (Figure 2c and d; Table 1). ICa in G369i KI cones was not sustained as in WT cones but inactivated rapidly during 500 ms step depolarizations (Figure 2e). For G369i KI cones, the overlay of the conductance-voltage (Figure 2d) and inactivation curves revealed a sizeable window current (Figure 2f). These features of ICa in G369i KI and Cav1.4 KO cones resembled those of Cav3 T-type channels rather than Cav1.4 Perez-Reyes, 2003.

Table 1
Comparison of parameters from electrophysiological recordings of cones.
CM (pF)p-valuenRM (MΩ)p-valuen
WT4.88 (3.86, 5.01)--113.57 (2.81, 4.65)--11
G369i KI4.08 (3.88, 4.34)0.73*95.06 (4.04, 8.24)0.04*9
Cav1.4 KO3.31 (3.00, 3.76)0.001*, 0.04b68.21 (7.26, 9.06)0.001*, 0.47b6
G-VVh (mV)p-valuenkp-valuen
WT–37.54 (-38.91, –35.13)--132.75 (2.47, 4.32)13
G369i KI–47.59 (-50.07, –46.72)0.0001*92.99 (2.68, 4.16)0.99*9
Cav1.4 KO–44.98 (-50.15, –43.27)0.085a, 0.99b34.33 (3.73, 5.22)0.34*, 0.493
Steady-state inactivationVh (mV)p-valuenkp-valuen
WT–49.06 (-57.95, –41.82)--8–7.25 (–12.30, –4.97)--8
G369i KI–59.40 (-62.73, –58.01)0.01*8–3.81 (–5.23, –2.46)0.12a8
Cav1.4 KO–56.62 (-61.65, –56.56)0.88*, 0.883–3.67 (–5.17, –1.19)0.14a, 0.99b3
Tau activationp-valuenTau deactivationp-valuen
WT2.04 (1.26, 2.71)--110.88 (0.62. 2.09)--6
G369i KI3.32 (2.99, 4.06)0.001*93.40 (2.62, 4.34)0.004*6
  1. Values represent median (25th, 75th quartiles). Vh and k were determined from Boltzmann fits of the G-V and steady-state inactivation curves. Time constant (tau) for activation was obtained from exponential fit of the rising phase of ICa evoked by a 50-ms test pulse to a voltage near the peak of the I-V. Tau deactivation was determined from exponential fit of the decay of the tail current evoked by repolarization to -90 mV from +20 mV. CM, membrane capacitance; RM, input resistance. P-values were determined by Kruskal Wallis test.

  2. *

    relative to WT.

  3. relative to G369i KI.

In a previous study, a Cav3-like current was detected in patch clamp recordings of cone pedicles in WT mouse cones (Davison et al., 2022). However, in recordings of WT mouse cone somas, we did not observe a low-voltage activated component in the I-V or G-V curves that would be indicative of a Cav3 subtype (Figure 2c and d). To further test for a Cav3 contribution to ICa in WT mouse cones, we used a double pulse voltage protocol where ICa was evoked before (P1) and after (P2) a 500 ms step to –60 mV (Figure 2g). With this protocol, the inactivation of Cav3 channels by the –60 mV step should lead to a reduction in the amplitude of the P2 vs the P1 current. While such a reduction was clearly evident in cones of G369i KI mice (i.e. P2/P1 <1), there was no significant difference in the P2 and P1 currents in cones of WT mice (Figure 2g–i).

We also used antagonists selective for Cav1 and Cav3 channels (isradipine and ML 218, respectively). As expected, ICa in WT cones was significantly but incompletely suppressed by isradipine (Figure 3a and b). The Vh of the I-V was similar before (–36.5±0.8 mV) and after (–38.3±1.8 mV) perfusion of isradipine (t(3,4)=0.90, p=0.43 by paired t-test), suggesting that the residual ICa after exposure to isradipine arose from unblocked Cav1.4 rather than Cav3 channels. While ML 218 modestly inhibited ICa in some WT cones, the effect was not statistically significant (Figure 3c and d) and could be attributed to weak activity on Cav1.4. In transfected HEK293T cells, ML 218 modestly inhibited ICa and caused a negative shift in the Vh for Cav1.4, in contrast to its strong inhibition of Cav3.2 (Figure 3—figure supplement 1). Like its effects on Cav3.2, ML 218 nearly abolished ICa in cones of G369i KI mice whereas isradipine had little effect (Figure 3a–d).

Figure 3 with 2 supplements see all
Pharmacological characterization of ICa in cones of wild-type (WT) and G369i KI mice.

(a) Representative traces for ICa evoked by voltage ramps in cones of retinas from WT (top) and G369i KI (bottom) mice before (baseline) and after exposure to isradipine (ISR, 1 μM). Middle panel, WT ICa from voltage ramps in the top panel were normalized to their peak ICa to clarify the similar properties of ICa before and after ISR exposure. (b) Peak ICa before (-) and during (+) ISR exposure from cones as recorded in a. WT, n=4; G369i KI, n=5; *p<0.05 by paired t-test. (c) Representative traces for ICa evoked by voltage ramps in cones of retinas from WT or G369i KI mice before (baseline) and after exposure to ML 218 (5 μM). Middle panel, WT ICa from voltage ramps in the top panel were normalized to their peak ICa to clarify the similar properties of ICa before and after ML 218 exposure. (d) Peak ICa before (-) and during (+) ML 218 exposure. WT, n=5; G369i KI, n=5; *p<0.05 by paired t-test.

Figure 3—source data 1

Values obtained from recordings that were used for analyses in Figure 3b and d.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/94908/elife-94908-fig3-data1-v1.xlsx

Finally, we recorded from ground squirrel and macaque cones, where the large amplitude of ICa facilitates pharmacological and biophysical analyses. Consistent with its actions on Cav1.4 in WT mouse cones (Figure 3b) and transfected HEK293T cells (Figure 3—figure supplement 1), ML 218 caused an insignificant inhibition of peak ICa (–7.0 ± 20.8%, n=6 cones) as well as a negative shift in the voltage-dependence of activation in ground squirrel cones (ΔV1/2 = -1.16 ± 0.94 mV, n=6, mean ± SD, p=0.029, t-test; Figure 4a and b). By contrast, the application of isradipine dramatically suppressed ICa in cones in various regions of the ground squirrel retina (Figure 4c and d). Subsequent application of ML 218 did not reveal a Cav3-like current: the I-V and G-V of the isradipine + ML 218-sensitive current were shifted in the positive rather than the negative direction relative to the isradipine-sensitive current (Figure 4c–g). This result is consistent with the time- and voltage-dependent block of Cav1 channels by dihydropyridine antagonists such as isradipine (Koschak et al., 2003). As a positive control, we confirmed that ML 218 blocked a prominent Cav3-type current in ground squirrel type 3 a OFF cone bipolar cells (Figure 4h and i). In recordings of macaque cone pedicles, we compared the properties of ICa using a holding voltage of –90 mV or –50 mV, the latter of which should inactivate Cav3 channels (Figure 5a). There was no difference in the I-V or G-V relationships obtained at these holding voltages (Figure 5b–e). As in WT mouse cones (Figure 2g–i), there was also no difference in ICa recorded before and after an inactivating pulse to –60 mV (Figure 5f and g). We conclude that Cav3 channels do not normally contribute to ICa in cones of WT mice, ground squirrels, and macaques.

Pharmacological characterization of ICa in ground squirrel cones.

(a) Representative traces corresponding to baseline-corrected ICa evoked by voltage ramps before (baseline) and during the application of ML 218. (b) G-V relationship of ICa in a. (c) Representative traces corresponding to ICa evoked by voltage ramps in control (baseline) and in ISR (2 μM) alone or in ISR + ML 218 (5 μM). (d) Peak ICa from cones including the record from c before (-) and during (+) ISR or ISR +ML 218 block. The changes during the addition of ML218 were small but significant (sup., n=7, ISR: p<0.0001, ML218: p=0.0047; mid., n=5, ISR: p<0.0001, ML218: p=0.0001; inf., n=5, ISR: p=0.0019, ML218: p=0.0460; two-tailed t-test) and were likely due to a further non-specific, time-dependent reduction in the Cav1 current. (e) ICa was evoked by steps from –85 mV to voltages between –65 and –5 mV in increments of +10 mV (protocol shown below the current traces in f). Representative traces are shown in control, ISR, or ISR +ML 218. Current traces during steps to –55 and –45 mV lacked both transient and ML 218-senstive components. Dashed lines indicate zero current. (f) Traces show the ICa sensitive to ISR (top) and ISR + ML218 (middle). The ICa recorded in ISR was subtracted from the baseline ICa (top). ICa recorded in ISR + ML218 was subtracted from ICa recorded in ISR (middle). (g) Top, I-V relationship of peak and steady-state ICa from f. Bottom, the G-V relationship of the ICa is blocked by ISR and ISR + ML218. Smooth lines represent Boltzmann fits. Symbols and bars represent mean ± SEM (n=4 cones). Due to a negative shift in the activation properties caused by ML 218 on a residual Cav1 current that is assumed to remain at the end of the experiment, the G-V curve of the ICa isolated through subtraction by applying ISR + ML 281 underwent a statistically insignificant shift to the right. Data presented in e-g are from the same cone. (h) Representative ICa traces from voltage ramps in an OFF cb3a bipolar cell before and during the application of ML 218. V1/2 was shifted to the right by 13.1 ± 4.3 mV (n=3 cb3a cells, mean ± SD) consistent with the block of a Cav3-like conductance. In cb3b OFF bipolar cells, ML 218 produced only a slight leftward shift in an ICa that had a more depolarized activation range, consistent with the exclusive expression a Cav1-type current (ΔV1/2 = -1.9 ± 0.4 mV, n=3 cells; data not shown). (i) Neurobiotin fill shows cb3a axon stratification and morphology in the retina labeled with antibodies against bassoon and choline acetyltransferase (CHAT) to label the OFF and ON sublamina of the IPL.

