Auditory cortex anatomy reflects multilingual phonological experience

  1. Olga Kepinska  Is a corresponding author
  2. Josue Dalboni da Rocha
  3. Carola Tuerk
  4. Alexis Hervais-Adelman
  5. Florence Bouhali
  6. David W Green
  7. Cathy J Price
  8. Narly Golestani
  1. Brain and Language Lab, Vienna Cognitive Science Hub, University of Vienna, Austria
  2. Department of Behavioral and Cognitive Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Austria
  3. Department of Diagnostic Imaging, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States
  4. Brain and Language Lab, Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Geneva, Switzerland
  5. Department of Basic Neuroscience, University of Geneva, Switzerland
  6. Zurich Linguistics Centre, University of Zurich, Switzerland
  7. Aix Marseille University, CNRS, CRPN, France
  8. Experimental Psychology, University College London, United Kingdom
  9. Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, United Kingdom
12 figures, 12 tables and 1 additional file

Figures

Illustration of the sample’s language experience.

Each bar represents a single participant’s overall language experience; the height of the stacked bars within each bar represents the age of onset(s) of acquisition (AoA) index for individual languages (the taller the bar, the earlier in life a given language was acquired). The color of each stacked bar refers to the number of phonemes in each language’s phonological inventory. For reference, English phonological inventory has 40 phonemes. Prior to plotting, data was sorted by the overall language experience based on a sum of AoA index for participants' individual languages; consequently, data of participants with most diverse language experience can be found on the left-hand side of the figure, and the right-hand side includes data from monolinguals (i.e. knowing only one language).

Multilingual language experience and thickness of the second transverse temporal gyrus (TTG).

Average thickness of the second TTG in the left (n = 130) and right (n = 96) hemisphere were negatively related to the multilingual language experience index weighted by their phoneme-level phonological distances. Plots show residuals, controlling for age, sex, and mean hemispheric thickness (β = – 0.35, t = – 2.96, p=0.004 and β = –0.26, t = – 1.98, p=0.05 for left and right hemisphere, respectively).

Thickness of the right first transverse temporal gyrus (TTG) and planum temporale (PT) in participants with a single TTG in the right hemisphere (n = 40).

Average thickness of Heschl’s gyrus (HG) in the right hemisphere was positively related to the amount of multilingual experience, irrespective of typological relations between languages (β = 0.15, t = 2.89, p=0.007) (left panel). The average thickness of the right PT was not related to language experience (β = 0.02, t = 2.43, p=0.81) (right panel). Plots show residuals, controlling for age, sex, and mean hemispheric thickness.

Multilingual language experience and thickness of the second transverse temporal gyrus (TTG) in an independent sample of participants.

(A) Average thickness of the left second TTG (n = 61) was not significantly related to the language experience index (β = – 0.09, t = – 0.58, p=0.57); average thickness of the right second TTG (n = 54) was significantly related to the language experience indices accounting for phoneme-level phonological overlaps between multilinguals' languages (β = – 0.38, t = – 2.48, p=0.02) (B) and feature-level information (β = – 1.02, t = – 3.77, p=0.0005) (C). The model including phonological feature-level information presented in panel (C) had the best fit to the average thickness data of the right second TTG.

Appendix 1—figure 1
Illustration of the replication sample’s language experience.

As in Figure 1, each bar here represents a single participant’s overall language experience; the height of the stacked bars within each bar represents the age of onset(s) of acquisition (AoA) index for individual languages (the taller the bar, the earlier in life a given language was acquired). The color of each stacked bar refers to the number of phonemes in each language’s phonological inventory.

Appendix 1—figure 2
Similarity matrices of typological distances between all languages represented in the study (N = 36) based on: (1) distances in distinctive acoustic and articulatory features describing the phonemes of each language (e.g. ‘short’, ‘long’); (2) distances in sets of phonemes belonging to each language; and (3) distances based on counts of phonological classes that share certain features (e.g. ‘consonants’, ‘front rounded vowels’, ‘clicks’).

Data for individual languages were collected from the PHOIBLE database (Stanford Phonology Archive, 2019a) and open-source software (Dediu and Moisik, 2016). The figure was generated in R, with the package pheatmap (Kolde, 2019), version 1.0.12.

