Experience-dependent flexibility in a molecularly diverse central-to-peripheral auditory feedback system

  1. Michelle M Frank
  2. Austen A Sitko
  3. Kirupa Suthakar
  4. Lester Torres Cadenas
  5. Mackenzie Hunt
  6. Mary Caroline Yuk
  7. Catherine Weisz
  8. Lisa V Goodrich  Is a corresponding author
  1. Harvard Medical School, United States
  2. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, United States

Abstract

Brainstem olivocochlear neurons (OCNs) modulate the earliest stages of auditory processing through feedback projections to the cochlea and have been shown to influence hearing and protect the ear from sound-induced damage. Here, we used single-nucleus sequencing, anatomical reconstructions, and electrophysiology to characterize murine OCNs during postnatal development, in mature animals, and after sound exposure. We identified markers for known medial (MOC) and lateral (LOC) OCN subtypes, and show that they express distinct cohorts of physiologically relevant genes that change over development. In addition, we discovered a neuropeptide-enriched LOC subtype that produces Neuropeptide Y along with other neurotransmitters. Throughout the cochlea, both LOC subtypes extend arborizations over wide frequency domains. Moreover, LOC neuropeptide expression is strongly upregulated days after acoustic trauma, potentially providing a sustained protective signal to the cochlea. OCNs are therefore poised to have diffuse, dynamic effects on early auditory processing over timescales ranging from milliseconds to days.

Data availability

Single-cell data collected in this study is available on GEO, accession number GSE214027.

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Michelle M Frank

    Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6613-8251
  2. Austen A Sitko

    Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-7601-6143
  3. Kirupa Suthakar

    Section on Neuronal Circuitry, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Lester Torres Cadenas

    Section on Neuronal Circuitry, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Mackenzie Hunt

    Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Mary Caroline Yuk

    Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Catherine Weisz

    Section on Neuronal Circuitry, National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, Bethesda, United States
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2595-835X
  8. Lisa V Goodrich

    Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
    For correspondence
    Lisa_Goodrich@hms.harvard.edu
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-3331-8600

Funding

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01-DC015974)

  • Lisa V Goodrich

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01-DC009223)

  • Lisa V Goodrich

NIH Office of the Director (Z01-DC000091)

  • Catherine Weisz

Blavatnik Family Foundation (Blavatnik Sensory Disorders Research Grant)

  • Lisa V Goodrich

National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (F32-DC019009)

  • Austen A Sitko

Harvard Mahoney Neuroscience Institute Fund (Postdoctoral Fellowship)

  • Austen A Sitko

Amgen Foundation (Summer Fellowship)

  • Mary Caroline Yuk

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Animal experimentation: This study was performed in accordance with recommendations from the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All experiments and procedures were approved by the Institutional Care and Use Committee of Harvard Medical School (protocol #IS00000067) or the National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders Animal Care and Use Committee. Every effort was made to minimize suffering throughout this work.

Copyright

This is an open-access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Metrics

  • 1,521
    views
  • 265
    downloads
  • 25
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Michelle M Frank
  2. Austen A Sitko
  3. Kirupa Suthakar
  4. Lester Torres Cadenas
  5. Mackenzie Hunt
  6. Mary Caroline Yuk
  7. Catherine Weisz
  8. Lisa V Goodrich
(2023)
Experience-dependent flexibility in a molecularly diverse central-to-peripheral auditory feedback system
eLife 12:e83855.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83855

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83855

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Brian C Ruyle, Sarah Masud ... Jose A Morón
    Research Article

    Millions of Americans suffering from Opioid Use Disorders face a high risk of fatal overdose due to opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD). Fentanyl, a powerful synthetic opioid, is a major contributor to the rising rates of overdose deaths. Reversing fentanyl overdoses has proved challenging due to its high potency and the rapid onset of OIRD. We assessed the contributions of central and peripheral mu opioid receptors (MORs) in mediating fentanyl-induced physiological responses. The peripherally restricted MOR antagonist naloxone methiodide (NLXM) both prevented and reversed OIRD to a degree comparable to that of naloxone (NLX), indicating substantial involvement of peripheral MORs to OIRD. Interestingly, NLXM-mediated OIRD reversal did not produce aversive behaviors observed after NLX. We show that neurons in the nucleus of the solitary tract (nTS), the first central synapse of peripheral afferents, exhibit a biphasic activity profile following fentanyl exposure. NLXM pretreatment attenuates this activity, suggesting that these responses are mediated by peripheral MORs. Together, these findings establish a critical role for peripheral MORs, including ascending inputs to the nTS, as sites of dysfunction during OIRD. Furthermore, selective peripheral MOR antagonism could be a promising therapeutic strategy for managing OIRD by sparing CNS-driven acute opioid-associated withdrawal and aversion observed after NLX.

    1. Neuroscience
    David C Williams, Amanda Chu ... Michael A McDannald
    Research Advance Updated

    Recognizing and responding to threat cues is essential to survival. Freezing is a predominant threat behavior in rats. We have recently shown that a threat cue can organize diverse behaviors beyond freezing, including locomotion (Chu et al., 2024). However, that experimental design was complex, required many sessions, and had rats receive many foot shock presentations. Moreover, the findings were descriptive. Here, we gave female and male Long Evans rats cue light illumination paired or unpaired with foot shock (eight total) in a conditioned suppression setting using a range of shock intensities (0.15, 0.25, 0.35, or 0.50 mA). We found that conditioned suppression was only observed at higher foot shock intensities (0.35 mA and 0.50 mA). We constructed comprehensive temporal ethograms by scoring 22,272 frames across 12 behavior categories in 200-ms intervals around cue light illumination. The 0.50 mA and 0.35 mA shock-paired visual cues suppressed reward seeking, rearing, and scaling, as well as light-directed rearing and light-directed scaling. These shock-paired visual cues further elicited locomotion and freezing. Linear discriminant analyses showed that ethogram data could accurately classify rats into paired and unpaired groups. Using complete ethogram data produced superior classification compared to behavior subsets, including an immobility subset featuring freezing. The results demonstrate diverse threat behaviors – in a short and simple procedure – containing sufficient information to distinguish the visual fear conditioning status of individual rats.