1. Epidemiology and Global Health
  2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease

Viral factors in influenza pandemic risk assessment

  1. Marc Lipsitch  Is a corresponding author
  2. Wendy Barclay
  3. Rahul Raman
  4. Charles J Russell
  5. Jessica A Belser
  6. Sarah Cobey
  7. Peter M Kasson
  8. James O Lloyd-Smith
  9. Sebastian Maurer-Stroh
  10. Steven Riley
  11. Catherine AA Beauchemin
  12. Trevor Bedford
  13. Thomas C Friedrich
  14. Andreas Handel
  15. Sander Herfst
  16. Pablo R Murcia
  17. Benjamin Roche
  18. Claus O Wilke
  19. Colin A Russell
  1. Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, United States
  2. Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  3. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
  4. St Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States
  6. University of Chicago, United States
  7. University of Virginia, United States
  8. University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  9. Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore
  10. Ryerson University, Canada
  11. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States
  12. University of Wisconsin School of Veterinary Medicine, United States
  13. University of Georgia, United States
  14. Erasmus Medical Center, Netherlands
  15. MRC-University of Glasgow Centre For Virus Research, United Kingdom
  16. Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, France
  17. The University of Texas at Austin, United States
  18. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18491
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Marc Lipsitch
  2. Wendy Barclay
  3. Rahul Raman
  4. Charles J Russell
  5. Jessica A Belser
  6. Sarah Cobey
  7. Peter M Kasson
  8. James O Lloyd-Smith
  9. Sebastian Maurer-Stroh
  10. Steven Riley
  11. Catherine AA Beauchemin
  12. Trevor Bedford
  13. Thomas C Friedrich
  14. Andreas Handel
  15. Sander Herfst
  16. Pablo R Murcia
  17. Benjamin Roche
  18. Claus O Wilke
  19. Colin A Russell
(2016)
Viral factors in influenza pandemic risk assessment
eLife 5:e18491.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18491
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

The threat of an influenza A virus pandemic stems from continual virus spillovers from reservoir species, a tiny fraction of which spark sustained transmission in humans. To date, no pandemic emergence of a new influenza strain has been preceded by detection of a closely related precursor in an animal or human. Nonetheless, influenza surveillance efforts are expanding, prompting a need for tools to assess the pandemic risk posed by a detected virus. The goal would be to use genetic sequence and/or biological assays of viral traits to identify those non-human influenza viruses with the greatest risk of evolving into pandemic threats, and/or to understand drivers of such evolution, to prioritize pandemic prevention or response measures. We describe such efforts, identify progress and ongoing challenges, and discuss three specific traits of influenza viruses (hemagglutinin receptor binding specificity, hemagglutinin pH of activation, and polymerase complex efficiency) that contribute to pandemic risk.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Marc Lipsitch

    Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Departments of Epidemiology and Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    mlipsitc@hsph.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    Marc Lipsitch, ML reports the following financial disclosures for topics unrelated to this manuscript: consulting income from Pfizer and Affinivax (both donated to charity) and research funding from Pfizer and PATH Vaccine Solutions. These entities had no role in the preparation of this work or in the decision to submit the work for publicationReviewing editor for eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1504-9213

  2. Wendy Barclay

    Division of Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  3. Rahul Raman

    Department of Biological Engineering, Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  4. Charles J Russell

    Department of Infectious Diseases, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  5. Jessica A Belser

    Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  6. Sarah Cobey

    Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  7. Peter M Kasson

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  8. James O Lloyd-Smith

    Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7941-502X

  9. Sebastian Maurer-Stroh

    Bioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  10. Steven Riley

    MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  11. Catherine AA Beauchemin

    Department of Physics, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0599-0069

  12. Trevor Bedford

    Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  13. Thomas C Friedrich

    Department of Pathobiological Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Veterinary Medicine, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  14. Andreas Handel

    University of Georgia, Athens, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4622-1146

  15. Sander Herfst

    Department of Viroscience, Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  16. Pablo R Murcia

    MRC-University of Glasgow Centre For Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4352-394X

  17. Benjamin Roche

    UMI UMMISCO, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

  18. Claus O Wilke

    Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7470-9261

  19. Colin A Russell

    Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Colin A Russell, During the prepartion of this manuscript, CAAB received funding through aresearch contract with AstraZeneca Inc., but for distinct, unrelatedresearch. AstraZeneca Inc. had no role in the preparation of this work orin the decision to submit the work for publication..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2113-162X

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (12/1/06/24/5793)

  • Sebastian Maurer-Stroh

Wellcome (200861/Z/16/Z)

  • Steven Riley

Medical Research Council (MR/J008761/1)

  • Steven Riley

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (MIDAS U01 GM110721-01)

  • Steven Riley

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (VIDI grant 91715372)

  • Sander Herfst

Agency for Science, Technology and Research (12/1/06/24/5793)

  • Sebastian Maurer-Stroh

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance (Contract HHSN272201400006C))

  • Charles J Russell

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM088344)

  • Claus O Wilke

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM098304)

  • Peter M Kasson

Royal Society (University Research Fellowship)

  • Colin A Russell

Medical Research Council (G0801822)

  • Pablo R Murcia

Wellcome (Project 093488/Z/10/Z)

  • Steven Riley

Wellcome (200187/Z/15/Z)

  • Steven Riley

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (MIDAS Center of Excellence Cooperative Agreement U54GM088558)

  • Marc Lipsitch

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discovery Grant (355837-2013))

  • Catherine AA Beauchemin

Ministry of Research and Innovation (Early Researcher Award Award (ER13-09-040))

