Viral factors in influenza pandemic risk assessment

  1. Marc Lipsitch  Is a corresponding author
  2. Wendy Barclay
  3. Rahul Raman
  4. Charles J Russell
  5. Jessica A Belser
  6. Sarah Cobey
  7. Peter M Kasson
  8. James O Lloyd-Smith
  9. Sebastian Maurer-Stroh
  10. Steven Riley
  11. Catherine AA Beauchemin
  12. Trevor Bedford
  13. Thomas C Friedrich
  14. Andreas Handel
  15. Sander Herfst
  16. Pablo R Murcia
  17. Benjamin Roche
  18. Claus O Wilke
  19. Colin A Russell
  1. Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, United States
  2. Imperial College London, United Kingdom
  3. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
  4. St Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States
  6. University of Chicago, United States
  7. University of Virginia, United States
  8. University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  9. Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore
  10. Ryerson University, Canada
  11. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States
  12. University of Wisconsin School of Veterinary Medicine, United States
  13. University of Georgia, United States
  14. Erasmus Medical Center, Netherlands
  15. MRC-University of Glasgow Centre For Virus Research, United Kingdom
  16. Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, France
  17. The University of Texas at Austin, United States
  18. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Abstract

The threat of an influenza A virus pandemic stems from continual virus spillovers from reservoir species, a tiny fraction of which spark sustained transmission in humans. To date, no pandemic emergence of a new influenza strain has been preceded by detection of a closely related precursor in an animal or human. Nonetheless, influenza surveillance efforts are expanding, prompting a need for tools to assess the pandemic risk posed by a detected virus. The goal would be to use genetic sequence and/or biological assays of viral traits to identify those non-human influenza viruses with the greatest risk of evolving into pandemic threats, and/or to understand drivers of such evolution, to prioritize pandemic prevention or response measures. We describe such efforts, identify progress and ongoing challenges, and discuss three specific traits of influenza viruses (hemagglutinin receptor binding specificity, hemagglutinin pH of activation, and polymerase complex efficiency) that contribute to pandemic risk.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Marc Lipsitch

    Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Departments of Epidemiology and Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    mlipsitc@hsph.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    Marc Lipsitch, ML reports the following financial disclosures for topics unrelated to this manuscript: consulting income from Pfizer and Affinivax (both donated to charity) and research funding from Pfizer and PATH Vaccine Solutions. These entities had no role in the preparation of this work or in the decision to submit the work for publicationReviewing editor for eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1504-9213
  2. Wendy Barclay

    Division of Infectious Disease, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Rahul Raman

    Department of Biological Engineering, Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Charles J Russell

    Department of Infectious Diseases, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Jessica A Belser

    Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Sarah Cobey

    Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Peter M Kasson

    Department of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. James O Lloyd-Smith

    Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7941-502X
  9. Sebastian Maurer-Stroh

    Bioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore, Singapore
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Steven Riley

    MRC Centre for Outbreak Analysis and Modelling, Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Catherine AA Beauchemin

    Department of Physics, Ryerson University, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0599-0069
  12. Trevor Bedford

    Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Thomas C Friedrich

    Department of Pathobiological Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Veterinary Medicine, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  14. Andreas Handel

    University of Georgia, Athens, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4622-1146
  15. Sander Herfst

    Department of Viroscience, Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  16. Pablo R Murcia

    MRC-University of Glasgow Centre For Virus Research, Glasgow, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4352-394X
  17. Benjamin Roche

    UMI UMMISCO, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  18. Claus O Wilke

    Department of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7470-9261
  19. Colin A Russell

    Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    Colin A Russell, During the prepartion of this manuscript, CAAB received funding through aresearch contract with AstraZeneca Inc., but for distinct, unrelatedresearch. AstraZeneca Inc. had no role in the preparation of this work orin the decision to submit the work for publication..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2113-162X

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council (12/1/06/24/5793)

  • Sebastian Maurer-Stroh

Wellcome (200861/Z/16/Z)

  • Steven Riley

Medical Research Council (MR/J008761/1)

  • Steven Riley

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (MIDAS U01 GM110721-01)

  • Steven Riley

Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (VIDI grant 91715372)

  • Sander Herfst

Agency for Science, Technology and Research (12/1/06/24/5793)

  • Sebastian Maurer-Stroh

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Centers of Excellence for Influenza Research and Surveillance (Contract HHSN272201400006C))

  • Charles J Russell

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM088344)

