1. Cell Biology
  2. Neuroscience

The NAD+ precursor NMN activates dSarm to trigger axon degeneration in Drosophila

  1. Arnau Llobet Rosell
  2. Maria Paglione
  3. Jonathan Gilley
  4. Magdalena Kocia
  5. Giulia Perillo
  6. Massimiliano Gasparrini
  7. Lucia Cialabrini
  8. Nadia Raffaelli
  9. Carlo Angeletti
  10. Giuseppe Orsomando
  11. Pei-Hsuan Wu
  12. Michael P Coleman
  13. Andrea Loreto
  14. Lukas Jakob Neukomm  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Lausanne, Switzerland
  2. University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  3. University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland
  4. Polytechnic University of Marche, Italy
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80245
Share this article
Cite this article
  1. Arnau Llobet Rosell
  2. Maria Paglione
  3. Jonathan Gilley
  4. Magdalena Kocia
  5. Giulia Perillo
  6. Massimiliano Gasparrini
  7. Lucia Cialabrini
  8. Nadia Raffaelli
  9. Carlo Angeletti
  10. Giuseppe Orsomando
  11. Pei-Hsuan Wu
  12. Michael P Coleman
  13. Andrea Loreto
  14. Lukas Jakob Neukomm
(2022)
The NAD+ precursor NMN activates dSarm to trigger axon degeneration in Drosophila
eLife 11:e80245.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80245
  2. Download BibTeX
  3. Download .RIS

Abstract

Axon degeneration contributes to the disruption of neuronal circuit function in diseased and injured nervous systems. Severed axons degenerate following the activation of an evolutionarily conserved signaling pathway, which culminates in the activation of SARM1 in mammals to execute the pathological depletion of the metabolite NAD+. SARM1 NADase activity is activated by the NAD+ precursor nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN). In mammals, keeping NMN levels low potently preserves axons after injury. However, it remains unclear whether NMN is also a key mediator of axon degeneration and dSarm activation in flies. Here, we demonstrate that lowering NMN levels in Drosophila through the expression of a newly generated prokaryotic NMN-Deamidase (NMN-D) preserves severed axons for months and keeps them circuit-integrated for weeks. NMN-D alters the NAD+ metabolic flux by lowering NMN, while NAD+ remains unchanged in vivo. Increased NMN synthesis, by the expression of mouse nicotinamide phosphoribosyltransferase (mNAMPT), leads to faster axon degeneration after injury. We also show that NMN-induced activation of dSarm mediates axon degeneration in vivo. Finally, NMN-D delays neurodegeneration caused by loss of the sole NMN-consuming and NAD+-synthesizing enzyme dNmnat. Our results reveal a critical role for NMN in neurodegeneration in the fly, which extends beyond axonal injury. The potent neuroprotection by reducing NMN levels is similar to the interference with other essential mediators of axon degeneration in Drosophila.

Data availability

Generated plasmids have been deposited in Addgene.All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Arnau Llobet Rosell

    Department of Fundamental Neurosciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7728-2999

  2. Maria Paglione

    Department of Fundamental Neurosciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  3. Jonathan Gilley

    Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-9510-7956

  4. Magdalena Kocia

    Department of Fundamental Neurosciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  5. Giulia Perillo

    Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  6. Massimiliano Gasparrini

    Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  7. Lucia Cialabrini

    Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  8. Nadia Raffaelli

    Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  9. Carlo Angeletti

    Department of Clinical Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  10. Giuseppe Orsomando

    Department of Clinical Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6640-097X

  11. Pei-Hsuan Wu

    Department of Genetic Medicine and Development, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  12. Michael P Coleman

    Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

  13. Andrea Loreto

    Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-6535-6436

  14. Lukas Jakob Neukomm

    Department of Fundamental Neurosciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
    For correspondence
    lukas.neukomm@unil.ch
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5007-3959

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (176855)

  • Lukas Jakob Neukomm

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (211015)

  • Lukas Jakob Neukomm

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/S009582/1a)

  • Jonathan Gilley

International Foundation for Research in Paraplegia (P180)

  • Lukas Jakob Neukomm

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (190919)

  • Lukas Jakob Neukomm

Università Politecnica delle Marche (2018-20)

  • Giuseppe Orsomando

Wellcome Trust (210904/Z/18/Z)

  • Andrea Loreto

John and Lucille Van Geest Foundation

  • Michael P Coleman

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (201535)

  • Pei-Hsuan Wu

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Llobet Rosell et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,620
    views
  • 274
    downloads
  • 18
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Arnau Llobet Rosell
  2. Maria Paglione
  3. Jonathan Gilley
  4. Magdalena Kocia
  5. Giulia Perillo
  6. Massimiliano Gasparrini
  7. Lucia Cialabrini
  8. Nadia Raffaelli
  9. Carlo Angeletti
  10. Giuseppe Orsomando
  11. Pei-Hsuan Wu
  12. Michael P Coleman
  13. Andrea Loreto
  14. Lukas Jakob Neukomm
(2022)
The NAD+ precursor NMN activates dSarm to trigger axon degeneration in Drosophila
eLife 11:e80245.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80245

