Association of close-range contact patterns with SARS-CoV-2: a household transmission study

  1. Jackie Kleynhans  Is a corresponding author
  2. Lorenzo Dall'Amico
  3. Laetitia Gauvin
  4. Michele Tizzoni
  5. Lucia Maloma
  6. Sibongile Walaza
  7. Neil A Martinson
  8. Anne von Gottberg
  9. Nicole Wolter
  10. Mvuyo Makhasi
  11. Cheryl Cohen
  12. Ciro Cattuto
  13. Stefano Tempia
  14. For the SA‐S‐HTS Group
  1. National Health Laboratory Service, South Africa
  2. ISI Foundation, Italy
  3. University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa
  4. University of Turin, Italy

Abstract

Background: Households are an important location for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission, especially during periods where travel and work was restricted to essential services. We aimed to assess the association of close-range contact patterns with SARS-CoV-2 transmission.

Methods: We deployed proximity sensors for two weeks to measure face-to-face interactions between household members after SARS-CoV-2 was identified in the household, in South Africa, 2020 - 2021. We calculated duration, frequency and average duration of close range proximity events with SARS-CoV-2 index cases. We assessed the association of contact parameters with SARS-CoV-2 transmission using mixed effects logistic regression accounting for index and household member characteristics.

Results: We included 340 individuals (88 SARS-CoV-2 index cases and 252 household members). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 acquisition were index cases with minimum Ct value <30 (aOR 10.6 95%CI 1.4-80.1) vs >35, and female contacts (aOR 2.4 95%CI 1.2-4.8). No contact parameters were associated with acquisition (aOR 1.0-1.1) for any of the duration, frequency, cumulative time in contact or average duration parameters.

Conclusion: We did not find an association between close-range proximity events and SARS-CoV-2 household transmission. Our findings may be due to study limitations, that droplet-mediated transmission during close-proximity contacts play a smaller role than airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in the household, or due to high contact rates in households.

Funding: Wellcome Trust (Grant number 221003/Z/20/Z) in collaboration with the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, United Kingdom.

Data availability

The contact network, selected individual characteristics and analysis script are available at https://github.com/crdm-nicd/sashts.git.

Article and author information

Author details

  1. Jackie Kleynhans

    National Health Laboratory Service, Sandringham, South Africa
    For correspondence
    jackiel@nicd.ac.za
    Competing interests
    Jackie Kleynhans, reports institutional grant funding from UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office, Wellcome Trust, WHO AFRO, Africa Pathogen Genomics Initiative (Africa PGI) through African Society of Laboratory Medicine (ASLM) and Africa CDC, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) and UK Department of Health and Social Care and managed by the Fleming Fund: SEQAFRICA project. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0001-7081-6273
  2. Lorenzo Dall'Amico

    ISI Foundation, Turin, Italy
    Competing interests
    Lorenzo Dall'Amico, received support from the European Union's Horizon 2a020 research and innovation programme under grant agreements No. 101003688 (EpiPose) and No. 101016233 (PERISCOPE). The author acknowledges support from the Lagrange Project of ISI Foundation funded by CRT Foundation. They were awarded a PhD contract with Grenoble INP, and received support for attending meetings/travel from the ISP Foundation and Grenoble INP. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  3. Laetitia Gauvin

    ISI Foundation, Turin, Italy
    Competing interests
    Laetitia Gauvin, has received Payment or honoraria for lectures from the University of Torino, Italy. They received support from the Lagrange Project of ISI Foundation funded by CRT Foundation. The authors has no other competing interests to declare..
  4. Michele Tizzoni

    ISI Foundation, Turin, Italy
    Competing interests
    Michele Tizzoni, acknowledges support from the Lagrange Project of ISI Foundation funded by CRT Foundation..
  5. Lucia Maloma

    Perinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Soweto, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  6. Sibongile Walaza

    National Health Laboratory Service, Sandringham, South Africa
    Competing interests
    Sibongile Walaza, reports institutional grant funding from WHO AFRO, Africa Pathogen Genomics Initiative (Africa PGI) through African Society of Laboratory Medicine (ASLM) and Africa CDC, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC), UK Department of Health and Social Care and managed by the Fleming Fund: SEQAFRICA project and the Wellcome Trust. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  7. Neil A Martinson

    Perinatal HIV Research Unit, University of the Witwatersrand, Soweto, South Africa
    Competing interests
    Neil A Martinson, received grant funds from Pfizer. They participated on the data safety monitoring board of a TB HDT trial, and on the Scientific Advisory Board of a trial of an electronic reminder to take daily TB treatment. They hold an unpaid leadership role at the Setshaba Research Center. The authors has no other competing interests to declare..
  8. Anne von Gottberg

    National Health Laboratory Service, Sandringham, South Africa
    Competing interests
    Anne von Gottberg, reports receiving grant funds from Sanofi Pasteur and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. They act as chairperson of the National Advisory Group on Immunisation. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
    ORCID icon "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-0243-7455
  9. Nicole Wolter

    National Health Laboratory Service, Sandringham, South Africa
    Competing interests
    Nicole Wolter, received grants from Sanofi Pasteur and Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and from US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  10. Mvuyo Makhasi

    National Health Laboratory Service, Sandringham, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.
  11. Cheryl Cohen

