Disease Transmission: Interactions between wild pigs and the spread of disease

Tracking wild pigs with GPS devices reveals how their social interactions could influence the spread of disease, offering new strategies for protecting agriculture, wildlife, and human health.
  1. Mercury Shitindo  Is a corresponding author
  1. Africa Bioethics Network, Kenya
  2. University of Zaragoza, Spain

Across landscapes worldwide, wild pigs are more than a nuisance – they are a global economic and ecological catastrophe. They pose threats to agriculture by destroying crops, to biodiversity by competing with native species, and to humans and farm animals by spreading disease. In the United States alone, wild pigs cause an estimated $120 billion in damages every year (Risch et al., 2021) and in Australia it has been estimated that a single outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease could cost the economy around $50 billion (Buetre, 2013).

To tackle the threat of disease outbreaks, it is important to understand how diseases spread through populations of wild (or feral) pigs, so it necessary to know how often wild pigs come into contact with each other. However, it is challenging to measure such contact rates for wild pigs because they are highly social and because they roam freely across vast landscapes. Now, in eLife, Tatiana Proboste (University of Queensland) and colleagues at Queensland and other research institutes in Australia report a new approach to collecting such data (Proboste et al., 2024).

Using GPS collars to track 146 wild pigs across diverse terrain in eastern Australia over six years, the team uncovered intricate patterns of animal movement and interaction. Their findings revealed crucial insights into how these animals socialize and move through their territories, offering new ways to predict and control the spread of dangerous diseases like foot-and-mouth disease, African swine fever, and zoonotic infections that can spread to humans.

The experiments showed that wild pigs organize themselves into distinct social groups, or "sounders", typically made up of adult females and their young. Adult males, in contrast, lead more solitary lives (Spencer et al., 2005). Using GPS data, Proboste et al. found that interactions between the pigs within sounders were frequent and cohesive, while interactions between different groups were relatively rare and mediated by roaming males. This dynamic is crucial for understanding disease transmission. Diseases are likely to spread quickly within a single sounder due to high levels of contact, but solitary males that move between groups create a potential pathway for diseases to spread more broadly. These findings echo patterns observed in wild boar populations in Europe, where males act as ‘bridges’ between otherwise isolated groups (Podgórski et al., 2018).

Conventional strategies for controlling disease outbreaks often focus on culling adult females to curb population growth (Bengsen et al., 2014). However, the results of Proboste et al. suggest a shift in strategy: culling adult males might be more effective because it could prevent the disease spreading from group to group. The researchers also uncovered seasonal variations in pig interactions, with contact rates peaking in summer – information that can be used to ensure that disease control measures are implemented when they are most likely to be effective. The inclusion of real-word data about wild pigs in models of disease transmission, such as the Australia Animal Disease Spread model (Bradhurst et al., 2015), will help the relevant authorities to respond to disease outbreaks more effectively.

As the global threat of diseases like African swine fever continues to grow, understanding the social networks of wild pigs has never been more important. The study by Proboste et al. highlights the power of combining technology and ecological insights to address complex challenges in public and animal health. While this study marks a significant step forward, questions remain.

How do environmental factors influence the seasonal patterns of pig interactions that were observed? Could machine learning help predict when and where disease transmission is most likely based on pig movement data? Answering these questions will require interdisciplinary approaches that combine ecology, epidemiology and advanced data analytics. By understanding how wild pigs interact and move across different habitats, we can develop more targeted and effective strategies to protect agriculture, biodiversity and human health from disease outbreaks.

References

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mercury Shitindo

    Mercury Shitindo is in the Africa Bioethics Network, Nairobi, Kenya and the University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

    For correspondence
    mercury.shitindo@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3814-8786

Publication history

  1. Version of Record published:

Copyright

© 2024, Shitindo

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 222
    views
  • 19
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mercury Shitindo
(2024)
Disease Transmission: Interactions between wild pigs and the spread of disease
eLife 13:e105293.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.105293
  1. Further reading

Further reading

    1. Ecology
    2. Evolutionary Biology
    Justine Boutry, Océane Rieu ... Fréderic Thomas
    Research Article

    While host phenotypic manipulation by parasites is a widespread phenomenon, whether tumors, which can be likened to parasite entities, can also manipulate their hosts is not known. Theory predicts that this should nevertheless be the case, especially when tumors (neoplasms) are transmissible. We explored this hypothesis in a cnidarian Hydra model system, in which spontaneous tumors can occur in the lab, and lineages in which such neoplastic cells are vertically transmitted (through host budding) have been maintained for over 15 years. Remarkably, the hydras with long-term transmissible tumors show an unexpected increase in the number of their tentacles, allowing for the possibility that these neoplastic cells can manipulate the host. By experimentally transplanting healthy as well as neoplastic tissues derived from both recent and long-term transmissible tumors, we found that only the long-term transmissible tumors were able to trigger the growth of additional tentacles. Also, supernumerary tentacles, by permitting higher foraging efficiency for the host, were associated with an increased budding rate, thereby favoring the vertical transmission of tumors. To our knowledge, this is the first evidence that, like true parasites, transmissible tumors can evolve strategies to manipulate the phenotype of their host.

    1. Ecology
    Ming-Qiang Wang, Shi-Kun Guo ... Chao-Dong Zhu
    Research Article

    Environmental factors can influence ecological networks, but these effects are poorly understood in the realm of the phylogeny of host-parasitoid interactions. Especially, we lack a comprehensive understanding of the ways that biotic factors, including plant species richness, overall community phylogenetic and functional composition of consumers, and abiotic factors such as microclimate, determine host-parasitoid network structure and host-parasitoid community dynamics. To address this, we leveraged a 5-year dataset of trap-nesting bees and wasps and their parasitoids collected in a highly controlled, large-scale subtropical tree biodiversity experiment. We tested for effects of tree species richness, tree phylogenetic, and functional diversity, and species and phylogenetic composition on species and phylogenetic diversity of both host and parasitoid communities and the composition of their interaction networks. We show that multiple components of tree diversity and canopy cover impacted both, species and phylogenetic composition of hosts and parasitoids. Generally, phylogenetic associations between hosts and parasitoids reflected nonrandomly structured interactions between phylogenetic trees of hosts and parasitoids. Further, host-parasitoid network structure was influenced by tree species richness, tree phylogenetic diversity, and canopy cover. Our study indicates that the composition of higher trophic levels and corresponding interaction networks are determined by plant diversity and canopy cover, especially via trophic links in species-rich ecosystems.