Multifactorial processes underlie parallel opsin loss in neotropical bats

  1. Alexa Sadier
  2. Kalina TJ Davies
  3. Laurel R Yohe
  4. Kun Yun
  5. Paul Donat
  6. Brandon P Hedrick
  7. Elizabeth R Dumont
  8. Liliana M Dávalos  Is a corresponding author
  9. Stephen J Rossiter  Is a corresponding author
  10. Karen E Sears  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  2. Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom
  3. Stony Brook University, United States
  4. University of Illinois, United States
  5. Harvard University, United States
  6. University of California, Merced, United States

Abstract

The loss of previously adaptive traits is typically linked to relaxation in selection, yet the molecular steps leading to such repeated losses are rarely known. Molecular studies of loss have tended to focus on gene sequences alone, but overlooking other aspects of protein expression might underestimate phenotypic diversity. Insights based almost solely on opsin gene evolution, for instance, have made mammalian color vision a textbook example of phenotypic loss. We address this gap by investigating retention and loss of opsin genes, transcripts and proteins across ecologically diverse noctilionoid bats. We find multiple, independent losses of short-wave sensitive opsins. Mismatches between putatively functional DNA sequences, mRNA transcripts, and proteins implicate transcriptional and post-transcriptional processes in the ongoing loss of S-opsins in some noctilionoid bats. Our results provide a snapshot of evolution in progress during phenotypic trait loss, and suggest vertebrate visual phenotypes cannot always be predicted from genotypes alone.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GenBank in the Nucleotide Database. The accession numbers are as follows: RHO: MK209460 - MK209505; OPN1LW: MK209506 - MK209551; OPN1SW: MK209552 - MK209592. The GenBank numbers for the OPN1SW PCR sequences are MK248618 - MK248630. Gene alignments are available via Dryad (http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.456569k).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alexa Sadier

    Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9907-3714
  2. Kalina TJ Davies

    School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Laurel R Yohe

    Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1567-8749
  4. Kun Yun

    Department of Animal Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Paul Donat

    Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Brandon P Hedrick

    Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4446-3405
  7. Elizabeth R Dumont

    School of Natural Sciences, University of California, Merced, Merced, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Liliana M Dávalos

    Department of Ecology and Evolution, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, United States
    For correspondence
    liliana.davalos-alvarez@stonybrook.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Stephen J Rossiter

    School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    s.j.rossiter@qmul.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Karen E Sears

    Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    For correspondence
    ksears@ucla.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9744-9602

Funding

National Science Foundation (1442142)

  • Kalina TJ Davies
  • Laurel R Yohe
  • Stephen J Rossiter

National Science Foundation (1442314)

  • Alexa Sadier
  • Kun Yun
  • Karen E Sears

National Science Foundation (1442278)

  • Paul Donat
  • Brandon P Hedrick
  • Elizabeth R Dumont

European Research Council (310482)

  • Kalina TJ Davies
  • Stephen J Rossiter

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols 14199 at UIUC and 2017-093 at UCLA. Every effort was made to minimize suffering.

Copyright

© 2018, Sadier et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,777
    views
  • 361
    downloads
  • 41
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alexa Sadier
  2. Kalina TJ Davies
  3. Laurel R Yohe
  4. Kun Yun
  5. Paul Donat
  6. Brandon P Hedrick
  7. Elizabeth R Dumont
  8. Liliana M Dávalos
  9. Stephen J Rossiter
  10. Karen E Sears
(2018)
Multifactorial processes underlie parallel opsin loss in neotropical bats
eLife 7:e37412.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37412

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.37412

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Mattias Siljestam, Claus Rueffler
    Research Article Updated

    The majority of highly polymorphic genes are related to immune functions and with over 100 alleles within a population, genes of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) are the most polymorphic loci in vertebrates. How such extraordinary polymorphism arose and is maintained is controversial. One possibility is heterozygote advantage (HA), which can in principle maintain any number of alleles, but biologically explicit models based on this mechanism have so far failed to reliably predict the coexistence of significantly more than 10 alleles. We here present an eco-evolutionary model showing that evolution can result in the emergence and maintenance of more than 100 alleles under HA if the following two assumptions are fulfilled: first, pathogens are lethal in the absence of an appropriate immune defence; second, the effect of pathogens depends on host condition, with hosts in poorer condition being affected more strongly. Thus, our results show that HA can be a more potent force in explaining the extraordinary polymorphism found at MHC loci than currently recognised.

    1. Ecology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Rebecca D Tarvin, Jeffrey L Coleman ... Richard W Fitch
    Research Article

    Understanding the origins of novel, complex phenotypes is a major goal in evolutionary biology. Poison frogs of the family Dendrobatidae have evolved the novel ability to acquire alkaloids from their diet for chemical defense at least three times. However, taxon sampling for alkaloids has been biased towards colorful species, without similar attention paid to inconspicuous ones that are often assumed to be undefended. As a result, our understanding of how chemical defense evolved in this group is incomplete. Here, we provide new data showing that, in contrast to previous studies, species from each undefended poison frog clade have measurable yet low amounts of alkaloids. We confirm that undefended dendrobatids regularly consume mites and ants, which are known sources of alkaloids. Thus, our data suggest that diet is insufficient to explain the defended phenotype. Our data support the existence of a phenotypic intermediate between toxin consumption and sequestration — passive accumulation — that differs from sequestration in that it involves no derived forms of transport and storage mechanisms yet results in low levels of toxin accumulation. We discuss the concept of passive accumulation and its potential role in the origin of chemical defenses in poison frogs and other toxin-sequestering organisms. In light of ideas from pharmacokinetics, we incorporate new and old data from poison frogs into an evolutionary model that could help explain the origins of acquired chemical defenses in animals and provide insight into the molecular processes that govern the fate of ingested toxins.