Reevaluation of Piezo1 as a gut RNA sensor

  1. Alec R Nickolls
  2. Gabrielle S O'Brien
  3. Sarah Shnayder
  4. Yunxiao Zhang
  5. Maximilian Nagel
  6. Ardem Patapoutian
  7. Alexander Theodore Chesler  Is a corresponding author
  1. National Institutes of Health, United States
  2. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Scripps Research Institute, United States

Abstract

Piezo1 is a stretch-gated ion channel required for mechanosensation in many organ systems. Recent findings point to a new role for Piezo1 in the gut, suggesting that it is a sensor of microbial single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) rather than mechanical force. If true, this would redefine the scope of Piezo biology. Here, we sought to replicate the central finding that fecal ssRNA is a natural agonist of Piezo1. While we observe that fecal extracts and ssRNA can stimulate calcium influx in certain cell lines, this response is independent of Piezo1. Additionally, sterilized dietary extracts devoid of gut biome RNA show similar cell line-specific stimulatory activity to fecal extracts. Together, our data highlight potential confounds inherent to gut-derived extracts, exclude Piezo1 as a receptor for ssRNA in the gut, and support a dedicated role for Piezo channels in mechanosensing.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Sequencing data have been deposited on the GEO website.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Alec R Nickolls

    National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  2. Gabrielle S O'Brien

    National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  3. Sarah Shnayder

    National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  4. Yunxiao Zhang

    Department of Neuroscience, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  5. Maximilian Nagel

    National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Ardem Patapoutian

    Department of Neuroscience, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-0726-7034
  7. Alexander Theodore Chesler

    National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, United States
    For correspondence
    alexander.chesler@nih.gov
    Competing interests
    Alexander Theodore Chesler, Reviewing editor, eLife.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3131-0728

Funding

National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (Intramural funds)

  • Alexander Theodore Chesler

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (Intramural funds)

  • Alexander Theodore Chesler

National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (Intramural funds)

  • Alexander Theodore Chesler

Howard Hughes Medical Institute

  • Ardem Patapoutian

National Institutes of Health (R35 NS105067)

  • Ardem Patapoutian

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health. All of the animals were handled according to approved institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC) protocols (#1365) of the NINDS-IRP.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 2,072
    views
  • 262
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Alec R Nickolls
  2. Gabrielle S O'Brien
  3. Sarah Shnayder
  4. Yunxiao Zhang
  5. Maximilian Nagel
  6. Ardem Patapoutian
  7. Alexander Theodore Chesler
(2022)
Reevaluation of Piezo1 as a gut RNA sensor
eLife 11:e83346.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83346

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83346

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Paul I Jaffe, Gustavo X Santiago-Reyes ... Russell A Poldrack
    Research Article

    Evidence accumulation models (EAMs) are the dominant framework for modeling response time (RT) data from speeded decision-making tasks. While providing a good quantitative description of RT data in terms of abstract perceptual representations, EAMs do not explain how the visual system extracts these representations in the first place. To address this limitation, we introduce the visual accumulator model (VAM), in which convolutional neural network models of visual processing and traditional EAMs are jointly fitted to trial-level RTs and raw (pixel-space) visual stimuli from individual subjects in a unified Bayesian framework. Models fitted to large-scale cognitive training data from a stylized flanker task captured individual differences in congruency effects, RTs, and accuracy. We find evidence that the selection of task-relevant information occurs through the orthogonalization of relevant and irrelevant representations, demonstrating how our framework can be used to relate visual representations to behavioral outputs. Together, our work provides a probabilistic framework for both constraining neural network models of vision with behavioral data and studying how the visual system extracts representations that guide decisions.

    1. Neuroscience
    Aneri Soni, Michael J Frank
    Research Article

    How and why is working memory (WM) capacity limited? Traditional cognitive accounts focus either on limitations on the number or items that can be stored (slots models), or loss of precision with increasing load (resource models). Here, we show that a neural network model of prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia can learn to reuse the same prefrontal populations to store multiple items, leading to resource-like constraints within a slot-like system, and inducing a trade-off between quantity and precision of information. Such ‘chunking’ strategies are adapted as a function of reinforcement learning and WM task demands, mimicking human performance and normative models. Moreover, adaptive performance requires a dynamic range of dopaminergic signals to adjust striatal gating policies, providing a new interpretation of WM difficulties in patient populations such as Parkinson’s disease, ADHD, and schizophrenia. These simulations also suggest a computational rather than anatomical limit to WM capacity.