Brain Activity: Unifying networks of a rhythm
Combining electrophysiological, anatomical and functional brain maps reveals networks of beta neural activity that align with dopamine uptake.
- Center of Brain, Behavior and Metabolism, University of Lübeck, Germany
Our brains constantly receive and respond to information from the world around us. This ability largely relies on communication between different areas of the brain via networks of neurons, as well as the release of molecules known as neurotransmitters. The interplay between neural networks and neurotransmitters manifests in waxing and waning patterns of electrical activity, known as brain rhythms, which oscillate at different frequencies.
However, understanding how areas of the brain communicate with one another has remained a major challenge in neuroscience, partly because directly measuring the activity of neurons in the cortex requires invasive procedures. This means that such measurements are typically only possible in animals or in patients undergoing surgery, and are usually limited to a few localized sites in the cortex (Frauscher et al., 2018).
Additionally, mapping how different brain regions connect and communicate requires various imaging techniques. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is needed to track how regions are anatomically and functionally linked, while positron emission tomography (PET) is required to observe the uptake of neurotransmitters. However, integrating these brain imaging data has proven challenging (Hansen et al., 2022). Now, in eLife, Wolf-Julian Neumann and colleagues from Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin and Humboldt University – including Meera Chikermane as first author – report an integrative approach that provides insights into an important rhythmic pattern of neural activity known as the beta rhythm (Chikermane et al., 2024).
Beta patterns of neural activity oscillate within a frequency band between 13–35 Hz, and are critical for controlling movements, making decisions, and regulating emotions (Spitzer and Haegens, 2017; Lundqvist et al., 2024). In Parkinson’s disease, aberrant beta activity has been associated with less neurons deep in the brain releasing dopamine, a key neurotransmitter involved in synaptic plasticity (and therefore learning), as well as regulating movement and emotions (Cavallo and Neumann, 2024). This led Chikermane et al. to hypothesize that beta-band brain networks would align with the distribution of dopamine-sensitive receptors.
To test their hypothesis, the team adopted an innovative approach (based on multimodal lesion network mapping [Fox, 2018]) that integrates different types of imaging data and maps within a shared standard brain mapping framework. This allows the different types of data to be compared with one another. First, they used electrophysiological recordings taken from healthy cortical areas in 106 epileptic patients to identify brain regions that exhibited strong beta oscillations (Figure 1, yellow node).
Figure 1
A combination of different imaging techniques can be used to unify brain networks associated with beta rhythms in neural activity.
Schematic of a coronal section of the human brain, with the cortex in gray and a structure deep within the brain known as the basal ganglia in blue. Surface electrodes were used to record neural activity from epileptic patients undergoing surgery. This revealed which areas of the brain display rhythmic patterns of activity within the beta frequency range (13–35 Hz), represented as a yellow circle over the motor cortex. Functional MRI (fMRI) data (measurements of blood oxygen level) revealed the brain areas that showed synchronized changes in activity (orange dashed lines) with target regions. This suggests that there is a functional network of beta regions (orange circles). Diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) data showed that the target regions also connect to other parts of the brain through white matter tracts, forming a structural network (blue solid lines). Finally, positron emission topography (PET) data was used to identify brain regions with high dopamine uptake. Dopamine signaling in these areas was found to align with the connectivity of beta networks (red shading).
Image credit: Adapted from SciDraw (CC BY 4.0).
Chikermane et al. designated these sites as target regions, and then employed open access MRI data to build network maps, which were derived from two types of MRI data: functional MRI (fMRI), which measures blood oxygen level and can be used to determine which parts of the brain are synchronously activated (Figure 1, dashed connections), and diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI), which shows how different regions of the brain are structurally connected by bundles of nerve tissues known as white matter tracts (Figure 1, solid connections). Additionally, PET imaging data, which relies on intravenous injections of a radioactively labelled molecule, were used to map which areas of the brain have a high uptake of dopamine, suggesting there is a high density of dopamine receptors (Figure 1, red shading). The three network maps – constructed using the fMRI, DW-MRI and PET data – were then integrated using a software known as the Lead-DBS toolbox.
