A direct experimental test of Ohno’s hypothesis

  1. Ljiljana Mihajlovic
  2. Bharat Ravi Iyengar
  3. Florian Baier
  4. Içvara Barbier
  5. Justyna Iwaszkiewicz
  6. Vincent Zoete
  7. Andreas Wagner  Is a corresponding author
  8. Yolanda Schaerli  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Fundamental Microbiology, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
  2. Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Switzerland
  3. Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity, University of Münster, Germany
  4. Molecular Modeling Group, Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Switzerland
  5. Department of Oncology UNIL-CHUV, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
  6. The Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Switzerland
  7. The Santa Fe Institute, United States
6 figures, 6 tables and 2 additional files

Figures

Figure 1 with 5 supplements
Experimental evolution of a duplicated fluorescent protein.

(A) E. coli cells carry a plasmid containing a duplicated gene coding for coGFP. (B) Upper panel: Plasmid with two copies of the cogfp gene, both under control of independently inducible promoters (Ptet and Ptac); lower panel: control single-copy plasmid with only one active gene copy, the other copy is not fluorescent due to mutations engineered into the chromophore. (C) Overview of the directed evolution experiment of the duplicated cogfp gene (see text for details).

Figure 1—figure supplement 1
Dual-color-emitting fluorescent protein coGFP.

Emission spectra of coGFP_S147G upon 388 nm excitation and pH 7. Two emission peaks at 456 nm (blue) and 507 nm (green) are detected.

Figure 1—figure supplement 2
Plasmid map of pDUP2 carrying the duplicated cogfp gene.

The two copies of the cogfp gene are facing each other, separated by a bidirectional terminator. The pDUP2 plasmid also includes the transcriptional repressors LacI and TetR and a kanamycin resistance gene. (#1: cogfp under the Ptet, #2: cogfp under the Ptac).

Figure 1—figure supplement 3
Expression levels of single-copy and double-copy constructs.

Green fluorescence distribution of the ancestral single-copy (blue) and double-copy (red) populations measured by flow cytometry upon the induction with anhydrotetracycline (aTc), isopropyl-β-D-1-thiogalactopyranosid (IPTG), or both normalized to the non-induced controls.

Figure 1—figure supplement 4
Selection regimes based on cell’s fluorescence phenotypes.

Flow cytometry plots of a first generation library after mutagenesis showing green (AmCyan) vs blue (DAPI) fluorescence. Highlighted regions indicate the gates used for the 6 different selection regimes: green: selection for green (no selection against blue fluorescence); blue: selection for blue (no selection against green fluorescence); green and blue; green-only (selection for green and against blue); blue-only (selection for blue and against green); and no selection for either fluorescence color.

Figure 1—figure supplement 5
Applied selection stringencies.

Histograms are schemes representing fluorescence distributions of the libraries. Single-copy wild type was used to set the selection threshold in the first generation of the evolution experiment (selected top 60%). In the upcoming generations, the threshold was set on the mutant libraries: selected top 1% in the second and top 0.01% in the following rounds of the evolution experiment.

Figure 2 with 2 supplements
Gene duplication increases mutational robustness.

The vertical axis shows mutational robustness, measured as the percentage of cells that maintain their fluorescence after mutagenesis, as a function of time (in generations of directed evolution) on the horizontal axis. Thick blue and red lines stand for the median fraction of fluorescent cells for single-copy and double-copy mutant libraries, respectively, while dotted lines indicate data from the three biological replicates. One-tailed Mann-Whitney tests, *p≤0.05, n=3. (Figure 2—source data 1).

Figure 2—figure supplement 1
Quantification of fluorescent cells.

Flow cytometry plots showing green (AmCyan) vs blue (DAPI) fluorescence. A non-induced control was used to set the gate (gray). Cells outside this gate (violet area) are considered fluorescent.

Figure 2—figure supplement 2
Gene duplication increases mutational robustness.

