How oscillating aerodynamic forces explain the timbre of the hummingbird’s hum and other animals in flapping flight
Abstract
How hummingbirds hum is not fully understood, but its biophysical origin is encoded in the acoustic nearfield. Hence, we studied six freely hovering Anna's hummingbirds, performing acoustic nearfield holography using a 2176 microphone array in vivo, while also directly measuring the 3D aerodynamic forces using a new aerodynamic force platform. We corroborate the acoustic measurements by developing an idealized acoustic model that integrates the aerodynamic forces with wing kinematics, which shows how the timbre of the hummingbird's hum arises from the oscillating lift and drag forces on each wing. Comparing birds and insects, we find that the characteristic humming timbre and radiated power of their flapping wings originates from the higher harmonics in the aerodynamic forces that support their bodyweight. Our model analysis across insects and birds shows that allometric deviation makes larger birds quieter and elongated flies louder, while also clarifying complex bioacoustic behavior.
Data availability
All data needed to evaluate the conclusions presented in the paper are available on Dryad, https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.73n5tb2vs.
-
Data from: How Oscillating Aerodynamic Forces Explain the Timbre of the Hummingbird's Hum and Other Animals in Flapping FlightDryad Digital Repository, 10.5061/dryad.73n5tb2vs.
Article and author information
Author details
Funding
National Science Foundation (Faculty Early Career Development (CAREER) Award,1552419)
- David Lentink
National Science Foundation (Graduate Research Fellowship)
- Ben J Hightower
Stanford University (Stanford Graduate Fellowship)
- Ben J Hightower
Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (Research Program ZERO (P15-06))
- Patrick W A Wijnings
Stanford University (Stanford Graduate Fellowship)
- Diana D Chin
National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate (Graduate Fellowship)
- Diana D Chin
The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Ethics
Animal experimentation: All bird training and experimental procedures were approved by Stanford's Administrative Panel on Laboratory Animal Care (APLAC-31426).
Copyright
© 2021, Hightower et al.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
Metrics
-
- 3,717
- views
-
- 387
- downloads
-
- 8
- citations
Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.
Download links
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Further reading
-
Specific aerodynamic forces created by its wings explain the hum of the Hummingbird
-
- Evolutionary Biology
Gene duplication drives evolution by providing raw material for proteins with novel functions. An influential hypothesis by Ohno (1970) posits that gene duplication helps genes tolerate new mutations and thus facilitates the evolution of new phenotypes. Competing hypotheses argue that deleterious mutations will usually inactivate gene duplicates too rapidly for Ohno’s hypothesis to work. We experimentally tested Ohno’s hypothesis by evolving one or exactly two copies of a gene encoding a fluorescent protein in Escherichia coli through several rounds of mutation and selection. We analyzed the genotypic and phenotypic evolutionary dynamics of the evolving populations through high-throughput DNA sequencing, biochemical assays, and engineering of selected variants. In support of Ohno’s hypothesis, populations carrying two gene copies displayed higher mutational robustness than those carrying a single gene copy. Consequently, the double-copy populations experienced relaxed purifying selection, evolved higher phenotypic and genetic diversity, carried more mutations and accumulated combinations of key beneficial mutations earlier. However, their phenotypic evolution was not accelerated, possibly because one gene copy rapidly became inactivated by deleterious mutations. Our work provides an experimental platform to test models of evolution by gene duplication, and it supports alternatives to Ohno’s hypothesis that point to the importance of gene dosage.