Figure 4—source data 1

Representative traces and values were obtained from recordings that were used for analyses in Figure 4.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/94908/elife-94908-fig4-data1-v1.xlsx
Characterization of ICa in patch clamp recordings of cone pedicles of macaque retina.

(a-c) Representative current traces (a) and corresponding I-V (b) and G-V (c) relationships for ICa evoked by 200 ms steps from a holding voltage of –90 mV or –50 mV. n=3 cones. (d, e) V1/2 (d) and slope factor (e) obtained from Boltzmann fit of data in c. p=0.50 in d; p=0.25 in e by Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test. (f) Voltage protocol (top) and representative ICa traces (bottom left) from cones as recorded in Figure 2g–i. Bottom right, expanded view of the boxed region in the left traces. (g) Peak ICa during P1 and P2 steps from cones recorded as in f. n=5 cones, p=0.62 by Wilcoxon matched pairs signed rank test.

Figure 5—source data 1

Values obtained from recordings that were used for analyses in Figure 5b–e and g.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/94908/elife-94908-fig5-data1-v1.xlsx

To test whether the appearance of the Cav3-mediated ICa in G369i KI cones could result from an increase in the expression of a specific Cav3 subtype (i.e. Cav3.1, Cav3.2, or Cav3.3), we initially tried labeling with commercially available antibodies against Cav3.2. However, the data were unreliable since these antibodies produced a similar labeling pattern in Cav3.2 KO retinal tissue (data not shown). As an alternative, we performed single-cell RNA sequencing on cells isolated from the retina of WT and G369i KI mice (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). We sequenced 28,782 cells and, with unsupervised clustering at resolution = 0.5, we grouped the cells into 20 clusters. Clusters 8 and 16 were identified as cones based on the expression of cone marker genes (e.g. Opn1sw, Opn1mw, Arr3, Gnat2). Consistent with previous studies (Davison et al., 2022; Williams et al., 2022), Cacna1h encoding the Cav3.2 subtype was the major Cav3 transcript expressed in WT mouse cones. There was no significant difference in Cacna1h expression between WT and G369i KI cones according to this analysis (Figure 3—figure supplement 2). Thus, the enhanced activity of Cav3 channels in cones of G369i KI mice results from a mechanism other than increased transcription of Cacna1h.

Cone synapses are enlarged with some errors in postsynaptic wiring in G369i KI mice

The replacement of Cav1.4 with Cav3 as the primary conduit for Ca2+ influx in G369i KI cones allowed us to dissect the importance of Cav1.4 Ca2+ signals for the molecular and structural organization of the cone synapse. To this end, we first analyzed WT and G369i KI cone synapses by immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. Presynaptic proteins such as bassoon and members of the postsynaptic signaling complex in depolarizing (ON) cone bipolar cells (GPR179, mGluR6, and TRPM1 Martemyanov and Sampath, 2017) were enriched near cone ribbons in G369i KI mice as in WT mice (Figure 6a). Compared to WT mice, the labeled structures in G369i KI mice occupied a larger volume (Figure 6b and c) but were of lower intensity (Figure 6d), suggesting an increase in the spread rather than in the levels of synaptic proteins. Unlike in WT mice, the volume of presynaptic and postsynaptic proteins increased linearly with the volume of the pedicle in G369i KI mice (Figure 6e–i). These results show that the molecular determinants of the cone synapse can assemble in G369i KI mice but change in their sub-synaptic distribution in ways that correlate with the expansion of the cone pedicle.

Immunofluorescence characterization of cone synapses in wild-type (WT) and G369i KI mice.

(a) Confocal images of the outer plexiform layer (OPL) of WT and G369i KI mice labeled with antibodies against cone arrestin (CAR) and proteins that are presynaptic (CtBP2, bassoon) or postsynaptic (GPR179, TRPM1, mGluR6). Every other panel shows high-magnification, deconvolved images of single pedicles labeled with cone arrestin (rod spherule-associated signals were removed for clarity). Arrows indicate ribbon synapses, which appear enlarged in the G369i KI pedicles. (b) Violin plot representing the volume of presynaptic protein labeling normalized to the volume of their respective CAR-labeled pedicles (volume occupancy). (c) Violin plot representing the volume of postsynaptic protein labeling normalized to the volume of their respective CAR-labeled pedicles. (d) Violin plot representing fluorescence intensity of postsynaptic proteins. For b-d, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001, ****p<0.0001, unpaired t-tests.(e–i), Dependence of synapse size on pedicle size. Volumes corresponding to labeling of CtBP2 (e: p=0.051, r=0.4 for WT; p<0.0001, r=0.88 for G369i KI), CaV1.4 (f: p=0.8, r=0.06 for WT; p=0.002, r=0.88 for G369i KI), bassoon (g: p=0.1, r=0.34 for WT; p<0.0001, r=0.75 for G369i KI), mGluR6 (h: p=0.32, r=0.35 for WT; p=0.002, r=0.73 for G369i KI) and TRPM1 (i: p=0.32, r=0.35 for WT; p=0.007, r=0.66 for G369i KI) are plotted against pedicle volume. Dashed and solid lines represent fits by linear regression for WT and G369i KI, respectively.

Figure 6—source data 1

Values obtained from images that were used for analyses in Figure 6b–i.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/94908/elife-94908-fig6-data1-v1.xlsx

The cone synapse is structurally complex, with the dendritic tips of two horizontal cells and an intervening ON cone bipolar cell invaginating deeply into the pedicle near the ribbon (Haverkamp et al., 2000). To test how the switch in Cav subtypes might affect this arrangement of postsynaptic partners, we generated 3D reconstructions of cone synapses by serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBFSEM; Figure 7). As with the enlarged synaptic contacts (Figure 6), structural modifications in G369i KI pedicles were evident. Compared to WT, ribbons in G369i KI pedicles appeared disorganized and were often parallel rather than perpendicular to the presynaptic membrane (Figure 7a–c). Consistent with our confocal analyses (Figure 1), G369i KI cone pedicles extended telodendria in multiple directions rather than just apically (Figure 7a). In addition, a slightly larger fraction of synaptic sites in the G369i KI pedicle (35% vs 14% in WT) formed incorrect postsynaptic partnerships including with glia (Figure 7b–d’; Table 2). Nevertheless, the number of ribbons is normal in G369i KI cones, and about half of the ribbons make invaginating contacts with the appropriate cell types (i.e. both horizontal cells and cone bipolar cells; Table 2). On average, there were more vesicles associated with ribbons in cones of G369i KI mice (245 per ribbon) than of WT mice (178 per ribbon; Table 2), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Together with our immunofluorescence data, these results indicate that cone synapses undergo relatively subtle morphological changes in G369i KI mice, perhaps in response to the loss of Cav1.4 Ca2+ signals.

Three-dimensional reconstruction of cone synapses by SBFSEM.

Reconstructions were made of wild-type (WT) and G369i KI pedicles (n=2 each). (a) 3D renderings showing ribbons (magenta) within cone pedicles (gray) from WT and G369i KI mice. (b) 3D renderings show ribbon sites in a WT cone pedicle contacting one horizontal (HC1; yellow) and three bipolar cells (BC1-3; purple). (b') Raw image from b shows a single plane example of BC1-2 and HC1 contacting the ribbon site. (c-d’), Single plane raw (c, d) images and 3D reconstructions (c’, d’) show ribbon sites within the G369i KI cone pedicle contacting in c,c’: horizontal cells (HC1-2) only (upper panels), CBCs (BC1-2) only (lower panels); and in d,d’: a glial cell (orange) and an unknown partner. The glial cell completely envelops the pedicle. Inset in d’ shows glial-contacting ribbon site (arrow). In other panels, arrows indicate points of contact between ribbons and other postsynaptic elements.

Table 2
Comparison of parameters for cone synapse organization.
WTG369i KI
Cone 1Cone 2Cone 1Cone 2
# of ribbons12886
Mean # synaptic vesicles per ribbon137.75218.25224267.5
Type of contact: % total (fraction of total)
Invaginating58.3
(7/12)
87.5
(7/8)
50
(4/8)
50
(3/6)
Non-invaginating41.7
(5/12)
12.5
(1/8)
50
(4/8)
50
(3/6)
Partner composition: % total (fraction of total)
HC/BC83.387.550.066.7
HC only8.312.525.033.3
BC only8.3012.50
Glia only0012.50
  1. Results represent analysis of n = 2 pedicles reconstructed by serial block face scanning electron microscopy in images obtained from WT or G369i KI mice (N = 1 animal each). The first row of vesicles encircling and immediately apposed to the ribbon were quantified for all the z- planes of the ribbon. Sites were counted as 'invaginating' if postsynaptic partners were enveloped on all sides by the cone terminal for at least a couple of consecutive image planes.

Postsynaptic responses to light are present in horizontal cells of G369i KI mice but not Cav1.4 KO mice

Compared to Cav1.4 KO mice, the relative preservation of cone synapses in G369i KI mice allowed the unique opportunity to test whether a Cav subtype other than Cav1.4 could support synaptic release. To this end, we analyzed synaptic transmission between cones and horizontal cells (HCs). In the darkness, glutamate released from cones depolarizes horizontal cells via activation of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic (AMPA)/kainate receptors (Hack et al., 2001; Brandstätter et al., 1997). The resulting excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) undergoes a decline in response to light stimuli that hyperpolarize cones (Feigenspan and Babai, 2015). In WT HCs, a 1 s light flash (λ=410 nm) inhibited the standing EPSC, which is reflected as an outward (hyperpolarizing ‘ON’) current (Figure 8a). Upon termination of the light, an inward (depolarizing ‘OFF’) current signaled the resumption of the EPSC (Figure 8a). Both the ON and OFF responses in WT HCs increased with light intensity, reflecting the impact of luminance on the presynaptic membrane potential of cones and the subsequent change in glutamate release from their terminals (Figure 8b).