The vertical axis shows mutational robustness, measured as the percentage of cells that maintain their fluorescence after mutagenesis, as a function of time (in generations of directed evolution) on the horizontal axis. Thick blue and red lines stand for the median fraction of fluorescent cells for single-copy and double-copy mutant libraries, respectively, while dotted lines indicate data from the three biological replicates. The corresponding selection regime is indicated at the top. One-tailed Mann-Whitney tests, *p≤0.05, n=3.

Figure 3 with 3 supplements
Gene duplication does not lead to significantly faster evolution of green fluorescence.

(A) The vertical axis shows green fluorescence (log10) as a function of time (generations) on the horizontal axis. (B) The vertical axis shows green fluorescence (log10) normalized to the fluorescence of its ancestral population as a function of time (generations) on the horizontal axis. Thick blue and red lines stand for the median fluorescence of single-copy and double-copy mutant populations, respectively, while dotted lines indicate data from the three biological replicates. One-tailed Mann-Whitney tests, *p≤0.05, n=3. (Figure 3—source data 1).

Figure 3—figure supplement 1
Fluorescence levels during evolution experiment.

Fluorescence levels of the (A) single- and (B) double-copy populations evolved under the indicated selection regimes throughout five generations of the evolution (1-5). Shown is the fluorescence (log10) at blue (456 nm) and green (507 nm) emission peaks upon excitation at 388 nm normalized to the ancestral population. Thick blue and green lines show the mean fluorescence of the populations, while dotted lines indicate data from the three biological replicates.

Figure 3—figure supplement 2
Coefficient of variation of fluorescence.

Populations evolved under selection for green. The vertical axis shows the coefficient of variation (CV) of fluorescence (standard deviation/mean) as a function of time (generations) on the horizontal axis. Thick blue and red lines stand for median variance for single or double-copy populations, respectively, while dotted lines indicate data from the three biological replicates. One-tailed Mann-Whitney tests, *p≤0.05, n=3.

Figure 3—figure supplement 3
Copy maintenance vs copy loss.
Figure 4 with 2 supplements
Double-copy populations accumulate more mutations per gene than single-copy populations during the first two generations.

The vertical axis shows the average number of non-synonymous mutations per cogfp gene, as a function of time (in generations of directed evolution) on the horizontal axis. Thick blue and red lines stand for the median numbers of single-copy and double-copy mutant populations respectively, while dotted lines indicate data from the three biological replicates. Mann-Whitney tests *p≤0.05, n=3. (Figure 4—source data 1).

Figure 4—figure supplement 1
Average number of mutations for single- and double-copy populations evolved under the indicated selection regimes.

The vertical axes show the average number of non-synonymous mutations per cogfp gene, as a function of time (in generations of directed evolution) on the horizontal axes. (A) Average number of mutations per coGFP in single-copy populations (blue: active copy, gray: inactive copy), (B) average number of mutations per coGFP of the active copy in single-copy populations (blue) vs both copies in double-copy populations (pink). Thick lines stand for the median of populations, while dotted lines indicate data from the three biological replicates. Mann-Whitney tests, *p≤0.05, n=3.

Figure 4—figure supplement 2
Frequency distribution of the number of mutations.

The vertical axes show the frequency of mutations, as a function of the number of mutations per cogfp gene on the horizontal axes. Blue and red bars stand for single-copy and double-copy populations, respectively. Generations of directed evolution are indicated at the top and selection regimes are indicated on the right. Average and standard deviation of three biological replicates are shown.

Figure 5 with 2 supplements
Populations with two gene copies show increased genetic diversity and dN/dS ratios.

The horizontal axes of all panels show time in generations during selection for green fluorescence. (A) Average pairwise amino acid distance for coGFP molecules in single-copy populations (blue: active copy, gray: inactive copy), (B) average pairwise amino acid distance for coGFP molecules of the active copy in single-copy populations (blue) vs both copies in double-copy populations (pink). (C) dN/dS ratio in single-copy populations (blue: active copy, gray: inactive copy), (D) dN/dS ratio of the active copy in single-copy populations (blue) vs both copies in double-copy populations (pink). Thick lines represent the median over three replicate populations, while dotted lines indicate data from the individual biological replicates. *p≤0.05 Mann-Whitney test, n=3. (Figure 5—source data 1).