Appendix 1—figure 3
Distributions of the three distance measures used in the study based on: (1) distances in distinctive acoustic and articulatory features describing the phonemes of each language (in red); (2) distances in sets of phonemes belonging to each language (in yellow); and (3) distances based on counts of phonological classes (in orange).
Appendix 1—figure 4
Auditory regions of interest (ROIs) used in the analysis.

The ROIs are overlaid on an inflated surface in the native space of one of the participants.

Appendix 1—figure 5
Results of a whole-brain vertex-wise analysis, aimed at establishing relations between the language experience index and whole-brain cortical thickness.

Overlaid on the inflated surface of the fsaverage template brain is the thresholded at p<0.0001 (uncorrected) significance map from the conducted F-test showing a negative relationship between cortical thickness in the highlighted region and the degree of multilingual language experience.

Appendix 1—figure 6
Cumulative phoneme inventory and thickness of the second transverse temporal gyrus (TTG).

Average thickness of the second TTG in the left and right hemisphere in relation to the number of unique phonemes each participant was exposed to across all their languages (the plotted values are residuals controlled for age, sex, mean hemispheric thickness, and the language experience index irrespective of typology).

Appendix 1—figure 7
Multilingual proficiency and thickness of the second transverse temporal gyrus (TTG).

Average thickness of the second TTG in the left and right hemisphere as a function of language proficiency in all languages of each participant (top panel), only their proficient languages (middle panel), and only their non-proficient languages (bottom panel). Plots show residuals, controlling for age, sex, and mean hemispheric thickness.

Author response image 1

Tables

Table 1
Breakdown of participants by number of languages they spoke.
Main sample
Number of languages1234567
Number of participants294036181021
Replication sample
Number of languages1234567
Number of participants3041614500
Table 2
Pearson correlations between the three phonological distance measures.
Features distancesPhoneme distancesPhonological classes distances
Features distances1
Phoneme distances0.421
Phonological classes distances0.240.511
Table 3
Overview of the performed analyses.
AnalysisRegions(s)Measures(s)MotivationResults
Language experience and auditory regions (section ‘Auditory cortex and language experience’)Auditory regions segmented by FreeSurfer (anterior STG, posterior STG, anterior STS, posterior STS, HG, HS, PT, and PP)Cortical volume, surface area, and thicknessExploratory first stepRelationship between the average thickness of the PT (bilaterally) and language experience (p=0.01)
Language experience and TTG (section ‘Superior temporal plane and language experience’)Transverse temporal gyri segmented by TASHCortical volume, surface area, and thickness and number of gyriTo elucidate above exploratory resultsRelationship between the average thickness of the second TTG (bilaterally) and language experience (p=0.01)
Vertex-wise analysis (section ‘Superior temporal plane and language experience’)Whole-brainCortical thicknessTo confirm above exploratory resultsCluster of vertices negatively related to participants’ language experience at p<0.0001 (uncorrected), located in the superior aspect of the left STG, corresponding to the location of the second TTG
Effects of language proficiency (section ‘Superior temporal plane and language experience’)Second TTGCortical thicknessTo confirm the results obtained from AoA-based language experience indexRelationship between the average thickness of the second TTG (bilaterally) is confirmed using a different metric to calculate language experience (p=0.018 for left, and p=0.065 for right hemisphere)
Language typology and second TTG (section ‘Second transverse temporal gyrus and effects of language typology’)Second TTGCortical thicknessTo assess the effect of language typology within the identified regionQuantifying the distance between languages based on phoneme-level information explains the most variance in the average thickness of the bilateral second TTG
Language experience expressed as 'cumulative phoneme inventory' (section ‘Second transverse temporal gyrus and effects of language typology’)Second TTGCortical thicknessTo account for language experience in participants with different L1sRelationship between the thickness of the left second TTG and the specific characteristics of languages at the phoneme-level of their phonological inventories (p=0.004)
Language experience in participants with a single TTG (section ‘Language experience in participants with a single TTG’)Right HG (first TTG) and right PTCortical thicknessTo assess the effect of language experience in participants without multiple TTGsPositive relationship between the thickness of right HG and language experience (p=0.007); no relationship between the thickness of right PT and language experience (p=0.81)
Replication analysis (section ‘Replication analysis’)Second TTGCortical thicknessTo replicate the main result (analysis ‘Language experience and TTG’ and ’Language typology and second TTG’) in an independent sampleRelationship between the average thickness of the second TTG and language experience partially replicated (for left hemisphere, p=0.047)
Table 4
Number of participants, their demographic and language experience characteristics displaying different overall shapes of the transverse temporal gyrus (TTG) (i.e. total number of identified gyri in the left and right hemisphere).

