Correlative all-optical quantification of mass density and mechanics of sub-cellular compartments with fluorescence specificity

  1. Raimund Schlüßler  Is a corresponding author
  2. Kyoohyun Kim  Is a corresponding author
  3. Martin Nötzel
  4. Anna Taubenberger
  5. Shada Abuhattum
  6. Timon Beck
  7. Paul Müller
  8. Shovamaye Maharana
  9. Gheorghe Cojoc
  10. Salvatore Girardo
  11. Andreas Hermann
  12. Simon Alberti
  13. Jochen Guck  Is a corresponding author
  1. Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
  2. Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Germany
  3. University of Rostock, Germany

Abstract

Quantitative measurements of physical parameters become increasingly important for understanding biological processes. Brillouin microscopy (BM) has recently emerged as one technique providing the 3D distribution of viscoelastic properties inside biological samples - so far relying on the implicit assumption that refractive index (RI) and density can be neglected. Here, we present a novel method (FOB microscopy) combining BM with optical diffraction tomography and epi-fluorescence imaging for explicitly measuring the Brillouin shift, RI and absolute density with specificity to fluorescently labeled structures. We show that neglecting the RI and density might lead to erroneous conclusions. Investigating the nucleoplasm of wild-type HeLa cells, we find that it has lower density but higher longitudinal modulus than the cytoplasm. Thus, the longitudinal modulus is not merely sensitive to the water content of the sample - a postulate vividly discussed in the field. We demonstrate the further utility of FOB on various biological systems including adipocytes and intracellular membraneless compartments. FOB microscopy can provide unexpected scientific discoveries and shed quantitative light on processes such as phase separation and transition inside living cells.

Data availability

The data sets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from figshare under the following link: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.5347778

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Raimund Schlüßler

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    For correspondence
    raimund.schluessler@tu-dresden.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3752-2382
  2. Kyoohyun Kim

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    For correspondence
    kyoohyun.kim@mpl.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1808-775X
  3. Martin Nötzel

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6442-9899
  4. Anna Taubenberger

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Shada Abuhattum

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Timon Beck

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Paul Müller

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Shovamaye Maharana

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Gheorghe Cojoc

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Salvatore Girardo

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Andreas Hermann

    Translational Neurodegeneration Section 'Albrecht Kossel', University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7364-7791
  12. Simon Alberti

    Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4017-6505
  13. Jochen Guck

    Biological Optomechanics, Max Planck Institute for the Science of Light, Erlangen, Germany
    For correspondence
    jochen.guck@mpl.mpg.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (419138906)

  • Simon Alberti
  • Jochen Guck

Volkswagen Foundation (92847)

  • Simon Alberti
  • Jochen Guck

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung

  • Jochen Guck

NOMIS Stiftung

  • Andreas Hermann

Hermann und Lilly Schilling-Stiftung

  • Andreas Hermann

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Schlüßler et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,815
    views
  • 510
    downloads
  • 57
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Raimund Schlüßler
  2. Kyoohyun Kim
  3. Martin Nötzel
  4. Anna Taubenberger
  5. Shada Abuhattum
  6. Timon Beck
  7. Paul Müller
  8. Shovamaye Maharana
  9. Gheorghe Cojoc
  10. Salvatore Girardo
  11. Andreas Hermann
  12. Simon Alberti
  13. Jochen Guck
(2022)
Correlative all-optical quantification of mass density and mechanics of sub-cellular compartments with fluorescence specificity
eLife 11:e68490.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68490

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.68490

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Jingjing Li, Xinyue Wang ... Vincent Archambault
    Research Article

    In animals, mitosis involves the breakdown of the nucleus. The reassembly of a nucleus after mitosis requires the reformation of the nuclear envelope around a single mass of chromosomes. This process requires Ankle2 (also known as LEM4 in humans) which interacts with PP2A and promotes the function of the Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor (BAF). Upon dephosphorylation, BAF dimers cross-bridge chromosomes and bind lamins and transmembrane proteins of the reassembling nuclear envelope. How Ankle2 functions in mitosis is incompletely understood. Using a combination of approaches in Drosophila, along with structural modeling, we provide several lines of evidence that suggest that Ankle2 is a regulatory subunit of PP2A, explaining how it promotes BAF dephosphorylation. In addition, we discovered that Ankle2 interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum protein Vap33, which is required for Ankle2 localization at the reassembling nuclear envelope during telophase. We identified the interaction sites of PP2A and Vap33 on Ankle2. Through genetic rescue experiments, we show that the Ankle2/PP2A interaction is essential for the function of Ankle2 in nuclear reassembly and that the Ankle2/Vap33 interaction also promotes this process. Our study sheds light on the molecular mechanisms of post-mitotic nuclear reassembly and suggests that the endoplasmic reticulum is not merely a source of membranes in the process, but also provides localized enzymatic activity.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.