Figure 5—figure supplement 1
Populations with two gene copies are showing increased genetic diversity.

The horizontal axes of all panels show time in generations for the indicated selection regimes. (A) Average pairwise amino acid distance for coGFP molecules in single-copy populations (blue: active copy, gray: inactive copy), (B) Average pairwise amino acid distance for coGFP molecules of the active copy in single-copy populations (blue) vs both copies in double-copy populations (pink). One-tailed Mann-Whitney tests, *p≤0.05, n=3.

Figure 5—figure supplement 2
Populations with two gene copies are showing higher dN/dS ratios.

(A) dN/dS ratio in single-copy populations (blue: active copy, gray: inactive copy), (B) dN/dS ratio of the active copy in single-copy populations (blue) vs both copies in double-copy populations (pink). Thick lines represent the median over three replicate populations, while dotted lines indicate data from the individual biological replicates. One-tailed Mann-Whitney tests, *p≤0.05, n=3.

Figure 6 with 7 supplements
Combination of beneficial mutations emerged earlier in double-copy populations.

The vertical axis shows the frequency of the indicated mutations and combinations thereof in the populations under selection for green fluorescence, as a function of time (in generations of directed evolution) on the horizontal axis. Thick blue and red lines stand for the median frequencies for single-copy and double-copy populations, respectively, while dotted lines indicate data from the three biological replicates. Detailed statistics are reported in Appendix 1—table 2. (Figure 6—source data 1).

Figure 6—figure supplement 1
Enriched mutations.

The vertical axes show the frequency of indicated mutations in the populations under indicated selection regimes, as a function of time (in generations of directed evolution) on the horizontal axis. Thick blue and red lines stand for the median frequencies for single-copy and double-copy populations, respectively, while dotted lines indicate data from the three biological replicates.

Figure 6—figure supplement 2
Emission spectra of engineered coGFP variants.

The vertical axes show the fluorescence intensities as a function of the emission wavelengths upon 388 nm excitation of the indicated coGFP variants. Vertical lines indicate blue (456 nm) and green (507 nm) emission peaks. In color, the engineered variants compared to the ancestral protein in gray. (A) Fluorescence of bacterial cells expressing a single copy of the indicated coGFP variant. (B) Fluorescence of purified protein of the indicated coGFP variant (0.05 mg/ml).

Figure 6—figure supplement 3
Relative green fluorescence of the engineered variants compared to the ancestral variant.

The vertical axes show the green (507 nm) fluorescence intensities (log10) of the indicated variant relative to that of the ancestral variant upon excitation at 388 nm. (A) Fluorescence of bacterial cells expressing a single copy of the indicated coGFP variant. (B) Fluorescence of purified coGFP protein after size-exclusion chromatography to remove unfolded protein. Tested variants: G147S (GS), V162D (VD), L98M (LM), G147S/V162D (GS/VD), G147S/L98M (GS/LM), V162D/L98M (VD/LM), G147S/V162D/L98M (GS/VD/LM).

Figure 6—figure supplement 4
Expression levels of the engineered coGFP variants.

Western blot of the soluble cell lysate fraction using a primary mouse antibody against the His-tag on coGFP and a secondary goat anti-mouse antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) for chemiluminescent detection. Relative expression levels compared to the ancestral variant coGFP 147G (wt) are indicated at the top. Tested variants: coGFP (wt), G147S (GS), V162D (VD), L98M (LM), G147S/V162D (GS/VD), G147S/L98M (GS/LM), V162D/L98M (VD/LM), G147S/V162D/L98M (GS/VD/LM).

Figure 6—figure supplement 5
Analysis of fractions of folded protein.

