Endogenous Syngap1 alpha splice forms promote cognitive function and seizure protection

  1. Murat Kilinc
  2. Vineet Arora
  3. Thomas K Creson
  4. Camilo Rojas
  5. Aliza A Le
  6. Julie Lauterborn
  7. Brent Wilkinson
  8. Nicolas Hartel
  9. Nicholas Graham
  10. Adrian Reich
  11. Gemma Gou
  12. Yoichi Araki
  13. Àlex Bayés
  14. Marcelo Coba
  15. Gary Lynch
  16. Courtney A Miller
  17. Gavin Rumbaugh  Is a corresponding author
  1. The Scripps Research Institute, United States
  2. University of California, Irvine, United States
  3. University of Southern California, United States
  4. Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau, Spain
  5. Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, United States

Abstract

Loss-of-function variants in SYNGAP1 cause a developmental encephalopathy defined by cognitive impairment, autistic features, and epilepsy. SYNGAP1 splicing leads to expression of distinct functional protein isoforms. Splicing imparts multiple cellular functions of SynGAP proteins through coding of distinct C-terminal motifs. However, it remains unknown how these different splice sequences function in vivo to regulate neuronal function and behavior. Reduced expression of SynGAP-a1/2 C-terminal splice variants in mice caused severe phenotypes, including reduced survival, impaired learning, and reduced seizure latency. In contrast, upregulation of a1/2 expression improved learning and increased seizure latency. Mice expressing a1-specific mutations, which disrupted SynGAP cellular functions without altering protein expression, promoted seizure, disrupted synapse plasticity, and impaired learning. These findings demonstrate that endogenous SynGAP isoforms with a1/2 spliced sequences promote cognitive function and impart seizure protection. Regulation of SynGAP-a expression or function may be a viable therapeutic strategy to broadly improve cognitive function and mitigate seizure.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for western blots and mass spec experiments.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Murat Kilinc

    Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Vineet Arora

    Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7856-0401
  3. Thomas K Creson

    Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Camilo Rojas

    Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Aliza A Le

    Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Julie Lauterborn

    Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Brent Wilkinson

    Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Nicolas Hartel

    Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Nicholas Graham

    Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Adrian Reich

    Bioinformatics and Statistics Core, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Gemma Gou

    Molecular Physiology of the Synapse Laboratory, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yoichi Araki

    Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3455-9377
  13. Àlex Bayés

    Molecular Physiology of the Synapse Laboratory, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5265-6306
  14. Marcelo Coba

    Zilkha Neurogenetic Institute, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Gary Lynch

    Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Courtney A Miller

    Department of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Gavin Rumbaugh

    Departments of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, United States
    For correspondence
    gavin@scripps.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6360-3894

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (MH096847 ; MH108408)

  • Gavin Rumbaugh

Autism Speaks (#10646)

  • Murat Kilinc

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#15-037 and #15-038) of Scripps Florida.

Copyright

© 2022, Kilinc et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,951
    views
  • 475
    downloads
  • 14
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Murat Kilinc
  2. Vineet Arora
  3. Thomas K Creson
  4. Camilo Rojas
  5. Aliza A Le
  6. Julie Lauterborn
  7. Brent Wilkinson
  8. Nicolas Hartel
  9. Nicholas Graham
  10. Adrian Reich
  11. Gemma Gou
  12. Yoichi Araki
  13. Àlex Bayés
  14. Marcelo Coba
  15. Gary Lynch
  16. Courtney A Miller
  17. Gavin Rumbaugh
(2022)
Endogenous Syngap1 alpha splice forms promote cognitive function and seizure protection
eLife 11:e75707.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75707

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75707

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Samyogita Hardikar, Bronte Mckeown ... Jonathan Smallwood
    Research Article

    Complex macro-scale patterns of brain activity that emerge during periods of wakeful rest provide insight into the organisation of neural function, how these differentiate individuals based on their traits, and the neural basis of different types of self-generated thoughts. Although brain activity during wakeful rest is valuable for understanding important features of human cognition, its unconstrained nature makes it difficult to disentangle neural features related to personality traits from those related to the thoughts occurring at rest. Our study builds on recent perspectives from work on ongoing conscious thought that highlight the interactions between three brain networks – ventral and dorsal attention networks, as well as the default mode network. We combined measures of personality with state-of-the-art indices of ongoing thoughts at rest and brain imaging analysis and explored whether this ‘tri-partite’ view can provide a framework within which to understand the contribution of states and traits to observed patterns of neural activity at rest. To capture macro-scale relationships between different brain systems, we calculated cortical gradients to describe brain organisation in a low-dimensional space. Our analysis established that for more introverted individuals, regions of the ventral attention network were functionally more aligned to regions of the somatomotor system and the default mode network. At the same time, a pattern of detailed self-generated thought was associated with a decoupling of regions of dorsal attention from regions in the default mode network. Our study, therefore, establishes that interactions between attention systems and the default mode network are important influences on ongoing thought at rest and highlights the value of integrating contemporary perspectives on conscious experience when understanding patterns of brain activity at rest.

    1. Neuroscience
    Ana Maria Ichim, Harald Barzan ... Raul Cristian Muresan
    Review Article

    Gamma oscillations in brain activity (30–150 Hz) have been studied for over 80 years. Although in the past three decades significant progress has been made to try to understand their functional role, a definitive answer regarding their causal implication in perception, cognition, and behavior still lies ahead of us. Here, we first review the basic neural mechanisms that give rise to gamma oscillations and then focus on two main pillars of exploration. The first pillar examines the major theories regarding their functional role in information processing in the brain, also highlighting critical viewpoints. The second pillar reviews a novel research direction that proposes a therapeutic role for gamma oscillations, namely the gamma entrainment using sensory stimulation (GENUS). We extensively discuss both the positive findings and the issues regarding reproducibility of GENUS. Going beyond the functional and therapeutic role of gamma, we propose a third pillar of exploration, where gamma, generated endogenously by cortical circuits, is essential for maintenance of healthy circuit function. We propose that four classes of interneurons, namely those expressing parvalbumin (PV), vasointestinal peptide (VIP), somatostatin (SST), and nitric oxide synthase (NOS) take advantage of endogenous gamma to perform active vasomotor control that maintains homeostasis in the neuronal tissue. According to this hypothesis, which we call GAMER (GAmma MEdiated ciRcuit maintenance), gamma oscillations act as a ‘servicing’ rhythm that enables efficient translation of neural activity into vascular responses that are essential for optimal neurometabolic processes. GAMER is an extension of GENUS, where endogenous rather than entrained gamma plays a fundamental role. Finally, we propose several critical experiments to test the GAMER hypothesis.