Spatiotemporal organization of human sensorimotor beta burst activity

  1. Catharina Zich  Is a corresponding author
  2. Andrew J Quinn
  3. James J Bonaiuto
  4. George O'Neill
  5. Lydia C Mardell
  6. Nick S Ward
  7. Sven Bestmann
  1. University College London, United Kingdom
  2. University of Oxford, United Kingdom
  3. Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, France

Abstract

Beta oscillations in human sensorimotor cortex are hallmark signatures of healthy and pathological movement. In single trials, beta oscillations include bursts of intermittent, transient periods of high-power activity. These burst events have been linked to a range of sensory and motor processes, but their precise spatial, spectral, and temporal structure remains unclear. Specifically, a role for beta burst activity in information coding and communication suggests spatiotemporal patterns, or travelling wave activity, along specific anatomical gradients. We here show in human magnetoencephalography recordings that burst activity in sensorimotor cortex occurs in planar spatiotemporal wave-like patterns that dominate along two axes either parallel or perpendicular to the central sulcus. Moreover, we find that the two propagation directions are characterised by distinct anatomical and physiological features. Finally, our results suggest that sensorimotor beta bursts occurring before and after a movement can be distinguished by their anatomical, spectral and spatiotemporal characteristics, indicating distinct functional roles.

Data availability

Data are available via the Open Science Framework (OSF) at https://osf. io/eu6nx. Data are also archived at the Open MEG Archive (OMEGA; Nisoetal.,2016) and may be accessed via http://dx .doi.org/10.23686/ 0015896 (Niso et al.,2018) after registration at https:// www.mcgill.ca/bic/resources/omega.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Catharina Zich

    Department of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    For correspondence
    catharina.zich@ndcn.ox.ac.uk
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0705-9297
  2. Andrew J Quinn

    Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-2267-9897
  3. James J Bonaiuto

    Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, Bron, France
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. George O'Neill

    Department of Imaging Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Lydia C Mardell

    Department of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3180-3239
  6. Nick S Ward

    Department of Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Sven Bestmann

    epartment for Clinical and Movement Neuroscience, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6867-9545

Funding

Brain Research UK (201718-13)

  • Catharina Zich

Brain Research UK (201617-03)

  • Catharina Zich

Wellcome Trust (098369/Z/12/Z)

  • Andrew J Quinn

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/T001046/1)

  • George O'Neill

Medical Research Council (MR/N013867/1)

  • Lydia C Mardell

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: The study protocol was in full accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all participants gave written informed consent after being fully informed about the purpose of the study. The study protocol, participant information, and form of consent, were approved by the UCL Research Ethics Committee (reference number 5833/001).

Copyright

© 2023, Zich et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,387
    views
  • 229
    downloads
  • 13
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Catharina Zich
  2. Andrew J Quinn
  3. James J Bonaiuto
  4. George O'Neill
  5. Lydia C Mardell
  6. Nick S Ward
  7. Sven Bestmann
(2023)
Spatiotemporal organization of human sensorimotor beta burst activity
eLife 12:e80160.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80160

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80160

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Paul I Jaffe, Gustavo X Santiago-Reyes ... Russell A Poldrack
    Research Article

    Evidence accumulation models (EAMs) are the dominant framework for modeling response time (RT) data from speeded decision-making tasks. While providing a good quantitative description of RT data in terms of abstract perceptual representations, EAMs do not explain how the visual system extracts these representations in the first place. To address this limitation, we introduce the visual accumulator model (VAM), in which convolutional neural network models of visual processing and traditional EAMs are jointly fitted to trial-level RTs and raw (pixel-space) visual stimuli from individual subjects in a unified Bayesian framework. Models fitted to large-scale cognitive training data from a stylized flanker task captured individual differences in congruency effects, RTs, and accuracy. We find evidence that the selection of task-relevant information occurs through the orthogonalization of relevant and irrelevant representations, demonstrating how our framework can be used to relate visual representations to behavioral outputs. Together, our work provides a probabilistic framework for both constraining neural network models of vision with behavioral data and studying how the visual system extracts representations that guide decisions.

    1. Neuroscience
    Aneri Soni, Michael J Frank
    Research Article

    How and why is working memory (WM) capacity limited? Traditional cognitive accounts focus either on limitations on the number or items that can be stored (slots models), or loss of precision with increasing load (resource models). Here, we show that a neural network model of prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia can learn to reuse the same prefrontal populations to store multiple items, leading to resource-like constraints within a slot-like system, and inducing a trade-off between quantity and precision of information. Such ‘chunking’ strategies are adapted as a function of reinforcement learning and WM task demands, mimicking human performance and normative models. Moreover, adaptive performance requires a dynamic range of dopaminergic signals to adjust striatal gating policies, providing a new interpretation of WM difficulties in patient populations such as Parkinson’s disease, ADHD, and schizophrenia. These simulations also suggest a computational rather than anatomical limit to WM capacity.