β-cell deletion of the PKm1 and PKm2 isoforms of pyruvate kinase in mice reveal their essential role as nutrient sensors for the KATP channel

  1. Hannah R Foster
  2. Thuong Ho
  3. Evgeniy Potapenko
  4. Sophia M Sdao
  5. Shih Ming Huang
  6. Sophie L Lewandowski
  7. Halena R VanDeusen
  8. Shawn M Davidson
  9. Rebecca L Cardone
  10. Marc Prentki
  11. Richard G Kibbey
  12. Matthew J Merrins  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Wisconsin-Madison, United States
  2. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, United States
  3. Yale University, United States
  4. University of Montreal, Canada

Abstract

Pyruvate kinase (PK) and the phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) cycle play key roles in nutrient-stimulated KATP channel closure and insulin secretion. To identify the PK isoforms involved, we generated mice lacking β-cell PKm1, PKm2, and mitochondrial PEP carboxykinase (PCK2) that generates mitochondrial PEP. Glucose metabolism generates both glycolytic and mitochondrially-derived PEP, which triggers KATP closure through local PKm1 and PKm2 signaling at the plasma membrane. Amino acids, which generate mitochondrial PEP without producing glycolytic fructose 1,6-bisphosphate to allosterically activate PKm2, signal through PKm1 to raise ATP/ADP, close KATP channels, and stimulate insulin secretion. Raising cytosolic ATP/ADP with amino acids is insufficient to close KATP channels in the absence of PK activity or PCK2, indicating that KATP channels are primarily regulated by PEP that provides ATP via plasma membrane-associated PK, rather than mitochondrially-derived ATP. Following membrane depolarization, the PEP cycle is also involved in an 'off-switch' that facilitates KATP channel reopening and Ca2+ extrusion, as shown by PK activation experiments and β-cell PCK2 deletion, which prolongs Ca2+ oscillations and increases insulin secretion. In conclusion, the differential response of PKm1 and PKm2 to the glycolytic and mitochondrial sources of PEP influences the β-cell nutrient response, and controls the oscillatory cycle regulating insulin secretion.

Data availability

Datasets generated or analyzed in this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files are provided for Figures 1-6 and the associated figure supplement files.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Hannah R Foster

    Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Thuong Ho

    Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Evgeniy Potapenko

    Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Sophia M Sdao

    Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Shih Ming Huang

    Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Sophie L Lewandowski

    Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Halena R VanDeusen

    Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Shawn M Davidson

    Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  9. Rebecca L Cardone

    Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  10. Marc Prentki

    Department of Nutrition, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Richard G Kibbey

    Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  12. Matthew J Merrins

    Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, United States
    For correspondence
    merrins@wisc.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1599-9227

Funding

National Institutes of Health (R01DK113103)

  • Matthew J Merrins

National Institutes of Health (R01DK113103)

  • Matthew J Merrins

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01B005113)

  • Matthew J Merrins

Health Resources and Services Administration (T32HP10010)

  • Hannah R Foster

National Institutes of Health (T32AG000213)

  • Hannah R Foster

National Institutes of Health (T32DK007665)

  • Sophie L Lewandowski

American Diabetes Association (1-17-PDF-155)

  • Halena R VanDeusen

National Institutes of Health (R01AG062328)

  • Matthew J Merrins

National Institutes of Health (R01DK127637)

  • Richard G Kibbey

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: Animal experiments were conducted under the supervision of the IACUC of the William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital (Protocol: MJM0001).

Copyright

© 2022, Foster et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,085
    views
  • 463
    downloads
  • 35
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Hannah R Foster
  2. Thuong Ho
  3. Evgeniy Potapenko
  4. Sophia M Sdao
  5. Shih Ming Huang
  6. Sophie L Lewandowski
  7. Halena R VanDeusen
  8. Shawn M Davidson
  9. Rebecca L Cardone
  10. Marc Prentki
  11. Richard G Kibbey
  12. Matthew J Merrins
(2022)
β-cell deletion of the PKm1 and PKm2 isoforms of pyruvate kinase in mice reveal their essential role as nutrient sensors for the KATP channel
eLife 11:e79422.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79422

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.79422

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology
    Ryan M Finnerty, Daniel J Carulli ... Wipawee Winuthayanon
    Research Article

    The oviduct is the site of fertilization and preimplantation embryo development in mammals. Evidence suggests that gametes alter oviductal gene expression. To delineate the adaptive interactions between the oviduct and gamete/embryo, we performed a multi-omics characterization of oviductal tissues utilizing bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq), and proteomics collected from distal and proximal at various stages after mating in mice. We observed robust region-specific transcriptional signatures. Specifically, the presence of sperm induces genes involved in pro-inflammatory responses in the proximal region at 0.5 days post-coitus (dpc). Genes involved in inflammatory responses were produced specifically by secretory epithelial cells in the oviduct. At 1.5 and 2.5 dpc, genes involved in pyruvate and glycolysis were enriched in the proximal region, potentially providing metabolic support for developing embryos. Abundant proteins in the oviductal fluid were differentially observed between naturally fertilized and superovulated samples. RNA-seq data were used to identify transcription factors predicted to influence protein abundance in the proteomic data via a novel machine learning model based on transformers of integrating transcriptomics and proteomics data. The transformers identified influential transcription factors and correlated predictive protein expressions in alignment with the in vivo-derived data. Lastly, we found some differences between inflammatory responses in sperm-exposed mouse oviducts compared to hydrosalpinx Fallopian tubes from patients. In conclusion, our multi-omics characterization and subsequent in vivo confirmation of proteins/RNAs indicate that the oviduct is adaptive and responsive to the presence of sperm and embryos in a spatiotemporal manner.

    1. Cell Biology
    Hyunggu Hahn, Carole Daly ... Alex RB Thomsen
    Research Article

    Chemokine receptors are GPCRs that regulate the chemotactic migration of a wide variety of cells including immune and cancer cells. Most chemokine receptors contain features associated with the ability to stimulate G protein signaling during β-arrestin-mediated receptor internalization into endosomes. As endosomal signaling of certain non-GPCR receptors plays a major role in cell migration, we chose to investigate the potential role of endosomal chemokine receptor signaling on mechanisms governing this function. Applying a combination of pharmacological and cell biological approaches, we demonstrate that the model chemokine receptor CCR7 recruits G protein and β-arrestin simultaneously upon chemokine stimulation, which enables internalized receptors to activate G protein from endosomes. Furthermore, spatiotemporal-resolved APEX2 proteome profiling shows that endosomal CCR7 uniquely enriches specific Rho GTPase regulators as compared to plasma membrane CCR7, which is directly associated with enhanced activity of the Rho GTPase Rac1 and chemotaxis of immune T cells. As Rac1 drives the formation of membrane protrusions during chemotaxis, our findings suggest an important integrated function of endosomal chemokine receptor signaling in cell migration.