Biomedical supervisors’ role modeling of open science practices
Tables
Table 1
Prevalence of open access publishing and sharing data openly among unique DOIs.
Practice | Ph.D. candidates | Supervisors | Total* | Spearman’s correlation |
---|---|---|---|---|
Open access | 548 | 1154 | 1702 (82.8%) | 0.24 |
Open data (automated) | 67 | 112 | 179 (8.8%) | 0.20 |
Open data (manually verified) | 34 | 66 | 100 (4.8%) | 0.22 |
-
*
Between parentheses indicates proportion out of the total sample.
Table 2
GEE logistic analyses for open access, open data (automated detection), and open data (manually verified).
Crude analysis | Adjusted analysis (institution added) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Practice | N | OR* | 95% CI | p-value | N | OR* | 95% CI | p-value |
Open access (binary) | 651 | 1.99 | (1.17–3.38) | 0.011 | 651 | 1.64 | (0.94–2.85) | 0.079 |
Reference category: up to or including the national average (76%) of the supervisor’s publications were open access | ||||||||
Open data automated (binary) | 644 | 2.09 | (1.13–3.88) | 0.019 | 644 | 2.21 | (1.19–4.12) | 0.012 |
Reference category: supervisor never shared data | ||||||||
Open data manually verified (binary) | 653 | 3.74 | (1.53–9.12) | 0.004 | 653 | 4.60 | (1.86–11.35) | 0.001 |
Reference category: supervisor never shared data |
-
N=the total number of included publications by Ph.D. candidates.
-
*
Odds ratios are EXP transformed.
Additional files
Download links
A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.
Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)
Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)
Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)
Biomedical supervisors’ role modeling of open science practices
eLife 12:e83484.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83484