Last column lists whole sample’s descriptive statistics.

LeftRightWhole sample:
Total number of gyri:12341234
N6784754078180136
Male/female0/628/5023/243/210/3033/4511/754/82
Proportion male/proportion female0/0.070.61/0.510.29/0.420.05/0.020.18/0.370.61/0.550.20/0.09
Age (mean)42.9535.9536.2928.4835.1236.4936.6336.11
Language experience – no typology (mean)0.690.790.830.930.850.800.760.807
Language experience – no typology (min)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000
Language experience – no typology (max)1.091.891.761.561.761.891.341.893
Table 5
Left and right second transverse temporal gyri (TTGs) and language experience.

Multiple regression model parameters (parameter estimates and standard errors, in brackets; p-values are listed according to the coding presented underneath the table) for the average cortical thickness values of the second TTG, as predicted by the four language experience indices: (1) the cumulative language experience measure not accounting for typology, and cumulative language experience weighted by overlaps between languages at the level of (2) acoustic/articulatory features, (3) phonemes, and (4) counts of phonological classes. Last two rows present model comparison results (additional variance explained and BF10 values). NB. All models including typological information were compared against the ‘No typology’ model.

LeftRight
Language experience
models:
No typologyFeaturesPhonemesPhonological classesNo typologyFeaturesPhonemesPhonological classes
(Intercept)β0.00–0.010.00–0.010.010.010.010.01
SE(0.03)(0.03)(0.03)(0.03)(0.03)(0.04)(0.03)(0.03)
Language experienceβ–0.12**–0.33–0.35**–0.60*–0.10+–0.25–0.26+–0.44
SE(0.05)(0.23)(0.12)(0.29)(0.05)(0.27)(0.13)(0.33)
Ageβ0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
SE(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)
Mean thickness (left/right)β1.40***1.41***1.37***1.41***0.94*0.99*0.92*0.99**
SE(0.30)(0.31)(0.30)(0.30)(0.37)(0.38)(0.37)(0.37)
Sexβ0.000.010.000.01–0.01–0.01–0.010.00
SE(0.05)(0.05)(0.05)(0.05)(0.05)(0.05)(0.05)(0.05)
Num.Obs.13013013013096969696
R20.200.170.210.180.160.130.160.14
R2 Adj.0.170.140.180.160.120.090.120.10
AIC18.523.516.921.211.914.911.814.0
BIC35.740.734.138.427.330.327.229.4
Log.Lik.–3.23–5.75–2.43–4.620.04–1.470.10–0.99
F7.806.328.296.984.303.464.333.72
RMSE0.250.250.250.250.240.250.240.24
ΔR2 Adjusted–0.030.01–0.02–0.030.00–0.02
BF100.082.230.250.221.080.36
  1. .p<0.1, +p = 0.05, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Table 6
Thickness of left and right second transverse temporal gyri (TTGs) and language experience in an independent sample of participants.

Multiple regression model parameters (parameter estimates and standard errors, in brackets; p-values are listed according to the coding presented underneath the table) for the average cortical thickness of the second TTG, as predicted by the four language experience indices: (1) the cumulative language experience measure not accounting for typology, and cumulative language experience weighted by overlaps between languages at the level of (2) features, (3) phonemes, and (4) counts of phonological classes. The last two rows present model comparison results (additional variance explained and BF10 values). NB. All models including typological information were compared against the ‘No typology’ model.