Purified coGFP proteins were run on a size-exclusion column. The vertical axes show the absorbance (280 nm) - a proxy for protein concentration as a function of the elution volume (in ml). Two main peaks are detected: The first one (at ~8 ml) corresponds to aggregated unfolded proteins. The second one (at ~13 ml) corresponds to folded protein. Fractions of unfolded and folded protein are indicated in red numbers above the peaks.

Figure 6—figure supplement 6
Structure of coGFP.

(A) Homology model of the ancestral coGFP with positions affected by key mutations presented in panel (B), top view. (B) Homology model of the coGFP triple mutant L98M, G147S, V162D chromophore region, top view. The top part of the protein is made invisible for clarity. Gray: coGFP in ribbon representation and carbon atoms, orange: mature chromophore; red: oxygen atoms; blue: nitrogen atoms; yellow: sulfur atoms; bright blue: hydrogen bonds.

Figure 6—figure supplement 7
Analysis of variants with two active gene copies.

(A) Scheme to explain the data analysis. Both copies were individually induced, and blue and green fluorescence were measured. This analysis only looks at variants where both copies have green or blue fluorescence of at least 90% of the ancestral variant. For those, we plotted the ratio of copy1/copy2 for blue (x-axis) and green (y-axis) fluorescence (log10 scale). The bottom scheme explains where the different scenarios will lie. For example, data points in the upper left corner have copy 1 improved in green and copy 2 improved in blue compared to the ancestral (WT) protein. Data points in the upper right corner have copy 1 improved in blue and green fluorescence, while copy 2 did not change much. (B) Actual data as explained in (A). We did not find cases where one copy improves in green and the other copy improves in blue.

Tables

Key resources table
Reagent type (species) or resourceDesignationSource or referenceIdentifiersAdditional information
Gene (Cavernularia obesa)CogfpPMID:23468077codon-optimised for E. coli
Strain, strain background (E. coli)NEB5αNew England Biolabs
Recombinant DNA reagentpAND (plasmid)PMID:24316737RRID:Addgene_49377
Recombinant DNA reagentpAND-MCS (plasmid)this paperRRID:Addgene_223514sequence and plasmid available via Addgene
Recombinant DNA reagentpDUP (plasmid)this paperRRID:Addgene_223515sequence and l plasmid available via Addgene
Recombinant DNA reagentpDUP1 (plasmid)this paperRRID:Addgene_223516sequence and plasmid available via Addgene
Recombinant DNA reagentpDUP2 (plasmid)this paperRRID:Addgene_223517sequence and plasmid available via Addgene
Commercial assay or kitIllustra TempliPhi DNA Amplification KitGE HealthcareGE Healthcare #25640010
Commercial assay or kitSMRTbell Barcoded Adapter Complete Prep Kit 96Pacific BiosciencesPacBio # 100-514-900
Commercial assay or kitThe SMRTbellTM Damage Repair KitPacific BiosciencesPacBio # 100-486-900
Commercial assay or kitAMPure PB KitPacific BiosciencesPacBio # 100-265-900
Commercial assay or kitNEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly Master MixNew England BiolabsNEB #E2621
Commercial assay or kitEcoRINew England BiolabsNEB #R0101S
Commercial assay or kitNotINew England BiolabsNEB #R3189S
Commercial assay or kitSacINew England BiolabsNEB #R3156S
Commercial assay or kitKpnINew England BiolabsNEB #R3142S
Commercial assay or kitNdeINew England BiolabsNEB #R0111S
Commercial assay or kitNcoINew England BiolabsNEB #R0193S
commercial assay or kitDpnINew England BiolabsNEB #R0176S
Chemical compound, drugMnCl2Sigma-AldrichSigma #M3634
Appendix 1—table 1
Values of structural stability difference DDG between homology models of coGFP structures and the mutated structures, calculated with Buildmodel FoldX function.

The results pointing to destabilizing effects are colored orange and stabilizing or synergistic are colored green.

