Mechanistic theory predicts the effects of temperature and humidity on inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and other enveloped viruses

  1. Dylan H Morris  Is a corresponding author
  2. Kwe Claude Yinda
  3. Amandine Gamble
  4. Fernando W Rossine
  5. Qishen Huang
  6. Trenton Bushmaker
  7. Robert J Fischer
  8. M Jeremiah Matson
  9. Neeltje Van Doremalen
  10. Peter J Vikesland
  11. Linsey C Marr
  12. Vincent J Munster
  13. James O Lloyd-Smith  Is a corresponding author
  1. Princeton University, United States
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, United States
  3. University of California, Los Angeles, United States
  4. Virginia Tech, United States

Abstract

Ambient temperature and humidity strongly affect inactivation rates of enveloped viruses, but a mechanistic, quantitative theory of these effects has been elusive. We measure the stability of SARS-CoV-2 on an inert surface at nine temperature and humidity conditions and develop a mechanistic model to explain and predict how temperature and humidity alter virus inactivation. We find SARS-CoV-2 survives longest at low temperatures and extreme relative humidities (RH); median estimated virus half-life is >24 hours at 10C and 40% RH, but ~1.5 hours at 27C and 65% RH. Our mechanistic model uses fundamental chemistry to explain why inactivation rate increases with increased temperature and shows a U-shaped dependence on RH. The model accurately predicts existing measurements of five different human coronaviruses, suggesting that shared mechanisms may affect stability for many viruses. The results indicate scenarios of high transmission risk, point to mitigation strategies, and advance the mechanistic study of virus transmission.

Data availability

All code and data needed to reproduce results and figures is archived on Github (https://github.com/dylanhmorris/sars-cov-2-temp-humidity/) and on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4093264), and licensed for reuse, with appropriate attribution/citation, under a BSD 3-Clause Revised License. This includes all original data generated in the experiments and all data collected and used for meta-analysis.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Dylan H Morris

    Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    For correspondence
    dhmorris@princeton.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3655-406X
  2. Kwe Claude Yinda

    Virus Ecology Unit, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Hamilton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Amandine Gamble

    Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Fernando W Rossine

    Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Qishen Huang

    Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Trenton Bushmaker

    Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Hamilton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Robert J Fischer

    Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Hamilton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. M Jeremiah Matson

    Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Hamilton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Neeltje Van Doremalen

    Laboratory of Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Hamilton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4368-6359
  10. Peter J Vikesland

    Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Linsey C Marr

    Civil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Vincent J Munster

    Laboratory of Virology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Hamilton, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. James O Lloyd-Smith

    Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States
    For correspondence
    jlloydsmith@ucla.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7941-502X

Funding

National Science Foundation (CCF 1917819)

  • Dylan H Morris

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (D18AC00031)

  • Amandine Gamble
  • James O Lloyd-Smith

UCLA AIDS Institute and Charity Treks

  • Amandine Gamble
  • James O Lloyd-Smith

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (Intramural Research Program)

  • Kwe Claude Yinda
  • Trenton Bushmaker
  • Robert J Fischer
  • M Jeremiah Matson
  • Neeltje Van Doremalen
  • Vincent J Munster

National Science Foundation (DEB-1557022)

  • James O Lloyd-Smith

Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (RC‐2635)

  • James O Lloyd-Smith

National Science Foundation (CBET-1705653)

  • Qishen Huang
  • Peter J Vikesland
  • Linsey C Marr

National Science Foundation (CBET-2029911)

  • Qishen Huang
  • Peter J Vikesland
  • Linsey C Marr

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 6,485
    views
  • 893
    downloads
  • 155
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Dylan H Morris
  2. Kwe Claude Yinda
  3. Amandine Gamble
  4. Fernando W Rossine
  5. Qishen Huang
  6. Trenton Bushmaker
  7. Robert J Fischer
  8. M Jeremiah Matson
  9. Neeltje Van Doremalen
  10. Peter J Vikesland
  11. Linsey C Marr
  12. Vincent J Munster
  13. James O Lloyd-Smith
(2021)
Mechanistic theory predicts the effects of temperature and humidity on inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 and other enveloped viruses
eLife 10:e65902.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65902

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.65902

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    Yuan Zhang, Dan Tang ... Xing Zhao
    Research Article

    Background:

    Biological aging exhibits heterogeneity across multi-organ systems. However, it remains unclear how is lifestyle associated with overall and organ-specific aging and which factors contribute most in Southwest China.