LeftRight
Language experience
models:
No typologyFeaturesPhonemesPhonological classesNo typologyFeaturesPhonemesPhonological classes
(Intercept)β1.001.120.991.24–1.85–2.20.–2.09–1.21
SE(1.14)(1.10)(1.13)(1.09)(1.34)(1.21)(1.33)(1.30)
Language Experienceβ–0.03–0.09–0.090.32–0.13*–1.02***–0.38*–0.75
SE(0.06)(0.28)(0.15)(0.49)(0.06)(0.27)(0.15)(0.49)
Scannerβ–0.08–0.09–0.08–0.090.100.090.110.09
SE(0.07)(0.07)(0.07)(0.07)(0.08)(0.07)(0.08)(0.08)
Ageβ0.000.010.000.010.01*0.01**0.01*0.01*
SE(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)
Sexβ0.090.090.090.070.000.030.01–0.02
SE(0.07)(0.07)(0.07)(0.07)(0.07)(0.06)(0.07)(0.07)
Mean thickness (left/right)β0.570.520.580.421.72**1.86***1.81***1.52**
SE(0.44)(0.42)(0.44)(0.42)(0.52)(0.46)(0.51)(0.50)
Num.Obs.6161616154545454
R20.0920.0890.0920.0940.2250.3500.2530.196
R2 Adj.0.0090.0060.0100.0120.1440.2820.1750.112
AIC13.914.113.813.77.6–1.95.69.5
BIC28.728.928.628.521.512.019.523.5
Log.Lik.0.047–0.0460.0770.1303.2057.9474.1962.229
F1.1091.0721.1201.1422.7815.1583.2442.342
RMSE0.240.240.240.240.230.210.220.23
ΔR2 Adjusted>–0.01<0.01<0.010.140.03–0.03
BF100.911.031.09114.682.700.38
  1. .p<0.1, +p = 0.05, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Appendix 1—table 1
Languages spoken by each participant in the main and replication samples.
Main sampleL1L2L3L4L5L6L7Number of languages
1CzechRussianGermanKoreanVietnameseFrenchEnglish7
2Swiss_GermanGermanFrenchGreekItalianEnglish6
3GermanItalianEnglishFrenchPortugueseSpanish6
4EnglishFrenchGermanSpanishMandarin5
5GermanEnglishFrenchDutchItalian5
6EnglishFrenchGermanItalianSpanish5
7GermanEnglishFrenchSpanishRussian5
8EnglishGermanLuxembourgishFrenchDanish5
9EnglishGermanFrenchSpanishItalian5
10EnglishItalianFrenchGermanSpanish5
11PortugueseEnglishSpanishFrenchItalian5
12HakkaMandarinMalayEnglishCantonese5
13EnglishFrenchItalianSpanishMandarin5
14GermanEnglishFrenchJapanese4
15EnglishFrenchGermanDanish4
16GermanEnglishFrenchSpanish4
17GermanEnglishFrenchItalian4
18GermanEnglishItalianFrench4
19EnglishFrenchGermanItalian4
20GermanEnglishGreekFrench4
21FrenchGermanEnglishSpanish4
22SpanishHebrewEnglishFrench4
23EnglishGermanSpanishFrench4
24GermanEnglishFrenchItalian4
25PortugueseEnglishFrenchItalian4
26GreekEnglishFrenchSpanish4
27GreekEnglishFrenchSpanish4
28GreekEnglishItalianSpanish4
29HakkaEnglishMandarinGerman4
30CantoneseEnglishMandarinItalian4
31CantoneseEnglishMandarinFrench4
32GermanEnglishDutch3
33EnglishSpanishPortuguese3
34EnglishFrenchSwedish3
35EnglishHindiPortuguese3
36GermanEnglishFrench3
37GermanEnglishDutch3
38GermanEnglishFrench3
39GermanEnglishSpanish3
40GreekEnglishFrench3
41GreekEnglishSpanish3
42GreekEnglishGerman3
43GreekEnglishGerman3
44GreekEnglishFrench3
45GreekEnglishFrench3
46GreekEnglishFrench3
47GreekEnglishFrench3
48GreekEnglishItalian3
49MandarinCantoneseEnglish3
50CantoneseEnglishMandarin3
51CantoneseMandarinEnglish3
52CantoneseMandarinEnglish3
53EnglishFrenchMandarin3
54CantoneseEnglishMandarin3
55EnglishMandarinGerman3
56CantoneseEnglishMandarin3
57EnglishFrenchMandarin3
58EnglishFrenchMandarin3
59EnglishGermanMandarin3
60BengaliHindiEnglish3
