Relative probabilities for cued turns in GTs given the presence of individual and combined properties of turn cue-locked glutamate peaks (based on a total of 548 traces, 364 recorded during cued turns and 184 during misses, 318 from GTs and 230 from STs). a: The ordinate depicts relative turn probabilities derived from contingency table analyses. A value of 1 indicates that GTs were as likely as STs to turn (inserted horizontal line), while a value of 2 that GTs were twice as likely as STs to turn. For each relative turn probability value, the associated significance level, derived from contingency table analyses and reflecting the degree of dissimilarity of the proportion of turns and misses in GTs versus STs, is indicated by the symbol color (no fill, not significant, n.s.; blue, P<0.05; green, P<0.01; magenta, P<0.001; red: P<0.0001). The three probability curves reflect predictions based solely on turn cue-locked maximum peak glutamate concentrations (abscissa; middle curve, circles), such concentrations derived from the presence of a single turn cue-locked peak (top curve, rhombi), or such concentrations in conjunction with the presence of multiple (2 or 3) turn cue-locked peaks (bottom curve, triangles). In a, the data points labeled b,c,d and e mark data points for which representative traces are shown in b-e (all traces are from cued turns in GTs, as the plot in a indicates the probability of GTs to turn relatively to STs). For example, the data point next to the label b in a indicates that in the presence of a single turn cue-locked glutamate peak of about 2.0 µM, GTs were 1.5 times as likely as STs to turn (significantly different from as likely to turn as STs at P<0.0001). A trace exemplifying this data point is shown in b. Circles in a: Regardless of other glutamate trace properties, increasing maximum peak concentrations, beginning with 2.8 µM glutamate, yielded significantly different proportions of turns and misses in GTs and STs and rising relative probabilities for GTs to execute a turn (“GLU max peaks ≥x”; the slope of the linear regression of all three curves was significantly different from zero; see Results). For example, for maximum peak concentrations ≥4 µM, GTs were 1.24 times as likely as STs to turn. Rhombi in a: The presence of a single turn cue-locked peak strongly increased the relative probability for GTs to turn (see Results). In conjunction with increasing amplitudes of these peaks (“1 peak only ∪ ≥x”), these probabilities did further increase, reaching, for example, 1.73 for glutamate concentrations ≥4 µM. Triangles in a: In striking contrast, the presence of 2 or 3 turn cue-evoked peaks (no more than 3 turn cue-locked peaks were observed) significantly lowered the relative probability for a turn in GTs below 1 or, conversely, indicated that STs were more likely to turn as GTs. However, in conjunction with rising max amplitude threshold levels (“2 and 3 peaks ∪ max peaks ≥x”), the relative probabilities of GTs to turn increased, so that at maximum peak concentrations of ≥6 µM glutamate, the proportions of turns and misses no longer differed significantly between the phenotypes. The vertical brackets on the right symbolize significant differences between the relative probabilities of the three trace characteristics (H(3)=33.41, P<0.0001; Kruskal–Wallis test; multiple comparisons: *,****, P<0.05, 0.0001).