MutationDDG by FoldX (kcal/mol)å of individual single mutant DDG (kcal/mol)Difference
L98M–0.25–0.250
G147S–0.57–0.570
V162D+3.46+3.460
G147S_V162D+3.33+2.86+0.47
L98M_G147S_V162D+1.95+2.64–0.69
L98M_V162D+3.28+3.210.08
L98M_G147S–1.05–0.82–0.23
Appendix 1—table 2
Detailed statistics for data reported in Figure 6.

The test is based on a generalized linear model (binomial model, mutation counts vs library type, likelihood ratio test). Beta means enrichment, p-values are bonferroni corrected. Negative beta means enriched in single-copy populations compared to double-copy populations. Positive beta means enriched in double-copy populations compared to single-copy populations.

MutationGenerationMedian frequency in single-copy populationsMedian frequency in double-copy populationsp-valuebeta
G147S10.380.521.00E+000.38
G147S20.512.012.21E-1121.51
G147S30.075.550.00E+003.95
G147S47.891.261.00E+00–0.02
G147S55.5812.980.00E+00–1.81
V162D10.110.301.49E-021.31
V162D21.985.854.99E-2441.06
V162D392.1389.021.26E-010.06
V162D499.4198.746.21E-12–1.20
V162D598.9999.234.25E-03–0.41
L98M10.680.935.23E-010.53
L98M24.904.501.00E+00–0.02
L98M34.278.292.27E-1220.58
L98M45.4420.004.28E-2102.11
L98M510.0011.137.96E-1380.59
L98M+G147 S10.000.001.00E+001.04
L98M+G147 S20.010.004.79E-02–1.65
L98M+G147 S30.000.009.42E-1414.11
L98M+G147 S40.000.695.29E-082.51
L98M+G147 S50.644.240.00E+00–2.28
L98M+V162D10.000.001.00E+001.04
L98M+V162D20.000.001.00E+00–0.67
L98M+V162D30.064.020.00E+003.22
L98M+V162D45.0819.432.91E-1862.09
L98M+V162D59.6710.951.11E-1140.54
G147S+V162D10.000.001.00E+001.32
G147S+V162D20.000.001.00E+000.25
G147S+V162D30.000.001.00E+00–0.34
G147S+V162D47.890.691.00E+00–0.16
G147S+V162D55.5812.910.00E+00–1.82
L98M+G147S+V162D10.000.001.00E+001.04
L98M+G147S+V162D20.000.001.00E+000.25
L98M+G147S+V162D30.000.001.00E+000.17
L98M+G147S+V162D40.000.578.99E-082.49
L98M+G147S+V162D50.644.240.00E+00–2.28
Appendix 1—table 3
Primers used in this study.
OligonucleotideOligonucleotide sequence (5 → 3)
Seq_0_fGAGTTGTAAAACGACGGCCAG
Seq_2_rGAAAGCTGGTCCAAGCGATTG
Seq_3_fCTCATTCGCTAATCGCCAC
pBAD_fGCCGTCACTGCGTCTTTTAC
LJM01_fGTG ATG ATG GTG ATG ATG GCC CAT ATG TAT ATC TCC
LJM01_rGTG ATG ATG GTG ATG ATG GCC CAT GGT ATA TCT CCT
LJM02GAT ATA CAT ATG GGC CAT CAT CAC CAT CAT CAC AGC ATT CCG GAA AAT