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.80245

Categories and tags

Research organism

Further reading

    1. Cell Biology

    Multi-omics analyses and machine learning prediction of oviductal responses in the presence of gametes and embryos

    Ryan M Finnerty, Daniel J Carulli ... Wipawee Winuthayanon
    Research Article

    The oviduct is the site of fertilization and preimplantation embryo development in mammals. Evidence suggests that gametes alter oviductal gene expression. To delineate the adaptive interactions between the oviduct and gamete/embryo, we performed a multi-omics characterization of oviductal tissues utilizing bulk RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq), single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq), and proteomics collected from distal and proximal at various stages after mating in mice. We observed robust region-specific transcriptional signatures. Specifically, the presence of sperm induces genes involved in pro-inflammatory responses in the proximal region at 0.5 days post-coitus (dpc). Genes involved in inflammatory responses were produced specifically by secretory epithelial cells in the oviduct. At 1.5 and 2.5 dpc, genes involved in pyruvate and glycolysis were enriched in the proximal region, potentially providing metabolic support for developing embryos. Abundant proteins in the oviductal fluid were differentially observed between naturally fertilized and superovulated samples. RNA-seq data were used to identify transcription factors predicted to influence protein abundance in the proteomic data via a novel machine learning model based on transformers of integrating transcriptomics and proteomics data. The transformers identified influential transcription factors and correlated predictive protein expressions in alignment with the in vivo-derived data. Lastly, we found some differences between inflammatory responses in sperm-exposed mouse oviducts compared to hydrosalpinx Fallopian tubes from patients. In conclusion, our multi-omics characterization and subsequent in vivo confirmation of proteins/RNAs indicate that the oviduct is adaptive and responsive to the presence of sperm and embryos in a spatiotemporal manner.

    1. Cell Biology

    Control of ciliary transcriptional programs during spermatogenesis by antagonistic transcription factors

    Weihua Wang, Junqiao Xing ... Zhangfeng Hu
    Research Article

    Existence of cilia in the last eukaryotic common ancestor raises a fundamental question in biology: how the transcriptional regulation of ciliogenesis has evolved? One conceptual answer to this question is by an ancient transcription factor regulating ciliary gene expression in both uni- and multicellular organisms, but examples of such transcription factors in eukaryotes are lacking. Previously, we showed that an ancient transcription factor X chromosome-associated protein 5 (Xap5) is required for flagellar assembly in Chlamydomonas. Here, we show that Xap5 and Xap5-like (Xap5l) are two conserved pairs of antagonistic transcription regulators that control ciliary transcriptional programs during spermatogenesis. Male mice lacking either Xap5 or Xap5l display infertility, as a result of meiotic prophase arrest and sperm flagella malformation, respectively. Mechanistically, Xap5 positively regulates the ciliary gene expression by activating the key regulators including Foxj1 and Rfx families during the early stage of spermatogenesis. In contrast, Xap5l negatively regulates the expression of ciliary genes via repressing these ciliary transcription factors during the spermiogenesis stage. Our results provide new insights into the mechanisms by which temporal and spatial transcription regulators are coordinated to control ciliary transcriptional programs during spermatogenesis.

    1. Cell Biology

    Endosomal chemokine receptor signalosomes regulate central mechanisms underlying cell migration

    Hyunggu Hahn, Carole Daly ... Alex RB Thomsen
    Research Article

    Chemokine receptors are GPCRs that regulate the chemotactic migration of a wide variety of cells including immune and cancer cells. Most chemokine receptors contain features associated with the ability to stimulate G protein signaling during β-arrestin-mediated receptor internalization into endosomes. As endosomal signaling of certain non-GPCR receptors plays a major role in cell migration, we chose to investigate the potential role of endosomal chemokine receptor signaling on mechanisms governing this function. Applying a combination of pharmacological and cell biological approaches, we demonstrate that the model chemokine receptor CCR7 recruits G protein and β-arrestin simultaneously upon chemokine stimulation, which enables internalized receptors to activate G protein from endosomes. Furthermore, spatiotemporal-resolved APEX2 proteome profiling shows that endosomal CCR7 uniquely enriches specific Rho GTPase regulators as compared to plasma membrane CCR7, which is directly associated with enhanced activity of the Rho GTPase Rac1 and chemotaxis of immune T cells. As Rac1 drives the formation of membrane protrusions during chemotaxis, our findings suggest an important integrated function of endosomal chemokine receptor signaling in cell migration.