Abstract

The proinflammatory alarmins S100A8 and S100A9 are among the most abundant proteins in neutrophils and monocytes but are completely silenced after differentiation to macrophages. The molecular mechanisms of the extraordinarily dynamic transcriptional regulation of S100a8 and S100a9 genes, however, are only barely understood. Using an unbiased genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout based screening approach in immortalized murine monocytes we identified the transcription factor C/EBPδ as a central regulator of S100a8 and S100a9 expression. We showed that S100A8/A9 expression and thereby neutrophil recruitment and cytokine release were decreased in C/EBPδ KO mice in a mouse model of acute lung inflammation. S100a8 and S100a9 expression was further controlled by the C/EBPδ-antagonists ATF3 and FBXW7. We confirmed the clinical relevance of this regulatory network in subpopulations of human monocytes in a clinical cohort of cardiovascular patients. Moreover, we identified specific C/EBPδ-binding sites within S100a8 and S100a9 promoter regions, and demonstrated that C/EBPδ-dependent JMJD3-mediated demethylation of H3K27me3 is indispensable for their expression. Overall, our work uncovered C/EBPδ as a novel regulator of S100a8 and S100a9 expression. Therefore, C/EBPδ represents a promising target for modulation of inflammatory conditions that are characterised by S100a8 and S100a9 overexpression.

Data availability

data and code availabilityhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA754262https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bioproject/PRJNA706411https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE200730

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Saskia-Larissa Jauch-Speer

    Institute of Immunology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Marisol Herrera-Rivero

    Department of Genetic Epidemiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7064-9487
  3. Nadine Ludwig

    Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Bruna Caroline Véras De Carvalho

    Institute of Immunology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Leonie Martens

    Institute of Immunology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Jonas Wolf

    Institute of Immunology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Achmet Imam Chasan

    Institute of Immunology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-5137-6890
  8. Anika Witten

    Department of Genetic Epidemiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Birgit Markus

    Clinic for Cardiology, Angiology and Internal Intensive Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Bernhard Schieffer

    Clinic for Cardiology, Angiology and Internal Intensive Medicine, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Thomas Vogl

    Institute of Immunology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Jan Rossaint

    Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  13. Monika Stoll

    Department of Genetic Epidemiology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  14. Johannes Roth

    Institute of Immunology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
    For correspondence
    rothj@uni-muenster.de
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7035-8348
  15. Olesja Fehler

    Institute of Immunology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6386-7080

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC 1009 B9)

  • Johannes Roth

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC 1009 Z2)

  • Johannes Roth

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC 1009 B8)

  • Thomas Vogl

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRU 342 P3)

  • Johannes Roth

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (RO 1190/14-1)

  • Johannes Roth

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRU 342 P5)

  • Thomas Vogl

Interdisciplinary Center of Clinical Research at the University of Münster (Ro2/023/19)

  • Johannes Roth

Interdisciplinary Center of Clinical Research at the University of Münster (Vo2/011/19)

  • Thomas Vogl

EU EFRE Bio NRW programme (005-1007-0006)

  • Monika Stoll

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Mouse experiments were in accordance with German Animal Welfare Legislation and performed as approved by the North Rhine-Westphalia Office of Nature, Environment and Consumer Protection (LANUV) and the District Government and District Veterinary Office Muenster under the reference number 81-02.04.2019.A445.

Human subjects: The BioNRW Study is conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. The research protocol, including the case report forms, was approved by the local ethics committee (#245-12). Written informed consent was obtained from all study participants.

Copyright

© 2022, Jauch-Speer et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,416
    views
  • 272
    downloads
  • 12
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Saskia-Larissa Jauch-Speer
  2. Marisol Herrera-Rivero
  3. Nadine Ludwig
  4. Bruna Caroline Véras De Carvalho
  5. Leonie Martens
  6. Jonas Wolf
  7. Achmet Imam Chasan
  8. Anika Witten
  9. Birgit Markus
  10. Bernhard Schieffer
  11. Thomas Vogl
  12. Jan Rossaint
  13. Monika Stoll
  14. Johannes Roth
  15. Olesja Fehler
(2022)
C/EBPδ-induced epigenetic changes control the dynamic gene transcription of S100a8 and S100a9
eLife 11:e75594.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75594

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.75594

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Fabian Link, Sisco Jung ... Brooke Morriswood
    Research Article

    The actin cytoskeleton is a ubiquitous feature of eukaryotic cells, yet its complexity varies across different taxa. In the parasitic protist Trypanosoma brucei, a rudimentary actomyosin system consisting of one actin gene and two myosin genes has been retained despite significant investment in the microtubule cytoskeleton. The functions of this highly simplified actomyosin system remain unclear, but appear to centre on the endomembrane system. Here, advanced light and electron microscopy imaging techniques, together with biochemical and biophysical assays, were used to explore the relationship between the actomyosin and endomembrane systems. The class I myosin (TbMyo1) had a large cytosolic pool and its ability to translocate actin filaments in vitro was shown here for the first time. TbMyo1 exhibited strong association with the endosomal system and was additionally found on glycosomes. At the endosomal membranes, TbMyo1 colocalised with markers for early and late endosomes (TbRab5A and TbRab7, respectively), but not with the marker associated with recycling endosomes (TbRab11). Actin and myosin were simultaneously visualised for the first time in trypanosomes using an anti-actin chromobody. Disruption of the actomyosin system using the actin-depolymerising drug latrunculin A resulted in a delocalisation of both the actin chromobody signal and an endosomal marker, and was accompanied by a specific loss of endosomal structure. This suggests that the actomyosin system is required for maintaining endosomal integrity in T. brucei.

    1. Cell Biology
    Georgia Maria Sagia, Xenia Georgiou ... Sofia Dimou
    Research Article Updated

    Membrane proteins are sorted to the plasma membrane via Golgi-dependent trafficking. However, our recent studies challenged the essentiality of Golgi in the biogenesis of specific transporters. Here, we investigate the trafficking mechanisms of membrane proteins by following the localization of the polarized R-SNARE SynA versus the non-polarized transporter UapA, synchronously co-expressed in wild-type or isogenic genetic backgrounds repressible for conventional cargo secretion. In wild-type, the two cargoes dynamically label distinct secretory compartments, highlighted by the finding that, unlike SynA, UapA does not colocalize with the late-Golgi. In line with early partitioning into distinct secretory carriers, the two cargoes collapse in distinct ER-Exit Sites (ERES) in a sec31ts background. Trafficking via distinct cargo-specific carriers is further supported by showing that repression of proteins essential for conventional cargo secretion does not affect UapA trafficking, while blocking SynA secretion. Overall, this work establishes the existence of distinct, cargo-dependent, trafficking mechanisms, initiating at ERES and being differentially dependent on Golgi and SNARE interactions.