Biological condensates form percolated networks with molecular motion properties distinctly different from dilute solutions

  1. Zeyu Shen
  2. Bowen Jia
  3. Yang Xu
  4. Jonas Wessén
  5. Tanmoy Pal
  6. Hue Sun Chan
  7. Shengwang Du
  8. Mingjie Zhang  Is a corresponding author
  1. Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, China
  2. University of Toronto, Canada
  3. Southern University of Science and Technology, China

Abstract

Formation of membraneless organelles or biological condensates via phase separation and related processes hugely expands the cellular organelle repertoire. Biological condensates are dense and viscoelastic soft matters instead of canonical dilute solutions. To date, numerous different biological condensates have been discovered; but mechanistic understanding of biological condensates remains scarce. In this study, we developed an adaptive single molecule imaging method that allows simultaneous tracking of individual molecules and their motion trajectories in both condensed and dilute phases of various biological condensates. The method enables quantitative measurements of concentrations, phase boundary, motion behavior and speed of molecules in both condensed and dilute phases as well as the scale and speed of molecular exchanges between the two phases. Notably, molecules in the condensed phase do not undergo uniform Brownian motion, but instead constantly switch between a (class of) confined state(s) and a random diffusion-like motion state. Transient confinement is consistent with strong interactions associated with large molecular networks (i.e., percolation) in the condensed phase. In this way, molecules in biological condensates behave distinctly different from those in dilute solutions. The methods and findings described herein should be generally applicable for deciphering the molecular mechanisms underlying the assembly, dynamics and consequently functional implications of biological condensates.

Data availability

The home-written codes and use of the codes for data analysis described in this manuscript have been uploaded in the GitHub database with unrestricted access:https://github.com/NeoLShen/Code-for-phase-simulation-and-HMM-analysis.git

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Zeyu Shen

    Division of Life Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1057-7191
  2. Bowen Jia

    Division of Life Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Yang Xu

    Division of Life Science, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Jonas Wessén

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5904-8442
  5. Tanmoy Pal

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Hue Sun Chan

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1381-923X
  7. Shengwang Du

    Department of Physics, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Mingjie Zhang

    School of Life Sciences, Southern University of Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China
    For correspondence
    zhangmj@sustech.edu.cn
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-9404-0190

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China ((82188101)

  • Mingjie Zhang

Ministry of Science and Technology (2019YFA0508402)

  • Mingjie Zhang

Shenzhen Bay Laboratory (S201101002)

  • Mingjie Zhang

University Grants Committee (AoE-M09-12,16104518 and 16101419)

  • Mingjie Zhang

Human Frontier Science Program (RGP0020/2019)

  • Mingjie Zhang

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT-155930)

  • Hue Sun Chan

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (RGPIN-2018-04351)

  • Hue Sun Chan

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Shen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,222
    views
  • 346
    downloads
  • 29
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Zeyu Shen
  2. Bowen Jia
  3. Yang Xu
  4. Jonas Wessén
  5. Tanmoy Pal
  6. Hue Sun Chan
  7. Shengwang Du
  8. Mingjie Zhang
(2023)
Biological condensates form percolated networks with molecular motion properties distinctly different from dilute solutions
eLife 12:e81907.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81907

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.81907

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Yamato Niitani, Kohei Matsuzaki ... Michio Tomishige
    Research Article

    The two identical motor domains (heads) of dimeric kinesin-1 move in a hand-over-hand process along a microtubule, coordinating their ATPase cycles such that each ATP hydrolysis is tightly coupled to a step and enabling the motor to take many steps without dissociating. The neck linker, a structural element that connects the two heads, has been shown to be essential for head–head coordination; however, which kinetic step(s) in the chemomechanical cycle is ‘gated’ by the neck linker remains unresolved. Here, we employed pre-steady-state kinetics and single-molecule assays to investigate how the neck-linker conformation affects kinesin’s motility cycle. We show that the backward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the front kinesin head confers higher affinity for microtubule, but does not change ATP binding and dissociation rates. In contrast, the forward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the rear kinesin head decreases the ATP dissociation rate but has little effect on microtubule dissociation. In combination, these conformation-specific effects of the neck linker favor ATP hydrolysis and dissociation of the rear head prior to microtubule detachment of the front head, thereby providing a kinetic explanation for the coordinated walking mechanism of dimeric kinesin.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Christopher T Schafer, Raymond F Pauszek III ... David P Millar
    Research Article

    The canonical chemokine receptor CXCR4 and atypical receptor ACKR3 both respond to CXCL12 but induce different effector responses to regulate cell migration. While CXCR4 couples to G proteins and directly promotes cell migration, ACKR3 is G-protein-independent and scavenges CXCL12 to regulate extracellular chemokine levels and maintain CXCR4 responsiveness, thereby indirectly influencing migration. The receptors also have distinct activation requirements. CXCR4 only responds to wild-type CXCL12 and is sensitive to mutation of the chemokine. By contrast, ACKR3 recruits GPCR kinases (GRKs) and β-arrestins and promiscuously responds to CXCL12, CXCL12 variants, other peptides and proteins, and is relatively insensitive to mutation. To investigate the role of conformational dynamics in the distinct pharmacological behaviors of CXCR4 and ACKR3, we employed single-molecule FRET to track discrete conformational states of the receptors in real-time. The data revealed that apo-CXCR4 preferentially populates a high-FRET inactive state, while apo-ACKR3 shows little conformational preference and high transition probabilities among multiple inactive, intermediate and active conformations, consistent with its propensity for activation. Multiple active-like ACKR3 conformations are populated in response to agonists, compared to the single CXCR4 active-state. This and the markedly different conformational landscapes of the receptors suggest that activation of ACKR3 may be achieved by a broader distribution of conformational states than CXCR4. Much of the conformational heterogeneity of ACKR3 is linked to a single residue that differs between ACKR3 and CXCR4. The dynamic properties of ACKR3 may underly its inability to form productive interactions with G proteins that would drive canonical GPCR signaling.