A mechano-osmotic feedback couples cell volume to the rate of cell deformation

  1. Larisa Venkova
  2. Amit Singh Vishen
  3. Sergio Lembo
  4. Nishit Srivastava
  5. Baptiste Duchamp
  6. Artur Ruppel
  7. Alice Williart
  8. Stéphane Vassilopoulos
  9. Alexandre Deslys
  10. Juan-Manuel Garcia Arcos
  11. Alba Diz-Muñoz
  12. Martial Balland
  13. Jean-François Joanny
  14. Damien Cuvelier
  15. Pierre Sens  Is a corresponding author
  16. Matthieu Piel  Is a corresponding author
  1. Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, France
  2. European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Germany
  3. Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Physique, France
  4. Sorbonne Université, INSERM, France
  5. Institut Curie, CNRS UMR168, France

Abstract

Mechanics has been a central focus of physical biology in the past decade. In comparison, how cells manage their size is less understood. Here we show that a parameter central to both the physics and the physiology of the cell, its volume, depends on a mechano-osmotic coupling. We found that cells change their volume depending on the rate at which they change shape, when they spontaneously spread are externally deformed. Cells undergo slow deformation at constant volume, while fast deformation leads to volume loss. We propose a mechano-sensitive pump and leak model to explain this phenomenon. Our model and experiments suggest that volume modulation depends on the state of the actin cortex and the coupling of ion fluxes to membrane tension. This mechano-osmotic coupling defines a membrane tension homeostasis module constantly at work in cells, causing volume fluctuations associated with fast cell shape changes, with potential consequences on cellular physiology.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in themanuscript and supporting file; all the raw analysed data shown in thefigure panels in the article are available in the accompanying SourceData files

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Larisa Venkova

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5721-7962
  2. Amit Singh Vishen

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Sergio Lembo

    Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2253-8771
  4. Nishit Srivastava

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4177-6123
  5. Baptiste Duchamp

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Artur Ruppel

    Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Physique, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  7. Alice Williart

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Stéphane Vassilopoulos

    Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0172-330X
  9. Alexandre Deslys

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Juan-Manuel Garcia Arcos

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Alba Diz-Muñoz

    Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6864-8901
  12. Martial Balland

    Laboratoire Interdisciplinaire de Physique, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  13. Jean-François Joanny

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS UMR168, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6966-3222
  14. Damien Cuvelier

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  15. Pierre Sens

    Laboratoire Physico Chimie Curie, Institut Curie, CNRS UMR168, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    pierre.sens@curie.fr
    Competing interests
    Pierre Sens, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4523-3791
  16. Matthieu Piel

    PSL Research University, Institut Curie, CNRS, UMR 144, Paris, France
    For correspondence
    matthieu.piel@curie.fr
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2848-177X

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-19-CE13-0030)

  • Matthieu Piel

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-EQPX-34)

  • Matthieu Piel

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-IDEX-0001-02 PSL)

  • Matthieu Piel

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-10-LABX-31)

  • Matthieu Piel

Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale (FDT201805005592)

  • Larisa Venkova

Human Frontier Science Program (LT000305/2018-L)

  • Nishit Srivastava

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR‐17‐CE13‐0020‐02)

  • Amit Singh Vishen

European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 641639)

  • Larisa Venkova

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Venkova et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 6,867
    views
  • 1,140
    downloads
  • 55
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Larisa Venkova
  2. Amit Singh Vishen
  3. Sergio Lembo
  4. Nishit Srivastava
  5. Baptiste Duchamp
  6. Artur Ruppel
  7. Alice Williart
  8. Stéphane Vassilopoulos
  9. Alexandre Deslys
  10. Juan-Manuel Garcia Arcos
  11. Alba Diz-Muñoz
  12. Martial Balland
  13. Jean-François Joanny
  14. Damien Cuvelier
  15. Pierre Sens
  16. Matthieu Piel
(2022)
A mechano-osmotic feedback couples cell volume to the rate of cell deformation
eLife 11:e72381.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72381

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.72381

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Chengfang Pan, Ying Liu ... Changlong Hu
    Research Article

    Prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) is an endogenous inhibitor of glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) and plays an important role in pancreatic β-cell dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This study aimed to explore the underlying mechanism by which PGE2 inhibits GSIS. Our results showed that PGE2 inhibited Kv2.2 channels via increasing PKA activity in HEK293T cells overexpressed with Kv2.2 channels. Point mutation analysis demonstrated that S448 residue was responsible for the PKA-dependent modulation of Kv2.2. Furthermore, the inhibitory effect of PGE2 on Kv2.2 was blocked by EP2/4 receptor antagonists, while mimicked by EP2/4 receptor agonists. The immune fluorescence results showed that EP1–4 receptors are expressed in both mouse and human β-cells. In INS-1(832/13) β-cells, PGE2 inhibited voltage-gated potassium currents and electrical activity through EP2/4 receptors and Kv2.2 channels. Knockdown of Kcnb2 reduced the action potential firing frequency and alleviated the inhibition of PGE2 on GSIS in INS-1(832/13) β-cells. PGE2 impaired glucose tolerance in wild-type mice but did not alter glucose tolerance in Kcnb2 knockout mice. Knockout of Kcnb2 reduced electrical activity, GSIS and abrogated the inhibition of PGE2 on GSIS in mouse islets. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that PGE2 inhibits GSIS in pancreatic β-cells through the EP2/4-Kv2.2 signaling pathway. The findings highlight the significant role of Kv2.2 channels in the regulation of β-cell repetitive firing and insulin secretion, and contribute to the understanding of the molecular basis of β-cell dysfunction in diabetes.

    1. Cell Biology
    Ryan M Finnerty, Daniel J Carulli ... Wipawee Winuthayanon
    Research Article

    The oviduct is the site of fertilization and preimplantation embryo development in mammals. Evidence suggests that gametes alter oviductal gene expression. To delineate the adaptive interactions between the oviduct and gamete/embryo, we performed a multi-omics characterization of oviductal tissues utilizing bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq), and proteomics collected from distal and proximal at various stages after mating in mice. We observed robust region-specific transcriptional signatures. Specifically, the presence of sperm induces genes involved in pro-inflammatory responses in the proximal region at 0.5 days post-coitus (dpc). Genes involved in inflammatory responses were produced specifically by secretory epithelial cells in the oviduct. At 1.5 and 2.5 dpc, genes involved in pyruvate and glycolysis were enriched in the proximal region, potentially providing metabolic support for developing embryos. Abundant proteins in the oviductal fluid were differentially observed between naturally fertilized and superovulated samples. RNA-seq data were used to identify transcription factors predicted to influence protein abundance in the proteomic data via a novel machine learning model based on transformers of integrating transcriptomics and proteomics data. The transformers identified influential transcription factors and correlated predictive protein expressions in alignment with the in vivo-derived data. Lastly, we found some differences between inflammatory responses in sperm-exposed mouse oviducts compared to hydrosalpinx Fallopian tubes from patients. In conclusion, our multi-omics characterization and subsequent in vivo confirmation of proteins/RNAs indicate that the oviduct is adaptive and responsive to the presence of sperm and embryos in a spatiotemporal manner.