Post-translational modification patterns on β-myosin heavy chain are altered in ischemic and non-ischemic human hearts

  1. Maicon Landim-Vieira
  2. Matthew C Childers
  3. Amanda L Wacker
  4. Michelle Rodriquez Garcia
  5. Huan He
  6. Rakesh Singh
  7. Elizabeth A Brundage
  8. Jamie R Johnston
  9. Bryan A Whitson
  10. P Bryant Chase
  11. Paul ML Janssen
  12. Michael Regnier
  13. Brandon J Biesiadecki
  14. Jose R Pinto
  15. Michelle S Parvatiyar  Is a corresponding author
  1. Florida State University, United States
  2. University of Washington, United States
  3. The Ohio State University, United States
  4. Ohio State University, United States

Abstract

Phosphorylation and acetylation of sarcomeric proteins are important for fine-tuning myocardial contractility. Here, we used bottom-up proteomics and label-free quantification to identify novel post-translational modifications (PTMs) on beta-myosin heavy chain (b-MHC) in normal and failing human heart tissues. We report six acetylated lysines and two phosphorylated residues: K34-Ac, K58-Ac, S210-P, K213-Ac, T215-P, K429-Ac, K951-Ac, and K1195-Ac. K951-Ac was significantly reduced in both ischemic and non-ischemic failing hearts compared to non-diseased hearts. Molecular dynamics simulations show that K951-Ac may impact stability of thick filament tail interactions and ultimately myosin head positioning. K58-Ac altered the solvent exposed SH3 domain surface - known for protein-protein interactions - but did not appreciably change motor domain conformation or dynamics under conditions studied. Together, K213-Ac/T215-P altered loop 1's structure and dynamics - known to regulate ADP-release, ATPase activity, and sliding velocity. Our study suggests that β-MHC acetylation levels may be influenced more by the PTM location than the type of heart disease since less protected acetylation sites are reduced in both heart failure groups. Additionally, these PTMs have potential to modulate interactions between β-MHC and other regulatory sarcomeric proteins, ADP-release rate of myosin, flexibility of the S2 region, and cardiac myofilament contractility in normal and heart failure hearts.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and the supporting files have been provided for Figures 2, 3, 7, 8 , 9 and Supplemental Figure 1, 2, 4, Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4.Mass spec data have been deposited at Dryad under the unique identifier DOI (doi:10.5061/dryad.s4mw6m97g).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Maicon Landim-Vieira

    Department of Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Matthew C Childers

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2440-9612
  3. Amanda L Wacker

    Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7580-7189
  4. Michelle Rodriquez Garcia

    Department of Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Huan He

    Department of Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Rakesh Singh

    Department of Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Elizabeth A Brundage

    Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Jamie R Johnston

    Department of Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Bryan A Whitson

    Department of Surgery, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. P Bryant Chase

    Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9701-561X
  11. Paul ML Janssen

    Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Michael Regnier

    Department of Bioengineering, University of Washington, Seattle, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Brandon J Biesiadecki

    Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Jose R Pinto

    Department of Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9092-4976
  15. Michelle S Parvatiyar

    Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology, Florida State University, Tallahassee, United States
    For correspondence
    mparvatiyar@fsu.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9416-0069

Funding

American Heart Association (16SDG2912000)

  • Michelle S Parvatiyar

Florida State University (46259)

  • Michelle S Parvatiyar

National Institutes of Health (HL128683)

  • Jose R Pinto

American Heart Association (2021AHAPRE216237)

  • Maicon Landim-Vieira

National Science Foundation (ACI-1548562)

  • Michael Regnier

National Institutes of Health (T32HL007828)

  • Matthew C Childers

National Institutes of Health (P30AR074990)

  • Michael Regnier

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: This study was conducted with the highest ethical standards, human heart samples were collected and stored with full consent of parties involved and were provided by the Lifeline of Ohio with coordination from surgeons and transplant coordinators at the Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center. All aspects of this study were approved and conform to the ethical guidelines established by the Institutional Review Board of The Ohio State University under protocol #2012H0197.

