Distinct neuronal populations contribute to trace conditioning and extinction learning in the hippocampal CA1

Abstract

Trace conditioning and extinction learning depend on the hippocampus, but it remains unclear how neural activity in the hippocampus is modulated during these two different behavioral processes. To explore this question, we performed calcium imaging from a large number of individual CA1 neurons during both trace eye-blink conditioning and subsequent extinction learning in mice. Our findings reveal that distinct populations of CA1 cells contribute to trace conditioned learning versus extinction learning, as learning emerges. Furthermore, we examined network connectivity by calculating co-activity between CA1 neuron pairs and found that CA1 network connectivity patterns also differ between conditioning and extinction, even though the overall connectivity density remains constant. Together, our results demonstrate that distinct populations of hippocampal CA1 neurons, forming different sub-networks with unique connectivity patterns, encode different aspects of learning.

Data availability

All custom software will be made available on the Han Lab Github, and links are provided in the manuscript.All data generated during this study is included in the manuscript.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Rebecca A Mount

    Biomedical Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8962-1641
  2. Sudiksha Sridhar

    Biomedical Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Kyle R Hansen

    Biomedical Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2782-7289
  4. Ali I Mohammed

    Biomedical Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Moona E Abdulkerim

    Biomedical Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Robb Kessel

    Biomedical Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Bobak Nazer

    Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Howard J Gritton

    Biomedical Engineering Department, Boston University, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    hgritton@bu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3194-3258
  9. Xue Han

    Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    xuehan@bu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3896-4609

Funding

National Science Foundation (CBET-1848029)

  • Xue Han

National Institutes of Health (1R01MH122971-01A1,1R21MH109941-01)

  • Xue Han

Boston University Dean's Catalyst Award

  • Xue Han

National Academy of Engineering

  • Xue Han

The Grainger Foundation, Inc.

  • Xue Han

National Science Foundation (DGE-1247312)

  • Kyle R Hansen

National Institutes of Health (F31 NS 105420)

  • Kyle R Hansen

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal procedures were approved by the Boston University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol #201800680), and all experiments were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.

Copyright

© 2021, Mount et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,813
    views
  • 359
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Rebecca A Mount
  2. Sudiksha Sridhar
  3. Kyle R Hansen
  4. Ali I Mohammed
  5. Moona E Abdulkerim
  6. Robb Kessel
  7. Bobak Nazer
  8. Howard J Gritton
  9. Xue Han
(2021)
Distinct neuronal populations contribute to trace conditioning and extinction learning in the hippocampal CA1
eLife 10:e56491.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56491

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.56491

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Friedrich Schuessler, Francesca Mastrogiuseppe ... Omri Barak
    Research Article

    The relation between neural activity and behaviorally relevant variables is at the heart of neuroscience research. When strong, this relation is termed a neural representation. There is increasing evidence, however, for partial dissociations between activity in an area and relevant external variables. While many explanations have been proposed, a theoretical framework for the relationship between external and internal variables is lacking. Here, we utilize recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to explore the question of when and how neural dynamics and the network’s output are related from a geometrical point of view. We find that training RNNs can lead to two dynamical regimes: dynamics can either be aligned with the directions that generate output variables, or oblique to them. We show that the choice of readout weight magnitude before training can serve as a control knob between the regimes, similar to recent findings in feedforward networks. These regimes are functionally distinct. Oblique networks are more heterogeneous and suppress noise in their output directions. They are furthermore more robust to perturbations along the output directions. Crucially, the oblique regime is specific to recurrent (but not feedforward) networks, arising from dynamical stability considerations. Finally, we show that tendencies toward the aligned or the oblique regime can be dissociated in neural recordings. Altogether, our results open a new perspective for interpreting neural activity by relating network dynamics and their output.