Abstract

A key unknown for SARS-CoV-2 is how asymptomatic infections contribute to transmission. We used a transmission model with asymptomatic and presymptomatic states, calibrated to data on disease onset and test frequency from the Diamond Princess cruise ship outbreak, to quantify the contribution of asymptomatic infections to transmission. The model estimated that 74% (70-78%, 95% posterior interval) of infections proceeded asymptomatically. Despite intense testing, 53% (51-56%) of infections remained undetected, most of them asymptomatic. Asymptomatic individuals were the source for 69% (20-85%) of all infections. The data did not allow identification of the infectiousness of asymptomatic infections, however low ranges (0-25%) required a net reproduction number for individuals progressing through presymptomatic and symptomatic stages of at least 15. Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections may contribute substantially to transmission. Control measures, and models projecting their potential impact, need to look beyond the symptomatic cases if they are to understand and address ongoing transmission.

Data availability

All data analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Model code is available through github.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jon C Emery

    Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Timothy W Russell

    Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Yang Liu

    Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Joel Hellewell

    Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Carl AB Pearson

    Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. CMMID COVID-19 Working Group

  7. Gwenan M Knight

    IDE, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7263-9896
  8. Rosalind M Eggo

    Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Adam J Kucharski

    Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8814-9421
  10. Sebastian Funk

    Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2842-3406
  11. Stefan Flasche

    Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Rein M G J Houben

    Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    rein.houben@lshtm.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4132-7467

Funding

European Research Council Starting Grant (Action Number 757699)

  • Jon C Emery
  • Rein M G J Houben

Wellcome (206250/Z/17/Z)

  • Timothy W Russell
  • Adam J Kucharski

Wellcome (208812/Z/17/Z)

  • Stefan Flasche

Wellcome (210758/Z/18/Z)

  • Joel Hellewell
  • Sebastian Funk

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-003174)

  • Yang Liu

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (NTD Modelling Consortium OPP1184344)

  • Carl AB Pearson

DFID/Wellcome Trust (Epidemic Preparedness Coronavirus research programme 221303/Z/20/Z)

  • Carl AB Pearson

European Union Horizon 2020 (project EpiPose (101003688))

  • Yang Liu

HDR UK (MR/S003975/1)

  • Rosalind M Eggo

National Institute for Health Research (16/137/109)

  • Yang Liu

Medical Research Council (MC_PC 19065)

  • Rosalind M Eggo

Medical Research Council (MR/P014658/1)

  • Gwenan M Knight

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2020, Emery et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,509
    views
  • 639
    downloads
  • 58
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jon C Emery
  2. Timothy W Russell
  3. Yang Liu
  4. Joel Hellewell
  5. Carl AB Pearson
  6. CMMID COVID-19 Working Group
  7. Gwenan M Knight
  8. Rosalind M Eggo
  9. Adam J Kucharski
  10. Sebastian Funk
  11. Stefan Flasche
  12. Rein M G J Houben
(2020)
The contribution of asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections to transmission on the Diamond Princess cruise ship
eLife 9:e58699.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58699

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.58699

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    3. Epidemiology and Global Health
    4. Immunology and Inflammation
    Edited by Jos WM van der Meer et al.
    Collection

    eLife has published articles on a wide range of infectious diseases, including COVID-19, influenza, tuberculosis, HIV/AIDS, malaria and typhoid fever.

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Genetics and Genomics
    Tianyu Zhao, Hui Li ... Li Chen
    Research Article

    Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a complex degenerative disease of the central nervous system, and elucidating its pathogenesis remains challenging. In this study, we used the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) model as the major analysis method to perform hypothesis-free Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis on the data from MRC IEU OpenGWAS (18,097 exposure traits and 16 AD outcome traits), and conducted sensitivity analysis with six models, to assess the robustness of the IVW results, to identify various classes of risk or protective factors for AD, early-onset AD, and late-onset AD. We generated 400,274 data entries in total, among which the major analysis method of the IVW model consists of 73,129 records with 4840 exposure traits, which fall into 10 categories: Disease, Medical laboratory science, Imaging, Anthropometric, Treatment, Molecular trait, Gut microbiota, Past history, Family history, and Lifestyle trait. More importantly, a freely accessed online platform called MRAD (https://gwasmrad.com/mrad/) has been developed using the Shiny package with MR analysis results. Additionally, novel potential AD therapeutic targets (CD33, TBCA, VPS29, GNAI3, PSME1) are identified, among which CD33 was positively associated with the main outcome traits of AD, as well as with both EOAD and LOAD. TBCA and VPS29 were negatively associated with the main outcome traits of AD, as well as with both EOAD and LOAD. GNAI3 and PSME1 were negatively associated with the main outcome traits of AD, as well as with LOAD, but had no significant causal association with EOAD. The findings of our research advance our understanding of the etiology of AD.