Monocyte-derived transcriptome signature indicates antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis as a potential mechanism of vaccine-induced protection against HIV-1

  1. Shida Shangguan
  2. Philip K Ehrenberg
  3. Aviva Geretz
  4. Lauren Yum
  5. Gautam Kundu
  6. Kelly May
  7. Slim Fourati
  8. Krystelle Nganou-Makamdop
  9. LaTonya D Williams
  10. Sheetal Sawant
  11. Eric Lewitus
  12. Punnee Pitisuttithum
  13. Sorachai Nitayaphan
  14. Suwat Chariyalertsak
  15. Supachai Rerks-Ngarm
  16. Morgane Rolland
  17. Daniel C Douek
  18. Peter Gilbert
  19. Georgia D Tomaras
  20. Nelson L Michael
  21. Sandhya Vasan
  22. Rasmi Thomas  Is a corresponding author
  1. Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, United States
  2. Emory University, United States
  3. National Institutes of Health, United States
  4. Duke University School of Medicine, United States
  5. Mahidol University, Thailand
  6. AFRIMS, Thailand
  7. Chiang Mai University, Thailand
  8. Ministry of Public Health, Thailand
  9. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, United States

Abstract

A gene signature previously correlated with mosaic adenovirus 26 vaccine protection in simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) and SHIV challenge models in non-human primates (NHP). In this report we investigated presence of this signature as a correlate of reduced risk in human clinical trials and potential mechanisms of protection. The absence of this gene signature in the DNA/rAd5 human vaccine trial, which did not show efficacy, strengthens our hypothesis that this signature is only enriched in studies that demonstrated protection. This gene signature was enriched in the partially effective RV144 human trial that administered the ALVAC/protein vaccine, and we find that the signature associates with both decreased risk of HIV-1 acquisition and increased vaccine efficacy. Total RNA-seq in a clinical trial that used the same vaccine regimen as the RV144 HIV vaccine implicated antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP) as a potential mechanism of vaccine protection. CITE-seq profiling of 53 surface markers and transcriptomes of 53,777 single cells from the same trial showed that genes in this signature were primarily expressed in cells belonging to the myeloid lineage, including monocytes, which are major effector cells for ADCP. The consistent association of this transcriptome signature with vaccine efficacy represents a tool both to identify potential mechanisms, as with ADCP here, and to screen novel approaches to accelerate development of new vaccine candidates.

Data availability

All code and data generated or analyzed during this study are included with the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided for all data used in this study, including CITE-seq and gene expression matrix for all studies are available at figshare 10.6084/m9.figshare.14555958. The RNA-seq gene expression data for RV306 and HVTN 505 studies are available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) under accession numbers: "GSE181932" and "GS1E181859" respectively. Dataset from GSE181932 can be accessed at URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE181932with reviewer token mnyxkcgedbqdnch.Dataset from GSE181859 can be accessed at URL https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE181859with reviewer token etuhyseoxrghxkd.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Shida Shangguan

    Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Philip K Ehrenberg

    Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8695-4301
  3. Aviva Geretz

    Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Lauren Yum

    Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Gautam Kundu

    Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Kelly May

    Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Slim Fourati

    Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6609-7587
  8. Krystelle Nganou-Makamdop

    National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. LaTonya D Williams

    Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sheetal Sawant

    Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Eric Lewitus

    Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Punnee Pitisuttithum

    Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Sorachai Nitayaphan

    AFRIMS, Bangkok, Thailand
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Suwat Chariyalertsak

    Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Supachai Rerks-Ngarm

    Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi, Thailand
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Morgane Rolland

    Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Maryland, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Daniel C Douek

    National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  18. Peter Gilbert

    Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  19. Georgia D Tomaras

    Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  20. Nelson L Michael

    Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  21. Sandhya Vasan

    Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  22. Rasmi Thomas

    Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, United States
    For correspondence
    rthomas@hivresearch.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2116-2418

Funding

Henry M. Jackson Foundation (W81XWH-07-2-0067)

