Engineering paralog-specific PSD-95 recombinant binders as minimally interfering multimodal probes for advanced imaging techniques

  1. Charlotte Rimbault
  2. Christelle Breillat
  3. Benjamin Compans
  4. Estelle Toulmé
  5. Filipe Nunes Vicente
  6. Monica Fernandez-Monreal
  7. Patrice Mascalchi
  8. Camille Genuer
  9. Virginia Puente-Muñoz
  10. Isabel Gauthereau
  11. Eric Hosy
  12. Stéphane Claverol
  13. Gregory Giannone
  14. Ingrid Chamma
  15. Cameron D Mackereth
  16. Christel Poujol
  17. Daniel Choquet
  18. Matthieu Sainlos  Is a corresponding author
  1. Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, France
  2. Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, UMS 3420, France
  3. University of Bordeaux, France
  4. Univ Bordeaux, Inserm U1212, CNRS, UMR 5320, France
  5. CNRS UMR 5297 University of Bordeaux, France

Abstract

Despite the constant advances in fluorescence imaging techniques, monitoring endogenous proteins still constitutes a major challenge in particular when considering dynamics studies or super-resolution imaging. We have recently evolved specific protein-based binders for PSD-95, the main postsynaptic scaffold proteins at excitatory synapses. Since the synthetic recombinant binders recognize epitopes not directly involved in the target protein activity, we consider them here as tools to develop endogenous PSD-95 imaging probes. After confirming their lack of impact on PSD-95 function, we validated their use as intrabody fluorescent probes. We further engineered the probes and demonstrated their usefulness in different super-resolution imaging modalities (STED, PALM and DNA-PAINT) in both live and fixed neurons. Finally, we exploited the binders to enrich at the synapse genetically encoded calcium reporters. Overall, we demonstrate that these evolved binders constitute a robust and efficient platform to selectively target and monitor endogenous PSD-95 using various fluorescence imaging techniques.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Charlotte Rimbault

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4760-8430
  2. Christelle Breillat

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Benjamin Compans

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7823-1499
  4. Estelle Toulmé

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Filipe Nunes Vicente

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Monica Fernandez-Monreal

    Bordeaux Imaging Center, Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, UMS 3420, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7278-448X
  7. Patrice Mascalchi

    Bordeaux Imaging Center, Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, UMS 3420, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Camille Genuer

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Virginia Puente-Muñoz

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Isabel Gauthereau

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Eric Hosy

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2479-5915
  12. Stéphane Claverol

    Bordeaux Proteome, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Gregory Giannone

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Ingrid Chamma

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  15. Cameron D Mackereth

    Univ Bordeaux, Inserm U1212, CNRS, UMR 5320, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Christel Poujol

    Bordeaux Imaging Center, Univ. Bordeaux, CNRS, INSERM, UMS 3420, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Daniel Choquet

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Univ Bordeaux, CNRS,UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4726-9763
  18. Matthieu Sainlos

    Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, CNRS UMR 5297 University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
    For correspondence
    sainlos@u-bordeaux.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5465-5641

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-13-BS07-0019- 01)

  • Christel Poujol
  • Matthieu Sainlos

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-16-CE16-0026)

  • Christel Poujol
  • Matthieu Sainlos

European Research Council (Dyn-Syn-Mem 787340)

  • Daniel Choquet

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All experiments were performed in accordance with the guidelines established by the European Communities Council (Directive 2010/63/EU of September 22, 2010) and were approved by the Animal Experimental Committee of Bordeaux (CE50)

Copyright

© 2024, Rimbault et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,995
    views
  • 346
    downloads
  • 10
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Charlotte Rimbault
  2. Christelle Breillat
  3. Benjamin Compans
  4. Estelle Toulmé
  5. Filipe Nunes Vicente
  6. Monica Fernandez-Monreal
  7. Patrice Mascalchi
  8. Camille Genuer
  9. Virginia Puente-Muñoz
  10. Isabel Gauthereau
  11. Eric Hosy
  12. Stéphane Claverol
  13. Gregory Giannone
  14. Ingrid Chamma
  15. Cameron D Mackereth
  16. Christel Poujol
  17. Daniel Choquet
  18. Matthieu Sainlos
(2024)
Engineering paralog-specific PSD-95 recombinant binders as minimally interfering multimodal probes for advanced imaging techniques
eLife 13:e69620.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69620

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69620

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Angel D'Oliviera, Xuhang Dai ... Jeffrey S Mugridge
    Research Article

    The SARS-CoV-2 main protease (Mpro or Nsp5) is critical for production of viral proteins during infection and, like many viral proteases, also targets host proteins to subvert their cellular functions. Here, we show that the human tRNA methyltransferase TRMT1 is recognized and cleaved by SARS-CoV-2 Mpro. TRMT1 installs the N2,N2-dimethylguanosine (m2,2G) modification on mammalian tRNAs, which promotes cellular protein synthesis and redox homeostasis. We find that Mpro can cleave endogenous TRMT1 in human cell lysate, resulting in removal of the TRMT1 zinc finger domain. Evolutionary analysis shows the TRMT1 cleavage site is highly conserved in mammals, except in Muroidea, where TRMT1 is likely resistant to cleavage. TRMT1 proteolysis results in reduced tRNA binding and elimination of tRNA methyltransferase activity. We also determined the structure of an Mpro-TRMT1 peptide complex that shows how TRMT1 engages the Mpro active site in an uncommon substrate binding conformation. Finally, enzymology and molecular dynamics simulations indicate that kinetic discrimination occurs during a later step of Mpro-mediated proteolysis following substrate binding. Together, these data provide new insights into substrate recognition by SARS-CoV-2 Mpro that could help guide future antiviral therapeutic development and show how proteolysis of TRMT1 during SARS-CoV-2 infection impairs both TRMT1 tRNA binding and tRNA modification activity to disrupt host translation and potentially impact COVID-19 pathogenesis or phenotypes.

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Qian Wang, Jinxin Liu ... Qian Liu
    Research Article

    Paramyxovirus membrane fusion requires an attachment protein for receptor binding and a fusion protein for membrane fusion triggering. Nipah virus (NiV) attachment protein (G) binds to ephrinB2 or -B3 receptors, and fusion protein (F) mediates membrane fusion. NiV-F is a class I fusion protein and is activated by endosomal cleavage. The crystal structure of a soluble GCN4-decorated NiV-F shows a hexamer-of-trimer assembly. Here, we used single-molecule localization microscopy to quantify the NiV-F distribution and organization on cell and virus-like particle membranes at a nanometer precision. We found that NiV-F on biological membranes forms distinctive clusters that are independent of endosomal cleavage or expression levels. The sequestration of NiV-F into dense clusters favors membrane fusion triggering. The nano-distribution and organization of NiV-F are susceptible to mutations at the hexamer-of-trimer interface, and the putative oligomerization motif on the transmembrane domain. We also show that NiV-F nanoclusters are maintained by NiV-F–AP-2 interactions and the clathrin coat assembly. We propose that the organization of NiV-F into nanoclusters facilitates membrane fusion triggering by a mixed population of NiV-F molecules with varied degrees of cleavage and opportunities for interacting with the NiV-G/receptor complex. These observations provide insights into the in situ organization and activation mechanisms of the NiV fusion machinery.