A transcriptional constraint mechanism limits the homeostatic response to activity deprivation in mammalian neocortex

Abstract

Healthy neuronal networks rely on homeostatic plasticity to maintain stable firing rates despite changing synaptic drive. These mechanisms, however, can themselves be destabilizing if activated inappropriately or excessively. For example, prolonged activity deprivation can lead to rebound hyperactivity and seizures. While many forms of homeostasis have been described, whether and how the magnitude of homeostatic plasticity is constrained remains unknown. Here we uncover negative regulation of cortical network homeostasis by the PARbZIP family of transcription factors. In cortical slice cultures made from knockout mice lacking all three of these factors, the network response to prolonged activity withdrawal measured with calcium imaging is much stronger, while baseline activity is unchanged. Whole cell recordings reveal an exaggerated increase in the frequency of miniature excitatory synaptic currents reflecting enhanced upregulation of recurrent excitatory synaptic transmission. Genetic analyses reveal that two of the factors, Hlf and Tef, are critical for constraining plasticity and for preventing life-threatening seizures. These data indicate that transcriptional activation is not only required for many forms of homeostatic plasticity but is also involved in restraint of the response to activity deprivation.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files, calcium imaging analysis code is available http://github.com/VH-Lab/vhlab-TwoPhoton-matlab. RNAseq data have been deposited to the BioSample database.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Vera Valakh

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7149-1562
  2. Derek Wise

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Xiaoyue Aelita Zhu

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Mingqi Sha

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Jaidyn Fok

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Stephen D Van Hooser

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1112-5832
  7. Robin Schectman

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  8. Isabel Cepeda

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  9. Ryan Kirk

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  10. Sean M O'Toole

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Sacha B Nelson

    Department of Biology, Brandeis University, Waltham, United States
    For correspondence
    nelson@brandeis.edu
    Competing interests
    Sacha B Nelson, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0108-8599

Funding

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS109916)

  • Sacha B Nelson

Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative (648651)

  • Sacha B Nelson

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Brandeis University (Protocol #20002), and conformed to the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Copyright

© 2023, Valakh et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,816
    views
  • 200
    downloads
  • 17
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Vera Valakh
  2. Derek Wise
  3. Xiaoyue Aelita Zhu
  4. Mingqi Sha
  5. Jaidyn Fok
  6. Stephen D Van Hooser
  7. Robin Schectman
  8. Isabel Cepeda
  9. Ryan Kirk
  10. Sean M O'Toole
  11. Sacha B Nelson
(2023)
A transcriptional constraint mechanism limits the homeostatic response to activity deprivation in mammalian neocortex
eLife 12:e74899.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74899

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74899

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Gáspár Oláh, Rajmund Lákovics ... Gábor Tamás
    Research Article

    Human-specific cognitive abilities depend on information processing in the cerebral cortex, where the neurons are significantly larger and their processes longer and sparser compared to rodents. We found that, in synaptically connected layer 2/3 pyramidal cells (L2/3 PCs), the delay in signal propagation from soma to soma is similar in humans and rodents. To compensate for the longer processes of neurons, membrane potential changes in human axons and/or dendrites must propagate faster. Axonal and dendritic recordings show that the propagation speed of action potentials (APs) is similar in human and rat axons, but the forward propagation of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) and the backward propagation of APs are 26 and 47% faster in human dendrites, respectively. Experimentally-based detailed biophysical models have shown that the key factor responsible for the accelerated EPSP propagation in human cortical dendrites is the large conductance load imposed at the soma by the large basal dendritic tree. Additionally, larger dendritic diameters and differences in cable and ion channel properties in humans contribute to enhanced signal propagation. Our integrative experimental and modeling study provides new insights into the scaling rules that help maintain information processing speed albeit the large and sparse neurons in the human cortex.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jacob A Miller
    Insight

    When navigating environments with changing rules, human brain circuits flexibly adapt how and where we retain information to help us achieve our immediate goals.