Active tactile discrimination is coupled with and modulated by the cardiac cycle

  1. Alejandro Galvez-Pol  Is a corresponding author
  2. Pavandeep Virdee  Is a corresponding author
  3. Javier Villacampa
  4. James Kilner  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of the Balearic Islands, Spain
  2. University College London, United Kingdom

Abstract

Perception and cognition are modulated by the phase of the cardiac signal in which the stimuli are presented. This has been shown by locking the presentation of stimuli to distinct cardiac phases. However, in everyday life sensory information is not presented in this passive and phase-locked manner, instead we actively move and control our sensors to perceive the world. Whether active sensing is coupled and modulated with the cardiac cycle remains largely unknown. Here we recorded the electrocardiograms of human participants while they actively performed a tactile grating orientation task. We show that the duration of subjects' touch varied as a function of the cardiac phase in which they initiated it. Touches initiated in the systole phase were held for longer periods of time than touches initiated in the diastole phase. This effect was most pronounced when elongating the duration of the touches to sense the most difficult gratings. Conversely, while touches in the control condition were coupled to the cardiac cycle, their length did not vary as a function of the phase in which these were initiated. Our results reveal that we actively spend more time sensing during systole periods, the cardiac phase associated with lower perceptual sensitivity (vs. diastole). In line with interoceptive inference accounts, these results indicate that we actively adjust the acquisition of sense data to our internal bodily cycles.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file; Source Data files have been provided for all figures in OSF repository: https://osf.io/d7x3g/

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alejandro Galvez-Pol

    Psychology Department, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
    For correspondence
    a.galvez-pol@uib.es
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4430-8336
  2. Pavandeep Virdee

    Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    pavandeep.virdee.16@ucl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Javier Villacampa

    Psychology Department, University of the Balearic Islands, Palma de Mallorca, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9971-9004
  4. James Kilner

    Department of Clinical and Movement Neurosciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    j.kilner@ucl.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Funding

Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2016-120)

  • James Kilner

Autonomus Community of the Balearic Islands, Postdoctoral Grant Margalida Comas (PD/036/2019)

  • Alejandro Galvez-Pol

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: All participants volunteered to take part in the experiment, gave informed consent, and were reimbursed for the participation. Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the University College London research ethics committee ID 10857/002

Copyright

© 2022, Galvez-Pol et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,056
    views
  • 395
    downloads
  • 34
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alejandro Galvez-Pol
  2. Pavandeep Virdee
  3. Javier Villacampa
  4. James Kilner
(2022)
Active tactile discrimination is coupled with and modulated by the cardiac cycle
eLife 11:e78126.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78126

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.78126

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Zachary Fournier, Leandro M Alonso, Eve Marder
    Research Article

    Circuit function results from both intrinsic conductances of network neurons and the synaptic conductances that connect them. In models of neural circuits, different combinations of maximal conductances can give rise to similar activity. We compared the robustness of a neural circuit to changes in their intrinsic versus synaptic conductances. To address this, we performed a sensitivity analysis on a population of conductance-based models of the pyloric network from the crustacean stomatogastric ganglion (STG). The model network consists of three neurons with nine currents: a sodium current (Na), three potassium currents (Kd, KCa, KA), two calcium currents (CaS and CaT), a hyperpolarization-activated current (H), a non-voltage-gated leak current (leak), and a neuromodulatory current (MI). The model cells are connected by seven synapses of two types, glutamatergic and cholinergic. We produced one hundred models of the pyloric network that displayed similar activities with values of maximal conductances distributed over wide ranges. We evaluated the robustness of each model to changes in their maximal conductances. We found that individual models have different sensitivities to changes in their maximal conductances, both in their intrinsic and synaptic conductances. As expected, the models become less robust as the extent of the changes increases. Despite quantitative differences in their robustness, we found that in all cases, the model networks are more sensitive to the perturbation of their intrinsic conductances than their synaptic conductances.

    1. Neuroscience
    Jacob A Miller
    Insight

    When navigating environments with changing rules, human brain circuits flexibly adapt how and where we retain information to help us achieve our immediate goals.