  • Catherine AA Beauchemin

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 5,109
    views
  • 1,211
    downloads
  • 80
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Marc Lipsitch
  2. Wendy Barclay
  3. Rahul Raman
  4. Charles J Russell
  5. Jessica A Belser
  6. Sarah Cobey
  7. Peter M Kasson
  8. James O Lloyd-Smith
  9. Sebastian Maurer-Stroh
  10. Steven Riley
  11. Catherine AA Beauchemin
  12. Trevor Bedford
  13. Thomas C Friedrich
  14. Andreas Handel
  15. Sander Herfst
  16. Pablo R Murcia
  17. Benjamin Roche
  18. Claus O Wilke
  19. Colin A Russell
(2016)
Viral factors in influenza pandemic risk assessment
eLife 5:e18491.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18491

Categories and tags

Research organisms

    1. Of interest

    Livestock abortion surveillance in Tanzania reveals disease priorities and importance of timely collection of vaginal swab samples for attribution

    Felix Lankester, Tito J Kibona ... Sarah Cleaveland
  2. Further reading

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease

    Livestock abortion surveillance in Tanzania reveals disease priorities and importance of timely collection of vaginal swab samples for attribution

    Felix Lankester, Tito J Kibona ... Sarah Cleaveland
    Research Article

    Lack of data on the aetiology of livestock diseases constrains effective interventions to improve livelihoods, food security and public health. Livestock abortion is an important disease syndrome affecting productivity and public health. Several pathogens are associated with livestock abortions but across Africa surveillance data rarely include information from abortions, little is known about aetiology and impacts, and data are not available to inform interventions. This paper describes outcomes from a surveillance platform established in Tanzania spanning pastoral, agropastoral and smallholder systems to investigate causes and impacts of livestock abortion. Abortion events were reported by farmers to livestock field officers (LFO) and on to investigation teams. Events were included if the research team or LFO could attend within 72 hr. If so, samples and questionnaire data were collected to investigate (a) determinants of attribution; (b) patterns of events, including species and breed, previous abortion history, and seasonality; (c) determinants of reporting, investigation and attribution; (d) cases involving zoonotic pathogens. Between 2017–2019, 215 events in cattle (n=71), sheep (n=44), and goats (n=100) were investigated. Attribution, achieved for 19.5% of cases, was significantly affected by delays in obtaining samples. Histopathology proved less useful than PCR due to rapid deterioration of samples. Vaginal swabs provided practical and sensitive material for pathogen detection. Livestock abortion surveillance, even at a small scale, can generate valuable information on causes of disease outbreaks, reproductive losses and can identify pathogens not easily captured through other forms of livestock disease surveillance. This study demonstrated the feasibility of establishing a surveillance system, achieved through engagement of community-based field officers, establishment of practical sample collection and application of molecular diagnostic platforms.

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Genetics and Genomics

    Systematic evaluation of multifactorial causal associations for Alzheimer’s disease and an interactive platform MRAD developed based on Mendelian randomization analysis

    Tianyu Zhao, Hui Li ... Li Chen
    Research Article

    Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex degenerative disease of the central nervous system, and elucidating its pathogenesis remains challenging. In this study, we used the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) model as the major analysis method to perform hypothesis-free Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis on the data from MRC IEU OpenGWAS (18,097 exposure traits and 16 AD outcome traits), and conducted sensitivity analysis with six models, to assess the robustness of the IVW results, to identify various classes of risk or protective factors for AD, early-onset AD, and late-onset AD. We generated 400,274 data entries in total, among which the major analysis method of the IVW model consists of 73,129 records with 4840 exposure traits, which fall into 10 categories: Disease, Medical laboratory science, Imaging, Anthropometric, Treatment, Molecular trait, Gut microbiota, Past history, Family history, and Lifestyle trait. More importantly, a freely accessed online platform called MRAD (https://gwasmrad.com/mrad/) has been developed using the Shiny package with MR analysis results. Additionally, novel potential AD therapeutic targets (CD33, TBCA, VPS29, GNAI3, PSME1) are identified, among which CD33 was positively associated with the main outcome traits of AD, as well as with both EOAD and LOAD. TBCA and VPS29 were negatively associated with the main outcome traits of AD, as well as with both EOAD and LOAD. GNAI3 and PSME1 were negatively associated with the main outcome traits of AD, as well as with LOAD, but had no significant causal association with EOAD. The findings of our research advance our understanding of the etiology of AD.

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health

    Noncaloric monosaccharides induce excessive sprouting angiogenesis in zebrafish via foxo1a-marcksl1a signal

    Xiaoning Wang, Jinxiang Zhao ... Dong Liu
    Research Article

    Artificially sweetened beverages containing noncaloric monosaccharides were suggested as healthier alternatives to sugar-sweetened beverages. Nevertheless, the potential detrimental effects of these noncaloric monosaccharides on blood vessel function remain inadequately understood. We have established a zebrafish model that exhibits significant excessive angiogenesis induced by high glucose, resembling the hyperangiogenic characteristics observed in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Utilizing this model, we observed that glucose and noncaloric monosaccharides could induce excessive formation of blood vessels, especially intersegmental vessels (ISVs). The excessively branched vessels were observed to be formed by ectopic activation of quiescent endothelial cells (ECs) into tip cells. Single-cell transcriptomic sequencing analysis of the ECs in the embryos exposed to high glucose revealed an augmented ratio of capillary ECs, proliferating ECs, and a series of upregulated proangiogenic genes. Further analysis and experiments validated that reduced foxo1a mediated the excessive angiogenesis induced by monosaccharides via upregulating the expression of marcksl1a. This study has provided new evidence showing the negative effects of noncaloric monosaccharides on the vascular system and the underlying mechanisms.