61BengaliHindiEnglish3
62HindiEnglishUrdu3
63HindiEnglishUrdu3
64BengaliEnglishHindi3
65BengaliEnglishHindi3
66EnglishSpanishFrench3
67FarsiEnglishArabic3
68EnglishGerman2
69EnglishFrench2
70DutchEnglish2
71EnglishCreole2
72EnglishIrish2
73GermanEnglish2
74GermanEnglish2
75GermanEnglish2
76GermanEnglish2
77EnglishGerman2
78GermanEnglish2
79ItalianEnglish2
80HebrewEnglish2
81EnglishHebrew2
82SpanishEnglish2
83GermanEnglish2
84GermanEnglish2
85GreekEnglish2
86GreekEnglish2
87GreekEnglish2
88GreekEnglish2
89GreekEnglish2
90GreekEnglish2
91GreekEnglish2
92GreekEnglish2
93MandarinEnglish2
94CantoneseEnglish2
95CantoneseEnglish2
96EnglishMandarin2
97MandarinEnglish2
98CantoneseEnglish2
99MandarinEnglish2
100MandarinEnglish2
101MandarinEnglish2
102GujaratiEnglish2
103GujaratiEnglish2
104GujaratiEnglish2
105EnglishHungarian2
106EnglishFrench2
107EnglishFrench2
108English1
109English1
110English1
111English1
112English1
113English1
114English1
115English1
116English1
117English1
118English1
119English1
120English1
121English1
122English1
123English1
124English1
125English1
126English1
127English1
128English1
129English1
130English1
131English1
132English1
133English1
134English1
135English1
136English1
Replication sampleL1L2L3L4L5L6L7Number of languages
1GermanEnglishFrenchSpanishItalian5
2GermanEnglishItalianFrenchArabic5
3SindhiEnglishHindiFrenchRussian5
4EnglishIrishFrenchGermanItalian5
5GermanEnglishFrenchItalianSpanish5
6EnglishFrenchGermanRussian4
7GermanEnglishItalianFrench4
8GermanEnglishFrenchItalian4
9EnglishFrenchGermanSpanish4
10EnglishFrenchSpanishGerman4
11Swiss_GermanGermanEnglishFrench4
12GermanEnglishFrenchSpanish4
13GermanEnglishFrenchSwahili4
14GermanEnglishFrenchSwedish4
15GermanEnglishFrenchSpanish4
16GermanPortugueseEnglishFrench4
17GermanDutchEnglishFrench4
18Swiss_GermanGermanFrenchEnglish4
19GermanEnglishFrenchSpanish4
20HungarianEnglishFrench3
21GermanEnglishFrench3
22EnglishGermanSpanish3
23PunjabiEnglishFrench3
24EnglishFrenchGerman3
25EnglishFrenchGerman3
26EnglishFrenchItalian3
27EnglishFrenchMandarin3
28GermanItalianEnglish3
29GermanEnglishFinnish3
30GermanEnglishFrench3
31GermanEnglishSpanish3
32GermanEnglishDutch3
33GermanEnglishDutch3
34GermanEnglishSpanish3
35GermanRussianEnglish3
36SwahiliEnglish2
37EnglishCzech2
38GermanEnglish2
39EnglishSpanish2
40English1
41English1
42English1
43English1
44English1
45English1
46English1
47English1
48English1
49English1
50English1
51English1
52English1
53English1
54English1
55English1
56English1
57English1
58English1
59English1
60English1
61English1
62English1
63English1
64English1
65English1
66English1
67English1
68English1
69English1
Appendix 1—table 2
Results of linear mixed models (parameter estimates and standard errors, in brackets; p-values are listed according to the coding presented underneath the table) testing the effect of language experience on the structure (volume, area, and average thickness) of the auditory regions: planum polare, Heschl’s gyrus, Heschl’s sulcus, planum temporale, anterior and posterior superior temporal gyrus, and anterior, middle, and posterior superior temporal sulcus (STG).