  • Shida Shangguan
  • Philip K Ehrenberg
  • Aviva Geretz
  • Lauren Yum
  • Gautam Kundu
  • Kelly May
  • Eric Lewitus
  • Morgane Rolland
  • Nelson L Michael
  • Sandhya Vasan
  • Rasmi Thomas

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases

  • Shida Shangguan
  • Philip K Ehrenberg
  • Aviva Geretz
  • Lauren Yum
  • Gautam Kundu
  • Eric Lewitus
  • Morgane Rolland
  • Nelson L Michael
  • Sandhya Vasan
  • Rasmi Thomas

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 1,563
    views
  • 205
    downloads
  • 12
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Shida Shangguan
  2. Philip K Ehrenberg
  3. Aviva Geretz
  4. Lauren Yum
  5. Gautam Kundu
  6. Kelly May
  7. Slim Fourati
  8. Krystelle Nganou-Makamdop
  9. LaTonya D Williams
  10. Sheetal Sawant
  11. Eric Lewitus
  12. Punnee Pitisuttithum
  13. Sorachai Nitayaphan
  14. Suwat Chariyalertsak
  15. Supachai Rerks-Ngarm
  16. Morgane Rolland
  17. Daniel C Douek
  18. Peter Gilbert
  19. Georgia D Tomaras
  20. Nelson L Michael
  21. Sandhya Vasan
  22. Rasmi Thomas
(2021)
Monocyte-derived transcriptome signature indicates antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis as a potential mechanism of vaccine-induced protection against HIV-1
eLife 10:e69577.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69577

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69577

Further reading

    1. Evolutionary Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Zach Hensel
    Short Report

    Accurate estimation of the effects of mutations on SARS-CoV-2 viral fitness can inform public-health responses such as vaccine development and predicting the impact of a new variant; it can also illuminate biological mechanisms including those underlying the emergence of variants of concern. Recently, Lan et al. reported a model of SARS-CoV-2 secondary structure and its underlying dimethyl sulfate reactivity data (Lan et al., 2022). I investigated whether base reactivities and secondary structure models derived from them can explain some variability in the frequency of observing different nucleotide substitutions across millions of patient sequences in the SARS-CoV-2 phylogenetic tree. Nucleotide basepairing was compared to the estimated ‘mutational fitness’ of substitutions, a measurement of the difference between a substitution’s observed and expected frequency that is correlated with other estimates of viral fitness (Bloom and Neher, 2023). This comparison revealed that secondary structure is often predictive of substitution frequency, with significant decreases in substitution frequencies at basepaired positions. Focusing on the mutational fitness of C→U, the most common type of substitution, I describe C→U substitutions at basepaired positions that characterize major SARS-CoV-2 variants; such mutations may have a greater impact on fitness than appreciated when considering substitution frequency alone.

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Yuqian Wang, Guibin Wang ... Xiangmin Lin
    Research Article

    Protein NƐ-lysine acetylation (Kac) modifications play crucial roles in diverse physiological and pathological functions in cells. In prokaryotic cells, there are only two types of lysine deacetylases (KDACs) that are Zn2+- or NAD+-dependent. In this study, we reported a protein, AhCobQ, in Aeromonas hydrophila ATCC 7966 that presents NAD+- and Zn2+-independent KDAC activity. Furthermore, its KDAC activity is located in an unidentified domain (from 195 to 245 aa). Interestingly, AhCobQ has no homology with current known KDACs, and no homologous protein was found in eukaryotic cells. A protein substrate analysis showed that AhCobQ has specific protein substrates in common with other known KDACs, indicating that these KDACs can dynamically co-regulate the states of Kac proteins. Microbiological methods employed in this study affirmed AhCobQ’s positive regulation of isocitrate dehydrogenase (ICD) enzymatic activity at the K388 site, implicating AhCobQ in the modulation of bacterial enzymatic activities. In summary, our findings present compelling evidence that AhCobQ represents a distinctive type of KDAC with significant roles in bacterial biological functions.