1. Neuroscience

Perceptual processing in the ventral visual stream requires area TE but not rhinal cortex

  1. Mark A G Eldridge  Is a corresponding author
  2. Narihisa Matsumoto
  3. John H Wittig
  4. Evan C Masseau
  5. Richard C Saunders
  6. Barry J Richmond  Is a corresponding author
  1. National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, United States
  2. National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Japan
  3. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, United States
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36310
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Mark A G Eldridge
  2. Narihisa Matsumoto
  3. John H Wittig
  4. Evan C Masseau
  5. Richard C Saunders
  6. Barry J Richmond
(2018)
Perceptual processing in the ventral visual stream requires area TE but not rhinal cortex
eLife 7:e36310.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36310
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

There is on-going debate over whether area TE, or the anatomically adjacent rhinal cortex, is the final stage of visual object processing. Both regions have been implicated in visual perception, but their involvement in non-perceptual functions, such as short-term memory, hinders clear-cut interpretation. Here using a two-interval forced choice task without a short-term memory demand, we find that after bilateral removal of area TE, monkeys trained to categorize images based on perceptual similarity (morphs between dogs and cats), are, on the initial viewing, badly impaired when given a new set of images. They improve markedly with a small amount of practice but nonetheless remain moderately impaired indefinitely. The monkeys with bilateral removal of rhinal cortex are, under all conditions, indistinguishable from unoperated controls. We conclude that the final stage of the integration of visual perceptual information into object percepts in the ventral visual stream occurs in area TE.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Mark A G Eldridge

    Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    mark.a.g.eldridge@gmail.com
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4292-6832

  2. Narihisa Matsumoto

    Human Informatics Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Japan
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. John H Wittig

    Surgical Neurology Branch, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0465-1022

  4. Evan C Masseau

    Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Richard C Saunders

    Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Barry J Richmond

    Laboratory of Neuropsychology, National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    barry.richmond@nih.gov
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8234-1540

Funding

National Institute of Mental Health (1ZIAMH002032-41)

  • Mark A G Eldridge
  • Narihisa Matsumoto
  • John H Wittig
  • Evan C Masseau
  • Richard C Saunders
  • Barry J Richmond

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experimental procedures conformed to the Institute of Medicine Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and were performed under an Animal Study Protocol approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the National Institute of Mental Health, covered by project number: MH002032.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 1,137
    views
  • 155
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Mark A G Eldridge
  2. Narihisa Matsumoto
  3. John H Wittig
  4. Evan C Masseau
  5. Richard C Saunders
  6. Barry J Richmond
(2018)
Perceptual processing in the ventral visual stream requires area TE but not rhinal cortex
eLife 7:e36310.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36310

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.36310

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience

    Inconsistencies between human and macaque lesion data can be resolved with a stimulus-computable model of the ventral visual stream

    Tyler Bonnen, Mark AG Eldridge
    Research Advance Updated

    Decades of neuroscientific research has sought to understand medial temporal lobe (MTL) involvement in perception. Apparent inconsistencies in the literature have led to competing interpretations of the available evidence; critically, findings from human participants with naturally occurring MTL damage appear to be inconsistent with data from monkeys with surgical lesions. Here, we leverage a ‘stimulus-computable’ proxy for the primate ventral visual stream (VVS), which enables us to formally evaluate perceptual demands across stimulus sets, experiments, and species. With this modeling framework, we analyze a series of experiments administered to monkeys with surgical, bilateral damage to perirhinal cortex (PRC), an MTL structure implicated in visual object perception. Across experiments, PRC-lesioned subjects showed no impairment on perceptual tasks; this originally led us(Eldridge et al., 2018) to conclude that PRC is not involved in perception. Here, we find that a ‘VVS-like’ model predicts both PRC-intact and -lesioned choice behaviors, suggesting that a linear readout of the VVS should be sufficient for performance on these tasks. Evaluating these computational results alongside findings from human experiments, we suggest that results from (Eldridge et al., 2018) alone cannot be used as evidence against PRC involvement in perception. These data indicate that experimental findings from human and non-human primates are consistent. As such, what appeared to be discrepancies between species was in fact due to reliance on informal accounts of perceptual processing.

    1. Neuroscience

    Opioids: Finding new ways to treat overdoses

    Jill R Turner, Jocelyn Martin
    Insight

    Reversing opioid overdoses in rats using a drug that does not enter the brain prevents the sudden and severe withdrawal symptoms associated with therapeutics that target the central nervous system.

    1. Neuroscience

    Pain-Related Memory Impairment: How does chronic pain lead to memory loss?

    Suelen Pereira, Ivan Tomsic ... Mychael V Lourenco
    Insight

    A dysfunctional signaling pathway in the hippocampus has been linked to chronic pain-related memory impairment in mice.