Cell Death: Caspases promote cell proliferation after necrosis

An enzyme known as caspase, which initiates apoptosis, has a central role in the regeneration of cells and repair of tissue that can occur after necrosis.
  1. Prathibha Yarikipati
  2. Andreas Bergmann  Is a corresponding author
  1. Department of Molecular, Cell and Cancer Biology, UMass Chan Medical School, United States

Necrosis is a form of cell death that can be caused by illness, infection, injury, radiation or chemicals. During necrosis, cells swell, burst and lyse, spilling their contents into the extracellular space, which attracts cells of the immune system and triggers inflammation. In humans, necrosis is irreversible and in severe cases, can lead to systemic organ failure and death (Khalid and Azimpouran, 2023).

However, recent research on fruit flies has revealed that some necrotic tissue can have surprisingly regenerative capabilities (Klemm et al., 2021; Yang et al., 2013). In these studies, necrosis was genetically induced in the wing imaginal disc, the precursor of the adult wings, by expressing a mutant Glutamate receptor (GluR1) that triggers the influx of calcium ions into cells, causing them to burst and die. Over half of these flies had wings that appeared normal, suggesting that the necrotic damage caused by GluR1 must have been repaired or regenerated during wing development.

Apoptosis is a genetically controlled form of cell death mediated by enzymes called caspases, and GluR1-induced necrosis is associated with two batches of apoptotic cells. The first batch is found at the edge of the wound, while the second batch, termed necrosis-induced apoptotic cells, is found away from the wound. It is likely that the role of the first batch is to clear away cells from the site of the wound. Now, in eLife, Jacob Klemm, Chloe Van Hazel and Robin Harris at the Arizona State University report on the properties of the cells in the second batch (Klemm et al., 2024).

The researchers used the same genetic ablation system (expression of a leaking GluR1 channel) to induce necrotic cell death within the wing imaginal disc of fruit flies. This revealed that inhibition of apoptosis in the second batch of cells significantly inhibited the regenerative proliferation of necrotic tissue. This suggests that controlled apoptosis is necessary for effective tissue regeneration after necrosis. However, necrosis-induced apoptosis occurs shortly after the induction of necrosis, while regenerative proliferation only occurs much later (36–48 hours; Figure 1A–C). How can necrosis-induced apoptotic cells induce regenerative proliferation if they have already died?

Regenerative proliferation and tissue repair after induction of necrosis.

(A) The wing imaginal disc is composed of a monolayer of epithelial cells. (B) Klemm et al. genetically induced necrosis. Immediately afterwards (0 hours), necrotic cells (pale green) and two batches of apoptotic cells (purple) were detectable. The first batch of apoptotic cells was at the edge of the wound, next to the necrotic cells. The second batch was located away from the wound and consisted of necrosis-induced apoptotic (NiA) cells, which died, and necrosis-induced caspase-positive (NiCP) cells, which did not die despite the fact that they contained the caspase Dronc, which can initiate apoptosis. (C) After 36–48 hours, the necrotic and apoptotic cells have been removed. However, the NiCP cells persist and release unknown signals in a Dronc-dependent manner that triggers regenerative proliferation and promotes the repair of the necrotic wound. This figure was created with BioRender.com.

Klemm et al. found that a significant fraction of necrosis-induced apoptotic cells did not undergo apoptosis. Instead, these cells – called necrosis-induced caspase positive (NiCP) cells because they contain caspases – survived and promoted regenerative proliferation. The experiments revealed that the regenerative proliferation mediated by NiCP cells depends on Dronc, a caspase that initiates apoptosis, but not on the effector caspases that execute apoptosis. Even though the effector caspases were active, they were only present at sub-lethal levels, which would explain why the NiCP cells survived during the regenerative process.

Dronc also has non-apoptotic functions. Indeed, it can mediate the proliferation of nearby cells in a process called apoptosis-induced proliferation, in which apoptotic cells can influence neighbouring cells to proliferate (Fogarty and Bergmann, 2017). Dronc’s function in regenerative proliferation after necrosis appears to be distinct from the mechanisms by which apoptosis might drive cell division, suggesting that Dronc can control regenerative proliferation through at least two non-apoptotic mechanisms: through activating signalling pathways that promote cell growth in apoptosis-induced proliferation, and through regulating cell division in NiCP-mediated regeneration (Figure 1C). These results suggest a versatile role for Dronc in proliferation and tissue regeneration beyond its canonical function in apoptosis.