  • Claus O Wilke

National Institutes of Health (R01 GM098304)

  • Peter M Kasson

Royal Society (University Research Fellowship)

  • Colin A Russell

Medical Research Council (G0801822)

  • Pablo R Murcia

Wellcome (Project 093488/Z/10/Z)

  • Steven Riley

Wellcome (200187/Z/15/Z)

  • Steven Riley

National Institute of General Medical Sciences (MIDAS Center of Excellence Cooperative Agreement U54GM088558)

  • Marc Lipsitch

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (Discovery Grant (355837-2013))

  • Catherine AA Beauchemin

Ministry of Research and Innovation (Early Researcher Award Award (ER13-09-040))

  • Catherine AA Beauchemin

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 5,166
    views
  • 1,219
    downloads
  • 82
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Marc Lipsitch
  2. Wendy Barclay
  3. Rahul Raman
  4. Charles J Russell
  5. Jessica A Belser
  6. Sarah Cobey
  7. Peter M Kasson
  8. James O Lloyd-Smith
  9. Sebastian Maurer-Stroh
  10. Steven Riley
  11. Catherine AA Beauchemin
  12. Trevor Bedford
  13. Thomas C Friedrich
  14. Andreas Handel
  15. Sander Herfst
  16. Pablo R Murcia
  17. Benjamin Roche
  18. Claus O Wilke
  19. Colin A Russell
(2016)
Viral factors in influenza pandemic risk assessment
eLife 5:e18491.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.18491

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    Marina Padilha, Victor Nahuel Keller ... Gilberto Kac
    Research Article Updated

    Background:

    The role of circulating metabolites on child development is understudied. We investigated associations between children’s serum metabolome and early childhood development (ECD).

    Methods:

    Untargeted metabolomics was performed on serum samples of 5004 children aged 6–59 months, a subset of participants from the Brazilian National Survey on Child Nutrition (ENANI-2019). ECD was assessed using the Survey of Well-being of Young Children’s milestones questionnaire. The graded response model was used to estimate developmental age. Developmental quotient (DQ) was calculated as the developmental age divided by chronological age. Partial least square regression selected metabolites with a variable importance projection ≥1. The interaction between significant metabolites and the child’s age was tested.

    Results:

    Twenty-eight top-ranked metabolites were included in linear regression models adjusted for the child’s nutritional status, diet quality, and infant age. Cresol sulfate (β=–0.07; adjusted-p <0.001), hippuric acid (β=–0.06; adjusted-p <0.001), phenylacetylglutamine (β=–0.06; adjusted-p <0.001), and trimethylamine-N-oxide (β=–0.05; adjusted-p=0.002) showed inverse associations with DQ. We observed opposite directions in the association of DQ for creatinine (for children aged –1 SD: β=–0.05; pP=0.01;+1 SD: β=0.05; p=0.02) and methylhistidine (–1 SD: β = - 0.04; p=0.04;+1 SD: β=0.04; p=0.03).

    Conclusions:

    Serum biomarkers, including dietary and microbial-derived metabolites involved in the gut-brain axis, may potentially be used to track children at risk for developmental delays.

    Funding:

    Supported by the Brazilian Ministry of Health and the Brazilian National Research Council.

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Gillian AM Tarr, Linda Chui ... Tim A McAllister
    Research Article

    Several areas of the world suffer a notably high incidence of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli. To assess the impact of persistent cross-species transmission systems on the epidemiology of E. coli O157:H7 in Alberta, Canada, we sequenced and assembled E. coli O157:H7 isolates originating from collocated cattle and human populations, 2007–2015. We constructed a timed phylogeny using BEAST2 using a structured coalescent model. We then extended the tree with human isolates through 2019 to assess the long-term disease impact of locally persistent lineages. During 2007–2015, we estimated that 88.5% of human lineages arose from cattle lineages. We identified 11 persistent lineages local to Alberta, which were associated with 38.0% (95% CI 29.3%, 47.3%) of human isolates. During the later period, six locally persistent lineages continued to be associated with human illness, including 74.7% (95% CI 68.3%, 80.3%) of reported cases in 2018 and 2019. Our study identified multiple locally evolving lineages transmitted between cattle and humans persistently associated with E. coli O157:H7 illnesses for up to 13 y. Locally persistent lineages may be a principal cause of the high incidence of E. coli O157:H7 in locations such as Alberta and provide opportunities for focused control efforts.