    Methods:

    This study involved 8396 participants who completed two surveys from the China Multi-Ethnic Cohort (CMEC) study. The healthy lifestyle index (HLI) was developed using five lifestyle factors: smoking, alcohol, diet, exercise, and sleep. The comprehensive and organ-specific biological ages (BAs) were calculated using the Klemera–Doubal method based on longitudinal clinical laboratory measurements, and validation were conducted to select BA reflecting related diseases. Fixed effects model was used to examine the associations between HLI or its components and the acceleration of validated BAs. We further evaluated the relative contribution of lifestyle components to comprehension and organ systems BAs using quantile G-computation.

    Results:

    About two-thirds of participants changed HLI scores between surveys. After validation, three organ-specific BAs (the cardiopulmonary, metabolic, and liver BAs) were identified as reflective of specific diseases and included in further analyses with the comprehensive BA. The health alterations in HLI showed a protective association with the acceleration of all BAs, with a mean shift of –0.19 (95% CI −0.34, –0.03) in the comprehensive BA acceleration. Diet and smoking were the major contributors to overall negative associations of five lifestyle factors, with the comprehensive BA and metabolic BA accounting for 24% and 55% respectively.

    Conclusions:

    Healthy lifestyle changes were inversely related to comprehensive and organ-specific biological aging in Southwest China, with diet and smoking contributing most to comprehensive and metabolic BA separately. Our findings highlight the potential of lifestyle interventions to decelerate aging and identify intervention targets to limit organ-specific aging in less-developed regions.

    Funding:

    This work was primarily supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82273740) and Sichuan Science and Technology Program (Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan Province, Grant No. 2024NSFSC0552). The CMEC study was funded by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2017YFC0907305, 2017YFC0907300). The sponsors had no role in the design, analysis, interpretation, or writing of this article.

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Bo Zheng, Bronner P Gonçalves ... Caoyi Xue
    Research Article

    Background:

    In many settings, a large fraction of the population has both been vaccinated against and infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Hence, quantifying the protection provided by post-infection vaccination has become critical for policy. We aimed to estimate the protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection of an additional vaccine dose after an initial Omicron variant infection.

    Methods:

    We report a retrospective, population-based cohort study performed in Shanghai, China, using electronic databases with information on SARS-CoV-2 infections and vaccination history. We compared reinfection incidence by post-infection vaccination status in individuals initially infected during the April–May 2022 Omicron variant surge in Shanghai and who had been vaccinated before that period. Cox models were fit to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs).

    Results:

    275,896 individuals were diagnosed with real-time polymerase chain reaction-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in April–May 2022; 199,312/275,896 were included in analyses on the effect of a post-infection vaccine dose. Post-infection vaccination provided protection against reinfection (aHR 0.82; 95% confidence interval 0.79–0.85). For patients who had received one, two, or three vaccine doses before their first infection, hazard ratios for the post-infection vaccination effect were 0.84 (0.76–0.93), 0.87 (0.83–0.90), and 0.96 (0.74–1.23), respectively. Post-infection vaccination within 30 and 90 days before the second Omicron wave provided different degrees of protection (in aHR): 0.51 (0.44–0.58) and 0.67 (0.61–0.74), respectively. Moreover, for all vaccine types, but to different extents, a post-infection dose given to individuals who were fully vaccinated before first infection was protective.

    Conclusions:

    In previously vaccinated and infected individuals, an additional vaccine dose provided protection against Omicron variant reinfection. These observations will inform future policy decisions on COVID-19 vaccination in China and other countries.

    Funding:

    This study was funded the Key Discipline Program of Pudong New Area Health System (PWZxk2022-25), the Development and Application of Intelligent Epidemic Surveillance and AI Analysis System (21002411400), the Shanghai Public Health System Construction (GWVI-11.2-XD08), the Shanghai Health Commission Key Disciplines (GWVI-11.1-02), the Shanghai Health Commission Clinical Research Program (20214Y0020), the Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (22ZR1414600), and the Shanghai Young Health Talents Program (2022YQ076).