Anterior STG was used as the reference level.

VolumeAreaThickness
 (Intercept)β1711.89***58.10***0.58***
SE(35.28)(11.85)(0.02)
 Ageβ1.010.070.00
SE(0.88)(0.24)(0.00)
 Sexβ0.63–7.410.02
SE(26.07)(8.07)(0.01)
 Whole-brain: volume/area/thicknessβ0.00***0.01***0.77***
SE(0.00)(0.00)(0.09)
 Language experienceβ41.507.450.03
SE(66.09)(22.33)(0.03)
 Posterior STGβ–1548.51***–257.01***–0.34***
SE(46.38)(15.85)(0.02)
 Anterior STSβ–2465.10***–190.57***–0.77***
SE(46.38)(15.85)(0.02)
 Middle STSβ–688.17***646.88***–1.01***
SE(46.38)(15.85)(0.02)
 Posterior STSβ–185.92***861.89***–1.01***
SE(46.38)(15.85)(0.02)
 PTβ–2064.07***–163.35***–0.80***
SE(46.38)(15.85)(0.02)
 HGβ–2886.10***–482.40***–0.78***
SE(46.38)(15.85)(0.02)
 HSβ–3416.84***–552.82***–0.97***
SE(46.38)(15.85)(0.02)
 PPβ–1870.15***–316.73***0.19***
SE(46.38)(15.85)(0.02)
 Hemisphereβ–478.00***–103.17***0.02
SE(46.38)(15.85)(0.02)
 Language experience × posterior STGβ–54.04–20.53–0.02
SE(90.37)(30.88)(0.05)
 Language experience × anterior STSβ–104.26–28.61–0.01
SE(90.37)(30.88)(0.05)
 Language experience × middle STSβ23.5628.91–0.02
SE(90.37)(30.88)(0.05)
 Language experience × posterior STSβ40.3438.03–0.05
SE(90.37)(30.88)(0.05)
 Language experience × PTβ–172.20.–35.12–0.12*
SE(90.37)(30.88)(0.05)
 Language experience × HGβ–39.06–4.31–0.02
SE(90.37)(30.88)(0.05)
 Language experience × HSβ–82.13–25.18–0.01
SE(90.37)(30.88)(0.05)
 Language experience × PPβ–91.67–9.65–0.07
SE(90.37)(30.88)(0.05)
 Language experience × hemisphereβ41.88–17.550.02
SE(90.37)(30.88)(0.05)
 Posterior STG × hemisphereβ407.62***99.63***0.02
SE(65.60)(22.42)(0.03)
 Anterior STS × hemisphereβ371.93***67.74**–0.05
SE(65.60)(22.42)(0.03)
 Middle STS × hemisphereβ440.40***43.39.0.11**
SE(65.60)(22.42)(0.03)
 Posterior STS × hemisphereβ1186.10***435.79***0.01
SE(65.60)(22.42)(0.03)
 PT × hemisphereβ222.12***7.780.04
SE(65.60)(22.42)(0.03)
 HG × hemisphereβ255.17***19.780.09**
SE(65.60)(22.42)(0.03)
 HS × hemisphereβ363.43***23.360.16***
SE(65.60)(22.42)(0.03)
 PP × hemisphereβ486.42***146.40***–0.15***
SE(65.60)(22.42)(0.03)
 Language experience × posterior STG × hemisphereβ–36.8132.36–0.02
SE(127.81)(43.68)(0.07)
 Language experience × anterior STS × hemisphereβ75.0552.320.01
SE(127.81)(43.68)(0.07)
 Language experience × middle STS × hemisphereβ15.4016.320.01
SE(127.81)(43.68)(0.07)
 Language experience × posterior STS × hemisphereβ50.8452.48–0.03
SE(127.81)(43.68)(0.07)
 Language experience × PT × hemisphereβ31.4633.640.03
SE(127.81)(43.68)(0.07)
 Language experience × HG × hemisphereβ–71.228.230.00
SE(127.81)(43.68)(0.07)
 Language experience × HS × hemisphereβ–13.5624.110.02
SE(127.81)(43.68)(0.07)
 Language experience × PP × hemisphereβ–37.1313.980.02
SE(127.81)(43.68)(0.07)
SD (Intercept id)91.8424.920.06
SD (Observations)382.49130.710.20
Num.Obs.244824482448
R2 Marg.0.9040.9370.793
R2 Cond.0.9100.9390.812
AIC35864.330661.7–580.1
BIC36102.230899.7–342.2
ICC0.10.00.1
RMSE374.14128.270.19
  1. STG: superior temporal gyrus, STS: superior temporal sulcus, PT: planum temporale, HG: Heschl’s gyrus, HS: Heschl’s sulcus, PP: planum polare.

