Differential interaction patterns of opioid analgesics with µ opioid receptors correlate with ligand-specific voltage sensitivity

  1. Sina B Kirchhofer
  2. Victor Jun Yu Lim
  3. Sebastian Ernst
  4. Noemi Karsai
  5. Ruland G Julia
  6. Meritxell Canals
  7. Peter Kolb  Is a corresponding author
  8. Moritz Bünemann  Is a corresponding author
  1. Philipp University of Marburg, Germany
  2. University of Nottingham, United Kingdom

Abstract

The µ opioid receptor (MOR) is the key target for analgesia, but the application of opioids is accompanied by several issues. There is a wide range of opioid analgesics, differing in their chemical structure and their properties of receptor activation and subsequent effects. A better understanding of ligand-receptor interactions and the resulting effects is important. Here, we calculated the respective binding poses for several opioids and analyzed interaction fingerprints between ligand and receptor. We further corroborated the interactions experimentally by cellular assays. As MOR was observed to display ligand-induced modulation of activity due to changes in membrane potential, we further analyzed the effects of voltage sensitivity on this receptor. Combining in silico and in vitro approaches, we defined discriminating interaction patterns responsible for ligand-specific voltage sensitivity and present new insights into their specific effects on activation of the MOR.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for Figures 1, 3, 4, 5, 6.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sina B Kirchhofer

    Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Philipp University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6285-9054
  2. Victor Jun Yu Lim

    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipp University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Sebastian Ernst

    Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Philipp University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Noemi Karsai

    Division of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0009-0000-3948-4071
  5. Ruland G Julia

    Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Philipp University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Meritxell Canals

    Division of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Peter Kolb

    Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Philipp University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    peter.kolb@uni-marburg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4089-614X
  8. Moritz Bünemann

    Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Philipp University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
    For correspondence
    Moritz.buenemann@staff.uni-marburg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2259-4378

Funding

European Commission (H2020-MSCA- 860229)

  • Meritxell Canals

United Kingdom Academy of Medical Siences Proffessorship

  • Meritxell Canals

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Kirchhofer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 798
    views
  • 210
    downloads
  • 5
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sina B Kirchhofer
  2. Victor Jun Yu Lim
  3. Sebastian Ernst
  4. Noemi Karsai
  5. Ruland G Julia
  6. Meritxell Canals
  7. Peter Kolb
  8. Moritz Bünemann
(2023)
Differential interaction patterns of opioid analgesics with µ opioid receptors correlate with ligand-specific voltage sensitivity
eLife 12:e91291.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91291

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.91291

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Geoffrey W Meissner, Allison Vannan ... FlyLight Project Team
    Research Article

    Techniques that enable precise manipulations of subsets of neurons in the fly central nervous system (CNS) have greatly facilitated our understanding of the neural basis of behavior. Split-GAL4 driver lines allow specific targeting of cell types in Drosophila melanogaster and other species. We describe here a collection of 3060 lines targeting a range of cell types in the adult Drosophila CNS and 1373 lines characterized in third-instar larvae. These tools enable functional, transcriptomic, and proteomic studies based on precise anatomical targeting. NeuronBridge and other search tools relate light microscopy images of these split-GAL4 lines to connectomes reconstructed from electron microscopy images. The collections are the result of screening over 77,000 split hemidriver combinations. Previously published and new lines are included, all validated for driver expression and curated for optimal cell-type specificity across diverse cell types. In addition to images and fly stocks for these well-characterized lines, we make available 300,000 new 3D images of other split-GAL4 lines.

    1. Neuroscience
    Hyun Jee Lee, Jingting Liang ... Hang Lu
    Research Advance

    Cell identification is an important yet difficult process in data analysis of biological images. Previously, we developed an automated cell identification method called CRF_ID and demonstrated its high performance in Caenorhabditis elegans whole-brain images (Chaudhary et al., 2021). However, because the method was optimized for whole-brain imaging, comparable performance could not be guaranteed for application in commonly used C. elegans multi-cell images that display a subpopulation of cells. Here, we present an advancement, CRF_ID 2.0, that expands the generalizability of the method to multi-cell imaging beyond whole-brain imaging. To illustrate the application of the advance, we show the characterization of CRF_ID 2.0 in multi-cell imaging and cell-specific gene expression analysis in C. elegans. This work demonstrates that high-accuracy automated cell annotation in multi-cell imaging can expedite cell identification and reduce its subjectivity in C. elegans and potentially other biological images of various origins.