Conceptual metaphorical mapping in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
- Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Japan
- National Taiwan University, Taiwan
Figures
Figure 1
Task sequence, example stimuli and response latency analyses.
(A) Typical trial sequence. (B) Stimulus exemplars. (C) Average response latencies for coherent, incoherent and close trials (mean ± SEM) for all participants, (D) for high-ranked participants and (E) for low-ranked participants. (F) Average response latency differences (coherent–incoherent) for high and low positions. (C, F) The number of independent data points (N) is six for each condition. (G) Normalized frequency distribution of response latencies of high- and low-ranked participants for coherent, incoherent and close trials. (H) Sensitivity index for both stimulus sets and stimuli. Positive values indicate facilitation for coherent relative to incoherent trials.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Conceptual metaphorical mapping in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes)
eLife 2:e00932.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.00932
