Science Forum: How failure to falsify in high-volume science contributes to the replication crisis
Abstract
The number of scientific papers published every year continues to increase, but scientific knowledge is not progressing at the same rate. Here we argue that a greater emphasis on falsification - the direct testing of strong hypotheses - would lead to faster progress by allowing well-specified hypotheses to be eliminated. We describe an example from neuroscience where there has been little work to directly test two prominent but incompatible hypotheses related to traumatic brain injury. Based on this example, we discuss how building strong hypotheses and then setting out to falsify them can bring greater precision to the clinical neurosciences, and argue that this approach could be beneficial to all areas of science.
Data availability
There are no data associated with this article.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
The authors declare that there was no funding for this work.
Copyright
© 2022, Rajtmajer et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 2,047
- views
-
- 491
- downloads
-
- 7
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
The experience-dependent spatial cognitive process requires sequential organization of hippocampal neural activities by theta rhythm, which develops to represent highly compressed information for rapid learning. However, how the theta sequences were developed in a finer timescale within theta cycles remains unclear. In this study, we found in rats that sweep-ahead structure of theta sequences developing with exploration was predominantly dependent on a relatively large proportion of FG-cells, that is a subset of place cells dominantly phase-locked to fast gamma rhythms. These ensembles integrated compressed spatial information by cells consistently firing at precessing slow gamma phases within the theta cycle. Accordingly, the sweep-ahead structure of FG-cell sequences was positively correlated with the intensity of slow gamma phase precession, in particular during early development of theta sequences. These findings highlight the dynamic network modulation by fast and slow gamma in the development of theta sequences which may further facilitate memory encoding and retrieval.
-
- Neuroscience
Active vision, the sensory-motor process through which animals dynamically adjust visual input to sample and prioritise relevant information via photoreceptors, eyes, head, and body movements, is well-documented across species. In small-brained animals like insects, where parallel processing may be limited, active vision for sequential acquisition of visual features might be even more important. We investigated how bumblebees use active vision to distinguish between two visual patterns: a multiplication sign and its 45°-rotated variant, a plus sign. By allowing bees to freely inspect patterns, we analysed their flight paths, inspection times, velocities and regions of focus through high-speed videography. We observed that bees tended to inspect only a small region of each pattern, with a preference for lower and left-side sections, before accurately accepting target or rejecting distractor patterns. The specific pattern areas scanned differed between the plus and multiplication signs, yet flight behaviour remained consistent and specific to each pattern, regardless of whether the pattern was rewarding or punishing. Transfer tests showed that bees could generalise their pattern recognition to partial cues, maintaining scanning strategies and selective attention to learned regions. These findings highlight active vision as a crucial aspect of bumblebees' visual processing, where selective scanning behaviours during flight enhance discrimination accuracy and enable efficient environmental analysis and visual encoding.