Retinoic acid-induced protein 14 controls dendritic spine dynamics associated with depressive-like behaviors

Abstract

Dendritic spines are the central postsynaptic machinery that determines synaptic function. The F-actin within dendritic spines regulates their dynamic formation and elimination. Rai14 is an F‑actin-regulating protein with a membrane‑shaping function. Here, we identified the roles of Rai14 for the regulation of dendritic spine dynamics associated with stress-induced depressive-like behaviors. Rai14-deficient neurons exhibit reduced dendritic spine density in the Rai14+/- mouse brain, resulting in impaired functional synaptic activity. Rai14 was protected from degradation by complex formation with Tara, and accumulated in the dendritic spine neck, thereby enhancing spine maintenance. Concurrently, Rai14 deficiency in mice altered gene expression profile relevant to depressive conditions and increased depressive-like behaviors. Moreover, Rai14 expression was reduced in the prefrontal cortex of the mouse stress model, which was blocked by antidepressant treatment. Thus, we propose that Rai14-dependent regulation of dendritic spines may underlie the plastic changes of neuronal connections relevant to depressive-like behaviors.

Data availability

Source data files including the numerical data associated with the figures are provided (for figures 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). The source data files with original uncropped western blot images are also provided as PDF files (figures with the uncropped gels with relevant band labelled) and a zipped folder (the original files of the raw unedited gels).Sequencing data have been deposited at Dryad (doi:10.5061/dryad.1rn8pk0w9)

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Soo Jeong Kim

    Department of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Youngsik Woo

    Department of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8308-8532
  3. Hyun Jin Kim

    Department of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9108-151X
  4. Bon Seong Goo

    Department of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Truong Thi My Nhung

    Department of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Seol-Ae Lee

    Department of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Bo Kyoung Suh

    Department of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-8079-9446
  8. Dong Jin Mun

    Department of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Joung-Hun Kim

    Department of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Republic of Korea
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Sang Ki Park

    Department of Life Sciences, Pohang University of Science and Technology, Pohang, Republic of Korea
    For correspondence
    skpark@postech.ac.kr
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1023-7864

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2021R1A2C3010639)

  • Sang Ki Park

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020M3E5E2039894)

  • Sang Ki Park

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2017R1A5A1015366)

  • Sang Ki Park

Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea (21-BR-03-01)

  • Sang Ki Park

Ministry of Education (2020R1A6A3A01096024)

  • Youngsik Woo

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: All of the animals were handled according to approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH-2017-0037, POSTECH-2019-0025, POSTECH-2020-0008, and POSTECH-2020-0018). All experiments were carried out under the approved guidelines.

Copyright

© 2022, Kim et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,464
    views
  • 239
    downloads
  • 6
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Soo Jeong Kim
  2. Youngsik Woo
  3. Hyun Jin Kim
  4. Bon Seong Goo
  5. Truong Thi My Nhung
  6. Seol-Ae Lee
  7. Bo Kyoung Suh
  8. Dong Jin Mun
  9. Joung-Hun Kim
  10. Sang Ki Park
(2022)
Retinoic acid-induced protein 14 controls dendritic spine dynamics associated with depressive-like behaviors
eLife 11:e77755.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77755

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77755

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Jingjing Li, Xinyue Wang ... Vincent Archambault
    Research Article

    In animals, mitosis involves the breakdown of the nucleus. The reassembly of a nucleus after mitosis requires the reformation of the nuclear envelope around a single mass of chromosomes. This process requires Ankle2 (also known as LEM4 in humans) which interacts with PP2A and promotes the function of the Barrier-to-Autointegration Factor (BAF). Upon dephosphorylation, BAF dimers cross-bridge chromosomes and bind lamins and transmembrane proteins of the reassembling nuclear envelope. How Ankle2 functions in mitosis is incompletely understood. Using a combination of approaches in Drosophila, along with structural modeling, we provide several lines of evidence that suggest that Ankle2 is a regulatory subunit of PP2A, explaining how it promotes BAF dephosphorylation. In addition, we discovered that Ankle2 interacts with the endoplasmic reticulum protein Vap33, which is required for Ankle2 localization at the reassembling nuclear envelope during telophase. We identified the interaction sites of PP2A and Vap33 on Ankle2. Through genetic rescue experiments, we show that the Ankle2/PP2A interaction is essential for the function of Ankle2 in nuclear reassembly and that the Ankle2/Vap33 interaction also promotes this process. Our study sheds light on the molecular mechanisms of post-mitotic nuclear reassembly and suggests that the endoplasmic reticulum is not merely a source of membranes in the process, but also provides localized enzymatic activity.

    1. Cell Biology
    2. Chromosomes and Gene Expression
    Bhumil Patel, Maryke Grobler ... Needhi Bhalla
    Research Article

    Meiotic crossover recombination is essential for both accurate chromosome segregation and the generation of new haplotypes for natural selection to act upon. This requirement is known as crossover assurance and is one example of crossover control. While the conserved role of the ATPase, PCH-2, during meiotic prophase has been enigmatic, a universal phenotype when pch-2 or its orthologs are mutated is a change in the number and distribution of meiotic crossovers. Here, we show that PCH-2 controls the number and distribution of crossovers by antagonizing their formation. This antagonism produces different effects at different stages of meiotic prophase: early in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 prevents double-strand breaks from becoming crossover-eligible intermediates, limiting crossover formation at sites of initial double-strand break formation and homolog interactions. Later in meiotic prophase, PCH-2 winnows the number of crossover-eligible intermediates, contributing to the designation of crossovers and ultimately, crossover assurance. We also demonstrate that PCH-2 accomplishes this regulation through the meiotic HORMAD, HIM-3. Our data strongly support a model in which PCH-2’s conserved role is to remodel meiotic HORMADs throughout meiotic prophase to destabilize crossover-eligible precursors and coordinate meiotic recombination with synapsis, ensuring the progressive implementation of meiotic recombination and explaining its function in the pachytene checkpoint and crossover control.