Spatial Attention: Time to get deep
As you read this text, you are probably focusing on a screen or piece of paper directly in front of you. This ability to focus on a specific object relies on the brain filtering out visual distractions from the surrounding area (Desimone and Duncan, 1995). However, if you wanted, you could suddenly shift your attention to the left or right, without moving your eyes. Understanding more about the relationship between attention and the anatomy of the brain is fundamental for research in neuroscience.
Previous studies have shown that attention is controlled by the cortex, the outer layer of the brain, which is thought to implement cognition, language, reasoning and other higher-order brain functions. However, much less is known about how structures deep within the brain affect this process. This is partly because most of the techniques commonly used to image brain activity are good at measuring the activity of neurons in the cortex but less so in deeper subcortical structures. Now, in eLife, Ole Jensen and colleagues at the University of Birmingham, University of New South Wales, and CERMEP-Imagerie du Vivant – including Tara Ghafari as first author – report how they used two brain imaging techniques to investigate the role of subcortical structures in spatial attention (Ghafari et al., 2024).
First, the team used a technique called magnetoencephalography (MEG) to measure magnetic fields generated by the electrical activity of neurons in the cortical layer. This method was applied to the brains of 33 individuals as they performed a task that required them to shift their attention between faces on the left and right of a computer screen (Gutteling et al., 2022). The same group of people were also placed in a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner to assess the size of two brain structures, the thalamus and basal ganglia, both of which sit beneath the cortex.
When our attention shifts to the left or right, the balance of waves in the left versus the right hemisphere of the brain changes. This is particularly true for a pattern of electrical activity known as the alpha wave which repeats roughly ten times per second (first discovered by Berger, 1929). It is believed that this asymmetry reflects one side of the brain focusing on the relevant input, while the other suppresses distractions from the surrounding environment (Schneider et al., 2022).
However, the human brain is not perfectly symmetrical. For instance, structures which are present on both sides of the brain (such as the thalamus) might be larger in the right hemisphere in some individuals, but larger in the left in others. On top of this, the response of alpha waves to attention is also asymmetrical: a shift in attention might lead to a larger change in the alpha waves in one hemisphere for some individuals, and the opposite hemisphere for others (Mazzetti et al., 2019).
Ghafari et al. set out to find whether the size of subcortical structures in the left and right hemispheres correlates with the asymmetry in alpha modulations. They found that whichever brain hemisphere had the larger caudate nucleus or globus pallidus (two structures that make up the basal ganglia) also displayed a higher level of alpha wave modulation. However, this effect was reversed for the thalamus, with higher levels of modulation happening in the hemisphere with the smaller thalamus (Figure 1). Moreover, Ghafari et al. also report what happens to these relationships when various features of the relevant stimuli and irrelevant distractors used in the experiments are changed.
These new findings will help us understand the underlying subcortical circuitry that controls how spatial attention is allocated in humans. Not least, this work paves the way for further research on how changes in the subcortical regions in neurological disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease or dementia alter the behavior of brain waves in the cortex.
Since the results of the present research are purely correlational, it remains unclear whether the asymmetry of subcortical structures is responsible for the asymmetry in alpha wave modulation. Furthermore, attention is just one of many perceptual and cognitive processes that modulate alpha waves (Clayton et al., 2018). It will thus be important for future studies to test if the results are specific to spatial attention or apply more generally to other cognitive processes and to other types of brain waves.
References
-
Über das Elektrenkephalogramm des MenschenArchiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten 87:527–570.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01797193
-
The many characters of visual alpha oscillationsThe European Journal of Neuroscience 48:2498–2508.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13747
-
Neural mechanisms of selective visual attentionAnnual Review of Neuroscience 18:193–222.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
-
Alpha oscillations reflect suppression of distractors with increased perceptual loadProgress in Neurobiology 214:102285.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2022.102285
-
Hemispheric asymmetry of globus pallidus relates to alpha modulation in reward-related attentional tasksThe Journal of Neuroscience 39:9221–9236.https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0610-19.2019
-
Target enhancement or distractor suppression? Functionally distinct alpha oscillations form the basis of attentionThe European Journal of Neuroscience 55:3256–3265.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15309
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2024, Schulz and Wöstmann
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 408
- views
-
- 33
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
A dysfunctional signaling pathway in the hippocampus has been linked to chronic pain-related memory impairment in mice.
-
- Neuroscience
Locomotion is controlled by spinal circuits that interact with supraspinal drives and sensory feedback from the limbs. These sensorimotor interactions are disrupted following spinal cord injury. The thoracic lateral hemisection represents an experimental model of an incomplete spinal cord injury, where connections between the brain and spinal cord are abolished on one side of the cord. To investigate the effects of such an injury on the operation of the spinal locomotor network, we used our computational model of cat locomotion recently published in eLife (Rybak et al., 2024) to investigate and predict changes in cycle and phase durations following a thoracic lateral hemisection during treadmill locomotion in tied-belt (equal left-right speeds) and split-belt (unequal left-right speeds) conditions. In our simulations, the ‘hemisection’ was always applied to the right side. Based on our model, we hypothesized that following hemisection the contralesional (‘intact’, left) side of the spinal network is mostly controlled by supraspinal drives, whereas the ipsilesional (‘hemisected’, right) side is mostly controlled by somatosensory feedback. We then compared the simulated results with those obtained during experiments in adult cats before and after a mid-thoracic lateral hemisection on the right side in the same locomotor conditions. Our experimental results confirmed many effects of hemisection on cat locomotion predicted by our simulations. We show that having the ipsilesional hindlimb step on the slow belt, but not the fast belt, during split-belt locomotion substantially reduces the effects of lateral hemisection. The model provides explanations for changes in temporal characteristics of hindlimb locomotion following hemisection based on altered interactions between spinal circuits, supraspinal drives, and somatosensory feedback.