Sensory experience controls dendritic structure and behavior by distinct pathways involving degenerins

  1. Sharon Inberg
  2. Yael Iosilevskii
  3. Alba Calatayud-Sanchez
  4. Hagar Setty
  5. Meital Oren-Suissa
  6. Michael Krieg
  7. Benjamin Podbilewicz  Is a corresponding author
  1. Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Israel
  2. Institute of Photonic Sciences, Spain
  3. Weizmann Institute of Science, Israel

Abstract

Dendrites are crucial for receiving information into neurons. Sensory experience affects the structure of these tree-like neurites, which, it is assumed, modifies neuronal function, yet the evidence is scarce, and the mechanisms are unknown. To study whether sensory experience affects dendritic morphology, we use the Caenorhabditis elegans' arborized nociceptor PVD neurons, under natural mechanical stimulation induced by physical contacts between individuals. We found that mechanosensory signals induced by conspecifics and by glass beads affect the dendritic structure of the PVD. Moreover, developmentally isolated animals show a decrease in their ability to respond to harsh touch. The structural and behavioral plasticity following sensory deprivation are functionally independent of each other and are mediated by an array of evolutionarily conserved mechanosensory amiloride-sensitive epithelial sodium channels (degenerins). Calcium imaging of the PVD neurons in a micromechanical device revealed that controlled mechanical stimulation of the body wall produces similar calcium dynamics in both isolated and crowded animals. Our genetic results, supported by optogenetic, behavioral, and pharmacological evidence, suggest an activity-dependent homeostatic mechanism for dendritic structural plasticity, that in parallel controls escape response to noxious mechanosensory stimuli.

Data availability

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting file. Strains, plasmids and other reagents are available upon request .

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Sharon Inberg

    Department of Biology, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  2. Yael Iosilevskii

    Department of Biology, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  3. Alba Calatayud-Sanchez

    Institute of Photonic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  4. Hagar Setty

    Department of Brain Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  5. Meital Oren-Suissa

    Department of Brain Sciences, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  6. Michael Krieg

    Institute of Photonic Sciences, Barcelona, Spain
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
  7. Benjamin Podbilewicz

    Department of Biology, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
    For correspondence
    podbilew@technion.ac.il
    Competing interests
    The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0411-4182

Funding

Israel Science Foundation (442/12)

  • Benjamin Podbilewicz

Israel Science Foundation (257/17)

  • Benjamin Podbilewicz

Adelis Fund (2023479)

  • Benjamin Podbilewicz

Ministry of Science and Technology, Israel (3-13022)

  • Benjamin Podbilewicz

MCIN /AEI /10.13039/501100011033 / FEDER, UE (PID2021-123812OB-I00)

  • Michael Krieg

MCIN /AEI /10.13039/501100011033 / FEDER, UE (CNS2022-135906)

  • Michael Krieg

Human Frontier Science Program (RGP021/2023)

  • Michael Krieg

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2025, Inberg et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 35
    views
  • 4
    downloads
  • 0
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Sharon Inberg
  2. Yael Iosilevskii
  3. Alba Calatayud-Sanchez
  4. Hagar Setty
  5. Meital Oren-Suissa
  6. Michael Krieg
  7. Benjamin Podbilewicz
(2025)
Sensory experience controls dendritic structure and behavior by distinct pathways involving degenerins
eLife 14:e83973.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83973

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.83973

Further reading

    1. Neuroscience
    Gyeong Hee Pyeon, Hyewon Cho ... Yong Sang Jo
    Research Article

    Recent studies suggest that calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) neurons in the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) represent aversive information and signal a general alarm to the forebrain. If CGRP neurons serve as a true general alarm, their activation would modulate both passive nad active defensive behaviors depending on the magnitude and context of the threat. However, most prior research has focused on the role of CGRP neurons in passive freezing responses, with limited exploration of their involvement in active defensive behaviors. To address this, we examined the role of CGRP neurons in active defensive behavior using a predator-like robot programmed to chase mice. Our electrophysiological results revealed that CGRP neurons encode the intensity of aversive stimuli through variations in firing durations and amplitudes. Optogenetic activation of CGRP neuron during robot chasing elevated flight responses in both conditioning and retention tests, presumably by amyplifying the perception of the threat as more imminent and dangerous. In contrast, animals with inactivated CGRP neurons exhibited reduced flight responses, even when the robot was programmed to appear highly threatening during conditioning. These findings expand the understanding of CGRP neurons in the PBN as a critical alarm system, capable of dynamically regulating active defensive behaviors by amplifying threat perception, ensuring adaptive responses to varying levels of danger.

    1. Neuroscience
    Ankur Sinha, Padraig Gleeson ... Robin Angus Silver
    Tools and Resources

    Data-driven models of neurons and circuits are important for understanding how the properties of membrane conductances, synapses, dendrites, and the anatomical connectivity between neurons generate the complex dynamical behaviors of brain circuits in health and disease. However, the inherent complexity of these biological processes makes the construction and reuse of biologically detailed models challenging. A wide range of tools have been developed to aid their construction and simulation, but differences in design and internal representation act as technical barriers to those who wish to use data-driven models in their research workflows. NeuroML, a model description language for computational neuroscience, was developed to address this fragmentation in modeling tools. Since its inception, NeuroML has evolved into a mature community standard that encompasses a wide range of model types and approaches in computational neuroscience. It has enabled the development of a large ecosystem of interoperable open-source software tools for the creation, visualization, validation, and simulation of data-driven models. Here, we describe how the NeuroML ecosystem can be incorporated into research workflows to simplify the construction, testing, and analysis of standardized models of neural systems, and supports the FAIR (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability) principles, thus promoting open, transparent and reproducible science.