A survey of optimal strategy for signature-based drug repositioning and an application to liver cancer

  1. Chen Yang
  2. Hailin Zhang
  3. Mengnuo Chen
  4. Siying Wang
  5. Ruolan Qian
  6. Linmeng Zhang
  7. Xiaowen Huang
  8. Jun Wang
  9. Zhicheng Liu
  10. Wenxin Qin
  11. Cun Wang  Is a corresponding author
  12. Hualian Hang  Is a corresponding author
  13. Hui Wang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China
  2. Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China

Abstract

Pharmacologic perturbation projects, such as Connectivity Map (CMap) and Library of Integrated Network-based Cellular Signatures (LINCS), have produced many perturbed expression data, providing enormous opportunities for computational therapeutic discovery. However, there is no consensus on which methodologies and parameters are the most optimal to conduct such analysis. Aiming to fill this gap, new benchmarking standards were developed to quantitatively evaluate drug retrieval performance. Investigations of potential factors influencing drug retrieval were conducted based on these standards. As a result, we determined an optimal approach for LINCS data-based therapeutic discovery. With this approach, homoharringtonine (HHT) was identified to be a candidate agent with potential therapeutic and preventive effects on liver cancer. The antitumor and antifibrotic activity of HHT was validated experimentally using subcutaneous xenograft tumor model and carbon tetrachloride (CCL4)-induced liver fibrosis model, demonstrating the reliability of the prediction results. In summary, our findings will not only impact the future applications of LINCS data but also offer new opportunities for therapeutic intervention of liver cancer.

Data availability

Sequencing data have been deposited in GEO under accession codes GSE180243 and GSE193897.All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

The following data sets were generated
The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Chen Yang

    Department of Liver Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Hailin Zhang

    Department of Liver Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mengnuo Chen

    Department of Liver Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Siying Wang

    Department of Liver Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Ruolan Qian

    Department of Liver Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Linmeng Zhang

    Department of Liver Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Xiaowen Huang

    Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jun Wang

    Department of Liver Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Zhicheng Liu

    Hepatic Surgery Center, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Wenxin Qin

    Department of Liver Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Cun Wang

    Department of Liver Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    cwang@shsci.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4977-2189
  12. Hualian Hang

    Department of Liver Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    hanghualian@shsmu.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Hui Wang

    Department of Liver Surgery, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
    For correspondence
    hwang@shsci.org
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4947-9537

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (81972208)

  • Hui Wang

National Natural Science Foundation of China (82170646)

  • Hualian Hang

Shanghai Natural Science Foundation (19ZR1452700)

  • Hui Wang

The Interdisciplinary Program of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (YG2021ZD10)

  • Hualian Hang

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animals were manipulated according to protocols approved by the Shanghai Medical Experimental Animal Care Commission and Shanghai Cancer Institute, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine.

Copyright

© 2022, Yang et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,847
    views
  • 477
    downloads
  • 95
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Chen Yang
  2. Hailin Zhang
  3. Mengnuo Chen
  4. Siying Wang
  5. Ruolan Qian
  6. Linmeng Zhang
  7. Xiaowen Huang
  8. Jun Wang
  9. Zhicheng Liu
  10. Wenxin Qin
  11. Cun Wang
  12. Hualian Hang
  13. Hui Wang
(2022)
A survey of optimal strategy for signature-based drug repositioning and an application to liver cancer
eLife 11:e71880.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71880

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.71880

Further reading

    1. Cancer Biology
    Qianqian Ju, Wenjing Sheng ... Cheng Sun
    Research Article

    TAK1 is a serine/threonine protein kinase that is a key regulator in a wide variety of cellular processes. However, the functions and mechanisms involved in cancer metastasis are still not well understood. Here, we found that TAK1 knockdown promoted esophageal squamous cancer carcinoma (ESCC) migration and invasion, whereas TAK1 overexpression resulted in the opposite outcome. These in vitro findings were recapitulated in vivo in a xenograft metastatic mouse model. Mechanistically, co-immunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry demonstrated that TAK1 interacted with phospholipase C epsilon 1 (PLCE1) and phosphorylated PLCE1 at serine 1060 (S1060). Functional studies revealed that phosphorylation at S1060 in PLCE1 resulted in decreased enzyme activity, leading to the repression of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) hydrolysis. As a result, the degradation products of PIP2 including diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol IP3 were reduced, which thereby suppressed signal transduction in the axis of PKC/GSK-3β/β-Catenin. Consequently, expression of cancer metastasis-related genes was impeded by TAK1. Overall, our data indicate that TAK1 plays a negative role in ESCC metastasis, which depends on the TAK1-induced phosphorylation of PLCE1 at S1060.

    1. Cancer Biology
    2. Cell Biology
    Xiangning Bu, Nathanael Ashby ... Inhee Chung
    Research Article

    Cell crowding is a common microenvironmental factor influencing various disease processes, but its role in promoting cell invasiveness remains unclear. This study investigates the biomechanical changes induced by cell crowding, focusing on pro-invasive cell volume reduction in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Crowding specifically enhanced invasiveness in high-grade DCIS cells through significant volume reduction compared to hyperplasia-mimicking or normal cells. Mass spectrometry revealed that crowding selectively relocated ion channels, including TRPV4, to the plasma membrane in high-grade DCIS cells. TRPV4 inhibition triggered by crowding decreased intracellular calcium levels, reduced cell volume, and increased invasion and motility. During this process, TRPV4 membrane relocation primed the channel for later activation, compensating for calcium loss. Analyses of patient-derived breast cancer tissues confirmed that plasma membrane-associated TRPV4 is specific to high-grade DCIS and indicates the presence of a pro-invasive cell volume reduction mechanotransduction pathway. Hyperosmotic conditions and pharmacologic TRPV4 inhibition mimicked crowding-induced effects, while TRPV4 activation reversed them. Silencing TRPV4 diminished mechanotransduction in high-grade DCIS cells, reducing calcium depletion, volume reduction, and motility. This study uncovers a novel pro-invasive mechanotransduction pathway driven by cell crowding and identifies TRPV4 as a potential biomarker for predicting invasion risk in DCIS patients.