Point of View: The NIH must reduce disparities in funding to maximize its return on investments from taxpayers

  1. Wayne P Wahls  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, United States

Abstract

New data from the NIH reveal that the scientific return on its sponsored research reaches a maximum at around $400,000 of annual support per principal investigator. We discuss the implications of this 'sweet spot' for funding policy, and propose that the NIH should limit both the minimum and maximum amount of funding per researcher.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Wayne P Wahls

    Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, United States
    For correspondence
    wahlswaynep@uams.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1338-1610

Funding

No external funding was received for this work

Copyright

© 2018, Wahls

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,351
    views
  • 595
    downloads
  • 24
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Wayne P Wahls
(2018)
Point of View: The NIH must reduce disparities in funding to maximize its return on investments from taxpayers
eLife 7:e34965.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.34965
  1. Further reading

Further reading

  1. Edited by Julia Deathridge
    Collection

    Research culture needs to be improved for the benefit of science and scientists.