Patch clamp recordings of light responses of horizontal cells in ild-type (WT), G369i KI, and Cav1.4 knockout (KO) mice.

(a-b) Representative traces from whole-cell patch clamp recordings of horizontal cells held at –70 mV (a) and quantified data (b) for currents evoked by 1 s light flashes (λ=410 nm) plotted against light intensities. In b, peak current amplitudes during (ON Response) and after (OFF Response) the light stimuli were plotted against photon flux per μm2q/μm2). Data represent mean ± SEM. WT, n=8; G369i KI, n=13; Cav1.4 KO, n=8. There was a significant difference in responses of WT, G369i KI, and Cav1.4 KO horizontal cells. For ON responses, F(16, 216)=22, p<0.0001 by two-way repeated measures ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparisons post-hoc test. For OFF responses, F(16, 216)=13.61, p<0.0001 by two-way repeated measures ANOVA, Tukey’s multiple comparisons post-hoc test. (c–d) Representative traces from horizontal cells held at –70 mV (c) and quantified data (d) for currents evoked by 1 s light flashes (λ=410 nm, 1.2 × 105 Φq/μm2) before, during, and after washout of DNQX (20 μM). In d, symbols represent responses from individual cells, n=5 cells for WT and three cells for G369i KI, bars represent mean ± SEM. **p<0.01 by paired t-tests.

Figure 8—source data 1

Representative traces and values were obtained from recordings that were used for analyses in Figure 8.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/94908/elife-94908-fig8-data1-v1.xlsx

Consistent with the lack of mature ribbons and abnormal cone pedicles (Figure 1), HC light responses were negligible in Cav1.4 KO mice (Figure 8a and b). In contrast, the ON and OFF responses were present in G369i KI HCs although significantly lower in amplitude than in WT HCs (Figure 8a and b). As expected, the EPSC in darkness and the light responses were abolished by the AMPA/kainate receptor antagonist, DNQX, in both WT and G369i KI HCs (Figure 8c and d). In addition to its smaller amplitude, the transient nature of the ON response in G369i KI HCs suggested inadequate cessation of cone glutamate release by light (Figure 8b). Slow deactivation of Cav3 channels and/or their activation at negative voltages (Perez-Reyes, 2003) could give rise to Ca2+ signals that support release following light-induced hyperpolarization of G369i KI cones.

To test if the diminished HC light responses correlated with lower presynaptic Ca2+ signals in G369i KI cones, we performed 2-photon imaging of vertical slices prepared from the whole retina that was incubated with the Ca2+ indicator Fluo3-AM and Alexa-568-conjugated peanut agglutinin (PNA) to demarcate regions of interest (ROIs) corresponding to cone pedicles. With this approach, Fluo3 fluorescence was detected only in photoreceptors and ganglion cells and not inner retinal cell-types (e.g. horizontal cells, bipolar cells, Mueller cell soma). Thus, Ca2+ signals reported by Fluo3 fluorescence near PNA-labeling originated primarily from cones. In WT cones, depolarization by K+ (50 mM) caused a sustained increase of Ca2+ (ΔF/F0=1.85 ± 0.1, n=11 terminals) that was significantly lower after the addition of isradipine (ΔF/F0=1.44 ± 0.07, p=0.0015 by repeated measures one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison posthoc test; F[1.608, 16.08]=55.17; p<0.0001; Figure 9a and b). The Ca2+ signal remaining in the presence of isradipine could arise from unblocked Cav1.4 channels and/or Ca2+ release from intracellular stores (Križaj, 2012). In G369i KI cones, the peak amplitude of the K+-evoked Ca2+ signal (ΔF/F0=1.07 ± 0.02, n=14 terminals) was significantly lower than in WT cones (t(23)=8.74, p<0.0001 by unpaired t-test, n=14 terminals). The decrease in the Ca2+ signal in the G369i KI cone pedicles during isradipine exposure paralleled that during the depolarization (Figure 9a), suggesting it was not a consequence of Cav1 blockade. The lower amplitude and more transient Ca2+ signals mediated by Cav3 channels may be cleared more rapidly in G369i KI cones as compared to prolonged Cav1.4-initiated Ca2+ signals in WT cones. Taken together, our results suggest that Cav3 channels nominally support Ca2+ signals and synaptic transmission in cones of G369i KI mice.

Ca2+ imaging of cone terminals in wild-type (WT) and G369i KI mice.

Depolarization-evoked fluorescence changes (ΔF) were measured by two-photon imaging of Fluo3-filled cone pedicles labeled with PNA-Alexa 568. (a) Representative images at the indicated timepoints (T) before (control), during, and after (wash) bath application of KCl (50 mM) and KCl + ISR (10μ M). For clarity, PNA-Alexa 568 labeling was outlined (magenta, solid circles) and the actual labeling was only shown in the initial panel of images. Dashed, yellow circles represent ROIs for analyses. (b) Changes in cone pedicle Fluo3 fluorescence were normalized to the initial fluorescence intensity at time = 0 (ΔF/F0). Solid lines and shaded areas represent the mean ± SEM, respectively. WT, n=11 pedicles; G369i KI, n=14 pedicles.

Figure 9—source data 1

Values obtained from time series ROIs that were used for analyses in Figure 9b.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/94908/elife-94908-fig9-data1-v1.xlsx

Light responses of bipolar cells and visual behavior are present in G369i KI but not Cav1.4 KO mice

While HCs play important roles in lateral inhibition of photoreceptor output, the vertical dissemination of visual information from cones to the inner retina is relayed by glutamate to ON and OFF cone bipolar cells (CBCs) which express mGluR6 and AMPA/kainate receptors, respectively. To test for the existence of cone-to-CBC transmission in G369i KI mice, we recorded electroretinograms (ERGs) under light-adapted conditions using Cav1.4 KO mice as a negative control (Figure 10a–d). In these recordings, the light-induced response of photoreceptors and the postsynaptic response of ON CBCs correspond to the a- and b-waves, respectively. Unlike in Cav1.4 KO mice, the a-waves of G369i KI mice resembled those in WT mice, which indicates that cones do not degenerate in this mouse strain (Figure 10a and b). While greatly reduced in amplitude, the b-wave was measurable in G369i KI mice and significantly larger than in Cav1.4 KO mice at the highest light intensities (F(14,104)=41, p<0.0001, post-hoc Tukey’s p=0.0038 at 2.3 log cd·s/m2; Figure 10a and b). We also recorded flicker ERGs using 10 Hz light stimuli that can isolate cone pathways involving both ON and OFF CBCs (Nusinowitz et al., 2007; Vinberg et al., 2015). In WT mice, flicker responses exhibited two peaks, one at a lower irradiance (–2 log cd·s/m2) and one at higher irradiance (0.5 log cd·s/m2; Figure 10c and d). The peak at the lower irradiance is attributed to responses in both rod and cone pathways, and the peak at a higher irradiance is attributed to responses exclusively in cone pathways (Nusinowitz et al., 2007; Vinberg et al., 2015). Flicker responses in G369i KI mice showed a similar non-monotonic relation as in WT mice but were significantly lower in amplitude (F(26,143)=51.18, p<0.0001, post-hoc Tukey’s p=0.0237 at 2.5 log cd·s/m2; Figure 10c and d). The inverted flicker responses at higher illuminations in G369i KI mice were absent in Cav1.4 KO mice and may result from the hyperpolarizing contribution of cone-to-OFF CBC transmission (Figure 10c).

Characterization of electroretinograms (ERGs) and visual behavior in wild-type (WT), G369i KI, and Cav1.4 knockout (KO) mice.

(a) Representative traces of photopic ERGs recorded in the presence of background green light (20 cd · s/m2) in WT, G369i KI, and CaV1.4 KO mice. Flash intensities are shown on the left. Arrows and arrowheads depict the a- and b-waves, respectively. (b) a-wave (left), and b-wave (right) amplitudes are plotted against light intensity. Symbols and bars represent mean ± SEM. WT, n=7; G369i KI, n=5; CaV1.4 KO, n=6. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001; ns, not significant; Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posthoc multiple comparisons. (c, d) Representative traces (c) and quantified data (d) for 10 Hz flicker responses evoked by white light flashes of increasing luminance (from –4–2 log cd· s/m2). Arrows in c depict inverted waveform responses in G369i KI mice that are absent in Cav1.4 KO mice. Symbols and bars represent mean ± SEM. WT, n=7; G369i KI, n=5; CaV1.4 KO, n=6. *p<0.05; **p<0.01. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s posthoc multiple comparisons. (e) Representative swim path traces of WT, G369i KI, and CaV1.4 KO mice from the visible platform swim tests performed in the dark (scotopic, upper panel) and light (photopic, lower panel). (f) Time required to reach the platform (latency to platform) was compared for each mouse strain. Symbols represent the average of the last 3 swim trials for each mouse of each genotype for both dark and light conditions. Dotted lines represent the mean. WT, n=11; G369i KI, n=10; CaV1.4 KO, n=9. *p<0.05; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001; Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s post hoc analysis.

Figure 10—source data 1

Representative electroretinogram (ERG) traces and values obtained from ERGs and behavioral swim tests that were used for analyses in Figure 10.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/94908/elife-94908-fig10-data1-v1.xlsx

To test whether the cone synaptic responses in G369i KI mice enable vision-guided behavior, we used a swim test that assesses the ability of mice to identify a visible platform (Bimonte-Nelson et al., 2015). Under scotopic (dark) conditions, G369i KI and Cav1.4 KO mice took significantly longer to find the platform compared to WT mice (Figure 10e and f). These results are consistent with flicker response assays (Figure 10c and d) as well as the absence of ICa in rods and rod-to-rod bipolar cell synaptic transmission in G369i KI mice (Maddox et al., 2020). Under photopic (light) conditions, G369i KI mice but not Cav1.4 KO mice performed as well as WT mice (Figure 10e and f). Thus, G369i KI mice have enough visual function under photopic conditions to quickly find the platform. Collectively, our results suggest that Cav3 channels can support cone synaptic responses that are sufficient for visual behavior in G369i KI but not Cav1.4 KO mice.

