Spatially bivariate EEG-neurofeedback can manipulate interhemispheric inhibition

Abstract

Human behavior requires interregional crosstalk to employ the sensorimotor processes in the brain. Although external neuromodulation techniques have been used to manipulate interhemispheric sensorimotor activity, a central controversy concerns whether this activity can be volitionally controlled. Experimental tools lack the power to up- or down-regulate the state of the targeted hemisphere over a large dynamic range and, therefore, cannot evaluate the possible volitional control of the activity. We addressed this difficulty by using the recently developed method of spatially bivariate electroencephalography (EEG)-neurofeedback to systematically enable the participants to modulate their bilateral sensorimotor activities. Herein, we report that participants learn to up- and down-regulate the ipsilateral excitability to the imagined hand while maintaining constant the contralateral excitability; this modulates the magnitude of interhemispheric inhibition (IHI) assessed by the paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) paradigm. Further physiological analyses revealed that the manipulation capability of IHI magnitude reflected interhemispheric connectivity in EEG and TMS, which was accompanied by intrinsic bilateral cortical oscillatory activities. Our results show an interesting approach for neuromodulation, which might identify new treatment opportunities, for example, in patients suffering from a stroke.

Data availability

Source data used to generate the figures are publicly available via Dryad Digital Repository, accessible here:Hayashi, Masaaki (2021), Spatially bivariate EEG-neurofeedback can manipulate interhemispheric rebalancing of M1 excitability, Dryad, Dataset, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.hhmgqnkj3Scripts used for the neurofeedback experiment are available on GitHub (https://github.com/MasaakiHayashi/elife-neurofeedback-experiment).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Masaaki Hayashi

    Graduate School of Science and Technology, Keio University, Kanagawa, Japan
    Competing interests
    Masaaki Hayashi, is employed by Connect Inc..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7104-6765
  2. Kohei Okuyama

    Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Nobuaki Mizuguchi

    Research Organization of Science and Technology, Ritsumeikan University, Shiga, Japan
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Ryotaro Hirose

    Graduate School of Science and Technology, Keio University, Kanagawa, Japan
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Taisuke Okamoto

    Graduate School of Science and Technology, Keio University, Kanagawa, Japan
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Michiyuki Kawakami

    Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Junichi Ushiba

    Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University, Kanagawa, Japan
    For correspondence
    ushiba@bio.keio.ac.jp
    Competing interests
    Junichi Ushiba, is a founder and the Representative Director of the University Startup Company, Connect Inc. involved in the research, development, and sales of rehabilitation devices including brain-computer interfaces. He receives a salary from Connect Inc., and holds shares in Connect Inc. This company does not have any relationships with the device or setup used in the current study..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1161-983X

Funding

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (Grant-in-Aid for Transformative Research Areas (A) (#20H05923))

  • Junichi Ushiba

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (Strategic International Brain Science Research Promotion Program (#JP20dm030702))

  • Junichi Ushiba

Ushioda Memorial Fund (The Keio University Doctorate Student Grant-in-Aid Program)

  • Masaaki Hayashi

Japan Science and Technology Agency (Moonshot R&D program (Grant Number JPMJMS2012))

  • Junichi Ushiba

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: The experiments conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki and were performed in accordance with the current TMS safety guidelines of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (Rossi et al., 2009). The experimental procedure was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio University (no.: 31-89, 2020-38, and 2021-74). Written informed consent was obtained from participants prior to the experiments.

Copyright

© 2022, Hayashi et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,609
    views
  • 386
    downloads
  • 9
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Masaaki Hayashi
  2. Kohei Okuyama
  3. Nobuaki Mizuguchi
  4. Ryotaro Hirose
  5. Taisuke Okamoto
  6. Michiyuki Kawakami
  7. Junichi Ushiba
(2022)
Spatially bivariate EEG-neurofeedback can manipulate interhemispheric inhibition
eLife 11:e76411.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76411

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76411

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Raven Star Wallace, Bronte Mckeown ... Jonathan Smallwood
    Research Article

    Movie-watching is a central aspect of our lives and an important paradigm for understanding the brain mechanisms behind cognition as it occurs in daily life. Contemporary views of ongoing thought argue that the ability to make sense of events in the ‘here and now’ depend on the neural processing of incoming sensory information by auditory and visual cortex, which are kept in check by systems in association cortex. However, we currently lack an understanding of how patterns of ongoing thoughts map onto the different brain systems when we watch a film, partly because methods of sampling experience disrupt the dynamics of brain activity and the experience of movie-watching. Our study established a novel method for mapping thought patterns onto the brain activity that occurs at different moments of a film, which does not disrupt the time course of brain activity or the movie-watching experience. We found moments when experience sampling highlighted engagement with multi-sensory features of the film or highlighted thoughts with episodic features, regions of sensory cortex were more active and subsequent memory for events in the movie was better—on the other hand, periods of intrusive distraction emerged when activity in regions of association cortex within the frontoparietal system was reduced. These results highlight the critical role sensory systems play in the multi-modal experience of movie-watching and provide evidence for the role of association cortex in reducing distraction when we watch films.

    1. Neuroscience
    Ankur Sinha, Padraig Gleeson ... Robin Angus Silver
    Tools and Resources

    Data-driven models of neurons and circuits are important for understanding how the properties of membrane conductances, synapses, dendrites, and the anatomical connectivity between neurons generate the complex dynamical behaviors of brain circuits in health and disease. However, the inherent complexity of these biological processes makes the construction and reuse of biologically detailed models challenging. A wide range of tools have been developed to aid their construction and simulation, but differences in design and internal representation act as technical barriers to those who wish to use data-driven models in their research workflows. NeuroML, a model description language for computational neuroscience, was developed to address this fragmentation in modeling tools. Since its inception, NeuroML has evolved into a mature community standard that encompasses a wide range of model types and approaches in computational neuroscience. It has enabled the development of a large ecosystem of interoperable open-source software tools for the creation, visualization, validation, and simulation of data-driven models. Here, we describe how the NeuroML ecosystem can be incorporated into research workflows to simplify the construction, testing, and analysis of standardized models of neural systems, and supports the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) principles, thus promoting open, transparent and reproducible science.