Conditional deletion of neurexins dysregulates neurotransmission from dopamine neurons

  1. Charles Ducrot
  2. Gregory de Carvalho
  3. Benoit Delignat-Lavaud
  4. Constantin VL Delmas
  5. Priyabrata Halder
  6. Nicolas Giguère
  7. Consiglia Pacelli
  8. Sriparna Mukherjee
  9. Marie-Josée Bourque
  10. Martin Parent
  11. LuLu Y Chen  Is a corresponding author
  12. Louis-Eric Trudeau  Is a corresponding author
  1. Université de Montréal, Canada
  2. University of California, Irvine, United States
  3. University of Foggia, Italy
  4. Université Laval, Canada

Abstract

Midbrain dopamine (DA) neurons are key regulators of basal ganglia functions. The axonal domain of these neurons is highly complex, with a large subset of non-synaptic release sites and a smaller subset of synaptic terminals from which in addition to DA, glutamate or GABA are also released. The molecular mechanisms regulating the connectivity of DA neurons and their neurochemical identity are unknown. An emerging literature suggests that neuroligins, trans-synaptic cell adhesion molecules, regulate both DA connectivity and neurotransmission. However, the contribution of their major interaction partners, neurexins (Nrxns) is unexplored. Here we tested the hypothesis that Nrxns regulate DA neuron neurotransmission. Mice with conditional deletion of all Nrxns in DA neurons (DAT::Nrxns KO) exhibited normal basic motor functions. However, they showed an impaired locomotor response to the psychostimulant amphetamine. In line with an alteration in DA neurotransmission, decreased levels of the membrane DA transporter (DAT) and increased levels of the vesicular monoamine transporter (VMAT2) were detected in the striatum of DAT::Nrxns KO mice, along with reduced activity-dependent DA release. Strikingly, electrophysiological recordings revealed an increase of GABA co-release from DA neuron axons in the striatum of these mice. Together, these findings suggest that Nrxns act as regulators of the functional connectivity of DA neurons.

Data availability

All primary data are provided in the source data files accompanying the manuscript.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Charles Ducrot

    Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Gregory de Carvalho

    Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9179-7697
  3. Benoit Delignat-Lavaud

    Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Constantin VL Delmas

    Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Priyabrata Halder

    Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Nicolas Giguère

    Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Consiglia Pacelli

    Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4915-5823
  8. Sriparna Mukherjee

    Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Marie-Josée Bourque

    Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Martin Parent

    Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. LuLu Y Chen

    Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, United States
    For correspondence
    chenly@uci.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8873-3481
  12. Louis-Eric Trudeau

    Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
    For correspondence
    louis-eric.trudeau@umontreal.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4684-1377

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (MOP106556)

  • Louis-Eric Trudeau

University of California Irvine, School of Medicine (GF15247)

  • LuLu Y Chen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures involving animals and their care were conducted in accordance with the Guide to care and use of Experimental Animals of the Canadian Council on Animal Care. The experimental protocols (#21-113) were approved by the animal ethics committees of the Université de Montréal (CDEA).

Copyright

© 2023, Ducrot et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Charles Ducrot
  2. Gregory de Carvalho
  3. Benoit Delignat-Lavaud
  4. Constantin VL Delmas
  5. Priyabrata Halder
  6. Nicolas Giguère
  7. Consiglia Pacelli
  8. Sriparna Mukherjee
  9. Marie-Josée Bourque
  10. Martin Parent
  11. LuLu Y Chen
  12. Louis-Eric Trudeau
(2023)
Conditional deletion of neurexins dysregulates neurotransmission from dopamine neurons
eLife 12:e87902.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87902

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.87902

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Jan H Kirchner, Lucas Euler ... Julijana Gjorgjieva
    Research Article

    Dendritic branching and synaptic organization shape single-neuron and network computations. How they emerge simultaneously during brain development as neurons become integrated into functional networks is still not mechanistically understood. Here, we propose a mechanistic model in which dendrite growth and the organization of synapses arise from the interaction of activity-independent cues from potential synaptic partners and local activity-dependent synaptic plasticity. Consistent with experiments, three phases of dendritic growth – overshoot, pruning, and stabilization – emerge naturally in the model. The model generates stellate-like dendritic morphologies that capture several morphological features of biological neurons under normal and perturbed learning rules, reflecting biological variability. Model-generated dendrites have approximately optimal wiring length consistent with experimental measurements. In addition to establishing dendritic morphologies, activity-dependent plasticity rules organize synapses into spatial clusters according to the correlated activity they experience. We demonstrate that a trade-off between activity-dependent and -independent factors influences dendritic growth and synaptic location throughout development, suggesting that early developmental variability can affect mature morphology and synaptic function. Therefore, a single mechanistic model can capture dendritic growth and account for the synaptic organization of correlated inputs during development. Our work suggests concrete mechanistic components underlying the emergence of dendritic morphologies and synaptic formation and removal in function and dysfunction, and provides experimentally testable predictions for the role of individual components.

    1. Neuroscience
    Christian Thome, Jan Maximilian Janssen ... Maren Engelhardt
    Tools and Resources

    The axon initial segment (AIS) constitutes not only the site of action potential initiation, but also a hub for activity-dependent modulation of output generation. Recent studies shedding light on AIS function used predominantly post-hoc approaches since no robust murine in vivo live reporters exist. Here, we introduce a reporter line in which the AIS is intrinsically labeled by an ankyrin-G-GFP fusion protein activated by Cre recombinase, tagging the native Ank3 gene. Using confocal, superresolution, and two-photon microscopy as well as whole-cell patch-clamp recordings in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo, we confirm that the subcellular scaffold of the AIS and electrophysiological parameters of labeled cells remain unchanged. We further uncover rapid AIS remodeling following increased network activity in this model system, as well as highly reproducible in vivo labeling of AIS over weeks. This novel reporter line allows longitudinal studies of AIS modulation and plasticity in vivo in real-time and thus provides a unique approach to study subcellular plasticity in a broad range of applications.