Abstract

The type VI secretion system (T6SS) secretes antibacterial effectors into target competitors. Salmonella spp. encode five phylogenetically distinct T6SSs. Here we characterize the function of the SPI-22 T6SS of Salmonella bongori showing that it has antibacterial activity and identify a group of antibacterial T6SS effectors (TseV1-4) containing an N-terminal PAAR-like domain and a C-terminal VRR-Nuc domain encoded next to cognate immunity proteins with a DUF3396 domain (TsiV1-4). TseV2 and TseV3 are toxic when expressed in Escherichia coli and bacterial competition assays confirm that TseV2 and TseV3 are secreted by the SPI-22 T6SS. Phylogenetic analysis reveals that TseV1-4 are evolutionarily related to enzymes involved in DNA repair. TseV3 recognizes specific DNA structures and preferentially cleave splayed arms, generating DNA double-strand breaks and inducing the SOS response in target cells. The crystal structure of the TseV3:TsiV3 complex reveals that the immunity protein likely blocks the effector interaction with the DNA substrate. These results expand our knowledge on the function of Salmonella pathogenicity islands, the evolution of toxins used in biological conflicts, and the endogenous mechanisms regulating the activity of these toxins.

Data availability

All data generated during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files have been provided.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Julia Takuno Hespanhol

    Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Daniel Enrique Sanchez-Limache

    Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1364-7527
  3. Gianlucca Gonçalves Nicastro

    Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Liam Mead

    Department of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Edgar Enrique Llontop

    Departamento de Bioquímica, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-4910-9667
  6. Gustavo Chagas-Santos

    Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Chuck Shaker Farah

    Departamento de Bioquímica, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  8. Robson Francisco de Souza

    Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5284-4630
  9. Rodrigo da Silva Galhardo

    Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-5686-9704
  10. Andrew Lovering

    Department of Biosciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  11. Ethel Bayer-Santos

    Departamento de Microbiologia, Universidade de São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
    For correspondence
    ebayersantos@usp.br
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-3832-3449

Funding

Sao Paulo Research foundation (2016/09047-8)

  • Robson Francisco de Souza

FAPESP Fellowship (2018/04553-8)

  • Ethel Bayer-Santos

MIBTP Studentship

  • Liam Mead

Sao Paulo Research Foundation (2017/17303-7)

  • Chuck Shaker Farah

Sao Paulo Research Foundation (2017/02178-2)

  • Ethel Bayer-Santos

Welcome Trust (209437/Z/17/Z)

  • Andrew Lovering

FAPESP Fellowship (2018/25316-4)

  • Julia Takuno Hespanhol

FAPESP Fellowship (2019/22715-8)

  • Daniel Enrique Sanchez-Limache

FAPESP Fellowship (2021/03400-6)

  • Gianlucca Gonçalves Nicastro

FAPESP Fellowship (2019/12234-2)

  • Edgar Enrique Llontop

FAPESP Fellowship (2020/15389-4)

  • Gustavo Chagas-Santos

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2022, Hespanhol et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 2,604
    views
  • 474
    downloads
  • 18
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Julia Takuno Hespanhol
  2. Daniel Enrique Sanchez-Limache
  3. Gianlucca Gonçalves Nicastro
  4. Liam Mead
  5. Edgar Enrique Llontop
  6. Gustavo Chagas-Santos
  7. Chuck Shaker Farah
  8. Robson Francisco de Souza
  9. Rodrigo da Silva Galhardo
  10. Andrew Lovering
  11. Ethel Bayer-Santos
(2022)
Antibacterial T6SS effectors with a VRR-Nuc domain are structure-specific nucleases
eLife 11:e82437.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82437

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.82437

Further reading

    1. Medicine
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Berit Siedentop, Viacheslav N Kachalov ... Sebastian Bonhoeffer
    Research Article

    Background:

    Under which conditions antibiotic combination therapy decelerates rather than accelerates resistance evolution is not well understood. We examined the effect of combining antibiotics on within-patient resistance development across various bacterial pathogens and antibiotics.

    Methods:

    We searched CENTRAL, EMBASE, and PubMed for (quasi)-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published from database inception to 24 November 2022. Trials comparing antibiotic treatments with different numbers of antibiotics were included. Patients were considered to have acquired resistance if, at the follow-up culture, a resistant bacterium (as defined by the study authors) was detected that had not been present in the baseline culture. We combined results using a random effects model and performed meta-regression and stratified analyses. The trials’ risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool.

    Results:

    42 trials were eligible and 29, including 5054 patients, qualified for statistical analysis. In most trials, resistance development was not the primary outcome and studies lacked power. The combined odds ratio for the acquisition of resistance comparing the group with the higher number of antibiotics with the comparison group was 1.23 (95% CI 0.68–2.25), with substantial between-study heterogeneity (I2=77%). We identified tentative evidence for potential beneficial or detrimental effects of antibiotic combination therapy for specific pathogens or medical conditions.

    Conclusions:

    The evidence for combining a higher number of antibiotics compared to fewer from RCTs is scarce and overall compatible with both benefit or harm. Trials powered to detect differences in resistance development or well-designed observational studies are required to clarify the impact of combination therapy on resistance.

    Funding:

    Support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 310030B_176401 (SB, BS, CW), grant 32FP30-174281 (ME), grant 324730_207957 (RDK)) and from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID, cooperative agreement AI069924 (ME)) is gratefully acknowledged.

    1. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Dipasree Hajra, Raju S Rajmani ... Dipshikha Chakravortty
    Research Article

    Sirtuins are the major players in host immunometabolic regulation. However, the role of sirtuins in the modulation of the immune metabolism pertaining to salmonellosis is largely unknown. Here, our investigation focussed on the role of two important sirtuins, SIRT1 and SIRT3, shedding light on their impact on intracellular Salmonella’s metabolic switch and pathogenesis establishment. Our study indicated the ability of the live Salmonella Typhimurium to differentially regulate the levels of SIRT1 and SIRT3 for maintaining the high glycolytic metabolism and low fatty acid metabolism in Salmonella. Perturbing SIRT1 or SIRT3 through knockdown or inhibition resulted in a remarkable shift in the host metabolism to low fatty acid oxidation and high glycolysis. This switch led to decreased proliferation of Salmonella in the macrophages. Further, Salmonella-induced higher levels of SIRT1 and SIRT3 led to a skewed polarization state of the macrophages from a pro-inflammatory M1 state toward an immunosuppressive M2, making it more conducive for the intracellular life of Salmonella. Alongside, governing immunological functions by modulating p65 NF-κB acetylation, SIRT1, and SIRT3 also skew Salmonella-induced host metabolic switch by regulating the acetylation status of HIF-1α and PDHA1. Interestingly, though knockdown of SIRT1/3 attenuated Salmonella proliferation in macrophages, in in vivo mice model of infection, inhibition or knockdown of SIRT1/3 led to more dissemination and higher organ burden, which can be attributed to enhanced ROS and IL-6 production. Our study hence reports for the first time that Salmonella modulates SIRT1/3 levels to maintain its own metabolism for successful pathogenesis.