  2. p<0.1, +p = 0.05, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Appendix 1—table 3
Results of the linear mixed models testing the effect of language experience on the structure (volume, area, and average thickness) of the gyri in the superior temporal region: first, second, and third transverse temporal gyrus (TTG).

Anterior TTG was used as the reference level.

VolumeAreaThickness
(Intercept)β–86.44***–31.09***0.05**
SE(14.45)(4.14)(0.01)
Language experienceβ–4.830.92–0.06*
SE(32.25)(9.24)(0.03)
Ageβ–1.33–0.300.00
SE(0.86)(0.22)(0.00)
Sexβ14.782.720.01
SE(12.69)(3.66)(0.01)
Whole-brain: volume/area/thickness β0.00***0.00***0.98***
SE(0.00)(0.00)(0.16)
Second gyrus β351.19***119.93***–0.13***
SE(17.05)(4.89)(0.01)
Third gyrus β–169.80***–50.83***0.01
SE(17.55)(5.03)(0.02)
Hemisphere β51.04***19.58***–0.04**
SE(14.42)(4.13)(0.01)
Language experience × second gyrus β–30.18–14.890.09**
SE(36.03)(10.33)(0.03)
Language experience × third gyrus β–5.663.50–0.05
SE(36.88)(10.57)(0.03)
Language experience × hemisphere β–27.16–7.250.00
SE(31.46)(9.02)(0.03)
Second gyrus × hemisphere β8.348.32.–0.02
SE(17.01)(4.88)(0.01)
Third gyrus × hemisphere β–18.79–6.34–0.01
SE(17.55)(5.03)(0.02)
Language experience × second gyrus × hemisphere β–11.32–2.86–0.02
SE(36.04)(10.34)(0.03)
Language experience × third gyrus × hemisphere β30.2511.01–0.03
SE(36.88)(10.57)(0.03)
SD (Intercept id)0.010.000.07
SD (Observations)257.9073.940.22
Num.Obs.567567567
R2 Marg.0.5210.5960.254
R2 Cond.0.5210.324
AIC7836.96455.566.9
BIC7910.76529.3140.7
ICC0.00.1
RMSE254.4772.950.21
  1. p<0.1, +p = 0.05, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Appendix 1—table 4
Left and right second transverse temporal gyri (TTGs) and cumulative phoneme inventory.

Multiple regression model parameters (parameter estimates and standard errors, in brackets; p-values are listed according to the coding presented underneath the table) for the average cortical thickness of the second TTG (left and right), as predicted by the ‘cumulative phoneme inventory’ index. For comparison, models with the cumulative language experience measure not accounting for typology, and cumulative language experience weighted by overlaps between languages at the level of phonemes are also reported. Last two rows present model comparison results (additional variance explained and BF10 and BF01 values are also reported).

