Abstract

Male infertility is an important health concern that is expected to have a major genetic etiology. Although high-throughput sequencing has linked gene defects to more than 50% of rare and severe sperm anomalies, less than 20% of common and moderate forms are explained. We hypothesized that this low success rate could at least be partly due to oligogenic defects - the accumulation of several rare heterozygous variants in distinct, but functionally connected, genes. Here, we compared fertility and sperm parameters in male mice harboring one to four heterozygous truncating mutations of genes linked to multiple morphological anomalies of the flagellum (MMAF) syndrome. Results indicated progressively deteriorating sperm morphology and motility with increasing numbers of heterozygous mutations. This first evidence of oligogenic inheritance in failed spermatogenesis strongly suggests that oligogenic heterozygosity could explain a significant proportion of asthenoteratozoospermia cases. The findings presented pave the way to further studies in mice and man.

Data availability

Figure 5 - Source Data 1, Figure 6 - Source Data 1 and Figure 7 - Source Data 1 contain the numerical data used to generate the figures.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Guillaume Martinez

    CHU Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
    For correspondence
    gmartinez@chu-grenoble.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7572-9096
  2. Charles Coutton

    CHU Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Corinne Loeuillet

    Institute for Advanced Biosciences, INSERM, CNRS, University Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Caroline Cazin

    CHU Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Jana Muroňová

    Institute for Advanced Biosciences, INSERM, CNRS, University Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Magalie Boguenet

    Institute for Advanced Biosciences, INSERM, CNRS, University Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Emeline Lambert

    Institute for Advanced Biosciences, INSERM, CNRS, University Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Magali Dhellemmes

    Institute for Advanced Biosciences, INSERM, CNRS, University Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Geneviève Chevalier

    Institute for Advanced Biosciences, INSERM, CNRS, University Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Jean-Pascal Hograindleur

    Institute for Advanced Biosciences, INSERM, CNRS, University Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Charline Vilpreux

    Institute for Advanced Biosciences, INSERM, CNRS, University Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Yasmine Neirijnck

    Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva Medical School, Genève, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Zine Eddine Kherraf

    Institute for Advanced Biosciences, INSERM, CNRS, University Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Jessica Escoffier

    Institute for Advanced Biosciences, INSERM, CNRS, University Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8166-5845
  15. Serge Nef

    Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, University of Geneva Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  16. Pierre F Ray

    Institute for Advanced Biosciences, INSERM, CNRS, University Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  17. Christophe Arnoult

    Institute for Advanced Biosciences, INSERM, CNRS, University Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France
    For correspondence
    christophe.arnoult@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3753-5901

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-19-CE17-0014)

  • Pierre F Ray
  • Christophe Arnoult

Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-21-CE17-0007)

  • Guillaume Martinez
  • Charles Coutton

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All animal procedures were conducted according to a protocol approved by the local Ethics Committee (ComEth Grenoble No. 318), by the French government (ministry agreement number #7128 UHTA-U1209-CA), and by the Direction Générale de la Santé (DGS) for the State of Geneva.

Copyright

© 2022, Martinez et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 934
    views
  • 148
    downloads
  • 17
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Guillaume Martinez
  2. Charles Coutton
  3. Corinne Loeuillet
  4. Caroline Cazin
  5. Jana Muroňová
  6. Magalie Boguenet
  7. Emeline Lambert
  8. Magali Dhellemmes
  9. Geneviève Chevalier
  10. Jean-Pascal Hograindleur
  11. Charline Vilpreux
  12. Yasmine Neirijnck
  13. Zine Eddine Kherraf
  14. Jessica Escoffier
  15. Serge Nef
  16. Pierre F Ray
  17. Christophe Arnoult
(2022)
Oligogenic heterozygous inheritance of sperm abnormalities in mouse
eLife 11:e75373.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75373

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75373

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Ryan M Finnerty, Daniel J Carulli ... Wipawee Winuthayanon
    Research Article

    The oviduct is the site of fertilization and preimplantation embryo development in mammals. Evidence suggests that gametes alter oviductal gene expression. To delineate the adaptive interactions between the oviduct and gamete/embryo, we performed a multi-omics characterization of oviductal tissues utilizing bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq), and proteomics collected from distal and proximal at various stages after mating in mice. We observed robust region-specific transcriptional signatures. Specifically, the presence of sperm induces genes involved in pro-inflammatory responses in the proximal region at 0.5 days post-coitus (dpc). Genes involved in inflammatory responses were produced specifically by secretory epithelial cells in the oviduct. At 1.5 and 2.5 dpc, genes involved in pyruvate and glycolysis were enriched in the proximal region, potentially providing metabolic support for developing embryos. Abundant proteins in the oviductal fluid were differentially observed between naturally fertilized and superovulated samples. RNA-seq data were used to identify transcription factors predicted to influence protein abundance in the proteomic data via a novel machine learning model based on transformers of integrating transcriptomics and proteomics data. The transformers identified influential transcription factors and correlated predictive protein expressions in alignment with the in vivo-derived data. Lastly, we found some differences between inflammatory responses in sperm-exposed mouse oviducts compared to hydrosalpinx Fallopian tubes from patients. In conclusion, our multi-omics characterization and subsequent in vivo confirmation of proteins/RNAs indicate that the oviduct is adaptive and responsive to the presence of sperm and embryos in a spatiotemporal manner.

    1. Cell Biology
    Hyunggu Hahn, Carole Daly ... Alex RB Thomsen
    Research Article

    Chemokine receptors are GPCRs that regulate the chemotactic migration of a wide variety of cells including immune and cancer cells. Most chemokine receptors contain features associated with the ability to stimulate G protein signaling during β-arrestin-mediated receptor internalization into endosomes. As endosomal signaling of certain non-GPCR receptors plays a major role in cell migration, we chose to investigate the potential role of endosomal chemokine receptor signaling on mechanisms governing this function. Applying a combination of pharmacological and cell biological approaches, we demonstrate that the model chemokine receptor CCR7 recruits G protein and β-arrestin simultaneously upon chemokine stimulation, which enables internalized receptors to activate G protein from endosomes. Furthermore, spatiotemporal-resolved APEX2 proteome profiling shows that endosomal CCR7 uniquely enriches specific Rho GTPase regulators as compared to plasma membrane CCR7, which is directly associated with enhanced activity of the Rho GTPase Rac1 and chemotaxis of immune T cells. As Rac1 drives the formation of membrane protrusions during chemotaxis, our findings suggest an important integrated function of endosomal chemokine receptor signaling in cell migration.