Discussion

The nervous system has remarkable abilities to adapt to pathological perturbations in neuronal activity. In the retina, ablation or degeneration of photoreceptors triggers various postsynaptic mechanisms that maintain some level of visual function in rod or cone pathways. These include remodeling of bipolar cell dendrites and their synapses (Beier et al., 2017; Shen et al., 2020; Leinonen et al., 2020) as well as changes in the sensitivity of bipolar cells to photoreceptor input and inhibitory modulation (Leinonen et al., 2020; Care et al., 2020). To our knowledge, this study provides the first evidence for a presynaptic form of homeostatic plasticity that originates within photoreceptors. Using Cav1.4 KO and G369i KI mice, we identify the upregulation of a Cav3 conductance as a common response to Cav1.4 loss-of-function in cones. However, Cav3 channels can only compensate for Cav1.4 loss-of-function if the basic aspects of cone synapse structure are maintained through an expression of the G369i mutant channel. Thus, our results also highlight a crucial, non-conducting role for the Cav1.4 protein that allows cone synapses to function in the absence of Cav1.4 Ca2+ signals.

A non-canonical role for Cav1.4 in regulating cone synapse assembly

As shown for rod synapses (Maddox et al., 2020), ribbons and other components of the pre- and post-synaptic complex assemble at cone synapses in G369i KI mice (Figures 1, 6 and 7). Cav3 Ca2+ signals are dispensable for this process since their presence in Cav1.4 KO cones is not accompanied by any semblance of ribbon synapses (Figure 1b). An intimate relationship between Cav1.4 and ribbons is supported by the colocalization of Cav1.4 and puncta resembling ribbon precursor spheres in the developing OPL (Liu et al., 2013). Cav1.4 interacts directly or indirectly with a variety of ribbon synapse-associated proteins including RIM (Kiyonaka et al., 2007), CAST/ERC2 (Kiyonaka et al., 2012), bassoon (tom Dieck et al., 2005), unc119 Alpadi et al., 2008; Haeseleer, 2008; Haeseleer et al., 2004, and a major component of the ribbon, RIBEYE (Schmitz et al., 2000). Cav1.4 could pioneer sites of ribbon assembly perhaps by serving as a docking or nucleation site for the active zone. At the same time, ribbon-associated proteins help cluster Cav1.4 near ribbons since knockout of these proteins in mice leads to fewer presynaptic Cav1.4 channels and in some cases shortened ribbons (tom Dieck et al., 2012). Regardless of the mechanism, our findings show that the formation of photoreceptor synaptic complexes does not require Ca2+ influx through Cav1.4 channels.

Functional Cav3 channels are present in cones in the absence of Cav1.4 Ca2+ signals

Our drop-seq analysis aligns with previous studies indicating that Cacna1h is expressed at extremely low levels compared to Cacna1f in WT mouse cones (Figure 3—figure supplement 2; Williams et al., 2022; Macosko et al., 2015). However, in contrast to recordings of WT mouse cone pedicles in a previous study (Davison et al., 2022), we found no evidence for Cav3-mediated currents in somatic recordings of cones in WT mice (Figures 2 and 3). We do not feel the discrepancy results from the different recording configurations given the electrically compact nature of cones. Moreover, recordings from macaque cone pedicles and from the ellipsoids of cylindrically shaped ground squirrel cones also did not reveal a Cav3-mediated current (Figures 4 and 5). We acknowledge that there are caveats of the pharmacological approach used in our study as well as the previous work (Davison et al., 2022). For example, dihydropyridine antagonists such as isradipine have relatively low affinity for some Cav1 subtypes, including Cav1.4 Koschak et al., 2003; Koschak et al., 2001, and have strongly voltage-dependent blocking properties. At a holding voltage of –90 mV, isradipine at 1 μM causes only ~80% inhibition of Cav1.4 with a greater block at depolarized voltages (Koschak et al., 2003), which agrees with our recordings of cones in WT mice (Figure 3a) and ground squirrels (Figure 4b–e). Moreover, in the low micromolar range, Cav3 blockers such as Z944 Tringham et al., 2012 and ML 218 (Figure 3—figure supplement 1) have nonspecific effects on Cav1 current amplitude and activation voltage. Thus, Cav channels mediating an ICa that is suppressed by Cav3 blockers and spared by dihydropyridines at negative voltages may be mistakenly categorized as Cav3 subtypes. In our experiments, the biophysical properties of the isradipine-sensitive ICa in cones of WT mice and ground squirrels resembled only those of Cav1, whereas those of the ML 218-sensitive ICa in cones of G369i KI mice resembled only those of Cav3. Therefore, we favor the interpretation that Cav3 contributes to ICa in mouse cones only upon silencing of Cav1.4 either by KO of the corresponding protein or by silencing its conductance.

Since Cacna1h expression was similar in WT and G369i KI cones (Figure 3—figure supplement 2), what causes the increased Cav3 channel activity in the latter? Among the Cav3 subtypes, Cav3.2 is uniquely sensitive to post-translational modifications that facilitate the opening of the channel and/or its cell surface trafficking (Cai et al., 2021). For example, Cav3.2 interacts with the deubiquitinating enzyme USP5 which enhances levels of Cav3.2 protein levels by suppressing its proteasomal degradation (García-Caballero et al., 2014). In addition, Cav3.2 is phosphorylated by calmodulin-dependent kinase II Welsby et al., 2003 and cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Gomez et al., 2020), which enhances channel activation and current density, respectively. Further interrogation of our drop-seq dataset could illuminate novel Cav3.2-regulatory pathways that are modified in G369i KI cones.

Consequences of Cav1.4 loss of function and relevance for CSNB2

Despite having the same complement of proteins as in WT mice, cone synapses in G369i KI mice were enlarged and made errors in postsynaptic partner selection (Figures 6 and 7). While I-V curves indicate similar peak ICa amplitudes in cones of WT and G369i KI mice near the membrane potential of cones in darkness (−45 to –50 mV Ingram et al., 2019, Figure 2a and c), the strong inactivation of Cav3 channels and/or reduced Ca2+ release from intracellular stores likely account for the greatly diminished Ca2+ signals in G369i KI pedicles (Figure 9). Paradoxically, reductions in presynaptic Ca2+ in rod photoreceptors correlated with illumination-dependent shrinkage of ribbons in vivo and in vitro (Dembla et al., 2020; Spiwoks-Becker et al., 2004; Regus-Leidig et al., 2010). However, ribbon synapse size increases with low presynaptic Ca2+ in zebrafish sensory hair cells Sheets et al., 2012. The mechanism involves decreased mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake and an increase in the redox state of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+/NADH ratio) (Wong et al., 2019). Cav3 Ca2+ signals may decay too quickly in G369i KI cones (Figure 9) to enable mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake or other mechanisms that trim ribbons.

An intriguing result was the linear increase in ribbon synapse size with pedicle volume in G369i KI but not in WT mice (Figure 6e–i), which could represent a form of homeostatic synaptic scaling as has been demonstrated at the neuromuscular junction (Goel et al., 2019; Hong et al., 2020). Similarly, the presence of some non-invaginating contacts with incorrect partner pairings in G369i KI mice (Figure 7, Table 2) could be an attempt to increase synaptic connectivity to compensate for weakened synaptic output. Consistent with this possibility, diminished presynaptic Ca2+ signals and non-invaginating cone synapses also characterize the retina of mice lacking the extracellular α2δ−4 subunit of Cav1.4 (Kerov et al., 2018). The cone synapses of G369i KI mice and α2δ−4 KO mice are clearly functional given that photopic visual behavior is preserved in both mouse strains Figure 10e and f; Kerov et al., 2018 and, in the case of G369i KI mice, HCs exhibit EPSCs whose amplitude decreases with light and AMPA/kainate receptor blockade (Figure 8). Defects in cone synaptic transmission that correlate with aberrant cone synapse morphology and connectivity also typify a mouse strain with a gain-of-function mutation in Cav1.4 linked to CSNB2 (Zanetti et al., 2021; Knoflach et al., 2013). Thus, balanced presynaptic Ca2+ signals may be needed to encode the correct post-synaptic wiring and structure of the cone synapse.

In addition to structural abnormalities in cone synapses, the inability of Cav3 channels to support sustained presynaptic Ca2+ entry likely contributed to the impaired light responses in HCs and CBCs in G369i KI mice (Figures 8 and 10). Due to their slow activation and strong inactivation (Perez-Reyes et al., 2009), Cav3 channels are not expected to fuel the Ca2+ nanodomains that support fast and sustained components of release, both of which occur only at ribbon sites in cones (Snellman et al., 2011; Choi et al., 2008). Cav3 channels may also be located further from the ribbon than Cav1.4, thus lowering the efficiency of coupling to exocytosis. Regardless of the features that differentiate the contributions of Cav3 and Cav1.4 to cone synaptic release, our findings provide further support for the widely held view that Cav1 channels are well-suited to support transmission at ribbon-type synapses.

