Network segregation is associated with processing speed in the cognitively healthy oldest-ol

Abstract

The brain is organized into systems and networks of interacting components. The functional connections among these components give insight into the brain's organization and may underlie some cognitive effects of aging. Examining the relationship between individual differences in brain organization and cognitive function in older adults who have reached oldest old ages with healthy cognition can help us understand how these networks support healthy cognitive aging. We investigated functional network segregation in 146 cognitively healthy participants aged 85+ in the McKnight Brain Aging Registry. We found that the segregation of the association system and the individual networks within the association system [the fronto-parietal network (FPN), cingulo-opercular network (CON) and default mode network (DMN)], has strong associations with overall cognition and processing speed. We also provide a healthy oldest-old (85+) cortical parcellation that can be used in future work in this age group. This study shows that network segregation of the oldest-old brain is closely linked to cognitive performance. This work adds to the growing body of knowledge about differentiation in the aged brain by demonstrating that cognitive ability is associated with differentiated functional networks in very old individuals representing successful cognitive aging.

Data availability

Code is available for node creation at https://github.com/Visscher-Lab/MBAR_oldestold_nodes and code and post processed data for statistical analyses and figures is available at https://github.com/Visscher-Lab/MBAR_segregation_paperBecause these data come from a select group of people who have lived to oldest-old ages, making them potentially identifiable, raw data is not available. More detailed data than the post processed data available online can be requested by submitting a request with explanation of intended use of the data to kmv@uab.edu. Requests are reviewed by a committee of principal investigators of the McKnight brain aging registry.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sara A Nolin

    School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    For correspondence
    nolin@musc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Mary E Faulkner

    School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Paul Stewart

    School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Leland L Fleming

    School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4047-9031
  5. Stacy Merritt

    Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Roxanne F Rezaei

    Evelyn F and William L McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Prad K Bharadwaj

    Evelyn F McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Mary Kate Franchetti

    Evelyn F McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. David A Raichlen

    University of Southern California, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Courtney J Jessup

    Evelyn F McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Lloyd Edwards

    School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. G Alex Hishaw

    Evelyn F McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Emily J Van Etten

    Evelyn F McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Theodore P Trouard

    Evelyn F McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. David Geldmacher

    School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Virginia G Wadley

    School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Noam Alperin

    Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Eric S Porges

    Evelyn F and William L McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Adam J Woods

    Evelyn F and William L McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Ron A Cohen

    Evelyn F and William L McKnight Brain Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Bonnie E Levin

    School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Tatjana Rundek

    School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  23. Gene E Alexander

    Evelyn F McKnight Brain Institute, University of Arizona, Tucson, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  24. Kristina Visscher

    School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, United States
    For correspondence
    kmv@uab.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0737-4024

Funding

Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Research Foundation

  • Ron A Cohen
  • Bonnie E Levin
  • Tatjana Rundek
  • Gene E Alexander
  • Kristina Visscher

National Institute of Health/National institute of Neurological Disorder and Stroke (T32NS061788-12 07/2008)

  • Sara A Nolin

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Informed consent was obtained from all participants and approval for the study was received from the Institutional Review Boards at each of the data collection sites including University of Alabama at Birmingham (IRB protocol X160113004), University of Florida (IRB protocol 201300162), University of Miami (IRB protocol 20151783), and University of Arizona (IRB protocol 1601318818).

Copyright

© 2025, Nolin et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 79
    views
  • 23
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sara A Nolin
  2. Mary E Faulkner
  3. Paul Stewart
  4. Leland L Fleming
  5. Stacy Merritt
  6. Roxanne F Rezaei
  7. Prad K Bharadwaj
  8. Mary Kate Franchetti
  9. David A Raichlen
  10. Courtney J Jessup
  11. Lloyd Edwards
  12. G Alex Hishaw
  13. Emily J Van Etten
  14. Theodore P Trouard
  15. David Geldmacher
  16. Virginia G Wadley
  17. Noam Alperin
  18. Eric S Porges
  19. Adam J Woods
  20. Ron A Cohen
  21. Bonnie E Levin
  22. Tatjana Rundek
  23. Gene E Alexander
  24. Kristina Visscher
(2025)
Network segregation is associated with processing speed in the cognitively healthy oldest-ol
eLife 14:e78076.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78076

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78076

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Zhiping Cao, Wing-Ho Yung, Ya Ke
    Research Article

    Mental and behavioral disorders are associated with extended period of hot weather as found in heatwaves, but the underlying neural circuit mechanism remains poorly known. The posterior paraventricular thalamus (pPVT) is a hub for emotional processing and receives inputs from the hypothalamic preoptic area (POA), the well-recognized thermoregulation center. The present study was designed to explore whether chronic heat exposure leads to aberrant activities in POA recipient pPVT neurons and subsequent changes in emotional states. By devising an air heating paradigm mimicking the condition of heatwaves and utilizing emotion-related behavioral tests, viral tract tracing, in vivo calcium recordings, optogenetic manipulations, and electrophysiological recordings, we found that chronic heat exposure for 3 weeks led to negative emotional valence and hyperarousal states in mice. The pPVT neurons receive monosynaptic excitatory and inhibitory innervations from the POA. These neurons exhibited a persistent increase in neural activity following chronic heat exposure, which was essential for chronic heat-induced emotional changes. Notably, these neurons were also prone to display stronger neuronal activities associated with anxiety responses to stressful situations. Furthermore, we observed saturated neuroplasticity in the POA-pPVT excitatory pathway after chronic heat exposure that occluded further potentiation. Taken together, long-term aberration in the POA to pPVT pathway offers a neurobiological mechanism of emotional and behavioral changes seen in extended periods of hot weather like heatwaves.

    1. Neuroscience
    Julieta Gomez-Frittelli, Gabrielle Frederique Devienne ... Julia A Kaltschmidt
    Research Article

    Intrinsic sensory neurons are an essential part of the enteric nervous system (ENS) and play a crucial role in gastrointestinal tract motility and digestion. Neuronal subtypes in the ENS have been distinguished by their electrophysiological properties, morphology, and expression of characteristic markers, notably neurotransmitters and neuropeptides. Here, we investigated synaptic cell adhesion molecules as novel cell-type markers in the ENS. Our work identifies two type II classic cadherins, Cdh6 and Cdh8, specific to sensory neurons in the mouse colon. We show that Cdh6+ neurons demonstrate all other distinguishing classifications of enteric sensory neurons including marker expression of Calcb and Nmu, Dogiel type II morphology and AH-type electrophysiology and IH current. Optogenetic activation of Cdh6+ sensory neurons in distal colon evokes retrograde colonic motor complexes (CMCs), while pharmacologic blockade of rhythmicity-associated current IH disrupts the spontaneous generation of CMCs. These findings provide the first demonstration of selective activation of a single neurochemical and functional class of enteric neurons and demonstrate a functional and critical role for sensory neurons in the generation of CMCs.