The findings by Klemm et al. challenge the traditional view of apoptosis as being a solely destructive process and highlight its potential role in tissue repair and regeneration. They also underscore the interplay between different forms of cell death (necrosis and apoptosis) in tissue homeostasis and repair.

However, a number of questions about the complex interplay between cell death and regeneration remain open. For example, what signals mediate the formation of necrosis-induced apoptotic cells and NiCP cells away from the wound, and what receptors do these signals target? Possible candidates could be intracellular factors, called DAMPs (damage-associated molecular patterns), which are released during the lysis of necrotic cells. Moreover, we need to understand the non-apoptotic roles of Dronc more fully, and to establish how NiCP cells maintain effector caspases below a sub-lethal threshold to stay alive. It would also be interesting to see what role macrophages and other innate immune cells play in the regenerative response to necrosis.

Lastly, although necrotic damage can be induced in the entire wing disc, only cells in the developing wing pouch (and, to a much lesser extent, cells in the notum), are competent to become NiCPs and to induce regenerative proliferation, whereas cells in the hinge region of the disc are not. By understanding the factors that confer regenerative competence to specific regions of the wing disc, new fundamental principles of tissue regeneration may be uncovered. These insights could potentially be leveraged to develop novel therapeutic approaches for enhancing regenerative capacity in human tissues affected by necrotic damage, opening new avenues in regenerative medicine.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Prathibha Yarikipati

    Prathibha Yarikipati is in the Department of Molecular, Cell and Cancer Biology, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, United States

    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4599-3918
  2. Andreas Bergmann

    Andreas Bergmann is in the Department of Molecular, Cell and Cancer Biology, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, United States

    For correspondence
    andreas.bergmann@umassmed.edu
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9134-871X

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published:

Copyright

© 2024, Yarikipati and Bergmann

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 577
    views
  • 62
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Prathibha Yarikipati
  2. Andreas Bergmann
(2024)
Cell Death: Caspases promote cell proliferation after necrosis
eLife 13:e103786.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.103786

Further reading

    1. Developmental Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Olivia B Taylor, Nicholas DeGroff ... Andy J Fischer
    Research Article

    The purpose of these studies is to investigate how Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) signaling regulates glial phenotype, dedifferentiation of Müller glia (MG), reprogramming into proliferating MG-derived progenitor cells (MGPCs), and neuronal differentiation of the progeny of MGPCs in the chick retina. We found that S1P-related genes are highly expressed by retinal neurons and glia, and levels of expression were dynamically regulated following retinal damage. Drug treatments that activate S1P receptor 1 (S1PR1) or increase levels of S1P suppressed the formation of MGPCs. Conversely, treatments that inhibit S1PR1 or decrease levels of S1P stimulated the formation of MGPCs. Inhibition of S1P receptors or S1P synthesis significantly enhanced the neuronal differentiation of the progeny of MGPCs. We report that S1P-related gene expression in MG is modulated by microglia and inhibition of S1P receptors or S1P synthesis partially rescues the loss of MGPC formation in damaged retinas missing microglia. Finally, we show that TGFβ/Smad3 signaling in the resting retina maintains S1PR1 expression in MG. We conclude that the S1P signaling is dynamically regulated in MG and MGPCs in the chick retina, and activation of S1P signaling depends, in part, on signals produced by reactive microglia.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Stem Cells and Regenerative Medicine
    Alison G Barber, Cynthia M Quintero ... Tannishtha Reya
    Research Article

    Despite advances in therapeutic approaches, lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. To understand the molecular programs underlying lung cancer initiation and maintenance, we focused on stem cell programs that are normally extinguished with differentiation but can be reactivated during oncogenesis. Here, we have used extensive genetic modeling and patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) to identify a dual role for Msi2: as a signal that acts initially to sensitize cells to transformation, and subsequently to drive tumor propagation. Using Msi reporter mice, we found that Msi2-expressing cells were marked by a pro-oncogenic landscape and a preferential ability to respond to Ras and p53 mutations. Consistent with this, genetic deletion of Msi2 in an autochthonous Ras/p53-driven lung cancer model resulted in a marked reduction of tumor burden, delayed progression, and a doubling of median survival. Additionally, this dependency was conserved in human disease as inhibition of Msi2 impaired tumor growth in PDXs. Mechanistically, Msi2 triggered a broad range of pathways critical for tumor growth, including several novel effectors of lung adenocarcinoma. Collectively, these findings reveal a critical role for Msi2 in aggressive lung adenocarcinoma, lend new insight into the biology of this disease, and identify potential new therapeutic targets.