Magnetic stimulation allows focal activation of the mouse cochlea

  1. Jae-Ik Lee
  2. Richard Seist
  3. Stephen McInturff
  4. Daniel J Lee
  5. Christian Brown
  6. Konstantina M Stankovic  Is a corresponding author
  7. Shelley Fried  Is a corresponding author
  1. Massachusetts General Hospital, United States
  2. Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, United States

Abstract

Cochlear implants (CIs) provide sound and speech sensations for patients with severe to profound hearing loss by electrically stimulating the auditory nerve. While most CI users achieve some degree of open set word recognition under quiet conditions, hearing that utilizes complex neural coding (e.g., appreciating music) has proved elusive, probably because of the inability of CIs to create narrow regions of spectral activation. Several novel approaches have recently shown promise for improving spatial selectivity, but substantial design differences from conventional CIs will necessitate much additional safety and efficacy testing before clinical viability is established. Outside the cochlea, magnetic stimulation from small coils (micro-coils) has been shown to confine activation more narrowly than that from conventional micro-electrodes, raising the possibility that coil-based stimulation of the cochlea could improve the spectral resolution of CIs. To explore this, we delivered magnetic stimulation from micro-coils to multiple locations of the cochlea and measured the spread of activation utilizing a multi-electrode array inserted into the inferior colliculus; responses to magnetic stimulation were compared to analogous experiments with conventional micro-electrodes as well as to responses when presenting auditory monotones. Encouragingly, the extent of activation with micro-coils was ~60% narrower compared to electric stimulation and largely similar to the spread arising from acoustic stimulation. The dynamic range of coils was more than three times larger than that of electrodes, further supporting a smaller spread of activation. While much additional testing is required, these results support the notion that magnetic micro-coil CIs can produce a larger number of independent spectral channels and may therefore improve auditory outcomes. Further, because coil-based devices are structurally similar to existing CIs, fewer impediments to clinical translational are likely to arise.

Data availability

The source data and codes are available on the Open Science Framework (DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/Y7ZRX).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jae-Ik Lee

    Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9006-3405
  2. Richard Seist

    Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Stephen McInturff

    Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Daniel J Lee

    Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Christian Brown

    Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Konstantina M Stankovic

    Department of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    kstankovic@stanford.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Shelley Fried

    Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    fried.shelley@mgh.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6456-8656

Funding

National Institutes of Health (DC 01089)

  • Stephen McInturff
  • Daniel J Lee
  • Christian Brown

Fondation Bertarelli (Translational Neuroscience and Neuro-Engineering)

  • Stephen McInturff
  • Daniel J Lee
  • Christian Brown

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01 DC015824)

  • Richard Seist
  • Konstantina M Stankovic

Fondation Bertarelli (Bertarelli Professorship)

  • Richard Seist
  • Konstantina M Stankovic

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Massachusetts Eye and Ear, and carried out in accordance with the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.(protocol# 15-003)

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 1,350
    views
  • 284
    downloads
  • 8
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jae-Ik Lee
  2. Richard Seist
  3. Stephen McInturff
  4. Daniel J Lee
  5. Christian Brown
  6. Konstantina M Stankovic
  7. Shelley Fried
(2022)
Magnetic stimulation allows focal activation of the mouse cochlea
eLife 11:e76682.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76682

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.76682

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Zhujun Shao, Mengya Zhang, Qing Yu
    Research Article

    When holding visual information temporarily in working memory (WM), the neural representation of the memorandum is distributed across various cortical regions, including visual and frontal cortices. However, the role of stimulus representation in visual and frontal cortices during WM has been controversial. Here, we tested the hypothesis that stimulus representation persists in the frontal cortex to facilitate flexible control demands in WM. During functional MRI, participants flexibly switched between simple WM maintenance of visual stimulus or more complex rule-based categorization of maintained stimulus on a trial-by-trial basis. Our results demonstrated enhanced stimulus representation in the frontal cortex that tracked demands for active WM control and enhanced stimulus representation in the visual cortex that tracked demands for precise WM maintenance. This differential frontal stimulus representation traded off with the newly-generated category representation with varying control demands. Simulation using multi-module recurrent neural networks replicated human neural patterns when stimulus information was preserved for network readout. Altogether, these findings help reconcile the long-standing debate in WM research, and provide empirical and computational evidence that flexible stimulus representation in the frontal cortex during WM serves as a potential neural coding scheme to accommodate the ever-changing environment.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jacob A Miller
    Insight

    When navigating environments with changing rules, human brain circuits flexibly adapt how and where we retain information to help us achieve our immediate goals.