Diversification dynamics in the Neotropics through time, clades and biogeographic regions

  1. Andrea S Meseguer  Is a corresponding author
  2. Alice Michel
  3. Pierre-Henri Fabre
  4. Oscar A Pérez Escobar
  5. Guillaume Chomicki
  6. Ricarda Riina
  7. Alexandre Antonelli
  8. Pierre-Olivier Antoine
  9. Frédéric Delsuc
  10. Fabien Condamine
  1. Real Jardín Botánico (RJB), CSIC, Spain
  2. University of California, Davis, United States
  3. Université de Montpellier, UMR 5554 CNRS, France
  4. Royal Botanic Gardens, United Kingdom
  5. University of Sheffield, United Kingdom

Abstract

The origins and evolution of the outstanding Neotropical biodiversity are a matter of intense debate. A comprehensive understanding is hindered by the lack of deep-time comparative data across wide phylogenetic and ecological contexts. Here, we quantify the prevailing diversification trajectories and drivers of Neotropical diversification in a sample of 150 phylogenies (12,512 species) of seed plants and tetrapods, and assess their variation across Neotropical regions and taxa. Analyses indicate that Neotropical diversity has mostly expanded through time (70% of the clades), while scenarios of saturated and declining diversity account for 21% and 9% of Neotropical diversity, respectively. Five biogeographic areas are identified as distinctive units of long-term Neotropical evolution, including Pan-Amazonia, the Dry Diagonal, and Bahama-Antilles. Diversification dynamics do not differ across these areas, suggesting no geographic structure in long-term Neotropical diversification. In contrast, diversification dynamics differ across taxa: plant diversity mostly expanded through time (88%), while a substantial fraction (43%) of tetrapod diversity accumulated at a slower pace or declined toward the present. These opposite evolutionary patterns may reflect different capacities for plants and tetrapods to cope with past climate changes.

Data availability

The chronogram dataset and the diversification results are archived in Dryad (72). All other data used or generated in this manuscript are presented in the manuscript, or its supplementary material.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Andrea S Meseguer

    Real Jardín Botánico (RJB), CSIC, Madrid, Spain
    For correspondence
    asanchezmeseguer@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0743-404X
  2. Alice Michel

    Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis, California, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Pierre-Henri Fabre

    Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, Université de Montpellier, UMR 5554 CNRS, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Oscar A Pérez Escobar

    Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Guillaume Chomicki

    Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Ricarda Riina

    Real Jardín Botánico (RJB), CSIC, Madrid, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Alexandre Antonelli

    Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Pierre-Olivier Antoine

    Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, Université de Montpellier, UMR 5554 CNRS, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Frédéric Delsuc

    Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, Université de Montpellier, UMR 5554 CNRS, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6501-6287
  10. Fabien Condamine

    Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution, Université de Montpellier, UMR 5554 CNRS, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-LABX-25-01)

  • Pierre-Olivier Antoine
  • Frédéric Delsuc
  • Fabien Condamine

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-17-CE31-0009)

  • Pierre-Olivier Antoine
  • Frédéric Delsuc
  • Fabien Condamine

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2020-120145GA-I00)

  • Andrea S Meseguer

Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid, Atraccion de Talento (2019-T1/AMB-12648)

  • Andrea S Meseguer

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2019-108109GB-I00)

  • Ricarda Riina

Swedish Research Council (2019-05191)

  • Alexandre Antonelli

Natural Environment Research Council (NE/S014470/1)

  • Guillaume Chomicki

Swiss Orchid Foundation

  • Oscar A Pérez Escobar

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (IJCI-2017-32301)

  • Andrea S Meseguer

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Meseguer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,526
    views
  • 598
    downloads
  • 16
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Andrea S Meseguer
  2. Alice Michel
  3. Pierre-Henri Fabre
  4. Oscar A Pérez Escobar
  5. Guillaume Chomicki
  6. Ricarda Riina
  7. Alexandre Antonelli
  8. Pierre-Olivier Antoine
  9. Frédéric Delsuc
  10. Fabien Condamine
(2022)
Diversification dynamics in the Neotropics through time, clades and biogeographic regions
eLife 11:e74503.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74503

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74503

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    Ljiljana Mihajlovic, Bharat Ravi Iyengar ... Yolanda Schaerli
    Research Article

    Gene duplication drives evolution by providing raw material for proteins with novel functions. An influential hypothesis by Ohno (1970) posits that gene duplication helps genes tolerate new mutations and thus facilitates the evolution of new phenotypes. Competing hypotheses argue that deleterious mutations will usually inactivate gene duplicates too rapidly for Ohno’s hypothesis to work. We experimentally tested Ohno’s hypothesis by evolving one or exactly two copies of a gene encoding a fluorescent protein in Escherichia coli through several rounds of mutation and selection. We analyzed the genotypic and phenotypic evolutionary dynamics of the evolving populations through high-throughput DNA sequencing, biochemical assays, and engineering of selected variants. In support of Ohno’s hypothesis, populations carrying two gene copies displayed higher mutational robustness than those carrying a single gene copy. Consequently, the double-copy populations experienced relaxed purifying selection, evolved higher phenotypic and genetic diversity, carried more mutations and accumulated combinations of key beneficial mutations earlier. However, their phenotypic evolution was not accelerated, possibly because one gene copy rapidly became inactivated by deleterious mutations. Our work provides an experimental platform to test models of evolution by gene duplication, and it supports alternatives to Ohno’s hypothesis that point to the importance of gene dosage.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Paul Richard J Yulo, Nicolas Desprat ... Heather L Hendrickson
    Research Article

    Maintenance of rod-shape in bacterial cells depends on the actin-like protein MreB. Deletion of mreB from Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 results in viable spherical cells of variable volume and reduced fitness. Using a combination of time-resolved microscopy and biochemical assay of peptidoglycan synthesis, we show that reduced fitness is a consequence of perturbed cell size homeostasis that arises primarily from differential growth of daughter cells. A 1000-generation selection experiment resulted in rapid restoration of fitness with derived cells retaining spherical shape. Mutations in the peptidoglycan synthesis protein Pbp1A were identified as the main route for evolutionary rescue with genetic reconstructions demonstrating causality. Compensatory pbp1A mutations that targeted transpeptidase activity enhanced homogeneity of cell wall synthesis on lateral surfaces and restored cell size homeostasis. Mechanistic explanations require enhanced understanding of why deletion of mreB causes heterogeneity in cell wall synthesis. We conclude by presenting two testable hypotheses, one of which posits that heterogeneity stems from non-functional cell wall synthesis machinery, while the second posits that the machinery is functional, albeit stalled. Overall, our data provide support for the second hypothesis and draw attention to the importance of balance between transpeptidase and glycosyltransferase functions of peptidoglycan building enzymes for cell shape determination.