Based on extremely heterogeneous clinical presentations, CSNB2 manifests as a spectrum of visual disorders that originate from various mutations in CACNA1F (Boycott et al., 2000; Bijveld et al., 2013). Even though some CSNB2 mutant Cav1.4 channels may traffic normally to the plasma membrane, many of these mutations are expected to produce non-functional, non-conducting Cav1.4 channels (Peloquin et al., 2007; Hoda et al., 2005). Yet, the visual phenotypes of CSNB2 patients are not as severe as the complete blindness in Cav1.4 KO mice, which lack any Cav1.4 protein expression and exhibit no signs of visual behavior (Figure 10e and f; Kerov et al., 2018). Collectively, our results suggest that G369i KI mice accurately model Cav1.4 channelopathies in CSNB2 patients that are characterized by a greater impairment in rod than in cone pathways. This interpretation is supported by our findings that G369i KI mice exhibit horizontal cell responses to bright but not dim illumination (Figure 8), ERG responses under conditions of light adaptation (Figure 10a–d) but not dark-adaptation (Maddox et al., 2020), and visual behavior under photopic but not scotopic conditions (Figure 10e and f). Together with the enlargement of synaptic sites, modest levels of synaptic release from cones of G369i KI mice may support the nominal transmission of visual information through cone pathways. G369i KI mice could also exhibit homeostatic alterations in the inner retina, which are known to support visual function when photoreceptor input is severely compromised (Shen et al., 2020; Leinonen et al., 2020; Care et al., 2020). Future studies of the retinal circuitry and visual behavior of G369i KI mice could identify compensatory pathways that are recruited upon Cav1.4 loss-of-function and how they might be targeted in novel therapies for CSNB2 and related disorders.

Values represent the median (25th, 75th quartiles). Vh and k were determined from Boltzmann fits of the G-V and steady-state inactivation curves. Time constant (tau) for activation was obtained from the exponential fit of the rising phase of ICa evoked by a 50 ms test pulse to a voltage near the peak of the I-V. Tau deactivation was determined from the exponential fit of the decay of the tail current evoked by repolarization to –90 mV from +20 mV. CM, membrane capacitance; RM, input resistance. p-values were determined by the Kruskal-Wallis test. a, relative to WT. b, relative to G369i KI.

Results represent the analysis of n=2 pedicles reconstructed by serial block face scanning electron microscopy in images obtained from WT or G369i KI mice (N=1 animal each). The first row of vesicles encircling and immediately apposed to the ribbon were quantified for all the z-planes of the ribbon. Sites were counted as 'invaginating' if postsynaptic partners were enveloped on all sides by the cone terminal for at least a couple of consecutive image planes.

Methods

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Cell line (Homo sapiens)HEK293TATCCCRL-3216CVCL_0063
Strain, strain background (Mus musculus)C57BL/6 JJackson Labs000664IMSR_JAX:000664
Strain, strain background (Mus musculus)G369i KILee Maddox et al., 2020N/ANA
Strain, strain background (Mus musculus)CaV1.4 KOJackson Labs017761IMSR_JAX:017761
Strain, strain background (Ictidomys tridecemlineatus)Ground SquirrelTLCN/ANA
Biological sample (Macaca mulatta)RetinaSeidemannN/ANA
Recombinant DNA reagentCACNA1HGenbankAF051946.3Gift of E. Perez-Reyes
Recombinant DNA reagentCACNA1FGenbankAF201304Gift of F. Haeseleer
AntibodyBassoon (Mouse monoclonal)ThermoFisher ScientificCat#: MA1-20689
RRID:AB_2066981
2 μg/mL
AntibodyCaV1.4 (Rabbit Polyclonal)Amy LeeCat#: Ab167
RRID:AB_2650487
5 μg/mL
AntibodyCone Arrestin (Rabbit Polyclonal)MilliporeCat#: AB15282
RRID:AB_1163387
5 μg/mL
AntibodyCtBP2 (Mouse monoclonal)BD BiosciencesCat#: 612044
RRID:AB_399431
1 μg/mL
AntibodyGPR179 (Mouse monoclonal)MilliporeCat#: MAB427
RRID:AB_2069582
2 μg/mL
AntibodymGluR6 (Mouse monoclonal)Melina AgostoN/A1 μg/mL
AntibodyTRPM1 (Mouse monoclonal)Melina AgostoN/A1 μg/mL
Commercial assay, kitMix-n-Stain Antibody Labelling KitBiotium92238
Chemical compound, drugAMESSigma, US BiologicalSigma: A1420; US Biological: A1372
Chemical compound, drugBAPTASigma-AldrichA4926
Chemical compound, drugAntisedanZoetis US LLC10000449
Chemical compound, drugTBF-TBOATocris2532
Chemical compound, drugDNQXAbcamab120169
Chemical compound, drugIsradipineSigma-AldrichI6658
Chemical compound, drugML218Tocris4507
Chemical compound, drugPicrotoxinTocris1128
Chemical compound, drugStrychnineSigmaS8753
Chemical compound, drugXylazinePivetal46066-0750-02
Chemical compound, drugZD7288Tocris1000
Software, algorithmAmiraThermoFisher Scientifichttps://www.thermofisher.com/amira
Software, algorithmcellSensOlympushttps://www.olympus-lifescience.com/en/software/cellsens
Software, algorithmEspion softwareDiagnosys, Inchttps://info.diagnosysllc.com/software
Software, algorithmFLUOVIEWOlympushttps://www.olympus-lifescience.com/en/laser-scanning/fv3000
Software, algorithmGraphPad PrismGraphPadhttps://www.graphpad.com
Software, algorithmIGOR ProWaveMetricshttps://www.wavemetrics.com
Software, algorithmImageJNIHhttps://imagej.nih.gov/ij
Software, algorithmpClampMolecular Deviceshttps://www.moleculardevices.com
Software, algorithmPatchmasterHarvard Bioscience, Inchttps://www.heka.com
Software, algorithmScan ImageMBF Bioscienceshttps://docs.scanimage.org/index.html

Animals

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with guidelines approved by the National Institutes of Health and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at the University of Texas at Austin and Northwestern University were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (AUP-2023–00170). The G369i KI Maddox et al., 2020 and Cav1.4 KO mouse strains were bred on the C57BL/6 J background strain for at least 10 generations. Adult male and female mice were used (6–12 weeks old), and aged-matched C57BL6/J mice were used as the control (WT) animals.

Immunofluorescence

Mice between 6–8 weeks of age were anesthetized using isoflurane and euthanized by cervical dislocation. Eyes were enucleated and hemisected. The eye cups with retina were fixed on ice in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB) for 30 min. Fixed eye cups were then washed three times with 0.1 M PB containing 1% glycine followed by an infusion of 30% sucrose at 4 °C overnight. The eye cups were orientated along their dorsal-ventral axis and frozen in a 1:1 (wt/vol) mixture of Optimal Cutting Temperature compound and 30% sucrose in a dry ice/isopentane bath. Eye cups were cryosectioned at 20 µm on a Leica CM1850 cryostat (Leica Microsystems), mounted on Superfrost plus Micro Slides (VWR), dried for 5–10 min at 42 °C, and stored at –20 °C until used. Slides with mounted cryosections were warmed to room temperature, washed with 0.1 M PB for 30 min to remove the OCT/sucrose mixture and blocked with dilution solution (DS, 0.1 M PB/10% goat serum/0.5% Triton-X100) for 15 min or overnight at room temperature. All remaining steps were carried out at room temperature. All primary antibodies and appropriate secondary antibodies were diluted in DS at concentrations specified in the Key Resources Table. Sections were incubated with primary antibodies for 1 hr or overnight and then washed five times with 0.1 M PB. Sections were then incubated with secondary antibodies for 30 min and then washed five times with 0.1 M PB. Trace 0.1 M PB was removed, and sections were then mounted with #1.5 H coverslips (ThorLabs) using ProLong Glass Antifade Mountant with or without NucBlue (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

For double labeling with other rabbit polyclonal antibodies, CAR antibodies were conjugated with the CF647 fluorophore (CAR-647) using the Mix-n-Stain antibody labeling kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Biotium). Sections were processed first with rabbit polyclonal Cav1.4 or EAAT2 antibodies and corresponding secondary antibodies as described above. To prevent CAR-647 from binding to any available sites on the anti-rabbit secondary antibodies previously added to the sections, CaV1.4 or EAAT2 antibodies were readded to the sections and incubated for 30 min. After washing, the sections were incubated with CAR-647 for 1 hr, followed by wash steps and cover glass mounting.

Immunofluorescence in labeled retinal sections was visualized using an Olympus FV3000 confocal microscope (Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an UPlanApo 60 x oil HR objective (1.5 NA). Images were captured using the Olympus FLUOVIEW software package. Acquisition settings were optimized using a saturation mask to prevent signal saturation prior to collecting 16-bit. All confocal images presented are maximum z-projections. Images (256 × 256 pixels) used in analyses of synaptic proteins were collected using a 30 X optical zoom, 0.6 Airy disk aperture, and voxel size of 0.028 μm × 0.028 μm (X × Y × Z). Amira segmentation was used for generating 3D binary masks, and Amira 3D label analysis was used for quantification of immunofluorescent and masked images. Non-deconvolved images were used for all analyses. 3D binary masks of individual CAR-labeled pedicles were made by setting the threshold 1 standard deviation above the mean fluorescence intensity of each 3D Figure . and 3D binary masks of presynaptic labels (CtBP2, CaV1.4, and Bassoon) or postsynaptic labels (GPR179, mGluR6, and TRPM1) within or associated with the pedicle, respectively, were made by setting the threshold 3 standard deviations above the mean fluorescence intensity. To aid in presentation, high-mag images displayed in Figures 1b and 6a were deconvolved using cellSens software (Olympus), and any immunofluorescence corresponding to rod synaptic proteins was subtracted from the image. Experiments involving qualitative and/or quantitative analyses were performed independently at least three times, with one eye from per animal representing a biological replicate (three animals per genotype).

Molecular biology and transfection

The cDNAs for CaV1.4 (GenBank: NM_019582), β2X13 (GenBank: KJ789960), and α2δ–4 (GenBank: NM_172364) were previously cloned into pcDNA3.1 Lee et al., 2015. The cDNA for CaV3.2 (GenBank: AF051946) was a gift from Dr. Edward Perez-Reyes, University of Virginia. All constructs were verified by DNA sequencing before use. Human embryonic kidney 293T (HEK293T) cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium with 10% FBS at 37 °C in 5% CO2. At 70–80% confluence, the cells were co-transfected with cDNAs encoding human Cav1.4 (1.8μg) β2X13 (0.6 μg), α2δ–4 (0.6 μg), and enhanced GFP in pEGFP-C1 (Clonetech, 0.1 μg) or CaV3.2 (2μg) and pEGFP-C1 (0.1 μg) using FuGENE 6 transfection reagent according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cells treated with the transfection mixture were incubated at 37 °C for 24 hr, dissociated using Trypsin-EDTA, and replated at a low density to isolate single cells. Replated cells were then incubated at 30 °C or 37 °C for an additional 24 hr before beginning experiments.