LJM03_rGTTACCAAACTGGAACCGGCGAGCGAAAGCATGTATGTTAG
LJM03_fCTAACATACATGCTTTCGCTCGCCGGTTCCAGTTTGGTAAC
LJM04_fGTTACCAAACTGGAACCGGGCAGCGAAAGCATGTATGTTAG
LJM04_rCTAACATACATGCTTTCGCTGCCCGGTTCCAGTTTGGTAAC
LJM05GGC CAT CAT CAC CAT CAT CAC
LJM06_fCTTATTCGGCCTTGAATTGATTATATGCGGATTAGAAAAACAACT
LJM06_rAGTTGTTTTTCTAATCCGCATATAATCAATTCAAGGCCGAATAAG
LJM07_rCAACTCGAATTCTTCCACCGTACGTCGAGCGGGAG
LJM08_fGATATAGCGGCCGCAATGGCGGCGCGCCATCGAATG
LJM09_fGTCATGGAATTCGAGTTGTAAAACGACG
LJM09_rGATTATGCGGCCGCGCCGTCACTGCGTCTTTTAC
LJM10_fGCTAGC CCATGG GCCATCATCATCACCATCATAG
LJM10_rCTCTAC GGTACC TTATTACGGTTTGGCAATTGCGGTTTC
Appendix 1—table 4
List of site-directed mutagenesis primers.
MutationForward primerReverse primer
Q74A, Y75S, G76AGATATTCTGAGCGTTGCATTT GCC AGC GCG AATCGTACCTATACCAGCTATCGATAGCTGGTATAGGTACGATT CGC GCT GGC AAATGCAACGCTCAGAATATC
V169DGGTGAAGATGTTCTGAGCTATAAAACCCAGAGCACCCATTCAGAACATCTTCACCAACCAGGGTGCCATCACTAACATAC
P142LGATGGTCTGGTTATGAAAAAAGAAGTTACCAAACTGGAACCATAACCAGACCATCTTCCGGGAAACCTTCACCGTTATAT
Y173FCTGAGCTTTAAAACCCAGAGCACCCATTATACCTGTCACAGGTTTTAAAGCTCAGAACAACTTCACCAACCAGGGTGCCA
S9RCATCACCGCATTCCGGAAAATAGCGGTCTGACCGAAGAAACGGAATGCGGAATGCTGTGATGATGGTGATGATGGCCCAT
S9ICATCACATCATTCCGGAAAATAGCGGTCTGACCGAAGAAACGGAATGATGAATGCTGTGATGATGGTGATGATGGCCCAT
S9CCATCACTGCATTCCGGAAAATAGCGGTCTGACCGAAGAAACGGAATGCAGAATGCTGTGATGATGGTGATGATGGCCCAT
L105MCGTACCATGAGCTTTGAAGATGGTGCCATTGTTAAAGTGGAAAGCTCATGGTACGTTCAAAGGTAAAACCTTCCGGAAAG
G154AGAACCGGCCAGCGAAAGCATGTATGTTAGTGATGGCACCCTTCGCTGGCCGGTTCCAGTTTGGTAACTTCTTTTTTCATA
G154CGAACCGTGCAGCGAAAGCATGTATGTTAGTGATGGCACCCTTCGCTGCACGGTTCCAGTTTGGTAACTTCTTTTTTCATA
G154SGAACCGAGCAGCGAAAGCATGTATGTTAGTGATGGCACCCTTCGCTGCTCGGTTCCAGTTTGGTAACTTCTTTTTTCATA
G154DGAACCGGACAGCGAAAGCATGTATGTTAGTGATGGCACCCTTCGCTGTCCGGTTCCAGTTTGGTAACTTCTTTTTTCATA
G48SCTGACCAGTATTCAGAAACTGGATATTCGTGTTATTGAAGCTGAATACTGGTCAGAATATTACCACCACCAATACCTTCC
T79NAATCGTAACTATACCAGCTATCCGGCAAAAATCCCGGATTGGTATAGTTACGATTGCCATACTGAAATGCAACGCTCAGA
V127LAAATTTCTGGGCAAAATCAAATATAACGGTGAAGGTTTCCTTTGCCCAGAAATTTACCATCCTCGATGCTAATATCGCTT
G76DCAGTATGACAATCGTACCTATACCAGCTATCCGGCAAAAAACGATTGTCATACTGAAATGCAACGCTCAGAATATCAAAG
G42AATTGGTGCTGGTAATATTCTGACCGGTATTCAGAAACTGGATTACCAGCACCAATACCTTCCATGCTAAAGGCATGACCA
H183RACCTGTCGCATGAAAACCATTTATCGCAGCAAAAAACCGGTTTCATGCGACAGGTATAATGGGTGCTCTGGGTTTTATAG
K129RGTGGGCAGAATCAAATATAACGGTGAAGGTTTCCCGGAAGTTTGATTCTGCCCACAAATTTACCATCCTCGATGCTAATA
