Conformational and oligomeric states of SPOP from small-angle X-ray scattering and molecular dynamics simulations

  1. F Emil Thomasen
  2. Matthew J Cuneo
  3. Tanja Mittag
  4. Kresten Lindorff-Larsen  Is a corresponding author
  1. University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  2. St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States

Abstract

Speckle-type POZ protein (SPOP) is a substrate adaptor in the ubiquitin proteasome system, and plays important roles in cell-cycle control, development, and cancer. SPOP forms linear higher-order oligomers following an isodesmic self-association model. Oligomerization is essential for SPOP's multivalent interactions with substrates, which facilitate phase separation and localization to biomolecular condensates. Structural characterization of SPOP in its oligomeric state and in solution is, however, challenging due to the inherent conformational and compositional heterogeneity of the oligomeric species. Here, we develop an approach to simultaneously and self-consistently characterize the conformational ensemble and the distribution of oligomeric states of SPOP by combining small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) and molecular dynamics simulations. We build initial conformational ensembles of SPOP oligomers using coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations, and use a Bayesian/maximum entropy approach to refine the ensembles, along with the distribution of oligomeric states, against a concentration series of SAXS experiments. Our results suggest that SPOP oligomers behave as rigid, helical structures in solution, and that a flexible linker region allows SPOP's substrate binding domains to extend away from the core of the oligomers. Additionally, our results are in good agreement with previous characterization of the isodesmic self-association of SPOP. In the future, the approach presented here can be extended to other systems to simultaneously characterize structural heterogeneity and self-assembly.

Data availability

Code and data is available at https://github.com/KULL-Centre/_2022_Thomasen_SPOP. Simulation data is available at https://doi.org/10.17894/ucph.ef999f72-b5e8-45c4-835f-3e49619a0f91. Plasmids are available from Addgene (plasmid IDs 194115 and 194116).

The following data sets were generated

Article and author information

Author details

  1. F Emil Thomasen

    Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagem, Denmark
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-2096-4873
  2. Matthew J Cuneo

    Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1475-6656
  3. Tanja Mittag

    Department of Structural Biology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, United States
    Competing interests
    Tanja Mittag, Tanja Mittag was a consultant for Faze Medicines, Inc..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-1827-3811
  4. Kresten Lindorff-Larsen

    Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
    For correspondence
    lindorff@bio.ku.dk
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-4750-6039

Funding

Lundbeckfonden (R155-2015-2666)

  • Kresten Lindorff-Larsen

Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF18OC0033950)

  • Kresten Lindorff-Larsen

National Institutes of Health (R01GM112846)

  • Tanja Mittag

American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities

  • Tanja Mittag

Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF18OC0032608)

  • Kresten Lindorff-Larsen

National Institutes of Health (P30GM133893)

  • Tanja Mittag

DOE Office of Biological and Environmental Research (KP1605010)

  • Tanja Mittag

National Institutes of Health (OD012331)

  • Tanja Mittag

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Copyright

© 2023, Thomasen et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,470
    views
  • 233
    downloads
  • 5
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. F Emil Thomasen
  2. Matthew J Cuneo
  3. Tanja Mittag
  4. Kresten Lindorff-Larsen
(2023)
Conformational and oligomeric states of SPOP from small-angle X-ray scattering and molecular dynamics simulations
eLife 12:e84147.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84147

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84147

Further reading

    1. Biochemistry and Chemical Biology
    2. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Yamato Niitani, Kohei Matsuzaki ... Michio Tomishige
    Research Article

    The two identical motor domains (heads) of dimeric kinesin-1 move in a hand-over-hand process along a microtubule, coordinating their ATPase cycles such that each ATP hydrolysis is tightly coupled to a step and enabling the motor to take many steps without dissociating. The neck linker, a structural element that connects the two heads, has been shown to be essential for head–head coordination; however, which kinetic step(s) in the chemomechanical cycle is ‘gated’ by the neck linker remains unresolved. Here, we employed pre-steady-state kinetics and single-molecule assays to investigate how the neck-linker conformation affects kinesin’s motility cycle. We show that the backward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the front kinesin head confers higher affinity for microtubule, but does not change ATP binding and dissociation rates. In contrast, the forward-pointing configuration of the neck linker in the rear kinesin head decreases the ATP dissociation rate but has little effect on microtubule dissociation. In combination, these conformation-specific effects of the neck linker favor ATP hydrolysis and dissociation of the rear head prior to microtubule detachment of the front head, thereby providing a kinetic explanation for the coordinated walking mechanism of dimeric kinesin.

    1. Structural Biology and Molecular Biophysics
    Christopher T Schafer, Raymond F Pauszek III ... David P Millar
    Research Article

    The canonical chemokine receptor CXCR4 and atypical receptor ACKR3 both respond to CXCL12 but induce different effector responses to regulate cell migration. While CXCR4 couples to G proteins and directly promotes cell migration, ACKR3 is G-protein-independent and scavenges CXCL12 to regulate extracellular chemokine levels and maintain CXCR4 responsiveness, thereby indirectly influencing migration. The receptors also have distinct activation requirements. CXCR4 only responds to wild-type CXCL12 and is sensitive to mutation of the chemokine. By contrast, ACKR3 recruits GPCR kinases (GRKs) and β-arrestins and promiscuously responds to CXCL12, CXCL12 variants, other peptides and proteins, and is relatively insensitive to mutation. To investigate the role of conformational dynamics in the distinct pharmacological behaviors of CXCR4 and ACKR3, we employed single-molecule FRET to track discrete conformational states of the receptors in real-time. The data revealed that apo-CXCR4 preferentially populates a high-FRET inactive state, while apo-ACKR3 shows little conformational preference and high transition probabilities among multiple inactive, intermediate and active conformations, consistent with its propensity for activation. Multiple active-like ACKR3 conformations are populated in response to agonists, compared to the single CXCR4 active-state. This and the markedly different conformational landscapes of the receptors suggest that activation of ACKR3 may be achieved by a broader distribution of conformational states than CXCR4. Much of the conformational heterogeneity of ACKR3 is linked to a single residue that differs between ACKR3 and CXCR4. The dynamic properties of ACKR3 may underly its inability to form productive interactions with G proteins that would drive canonical GPCR signaling.