Solutions for patch clamp recordings

HEK293T extracellular recording solution contained the following (in mM): 140 Tris, 20 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, pH 7.3 with methanesulfonic acid, and osmolarity 309 mOsm/kg. HEK293T internal recording solution contained the following: 140 NMDG, 10 HEPES, 2 MgCl2, 2 Mg-ATP, 5 EGTA, pH 7.3 with methanesulfonic acid, osmolarity 358 mOsm/kg.

For recordings of ICa in mouse retina, extracellular recording solution contained the following (in mM): 115 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 22.5 NaHCO3, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 5 HEPES, 5 CsCl, 5.5 Glucose, osmolarity 290 mOsm/kg. Mouse cone intracellular solution contained the following (in mM): 105 CsMeSO4, 20 TEA-Cl, 1 MgCl2, 11 HEPES, 10 EGTA, 4 Mg-ATP, 10 phosphocreatine, 0.3 Na-GTP, pH 7.4 with CsOH, osmolarity 300 mOsm/kg.

For recordings of ICa in ground squirrel retina, extracellular recording solution contained the following (in mM): 10 HEPES, 85 NaCl, 3.1 KCl, 2.48 MgSO4, 6 Glucose, 1 Na-succinate, 1 Na-malate, 1 Na-lactate, 1 Na-pyruvate, 2 CaCl2, 25 NaHCO3, and 20 TEA-Cl, osmolarity 285 ± 5 mOsm/kg. Intracellular solution contained the following (in mM): 80 CsCl, 10 BAPTA, 2 MgSO4, 10 HEPES, 20 TEA-Cl, 5 Mg-ATP, and 0.5 Na-GTP, pH 7.35 with CsOH, osmolarity 285±5 mOsm/kg. For recordings of IAglu, extracellular recording solution contained (in mM): 125 NaCl, 3.0 KCl, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 25 NaHCO3, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 3 dextrose, 3 sodium pyruvate, 0.1 picrotoxin and 0.02 DNQX, and in indicated experiments 0.0013 TFB-TBOA. Intracellular IAglu contained (in mM): 125 KSCN, 10 TEA-Cl, 10 HEPES, 1 CaCl2, 2 MgCl2, 0.3 Na-GTP, 4 Mg-ATP, 10 K2 phosphocreatine, 0.02 ZD7288. Mouse and ground squirrel extracellular slice recording solutions were equilibrated with 5% CO2 /95% O2 to a pH of ~7.5.

For recordings of light responses in horizontal cells of mouse retina, extracellular recording solution consisted of Ames’ media supplemented with 100 U/mL penicillin, 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin, and 22.6 mM NaHCO3, osmolarity 280±5 mOsm/kg. The intracellular recording solution contained the following (in mM): 135 K-Aspartate, 10 KCl, 10 HEPES, 5 EDTA, 0.5 CaCl2, 1 Mg-ATP, 0.2 Na-GTP, pH 7.35 with KOH, osmolarity 305 ± 5 mOsm/kg.

Patch clamp electrophysiology

Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings of transfected HEK293T cells were performed 48–72 hr after transfection using an EPC-10 amplifier and Patchmaster software (HEKA Elektronik, Lambrecht, Germany). Patch pipette electrodes with a tip resistance between 4 and 6 MΩ were pulled from thin-walled borosilicate glass capillaries (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL) using a P-97 Flaming/Brown Puller (Sutter Instruments, Novato, CA). A reference Ag/AgCl wire was placed into the culture dish mounted on an inverted Olympus IX70 microscope. Recordings were performed at room temperature. A pressurized perfusion pencil multi-barrel manifold controlled with Valve Bank II (AutoMate Scientific, Inc, Berkeley, CA) was used to deliver extracellular solutions. ML218 of different concentrations (0.5, 1, 5, 25, and 100 mM) was added to the extracellular solution on the day of the experiments. Series resistance was compensated up to 70%, and passive membrane leak subtraction was conducted using a P/−4 protocol. Whole-cell Ca2+ currents (ICa) of transfected HEK293T cells were evoked for 50ms with incremental +5 mV steps from –80 mV to +65 mV. Current-Voltage (IV) data were fit with a single Boltzmann equation: ICa = Gmax(Vm-Vr)/(1+exp[-(Vm-Vh)/k]), where Gmax is the maximal conductance, Vm is the test voltage, Vr is the Ca2+ reversal potential, Vh is the membrane potential required to activate 50% of Gmax, and k is the slope factor. Data were sampled at 100 kHz, filtered at 3 kHz, and analyzed using IgroPro (WaveMetrics).

Whole-cell voltage-clamp recordings of mouse cones, rods, and horizontal cells and macaque cone terminals were performed using an EPC-10 amplifier and Patchmaster software (HEKA). Patch pipette electrodes with a tip resistance between 10 and 14 MΩ for cones and 6–8 for horizontal cells were pulled from thick-walled borosilicate glass (1.5 mm outer diameter; 0.84 mm inner diameter; World Precision Instruments).

To prepare retinal slices, adult mice (6–8 weeks old) were anesthetized using isoflurane and euthanized by cervical dislocation. Eyes were enucleated, placed into cold Ames’ media slicing solution, and hemisected. Following the removal of the vitreous, the eye cup was separated into dorsal and ventral halves using a scalpel. Ventral retina was isolated, molded into low-melt agarose, and mounted in a Leica VT1200s vibratome (Leica Biosystems). Mouse retina slicing solution was continuously bubbled with 100% O2 and contained the following: Ames’ Medium with L-glutamine supplemented with (in mM) 15 NaCl, 10 HEPES, 10 U/mL penicillin, 0.1 mg/mL streptomycin, pH 7.4, osmolarity 300 mOsm/kg. Vertical (~200 µm) or horizontal (~160 µm) retinal slices were anchored in a recording chamber, placed onto a fixed stage, and positioned under an upright Olympus BX51WI microscope equipped with a 60 X water-immersion objective (1.0 NA), and superfused with extracellular solution (flow rate of ~1–2 ml/min) at room temperature. Slices were visualized using IR-DIC optics and an IR-2000 (Dage MTI, Michigan City, IN) or SciCam Pro (Scientifica, Uckfield, United Kingdom) CCD camera controlled by the IR-capture software package or µManager, respectively (Edelstein et al., 2010; Edelstein et al., 2014). Drugs used in these experiments were added to the mouse extracellular solution on the day of experiments at the concentration described in Table 3. A reference Ag/AgCl pellet electrode was placed directly into the recording chamber solution. Data from whole-cell recordings with a series resistance >20 MΩ were discarded.

Table 3
Pharmacological drugs and their concentrations used in electrophysiological recordings of cones.
CompoundConcentration (μM) for mouse recordingsConcentration (μM) for ground squirrel recordings
Cadmium200N/A
DL-TBOAN/A375
DNQX20N/A
Isradipine12
ML21855
Nickel100N/A
PicrotoxinN/A50
StrychnineN/A10
ZD7288N/A50
Glutamate1000N/A

Cone and rod somas were identified based on their morphology and location. Cone identity was confirmed by the whole-cell capacitance (~3–4 pF), which is larger than rod whole-cell capacitance (~0.7–1 pF). Unless otherwise indicated, cones and rods were held at –90 mV for 200ms followed by a ramp of +0.5 mV/ms to +40 mV. To determine the voltage activation of ICa, whole-cell Ca2+ currents in cones were evoked for 50 ms with incremental +5 mV steps from –80 mV to +40 mV. The activation voltage of ICa is reported as G/Gmax, where G is the conductance at each test voltage and Gmax is the maximum peak conductance for each cone. Conductance was calculated using the equation ICa = G(Vm-Vr), where Vr is +60 mV. To determine steady-state inactivation of ICa, currents in cones were evoked for 500 ms with incremental +5 mV steps from –90 mV and –30 mV followed by a final step to –30 mV for 50 ms after each test voltage. The steady-state inactivation of ICa is reported as I/Imax, where I is the peak current in the final voltage step to –30 mV and Imax is the maximum peak current for each cone. Data were sampled between 20 and 60 kHz and filtered at 3 kHz.

For horizontal cell light responses, horizontal slices were prepared from the central mouse retina. The identity of horizontal cells was determined based on their larger soma diameter (~15 μm) compared to bipolar cell somas (~6 μm). During whole cell patch clamp recordings, horizontal cells were held at –70 mV. Light stimuli (1 s) at 410 nm (630 × 830 μm) were presented onto the retina (at a minimum of 5 s intervals) through the microscope’s condenser using a Polygon1000 DMD pattern illuminator (Mightex, Pleasanton, CA, USA) and a custom-built light path. Light intensity (in watts) was measured at the point on the microscope stage where the retina is placed using a power meter (Thorlabs, Newton, New Jersey, USA). Photon flux Фq (photons/s) within the light stimulus area was calculated using the measured light intensities in the formula:

Фqperμm2=measuredlightintensity(W)hcλ/lightstimulusarea(μm2)

where h is Planck’s constant (J*s), c is the speed of light (m/s), and λ is the wavelength (m). Light stimulus intensity was increased in Log2 steps from 4.9 × 102 to 2.1 × 105 Фq/μm2. For each light intensity step, both ON and OFF current amplitudes were measured from baseline (averaged 5 ms of current prior to light onset) to the maximum positive (after light onset) or maximum negative (after light offset) current, respectively. To confirm the identity of these horizontal cell light responses as AMPA-mediated currents, 1 s light stimuli (410 nm, 1.2 × 105 Фq/μm2) were continuously delivered every 10 s before, during, and after bath application of 20 μM DNQX.