S155ICCGGGCATCGAAAGCATGTATGTTAGTGATGGCACCCTGGGCTTTCGATGCCCGGTTCCAGTTTGGTAACTTCTTTTTTC
E168DGTTGGTGATGTTGTTCTGAGCTATAAAACCCAGAGCACCCAACAACATCACCAACCAGGGTGCCATCACTAACATACATG
G163DAGTGATGACACCCTGGTTGGTGAAGTTGTTCTGAGCTATACAGGGTGTCATCACTAACATACATGCTTTCGCTGCCCGGT
L197MGAAAACATGCCGAAATTTCATTATGTTCATCACCGCCTGGTTTCGGCATGTTTTCAACCGGTTTTTTGCTGCGATAAATG
O229YAAACCGTATTAAGAGCTCCAATCGCTTGGACCAGCTTTCCCTCTTAATACGGTTTGGCAATTGCGGTTTCATGCTGCTCG
R206LCATCACCTCCTGGAAAAAAAAATTGTGGAAGAGGGCTATTTTCCAGGAGGTGATGAACATAATGAAATTTCGGCAGGTTT
S106NACCCTGAACTTTGAAGATGGTGCCATTGTTAAAGTGGAAATTCAAAGTTCAGGGTACGTTCAAAGGTAAAACCTTCCGGA
S177NACCCAGAACACCCATTATACCTGTCACATGAAAACCATTTATGGGTGTTCTGGGTTTTATAGCTCAGAACAACTTCACCA
S155NCCGGGCAACGAAAGCATGTATGTTAGTGATGGCACCCTGGGCTTTCGTTGCCCGGTTCCAGTTTGGTAACTTCTTTTTTC
S172RGTTCTGAGATATAAAACCCAGAGCACCCATTATACCTGTCTTTATATCTCAGAACAACTTCACCAACCAGGGTGCCATCA
V148IAAAGAAATTACCAAACTGGAACCGGGCAGCGAAAGCATGTTTTGGTAATTTCTTTTTTCATAACCGGACCATCTTCCGGG
R206HCATCACCACCTGGAAAAAAAAATTGTGGAAGAGGGCTATTTTCCAGGTGGTGATGAACATAATGAAATTTCGGCAGGTTT
H183RACCTGTCGCATGAAAACCATTTATCGCAGCAAAAAACCGGTTTCATGCGACAGGTATAATGGGTGCTCTGGGTTTTATAG
Appendix 1—table 5
Plasmids used in this study.
Plasmid nameDescriptionSourceAddgene number
pANDSource of backboneAddgene #49377#49377
pAND-MCSMCS added, NdeI site removed from TetRThis study#223514
pDUPcogfp under PtacThis study#223515
pDUP1cogfp inactive under Ptet, cogfp under PtacThis study#223516
pDUP2cogfp under Ptet, cogfp under PtacThis study#223517

Additional files

MDAR checklist
https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/97216/elife-97216-mdarchecklist1-v1.docx
Source data 1

Summary of single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing results.

Number of reads sequenced by SMRT sequencing and mean number of amino-acid changes per cogfp gene. X, Y, Z: replicate populations. 1–5: generations of evolution.

https://cdn.elifesciences.org/articles/97216/elife-97216-data1-v1.xlsx

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Ljiljana Mihajlovic
  2. Bharat Ravi Iyengar
  3. Florian Baier
  4. Içvara Barbier
  5. Justyna Iwaszkiewicz
  6. Vincent Zoete
  7. Andreas Wagner
  8. Yolanda Schaerli
(2025)
A direct experimental test of Ohno’s hypothesis
eLife 13:RP97216.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.97216.3