Automated hippocampal unfolding for morphometry and subfield segmentation with HippUnfold

  1. Jordan DeKraker  Is a corresponding author
  2. Roy AM Haast
  3. Mohamed D Yousif
  4. Bradley Karat
  5. Jonathan C Lau
  6. Stefan Köhler
  7. Ali R Khan  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Western Ontario, Canada
  2. Aix-Marseille University, France

Abstract

Like neocortical structures, the archicortical hippocampus differs in its folding patterns across individuals. Here, we present an automated and robust BIDS-App, HippUnfold, for defining and indexing individual-specific hippocampal folding in MRI, analogous to popular tools used in neocortical reconstruction. Such tailoring is critical for inter-individual alignment, with topology serving as the basis for homology. This topological framework enables qualitatively new analyses of morphological and laminar structure in the hippocampus or its subfields. It is critical for refining current neuroimaging analyses at a meso- as well as micro-scale. HippUnfold uses state-of-the-art deep learning combined with previously developed topological constraints to generate uniquely folded surfaces to fit a given subject's hippocampal conformation. It is designed to work with commonly employed sub-millimetric MRI acquisitions, with possible extension to microscopic resolution. In this paper we describe the power of HippUnfold in feature extraction, and highlight its unique value compared to several extant hippocampal subfield analysis methods.

Data availability

All code for the HippUnfold application has been made available at https://github.com/khanlab/hippunfold. Data and code to generate the Figures shown in this study have been made available at https://zenodo.org/record/6360647.

The following previously published data sets were used

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jordan DeKraker

    University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    For correspondence
    jordan.dekraker@mail.mcgill.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4093-0582
  2. Roy AM Haast

    Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Mohamed D Yousif

    University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Bradley Karat

    University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6550-1418
  5. Jonathan C Lau

    University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Stefan Köhler

    Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, london, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1905-6453
  7. Ali R Khan

    University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
    For correspondence
    alik@robarts.ca
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0760-8647

Funding

Canadian HIV Trials Network, Canadian Institutes of Health Research (366062)

  • Stefan Köhler
  • Ali R Khan

Canada Research Chairs (950-231964)

  • Ali R Khan

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (6639)

  • Ali R Khan

Canada Foundation for Innovation (37427)

  • Ali R Khan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: Informed consent and consent to publish were obtained by the original authors of the open source data examined here. Each of the three datasets included research ethics board approvals, as well as informed consent and, in the HCP-Aging dataset, assessment of the subjects' ability to provide consent. For the single epilepsy patient case examined here, research ethics board approval and informed consent were collected at the Western University (HSREB # 108952, Lawson: R-17-156).

Copyright

© 2022, DeKraker et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 3,860
    views
  • 386
    downloads
  • 59
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jordan DeKraker
  2. Roy AM Haast
  3. Mohamed D Yousif
  4. Bradley Karat
  5. Jonathan C Lau
  6. Stefan Köhler
  7. Ali R Khan
(2022)
Automated hippocampal unfolding for morphometry and subfield segmentation with HippUnfold
eLife 11:e77945.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77945

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.77945

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Jacob A Miller
    Insight

    When navigating environments with changing rules, human brain circuits flexibly adapt how and where we retain information to help us achieve our immediate goals.

    1. Neuroscience
    Zhujun Shao, Mengya Zhang, Qing Yu
    Research Article

    When holding visual information temporarily in working memory (WM), the neural representation of the memorandum is distributed across various cortical regions, including visual and frontal cortices. However, the role of stimulus representation in visual and frontal cortices during WM has been controversial. Here, we tested the hypothesis that stimulus representation persists in the frontal cortex to facilitate flexible control demands in WM. During functional MRI, participants flexibly switched between simple WM maintenance of visual stimulus or more complex rule-based categorization of maintained stimulus on a trial-by-trial basis. Our results demonstrated enhanced stimulus representation in the frontal cortex that tracked demands for active WM control and enhanced stimulus representation in the visual cortex that tracked demands for precise WM maintenance. This differential frontal stimulus representation traded off with the newly-generated category representation with varying control demands. Simulation using multi-module recurrent neural networks replicated human neural patterns when stimulus information was preserved for network readout. Altogether, these findings help reconcile the long-standing debate in WM research, and provide empirical and computational evidence that flexible stimulus representation in the frontal cortex during WM serves as a potential neural coding scheme to accommodate the ever-changing environment.