Cerebellum: Linking abnormal neural activity patterns to motor deficits
The brain is made up of a dense web of interconnected brain regions. This means that when neurological dysfunction occurs in one area, errant signals can spread to connected regions. While the spread of abnormal activity in the brain poses challenges for researchers developing therapeutic interventions, it also presents opportunities. It might be possible to detect abnormal brain activity and correct it without needing to pinpoint the exact origin of the dysfunction.
Studying movement disorders is an ideal medium for understanding the effects of neurological dysfunction on brain circuits because animal models that mimic the motor symptoms of patients can be studied in the laboratory. The cerebellum is one of many areas crucial for movement control and presents a unique opportunity to understand how neural circuits are linked to motor disorders (Holmes, 1917). Information from much of the brain is sent to the cerebellum and processed by expansive neural circuitry in the cerebellar cortex, the folded surface of the cerebellum. The processed inputs are then funneled through an information bottleneck at the synapse between Purkinje cells, which are the sole output of the cerebellar cortex, and their targets in discrete clusters of neurons in the cerebellar nuclei (a set of relay stations located deep in the cerebellum). From there, the information processed by the cerebellum is broadcast back to the rest of the brain (Bostan et al., 2013). The large number of inputs to the cerebellar cortex and the compression of information at the cerebellar nuclei provide an ideal target for understanding how dysfunction in one area can affect connected regions.
Now, in eLife, Meike van der Heijden, Amanda Brown, Dominic Kizek and Roy Sillitoe report that abnormal patterns of activity from a single set of neurons can be used to predict motor symptoms associated with multiple neurological disorders (van der Heijden et al., 2024). Taking advantage of the information bottleneck at the cerebellar nuclei, the team – who are based at Baylor College of Medicine and Texas Children’s Hospital – measured the firing patterns of these neurons in mouse models of movement disorders. The recordings were then used to devise a relatively simple machine-learning classifier, which examines the firing patterns and automatically sorts them into different categories based on their characteristics.
The classifier identified unique firing patterns associated with different motor symptoms and then successfully predicted motor symptoms across multiple mouse models of the same neurological disorder (Figure 1A). This predictive ability was true for motor symptoms often associated with cerebellar disorders, such as ataxia (loss of coordination), as well as those often associated with dysfunction of other brain regions, for example, dystonia (uncontrolled muscle spasms).
The team then went a crucial step further. If unique firing patterns in the cerebellar nuclei can predict motor symptoms, can inducing these patterns in the brains of healthy mice cause motor symptoms even in the absence of neurological disorders? Using an optogenetic system to modify firing activity in cerebellar neurons, van der Heijden et al. were able to induce motor deficits in mice that were reminiscent of motor disorders (Figure 1B).
The findings of van der Heijden et al. provide a major stepping stone for understanding the cerebellum’s role in motor disorders, and they also have broad implications for targeted therapies to reduce motor symptoms in patients. If driving aberrant activity in cerebellar nuclei neurons produces motor symptoms, then the opposite might also be true – strategically chosen patterns of stimulation might be able to restore healthy firing patterns and reduce motor deficits (Figure 1C).
It is possible to envision a device that includes a sophisticated classifier – perhaps leveraging advances in deep-learning techniques – capable of pinpointing precise patterns of aberrant activity in the cerebellar nuclei. This device could then identify the targeted stimulation parameters needed to push the aberrant activity back towards normal, a technique termed “closed-loop” brain stimulation (Chandrabhatla et al., 2023).
With monitoring of neural activity in carefully chosen sites and strategic selection of stimulation parameters, closed-loop brain stimulation could even be therapeutic for neurological disorders without motor dysfunction. It has only recently been appreciated that the cerebellum is also densely interconnected with regions of the brain traditionally thought of as ‘non-motor’ (Strick et al., 2009). In addition, it is now known that cerebellar damage often results in deficits in higher-order behavioral functions, such as difficulty with language and visuo-spatial cognition (Schmahmann, 2019). Therefore, targeted stimulation of the cerebellar nuclei might also alleviate some non-motor symptoms of neurological disorders. While significant research remains, the work of van der Heijden et al. highlights a bright future for cerebellar nuclei stimulation as a therapeutic target for a range of brain disorders.
References
-
Cerebellar networks with the cerebral cortex and basal gangliaTrends in Cognitive Sciences 17:241–254.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.003
-
The cerebellum and cognitionNeuroscience Letters 688:62–75.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.005
-
Cerebellum and nonmotor functionAnnual Review of Neuroscience 32:413–434.https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.31.060407.125606
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2024, Herzfeld
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 415
- views
-
- 32
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
Neural diversity can expand the encoding capacity of a circuitry. A striking example of diverse structure and function is presented by the afferent synapses between inner hair cells (IHCs) and spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) in the cochlea. Presynaptic active zones at the pillar IHC side activate at lower IHC potentials than those of the modiolar side that have more presynaptic Ca2+ channels. The postsynaptic SGNs differ in their spontaneous firing rates, sound thresholds, and operating ranges. While a causal relationship between synaptic heterogeneity and neural response diversity seems likely, experimental evidence linking synaptic and SGN physiology has remained difficult to obtain. Here, we aimed at bridging this gap by ex vivo paired recordings of murine IHCs and postsynaptic SGN boutons with stimuli and conditions aimed to mimic those of in vivo SGN characterization. Synapses with high spontaneous rate of release (SR) were found predominantly on the pillar side of the IHC. These high SR synapses had larger and more temporally compact spontaneous EPSCs, lower voltage thresholds, tighter coupling of Ca2+ channels and vesicular release sites, shorter response latencies, and higher initial release rates. This study indicates that synaptic heterogeneity in IHCs directly contributes to the diversity of spontaneous and sound-evoked firing of SGNs.
-
- Neuroscience
Life histories of oviparous species dictate high metabolic investment in the process of gonadal development leading to ovulation. In vertebrates, these two distinct processes are controlled by the gonadotropins follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH), respectively. While it was suggested that a common secretagogue, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), oversees both functions, the generation of loss-of-function fish challenged this view. Here, we reveal that the satiety hormone cholecystokinin (CCK) is the primary regulator of this axis in zebrafish. We found that FSH cells express a CCK receptor, and our findings demonstrate that mutating this receptor results in a severe hindrance to ovarian development. Additionally, it causes a complete shutdown of both gonadotropins secretion. Using in-vivo and ex-vivo calcium imaging of gonadotrophs, we show that GnRH predominantly activates LH cells, whereas FSH cells respond to CCK stimulation, designating CCK as the bona fide FSH secretagogue. These findings indicate that the control of gametogenesis in fish was placed under different neural circuits, that are gated by CCK.