Copyright

© 2022, Landim-Vieira et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,641
    views
  • 273
    downloads
  • 15
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Maicon Landim-Vieira
  2. Matthew C Childers
  3. Amanda L Wacker
  4. Michelle Rodriquez Garcia
  5. Huan He
  6. Rakesh Singh
  7. Elizabeth A Brundage
  8. Jamie R Johnston
  9. Bryan A Whitson
  10. P Bryant Chase
  11. Paul ML Janssen
  12. Michael Regnier
  13. Brandon J Biesiadecki
  14. Jose R Pinto
  15. Michelle S Parvatiyar
(2022)
Post-translational modification patterns on β-myosin heavy chain are altered in ischemic and non-ischemic human hearts
eLife 11:e74919.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74919

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.74919

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Yangyu Wu, Yangyang Yan ... Fred J Sigworth
    Research Article

    We present near-atomic-resolution cryoEM structures of the mammalian voltage-gated potassium channel Kv1.2 in open, C-type inactivated, toxin-blocked and sodium-bound states at 3.2 Å, 2.5 Å, 3.2 Å, and 2.9 Å. These structures, all obtained at nominally zero membrane potential in detergent micelles, reveal distinct ion-occupancy patterns in the selectivity filter. The first two structures are very similar to those reported in the related Shaker channel and the much-studied Kv1.2–2.1 chimeric channel. On the other hand, two new structures show unexpected patterns of ion occupancy. First, the toxin α-Dendrotoxin, like Charybdotoxin, is seen to attach to the negatively-charged channel outer mouth, and a lysine residue penetrates into the selectivity filter, with the terminal amine coordinated by carbonyls, partially disrupting the outermost ion-binding site. In the remainder of the filter two densities of bound ions are observed, rather than three as observed with other toxin-blocked Kv channels. Second, a structure of Kv1.2 in Na+ solution does not show collapse or destabilization of the selectivity filter, but instead shows an intact selectivity filter with ion density in each binding site. We also attempted to image the C-type inactivated Kv1.2 W366F channel in Na+ solution, but the protein conformation was seen to be highly variable and only a low-resolution structure could be obtained. These findings present new insights into the stability of the selectivity filter and the mechanism of toxin block of this intensively studied, voltage-gated potassium channel.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Joseph Clayton, Aarion Romany ... Jana Shen
    Research Article

    Aberrant signaling of BRAFV600E is a major cancer driver. Current FDA-approved RAF inhibitors selectively inhibit the monomeric BRAFV600E and suffer from tumor resistance. Recently, dimer-selective and equipotent RAF inhibitors have been developed; however, the mechanism of dimer selectivity is poorly understood. Here, we report extensive molecular dynamics (MD) simulations of the monomeric and dimeric BRAFV600E in the apo form or in complex with one or two dimer-selective (PHI1) or equipotent (LY3009120) inhibitor(s). The simulations uncovered the unprecedented details of the remarkable allostery in BRAFV600E dimerization and inhibitor binding. Specifically, dimerization retrains and shifts the αC helix inward and increases the flexibility of the DFG motif; dimer compatibility is due to the promotion of the αC-in conformation, which is stabilized by a hydrogen bond formation between the inhibitor and the αC Glu501. A more stable hydrogen bond further restrains and shifts the αC helix inward, which incurs a larger entropic penalty that disfavors monomer binding. This mechanism led us to propose an empirical way based on the co-crystal structure to assess the dimer selectivity of a BRAFV600E inhibitor. Simulations also revealed that the positive cooperativity of PHI1 is due to its ability to preorganize the αC and DFG conformation in the opposite protomer, priming it for binding the second inhibitor. The atomically detailed view of the interplay between BRAF dimerization and inhibitor allostery as well as cooperativity has implications for understanding kinase signaling and contributes to the design of protomer selective RAF inhibitors.