For voltage-clamp recordings of 13-lined ground squirrel cones, retinal slices were prepared as previously described (DeVries and Schwartz, 1999). The eyecup was divided along the dorsal to ventral axis into superior, middle, and inferior parts. The dorsal area above the line of the optic nerve head was defined as superior, the central region with a width of about 5 mm just ventral to the optic nerve head was middle, and the remaining ventral area was inferior. Isradipine and ML218, alone or in combination, were applied from separate puffer pipettes whose orifices were aimed at the cone synaptic region. Recordings were made with an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Molecular Devices). Signals were electronically filtered at 5 kHz and digitized at a rate of 10 kHz. Additional Gaussian filtering was added (cutoff frequency of 500 Hz). Tissue was viewed through a 63 x water immersion objective on a Zeiss Axioskop FS2 microscope and superfused with an extracellular solution at room temperature. Drugs and their concentrations used during these experiments are described in Table 3. Membrane potential was continuously maintained at –85 mV. During ramp stimulation, the membrane potential was depolarized to –85 to +35 mV at a rate of 1 mV/ms.

For rhesus macaque cone terminal recordings, a 12-year-old male was sedated with ketamine (5 mg/kg I.M.) and dexmedetomidine (0.015 mg/kg I.M.). Post-sedation, the animal received buprenorphine (0.02 mg/kg I.M.), atropine (0.02 mg/kg I.M.), and maropitant citrate (1 mg/kg S.Q.). The animal was intubated and maintained with inhaled isoflurane (0.75–2.0%) and propofol (7–8 mg/kg/hr I.V.). Crystalloid fluids (5 mL/kg/hr) were administered I.V., and phenylephrine (5–10 mcg/kg/hr I.V.) was used for blood pressure support. The animal was under anesthesia for approximately 3 hr prior to perfusion. Transcardial perfusion was approached through a midline thoracotomy. Immediately prior to perfusion, 5 mL of Euthasol (sodium pentobarbital 390 mg/mL/phenytoin sodium 50 mg/mL) was administered I.V. The descending thoracic aorta was clamped, the pericardium was opened, and the right atrium was cut. The apex of the left ventricle was sharply incised, and a large bore cannula (Yankauer suction handle, 5 mm internal diameter) was inserted through the left ventricle until it could be palpated in the ascending aorta. The cannula was clamped in place at the apex of the left ventricle. The animal was perfused with 4 L of cold phosphate-buffered saline at ~500 mL/min. Eyes were removed approximately 1 hr following perfusion. Eyes were dissected, and eye cups were allowed to dark adapt for ~30 min and stored in bicarbonate buffered Ames’ media at 32 °C equilibrated with 95% O2/5% CO2 prior to slice preparations. Vertical sections of central retina were prepared from 5 mm retina punches as described for mice. Depending on the species, the electrophysiological experiments were performed one or more times with cells from one animal representing technical replicates.

Single cell RNA sequencing

Retinas from 2 WT and 2 G369i KI mice (2–3 months old, all males) were dissected in ice-cold Dulbecco’s Phosphate Buffered Saline (D-PBS) and dissociated into single cells using the Papain Dissociation System (Worthington Biochemical). Two retinas were incubated in a 2.5 ml of dissociation solution (40 U/ml papain, 2 mM L-cysteine, 200 U/ml DNAse in Earle’s Balanced Salt Solution, EBSS) for 8 min at 37 °C. Following aspiration, 2 ml of inactivation solution (ovomucoid protease inhibitor and bovine serum albumin (BSA), 10 mg/ml each in EBSS) was added prior to trituration with a series of fire-polished, siliconized glass Pasteur pipettes. The solution was passed through a 40 μm mesh (pluriStrainer, Cat# 43-50040-51, pluriSelect) prior to centrifugation (200 × g for 5 min, 4 °C). Following aspiration of the supernatant, the cell pellet was resuspended in 0.5 ml D-PBS +0.5% BSA. Cell suspensions (10,000 cells per sample) were loaded on the Chromium Controller (10 X Genomics) and processed for cDNA library generation following the manufacturer’s instructions for the Chromium NextGEM Single Cell 3’ Reagent Kit v3.1 (10X Genomics). The resulting libraries were examined for size and quality using the Bioanalyzer High Sensitivity DNA Kit (Agilent) and their concentrations were measured using the KAPA SYBR Fast qPCR kit (Roche). Samples were sequenced on the NovaSeq 6000 instrument (paired end, read 1:28 cycles, read 2: 90 cycles) with a targeted depth of 9 K reads/cell.

scRNA-seq Fastq files were processed with CellRanger (v7.1.0) using the reference genome mm10–2020 A with introns included. CellRanger outputs were imported to Seurat (v5.0.1), a gene by feature count matrix was constructed, log normalization was performed, and the log normalized values were used for downstream analysis. Unsupervised clustering was performed in Seurat using resolution = 0.5. DEsingle method (v1.6.0, Miao et al., 2018) was used for differential expression analysis comparing G369i KI to WT in each cluster.

Serial block-face scanning electron microscopy and 3D reconstructions

Eye cups were prepared from P42 WT and G369i KI littermates and fixed using 4% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4, for 4 hr at room temperature followed by additional fixation overnight at 4 °C. Glutaraldehyde-fixed eye cups were then washed 3 times in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer. Retinas were thereafter isolated and embedded in Durcupan resin after staining, dehydration, and embedding as described previously (Della Santina et al., 2016). A Thermo Scientific VolumeScope serial block face scanning electron micrscope was used to image embedded retinas. Retinal regions comprising a 2x2 montage of 40.96 μm tiles were imaged at a resolution of 5 nm/pixel and section thickness of 50 nm. Image stacks were aligned, and cone photoreceptor terminals were reconstructed using TrakEM2 (NIH). Postsynaptic partners at cone ribbons were followed to the inner nuclear layer to determine their identity. Amira software was used for 3D visualization of reconstructed profiles.

Electroretinography

Retinal function was assessed using the Celeris system (Diagnosys, Inc) paired with the Espion software (Diagnosys, Inc). Mice were anaesthetized under red light (660  nm) via intraperitoneal (I.P.) injection with ketamine/xylazine mixture (100 mg/kg ketamine, 10 mg/kg xylazine). Tropicamide ophthalmic solution (1 %) and hypromellose lubricant eye gel (0.3%) were administered topically to both eyes before the mouse was secured to a heated (37 °C) platform to maintain body temperature. Ag/AgCl corneal stimulators were placed on each eye. After collecting data from individual mice, atipamezole (Antisedan, 1–2 mg/kg) was I.P. injection administered to reverse the effects of the ketamine and xylazine. For photopic ERGs, eyes were light adapted using a background green light at 20 cd·s/m2 for 10 min. Following light adaptation, eight different light intensity pulses (–0.5, 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.3, and 2.6 log cd·s/m2) were delivered on top of the background green light. ERG a-waves were measured from baseline to the peak of the negative potential. ERG b-waves were measured without filtering the oscillatory potentials from the peak of the a-wave to the peak of the positive potential within 60–70 ms (WT) and 80–100 ms (G369i KI and CaV1.4 KO) of the light stimuli. For flickering ERGs, mice were dark-adapted (>12 hr). White light pulses from –4–2.5 log cd·s/m2 were delivered in 0.5 log unit steps at 10 Hz. Response amplitudes were measured from the trough to the peak of each response at all light intensities. Each intensity stimulus was delivered 10 times, with a 3 s interval between each stimulus, and averaged. The mean response amplitudes recorded in the right and left eye of each mouse are reported for all quantified ERG data. Experiments were performed at least three times with at least 3 mice per genotype (each mouse represented a biological replicate).

Visible platform swim test

The visible platform swim test was performed as has been previously described (Bimonte-Nelson et al., 2015). WT, G369i KI, and Cav1.4 KO male and female mice (6–9 weeks old) were dark-adapted overnight and allowed to adapt to the procedure room for at least 1 hr prior to beginning the experiments. A water-filled, four-foot diameter galvanized steel tank and a visible white platform with a diameter of 10 cm was used for the swim test. Mice were subjected to six swim trials per day. Assays conducted under photopic (55 lux) and scotopic conditions (0 lux) were performed on days 1 and 2, respectively. Light intensity for photopic and scotopic conditions was measured at the platform using an Extech HD450 light meter (FLIR Systems, Nashua, New Hampshire). Mice were given 90 s to find the platform before being removed. After one trial was performed on all mice, the platform was moved to one of three different locations, top left, top center, and top right in relation to the initial site of mouse placement in the tank. Each trial was recorded using an infrared camera (Basler AG, Ahrensburg, Germany) and EthoVision XT16 software (Noldus Information Technology). Locating the platform was considered successful when mice contacted the platform with a head-on approach, even if mice failed to escape onto the platform. Mice were allowed to rest on the platform for 15 s at the end of each trial before being returned to a pre-warmed cage. Latency to find the platform was manually recorded and confirmed using recorded videos. Male and female mice were tested separately, and no sex differences in performance were identified post-hoc using two-way RM-ANOVA (Supplementary file 1). Male and female data were combined into a single group for each genotype. Latency to the platform was calculated by averaging the final 3 trials under scotopic and photopic conditions for each mouse and compared using Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA with Dunn’s posthoc multiple comparison test. Experiments were performed at least three times with at least 3 mice per genotype (each mouse represented a biological replicate).