LeftRight
    Language experience
    Models:
Cumulative phoneme inventoryLanguage experienceLanguage experience (phonemes)Cumulative phoneme inventoryLanguage experienceLanguage experience (Phonemes)
 (Intercept)β0.000.000.000.000.000.00
SE(0.02)(0.02)(0.02)(0.03)(0.03)(0.03)
 Language experienceβ0.05–0.12**–0.08–0.10+
SE(0.07)(0.05)(0.09)(0.05)
 Phonemesβ0.00**0.00
SE(0.00)(0.00)
 Language experience (phonemes)β–0.35**--–0.26+
SE-(0.12)--(0.13)
 Ageβ0.00.0.000.000.000.000.00
SE(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)
 Mean thickness (left/right)β1.43***1.40***1.37***0.95*0.94*0.92*
SE(0.29)(0.30)(0.30)(0.37)(0.37)(0.37)
 Sexβ0.000.000.000.010.000.01
SE(0.02)(0.02)(0.02)(0.03)(0.03)(0.03)
Num.Obs.130130130969696
R20.2510.2000.2100.1600.1590.160
R2 Adj.0.2210.1740.1840.1130.1220.123
AIC11.918.516.913.811.911.8
BIC31.935.734.131.827.327.2
Log.Lik.1.062–3.232–2.4300.0850.0360.101
F8.3087.8028.2873.4204.2954.331
RMSE0.240.250.250.240.240.24
ΔR2 Adjusted–0.04–0.030.010.01
BF100.150.349.339.96
BF016.432.880.110.10
  1. p<0.1, +p = 0.05, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Appendix 1—table 5
Right superior temporal plane (Heschl’s gyrus and planum temporale) and language experience in participants with one transverse temporal gyrus (TTG).

Multiple regression model parameters (parameter estimates and standard errors, in brackets; p-values are listed according to the coding presented underneath the table) for the average cortical thickness of the right Heschl’s gyrus, and the right planum temporale, as predicted by the four language experience indices: (1) the cumulative language experience measure not accounting for typology, and cumulative language experience weighted by overlaps between languages at the level of (2) phonemes, (3) acoustic/articulatory features, and (4) counts of phonological classes. Last two rows present model comparison results (additional variance explained and BF10 values). NB. All models including typological information were compared against the ‘No typology’ model.

Right Heschl’s gyrusRight planum temporale
No typologyFeaturesPhonemesPhonological classesNo typologyFeaturesPhonemesPhonological classes
(Intercept)β–0.01–0.01–0.01–0.13*2.52***2.52***2.52***2.50***
SE(0.03)(0.03)(0.03)(0.06)(0.03)(0.03)(0.03)(0.07)
Language experience indicesβ0.15**0.48+0.35*0.82*0.020.030.060.11
SE(0.05)(0.24)(0.15)(0.32)(0.07)(0.30)(0.19)(0.41)
Ageβ0.000.000.000.00–0.00–0.00–0.00–0.00
SE(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)(0.00)
Sexβ0.050.030.050.040.060.050.060.06
SE(0.05)(0.06)(0.06)(0.05)(0.07)(0.07)(0.07)(0.07)
Mean Thickness (right)β0.93**0.99**0.96**0.93**0.90*0.90*0.91*0.90*
SE(0.30)(0.31)(0.30)(0.30)(0.38)(0.39)(0.38)(0.38)
Num.Obs.4040404040404040
R20.420.360.380.400.230.230.230.23
R2 Adj.0.360.280.310.330.150.140.150.15
AIC–36.6–32.4–34.0–34.9–15.6–15.5–15.6–15.6
BIC–26.5–22.3–23.8–24.7–5.4–5.4–5.5–5.4
Log.Lik.24.3022.1922.9923.4313.7913.7613.8113.79
RMSE0.130.140.140.130.170.170.170.17
ΔR2 Adjusted–0.07–0.04–0.03>–0.01<0.01<0.01
BF100.120.270.420.971.021.01
  1. p<0.1, +p=0.05, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.

Author response table 1
ModelAdjusted R2
left 2nd
TTG
(1) No typology0.174
(2) Phonemes0.184
(3) Features0.142
(4) Phonological classes0.156
(5) Lexical0.164
right 2nd
TTG
(1) No typology0.122
(2) Phonemes0.123
(3) Features0.094
(4) Phonological classes0.103
(5) Lexical0.116

Additional files

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Olga Kepinska
  2. Josue Dalboni da Rocha
  3. Carola Tuerk
  4. Alexis Hervais-Adelman
  5. Florence Bouhali
  6. David W Green
  7. Cathy J Price
  8. Narly Golestani
(2025)
Auditory cortex anatomy reflects multilingual phonological experience
eLife 12:RP90269.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.90269.3