    National Health Laboratory Service, Sandringham, South Africa
    Competing interests
    Cheryl Cohen, has received grant support from Sanofi Pasteur, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Welcome Trust, Programme for Applied Technologies in Health (PATH), Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and South African Medical Research Council (SA-MRC). The author has no other competing interests to declare..
  12. Ciro Cattuto

    Department of Informatics, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
    Competing interests
    Ciro Cattuto, received support from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreements No. 101003688 (EpiPose) and No. 101016233 (PERISCOPE), and from Fondation Botnar, EPFL COVID-19 Real Time Epidemiology I-DAIR Pathfinder. They also received support from the Lagrange Project of ISI Foundation funded by CRT Foundation, and received equipment from the European Space Agency. They were issued the patent US8660490B2. They received support for attending meetings/travel from Gulbenkian Foundation, and participate as a Steering Board Member at CRT Foundation, on the Advisory Board at The Data Guild and on the Advisory Board in GovLab's 100 Questions Initiative and Open Data Policy Lab. The authors has no other competing interests to declare..
  13. Stefano Tempia

    National Health Laboratory Service, Sandringham, South Africa
    Competing interests
    No competing interests declared.

Funding

Wellcome Trust (221003/Z/20/Z)

  • Cheryl Cohen

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (101016233)

  • Ciro Cattuto

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Ethics

Human subjects: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by University of the Witwatersrand Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference M2008114). The study was structured in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all household members aged {greater than or equal to}18 years; assent was obtained from children aged 7-17 years, and consent from a parent/ guardian of children aged <18 years. Informed consent was administered by a study team member who explained the study and requirements to participants, and shared an information leaflet with participants to keep. Consent included the enrolment into the study and all required procedures, as well as the anonymous processing of personal data for the final study report. Participants in follow-up received grocery store vouchers of USD 3 per visit to compensate for time required for specimen collection and interview, and an additional voucher once proximity sensors were returned with no visible damage.

Copyright

© 2023, Kleynhans et al.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License permitting unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.

Metrics

  • 1,082
    views
  • 129
    downloads
  • 3
    citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.

Download links

A two-part list of links to download the article, or parts of the article, in various formats.

Downloads (link to download the article as PDF)

Open citations (links to open the citations from this article in various online reference manager services)

Cite this article (links to download the citations from this article in formats compatible with various reference manager tools)

  1. Jackie Kleynhans
  2. Lorenzo Dall'Amico
  3. Laetitia Gauvin
  4. Michele Tizzoni
  5. Lucia Maloma
  6. Sibongile Walaza
  7. Neil A Martinson
  8. Anne von Gottberg
  9. Nicole Wolter
  10. Mvuyo Makhasi
  11. Cheryl Cohen
  12. Ciro Cattuto
  13. Stefano Tempia
  14. For the SA‐S‐HTS Group
(2023)
Association of close-range contact patterns with SARS-CoV-2: a household transmission study
eLife 12:e84753.
https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84753

Share this article

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.84753

Further reading

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    Xiaoning Wang, Jinxiang Zhao ... Dong Liu
    Research Article

    Artificially sweetened beverages containing noncaloric monosaccharides were suggested as healthier alternatives to sugar-sweetened beverages. Nevertheless, the potential detrimental effects of these noncaloric monosaccharides on blood vessel function remain inadequately understood. We have established a zebrafish model that exhibits significant excessive angiogenesis induced by high glucose, resembling the hyperangiogenic characteristics observed in proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Utilizing this model, we observed that glucose and noncaloric monosaccharides could induce excessive formation of blood vessels, especially intersegmental vessels (ISVs). The excessively branched vessels were observed to be formed by ectopic activation of quiescent endothelial cells (ECs) into tip cells. Single-cell transcriptomic sequencing analysis of the ECs in the embryos exposed to high glucose revealed an augmented ratio of capillary ECs, proliferating ECs, and a series of upregulated proangiogenic genes. Further analysis and experiments validated that reduced foxo1a mediated the excessive angiogenesis induced by monosaccharides via upregulating the expression of marcksl1a. This study has provided new evidence showing the negative effects of noncaloric monosaccharides on the vascular system and the underlying mechanisms.

    1. Epidemiology and Global Health
    2. Microbiology and Infectious Disease
    Amanda C Perofsky, John Huddleston ... Cécile Viboud
    Research Article

    Influenza viruses continually evolve new antigenic variants, through mutations in epitopes of their major surface proteins, hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). Antigenic drift potentiates the reinfection of previously infected individuals, but the contribution of this process to variability in annual epidemics is not well understood. Here, we link influenza A(H3N2) virus evolution to regional epidemic dynamics in the United States during 1997—2019. We integrate phenotypic measures of HA antigenic drift and sequence-based measures of HA and NA fitness to infer antigenic and genetic distances between viruses circulating in successive seasons. We estimate the magnitude, severity, timing, transmission rate, age-specific patterns, and subtype dominance of each regional outbreak and find that genetic distance based on broad sets of epitope sites is the strongest evolutionary predictor of A(H3N2) virus epidemiology. Increased HA and NA epitope distance between seasons correlates with larger, more intense epidemics, higher transmission, greater A(H3N2) subtype dominance, and a greater proportion of cases in adults relative to children, consistent with increased population susceptibility. Based on random forest models, A(H1N1) incidence impacts A(H3N2) epidemics to a greater extent than viral evolution, suggesting that subtype interference is a major driver of influenza A virus infection ynamics, presumably via heterosubtypic cross-immunity.