The results revealed that beta activity is widespread throughout the brain. In fact, out of 1,772 surface electrodes placed in the cortex of the patients studied, only 21 did not exhibit beta oscillations. Among these cortical sites, beta signals were strongest across the frontal, cingulate, and insular regions of the brain. Importantly, all three of these areas map onto regions that were shown to be both functionally and structurally connected. This shared network also positively correlated with sites in the cortex and basal ganglia where high levels of dopamine receptor binding were observed. Collectivity, these findings help unify networks associated with beta rhythms in the human brain.
Chikermane et al. have circumvented the limitations of each electrophysiology and brain imaging technique in a synergistic way. Their results represent a significant step forward in mapping the organization of brain regions that display beta activity. The findings have important implications for understanding the circuit-level pathophysiology associated with altered beta activity, and how dopamine contributes to movement disorders such as Parkinson’s disease. Additionally, the findings suggests that improvements to deep brain stimulation, a technique that uses electrical pulses to stimulate structures deep in the brain, could potentially enhance motor function in Parkinson’s disease patients. However, whether and how the brain mapping technique developed by Chikermane et al. can be used to characterize and alleviate individual patient symptoms, or predict responsiveness to interventions, remains an open question for future research.
References
-
Dopaminergic reinforcement in the motor system: Implications for Parkinson’s disease and deep brain stimulationThe European Journal of Neuroscience 59:457–472.https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.16222
-
Mapping symptoms to brain networks with the human connectomeThe New England Journal of Medicine 379:2237–2245.https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1706158
-
Beta: bursts of cognitionTrends in Cognitive Sciences 28:662–676.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2024.03.010
Article and author information
Author details
Publication history
Copyright
© 2024, Alavash
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 1,242
- views
-
- 94
- downloads
-
- 0
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Brain Activity: Unifying networks of a rhythm
eLife 13:e104698.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.104698
Further reading
-
- Neuroscience
- Physics of Living Systems
Neurons generate and propagate electrical pulses called action potentials which annihilate on arrival at the axon terminal. We measure the extracellular electric field generated by propagating and annihilating action potentials and find that on annihilation, action potentials expel a local discharge. The discharge at the axon terminal generates an inhomogeneous electric field that immediately influences target neurons and thus provokes ephaptic coupling. Our measurements are quantitatively verified by a powerful analytical model which reveals excitation and inhibition in target neurons, depending on position and morphology of the source-target arrangement. Our model is in full agreement with experimental findings on ephaptic coupling at the well-studied Basket cell-Purkinje cell synapse. It is able to predict ephaptic coupling for any other synaptic geometry as illustrated by a few examples.
-
- Neuroscience
Detecting causal relations structures our perception of events in the world. Here, we determined for visual interactions whether generalized (i.e. feature-invariant) or specialized (i.e. feature-selective) visual routines underlie the perception of causality. To this end, we applied a visual adaptation protocol to assess the adaptability of specific features in classical launching events of simple geometric shapes. We asked observers to report whether they observed a launch or a pass in ambiguous test events (i.e. the overlap between two discs varied from trial to trial). After prolonged exposure to causal launch events (the adaptor) defined by a particular set of features (i.e. a particular motion direction, motion speed, or feature conjunction), observers were less likely to see causal launches in subsequent ambiguous test events than before adaptation. Crucially, adaptation was contingent on the causal impression in launches as demonstrated by a lack of adaptation in non-causal control events. We assessed whether this negative aftereffect transfers to test events with a new set of feature values that were not presented during adaptation. Processing in specialized (as opposed to generalized) visual routines predicts that the transfer of visual adaptation depends on the feature similarity of the adaptor and the test event. We show that the negative aftereffects do not transfer to unadapted launch directions but do transfer to launch events of different speeds. Finally, we used colored discs to assign distinct feature-based identities to the launching and the launched stimulus. We found that the adaptation transferred across colors if the test event had the same motion direction as the adaptor. In summary, visual adaptation allowed us to carve out a visual feature space underlying the perception of causality and revealed specialized visual routines that are tuned to a launch’s motion direction.