Ca2+ imaging of cone terminals

Retinas were dissected and stored in an oxygenated mouse retina-slicing solution. The loading of the cell-permeant Ca2+ dye Fluo-3, AM was modified from on a previous publication (Johnson et al., 2007). To label the base of cone terminals, retinas were incubated in retina slicing solution containing PNA Lectin conjugated with CF568 (100 μg/mL) for 15 min at room temperature. Then the retinas were incubated with retina slicing solution containing 1 mM Fluo-3, AM, and 0.025% pluronic acid (Biotium) for 45 min at room temperature followed by three rinses with retina slicing solution. The retinas were then incubated in retina slicing solution for 15 min at 35 °C to increase esterase activity. Vertical retina slices were prepared as described above. Slices were mounted on a Hyperscope multiphoton system (Scientifica, Uckfield, United Kingdom) equipped with a resonant scanner and a Mai Tai HP DeepSee laser (Spectra-Physics, Milpitas, CA, USA) tuned to 800 nm at 5% power. Slices were perfused with normal extracellular solution containing (in mM) 112 NaCl, 3 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 3 CaCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 10 Na Pyruvate, 22.5 NaHCO3, 5 HEPES, 10 Glucose, osmolarity 300 ± 5 mOsm/kg. High-K + extracellular solution contained (in mM) 65 NaCl, 50 KCl, 1 MgCl2, 3 CaCl2, 1.25 NaH2PO4, 10 Na Pyruvate, 22.5 NaHCO3, 5 HEPES, 10 Glucose, osmolarity 300 ± 5 mOsm/kg. Extracellular solutions were supplemented with 20 μM CNQX, 25 μM L-APV, and 100 μM picrotoxin. Isradipine (10 μM) was added to High-K + extracellular solution. Images (512 × 512) were collected as 15-frame averages at 0.93 Hz using ScanImage (MBF Bioscience, Williston, VT, USA). Changes of Fluo-3 fluorescence in cone terminals were measured in ROIs drawn juxtaposed to PNA-CF568 labeling using Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012). Experiments were performed at least three times with at least 3 mice per genotype (each mouse represented a biological replicate).

Data analysis

Electrophysiological data were analyzed by custom routines written in IgorPro software (Wavemetrics) and statistical analysis was performed using Prism software (GraphPad). Data were analyzed for normality by Shapiro Wilk test followed by parametric (t-test or ANOVA) or non-parametric methods (Kruskal Wallis, Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon).

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files; source data files have been provided for Figures 2–10, Figure 2—figure supplement 1, and Figure 3—figure supplement 1.

References

    1. Hack I
    2. Frech M
    3. Dick O
    4. Peichl L
    5. Brandstätter JH
    (2001)
    Heterogeneous distribution of AMPA glutamate receptor subunits at the photoreceptor synapses of rodent retina
    The European Journal of Neuroscience 13:15–24.
    1. Johnson JE Jr
    2. Perkins GA
    3. Giddabasappa A
    4. Chaney S
    5. Xiao W
    6. White AD
    7. Brown JM
    8. Waggoner J
    9. Ellisman MH
    10. Fox DA
    (2007)
    Spatiotemporal regulation of ATP and Ca2+ dynamics in vertebrate rod and cone ribbon synapses
    Molecular Vision 13:887–919.
    1. Regus-Leidig H
    2. Specht D
    3. Tom Dieck S
    4. Brandstätter JH
    (2010)
    Stability of active zone components at the photoreceptor ribbon complex
    Molecular Vision 16:2690–2700.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. J Wesley Maddox

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas-Austin, Austin, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation, Formal analysis, Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology
    Contributed equally with
    Gregory J Ordemann
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1630-2746
  2. Gregory J Ordemann

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas-Austin, Austin, United States
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Conceptualization, Methodology
    Contributed equally with
    J Wesley Maddox
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  3. Juan AM de la Rosa Vázquez

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas-Austin, Austin, United States
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Conceptualization, Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  4. Angie Huang

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas-Austin, Austin, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  5. Christof Gault

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas-Austin, Austin, United States
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Conceptualization
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  6. Serena R Wisner

    1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin- Madison, Madison, United States
    2. Neuroscience Training Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Conceptualization
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  7. Kate Randall

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas-Austin, Austin, United States
    Contribution
    Conceptualization
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  8. Daiki Futagi

    Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Conceptualization
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  9. Nihal A Salem

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas-Austin, Austin, United States
    Contribution
    Writing – review and editing, Formal analysis
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  10. Dayne Mayfield

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas-Austin, Austin, United States
    Contribution
    Supervision, Funding acquisition
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  11. Boris V Zemelman

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas-Austin, Austin, United States
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Conceptualization, Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2463-4887
  12. Steven DeVries

    Department of Ophthalmology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, United States
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization, Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  13. Mrinalini Hoon

    1. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin- Madison, Madison, United States
    2. McPherson Eye Research Institute, Madison, United States
    Contribution
    Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Conceptualization, Methodology
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
  14. Amy Lee

    Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas-Austin, Austin, United States
    Contribution
    Data curation, Resources, Formal analysis, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - original draft, Project administration, Methodology
    For correspondence
    amy.lee1@austin.utexas.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8021-0443

Funding

National Institutes of Health (EY026817)

  • Amy Lee

National Institutes of Health (EY029953)

  • J Wesley Maddox

National Institutes of Health (EY031677)

  • Mrinalini Hoon

National Institutes of Health (EY012141)

  • Steven DeVries

National Institutes of Health (EY032506)

  • Steven DeVries

National Institutes of Health (AA029955)

  • Nihal A Salem

National Institutes of Health (AA0012404)

  • Dayne Mayfield

National Institutes of Health (AA020926)

  • Dayne Mayfield

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Acknowledgements

J W M, G J O, J D V, A H, K R, and A L were supported by NIH grants EY026817 (to A L), EY029953 (to J W M), and unrestricted funds from the University of Texas-Austin (to A L); S R W and M H were supported by NIH grant EY031677 (to M H), an unrestricted grant from RPB to UW Madison Dept. of Ophthalmology and a McPherson ERI professorship to M H; D F and S H D were supported by NIH grants EY012141 and EY032506, an unrestricted grant from RPB to the Northwestern University Dept. of Ophthalmology, and an RPB International Travel Award. N A S and R D Mayfield were supported by AA029955 (N A S) and AA0012404 and AA020926 (R D M). The authors thank J Sun for assistance with acquiring some of the electrophysiological data in Figure 3—figure supplement 1, S Knecht and R Wong for assistance with serial EM image collection, E Seidemann and B Shukla for the generous donation and collection of macaque retinal tissue, respectively, M Agosto for mGluR6 and TRPM1 antibodies, and M McCall and F Vinberg for advice on ERGs.

Ethics

All animal experiments were performed in accordance with guidelines approved by the National Institutes of Health and the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committees at the University of Texas at Austin and Northwestern University were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (AUP-2023-00170).

Version history

  1. Sent for peer review:
  2. Preprint posted:
  3. Reviewed Preprint version 1:
  4. Reviewed Preprint version 2:
  5. Reviewed Preprint version 3:
  6. Version of Record published:

Cite all versions

You can cite all versions using the DOI https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.94908. This DOI represents all versions, and will always resolve to the latest one.

Copyright

© 2024, Maddox, Ordemann et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 845
    views
  • 44
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. J Wesley Maddox
  2. Gregory J Ordemann
  3. Juan AM de la Rosa Vázquez
  4. Angie Huang
  5. Christof Gault
  6. Serena R Wisner
  7. Kate Randall
  8. Daiki Futagi
  9. Nihal A Salem
  10. Dayne Mayfield
  11. Boris V Zemelman
  12. Steven DeVries
  13. Mrinalini Hoon
  14. Amy Lee
(2024)
A non-conducting role of the Cav1.4 Ca2+ channel drives homeostatic plasticity at the cone photoreceptor synapse
eLife 13:RP94908.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.94908.4

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.94908

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    2. Neuroscience
    LeYuan Gu, WeiHui Shao ... HongHai Zhang
    Research Article

    The advent of midazolam holds profound implications for modern clinical practice. The hypnotic and sedative effects of midazolam afford it broad clinical applicability. However, the specific mechanisms underlying the modulation of altered consciousness by midazolam remain elusive. Herein, using pharmacology, optogenetics, chemogenetics, fiber photometry, and gene knockdown, this in vivo research revealed the role of locus coeruleus (LC)-ventrolateral preoptic nucleus noradrenergic neural circuit in regulating midazolam-induced altered consciousness. This effect was mediated by α1 adrenergic receptors. Moreover, gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor type A (GABAA-R) represents a mechanistically crucial binding site in the LC for midazolam. These findings will provide novel insights into the neural circuit mechanisms underlying the recovery of consciousness after midazolam administration and will help guide the timing of clinical dosing and propose effective intervention targets for timely recovery from midazolam-induced loss of consciousness.

    1. Neuroscience
    Ana Maria Ichim, Harald Barzan ... Raul Cristian Muresan
    Review Article

    Gamma oscillations in brain activity (30–150 Hz) have been studied for over 80 years. Although in the past three decades significant progress has been made to try to understand their functional role, a definitive answer regarding their causal implication in perception, cognition, and behavior still lies ahead of us. Here, we first review the basic neural mechanisms that give rise to gamma oscillations and then focus on two main pillars of exploration. The first pillar examines the major theories regarding their functional role in information processing in the brain, also highlighting critical viewpoints. The second pillar reviews a novel research direction that proposes a therapeutic role for gamma oscillations, namely the gamma entrainment using sensory stimulation (GENUS). We extensively discuss both the positive findings and the issues regarding reproducibility of GENUS. Going beyond the functional and therapeutic role of gamma, we propose a third pillar of exploration, where gamma, generated endogenously by cortical circuits, is essential for maintenance of healthy circuit function. We propose that four classes of interneurons, namely those expressing parvalbumin (PV), vasointestinal peptide (VIP), somatostatin (SST), and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) take advantage of endogenous gamma to perform active vasomotor control that maintains homeostasis in the neuronal tissue. According to this hypothesis, which we call GAMER (GAmma MEdiated ciRcuit maintenance), gamma oscillations act as a ‘servicing’ rhythm that enables efficient translation of neural activity into vascular responses that are essential for optimal neurometabolic processes. GAMER is an extension of GENUS, where endogenous rather than entrained gamma plays a fundamental role. Finally, we propose several critical experiments to test the GAMER hypothesis.