Persistent cell migration emerges from a coupling between protrusion dynamics and polarized trafficking

  1. Kotryna Vaidžiulytė
  2. Anne-Sophie Macé
  3. Aude Battistella
  4. William Beng
  5. Kristine Schauer  Is a corresponding author
  6. Mathieu Coppey  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut Curie, France
  2. Institut Gustave Roussy, France

Abstract

Migrating cells present a variety of paths, from random to highly directional ones. While random movement can be explained by basal intrinsic activity, persistent movement requires stable polarization. Here, we quantitatively address emergence of persistent migration in RPE1 cells over long timescales. By live-cell imaging and dynamic micropatterning, we demonstrate that the Nucleus-Golgi axis aligns with direction of migration leading to efficient cell movement. We show that polarized trafficking is directed towards protrusions with a 20 min delay, and that migration becomes random after disrupting internal cell organization. Eventually, we prove that localized optogenetic Cdc42 activation orients the Nucleus-Golgi axis. Our work suggests that polarized trafficking stabilizes the protrusive activity of the cell, while protrusive activity orients this polarity axis, leading to persistent cell migration. Using a minimal physical model, we show that this feedback is sufficient to recapitulate the quantitative properties of cell migration in the timescale of hours.

Data availability

Source data files with numerical data and Source Code for all the graphs in the figures are provided as a zip supplementary file attached to each figure in this submission. Raw imaging data for all the figures are available in the BioImage Archive repository at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-BIAD365 with BioStudies accession number S-BIAD365.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Kotryna Vaidžiulytė

    UMR144 / UMR168, Institut Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2114-3612
  2. Anne-Sophie Macé

    CNRS / UMR144, Institut Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Aude Battistella

    UMR144 / UMR168, Institut Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. William Beng

    UMR144 / UMR168, Institut Curie, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Kristine Schauer

    Tumor Cell Dynamics Unit, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
    For correspondence
    kristine.schauer@gustaveroussy.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Mathieu Coppey

    CNRS / UMR168, Institut Curie, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    mathieu.coppey@curie.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8924-3233

Funding

Programme doctoral Interface pour le Vivant

  • Kotryna Vaidžiulytė

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FDT201904008167)

  • Kotryna Vaidžiulytė

Labex CelTisPhyBio (ANR-10-LBX-0038)

  • Kristine Schauer
  • Mathieu Coppey

Labex and Equipex IPGG (ANR-10-NANO0207)

  • Mathieu Coppey

Idex Paris Science et Lettres (ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL)

  • Kristine Schauer
  • Mathieu Coppey

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

  • Kristine Schauer
  • Mathieu Coppey

Institut Curie

  • Kristine Schauer
  • Mathieu Coppey

French National Research Infrastructure France-BioImaging (ANR-10-INBS-04)

  • Anne-Sophie Macé
  • Mathieu Coppey

Institut Convergences Q-life (ANR-17-CONV-0005)

  • Mathieu Coppey

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Vaidžiulytė et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 4,037
    views
  • 490
    downloads
  • 12
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Kotryna Vaidžiulytė
  2. Anne-Sophie Macé
  3. Aude Battistella
  4. William Beng
  5. Kristine Schauer
  6. Mathieu Coppey
(2022)
Persistent cell migration emerges from a coupling between protrusion dynamics and polarized trafficking
eLife 11:e69229.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69229

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69229

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Kourosh Hayatigolkhatmi, Chiara Soriani ... Simona Rodighiero
    Tools and Resources

    Understanding the cell cycle at the single-cell level is crucial for cellular biology and cancer research. While current methods using fluorescent markers have improved the study of adherent cells, non-adherent cells remain challenging. In this study, we addressed this gap by combining a specialized surface to enhance cell attachment, the FUCCI(CA)2 sensor, an automated image analysis pipeline, and a custom machine learning algorithm. This approach enabled precise measurement of cell cycle phase durations in non-adherent cells. This method was validated in acute myeloid leukemia cell lines NB4 and Kasumi-1, which have unique cell cycle characteristics, and we tested the impact of cell cycle-modulating drugs on NB4 cells. Our cell cycle analysis system, which is also compatible with adherent cells, is fully automated and freely available, providing detailed insights from hundreds of cells under various conditions. This report presents a valuable tool for advancing cancer research and drug development by enabling comprehensive, automated cell cycle analysis in both adherent and non-adherent cells.

    1. Cell Biology
    Fatima Tleiss, Martina Montanari ... C Leopold Kurz
    Research Article

    Multiple gut antimicrobial mechanisms are coordinated in space and time to efficiently fight foodborne pathogens. In Drosophila melanogaster, production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) together with intestinal cell renewal play a key role in eliminating gut microbes. A complementary mechanism would be to isolate and treat pathogenic bacteria while allowing colonization by commensals. Using real-time imaging to follow the fate of ingested bacteria, we demonstrate that while commensal Lactiplantibacillus plantarum freely circulate within the intestinal lumen, pathogenic strains such as Erwinia carotovora or Bacillus thuringiensis, are blocked in the anterior midgut where they are rapidly eliminated by antimicrobial peptides. This sequestration of pathogenic bacteria in the anterior midgut requires the Duox enzyme in enterocytes, and both TrpA1 and Dh31 in enteroendocrine cells. Supplementing larval food with hCGRP, the human homolog of Dh31, is sufficient to block the bacteria, suggesting the existence of a conserved mechanism. While the immune deficiency (IMD) pathway is essential for eliminating the trapped bacteria, it is dispensable for the blockage. Genetic manipulations impairing bacterial compartmentalization result in abnormal colonization of posterior midgut regions by pathogenic bacteria. Despite a functional IMD pathway, this ectopic colonization leads to bacterial proliferation and larval death, demonstrating the critical role of bacteria anterior sequestration in larval defense. Our study reveals a temporal orchestration during which pathogenic bacteria, but not innocuous, are confined in the anterior part of the midgut in which they are eliminated in an IMD-pathway-dependent manner.